Log in

View Full Version : The Corporate Alarm Clock



Left-Reasoning
15th September 2010, 04:01
by Kevin Carson



This morning Joe was awakened by his alarm clock. Thanks to patents, which remove incentives to interoperability and modular design, the clock was designed to be thrown away rather than repaired. Thanks to “intellectual property” law, as well, the company was able to outsource actual production and then charge Joe a 1000% brand-name markup while paying the people who made it pennies. The clock was powered by electricity generated by the public power monopoly regulated by the US Department of Energy — a regulated monopoly operating on the same cost-plus markup accounting system as most other public utilities, including the military contractors who gave us the $600 toilet seat. Joe then took a shower in the clean water provided by the municipal water utility; Joe’s water bill reflects a rate structure which provides below-cost water for large-scale industrial use and agribusiness. Joe watched the news on the kind of legacy broadcast media described by Edward Herman, which thanks to the FCC licensing monopolies is controlled by a handful of corporate gatekeepers.

He watched it while eating his breakfast of General Mills cereal, which thanks to government subsidies was produced at some giant mill in Minneapolis, despite the fact that cereal grains are most economically milled on a small scale near the point of consumption. Joe has no idea what’s in his bacon, because the FDA (at Monsanto’s behest) prohibits labeling food as GMO-free. Most of what he eats is loaded with high-fructose corn syrup, and what little “fresh” produce he eats is shipped from a giant plantation thousands of miles away, thanks to USDA subsidies.

Joe took pills which were declared safe under an inspection regime originally created at the behest of the drug cartel itself, the inflated costs of which serve as a useful entry barrier and thereby benefit incumbent producers. He paid a 2000% markup on the pills thanks to government-granted patent monopolies. Joe’s medical plan stopped paying for prescription drugs because his weak union has been making more concessions at every contract renewal. The Wagner Act criminalized most of the really effective techniques, so unions like Joe’s are forced to fight by the bosses’ rules.

Joe drives to work on a government-subsidized highway system, built under the supervision of former auto exec Charlie “What’s Good for GM” Wilson. Joe’s commute takes almost an hour. Thanks to subsidized freeways and subsidized utilities to outlying developments, it’s artificially cheap to build monoculture bedroom communities far removed from where people work and shop. And thanks to zoning laws and other regulations against mixed use development, it’s extremely costly to live near your employer or be able to walk to a neighborhood grocer.

Joe begins his workday. He’s doing the work of a downsized person in addition to his own, the work environment is becoming increasingly hostile and authoritarian, and the micromanagement increasingly demeaning. He finds his face sore from the fake smile he constantly displays to reassure the bosses he’s got his mind right. He got no COLA raise last time around, and his insurance copay and deductible are higher. (It all gets back to the union thing above). The bosses sometimes drop hints about closing the plant down and moving to China, which is a whole lot more profitable thanks to World Bank subsidies to the road and utility infrastructure the offshore factories need, and thanks to WTO enforcement of “intellectual property” law that corporate headquarters use to maintain control of outsourced production overseas.

Joe pays his bills with legal tender created by banks, under the state-granted power to loan the medium of exchange into existence out of thin air and then charge interest on it.

After work Joe finds his kids back home from the public schools, where they’re being processed into human resources who will cheerfully take direction from some authority figure behind a desk for the rest of their lives — just like Joe does. While they were there, the kids were taught about the wonders of Our Free Enterprise System (suitably adjusted, of course, by government action to protect us from corporate power run amok).

When Joe goes to sleep, if he’s a conservative, he will thank the beneficent Free Market for all the good things he enjoys. If he’s a liberal, he’ll give thanks for the interventionist state as a bulwark against unbridled corporate tyranny. And he’ll get a night’s rest, preparing for another day of serving the unholy corporate-state alliance that rules his life from cradle to grave.

http://c4ss.org/content/3392

Dean
15th September 2010, 14:24
Joe goes through X number of predetermined systems described to condemn collectivist and state models.

Joe then conflates "liberal" with closed economic systems and "conservative" with liberal ones.

Joe realizes he's an intellectual fraud.

Nolan
15th September 2010, 19:14
Fuck you, everyone knows the state and the capitalists are enemies.

Left-Reasoning
15th September 2010, 23:41
Fuck you, everyone knows the state and the capitalists are enemies.

You are correct. Both the State and the Capitalists are our enemies.

Left-Reasoning
15th September 2010, 23:43
Joe goes through X number of predetermined systems described to condemn collectivist and state models.

Joes is exploited in numerous ways by the Capitalists that use the government as an instrument of exploitation.

Dean
16th September 2010, 13:03
Joes is exploited in numerous ways by the Capitalists that use the government as an instrument of exploitation.

I think you need a cup of Joe.

iwwforever
16th September 2010, 13:29
This is Joe's workday, on the weekends he spends his free time shopping, watching sports tv, and going to church.

Bud Struggle
16th September 2010, 14:00
The OP's point is all well and good--but it would be the same no matter what system Joe was under. I'm sure little Russian boys and girls inder the USSR and little Cuban boys and girls get the same indoctrination from their countries.

Secondly, most if not all of the information surrounding the circumstances of what Joe believes is readily available to him as it was to the OP. He can learn about his bacon and his Cheerios fairly easily.


Is it society's job to do all this for Joe? Sooner or later he has to take charge of his own life and learn about the decisions he makes and those that are made for him and then he has to decide for himself how he wants to proceed.

Further in America's information society Joe has a lot more opportunity than Josef or Jose to learn these things. Do you think after your Revolution that there will be courses in school on the wonders of Free Enterprise?

The OP isn't just describing American culture--he is describing EVERY culture.

ckaihatsu
16th September 2010, 21:41
Do you think after your Revolution that there will be courses in school on the wonders of Free Enterprise?


Post-Classical Mythology 201

Bud Struggle
16th September 2010, 21:46
Post-Classical Mythology 201

Right now in 2010 that spot is already taken by Communist Studies.

ckaihatsu
16th September 2010, 22:11
Pick one, any one:


- Just *had* to, didn't you?...!

- It's *on*, motherfucker!!!

- Stop conflating Stalinism with a truly post-capitalist global workers' society.

- 3,873 gazillion Marxists can't be wrong.

- You're so funny I forgot to laugh.

- If at first you don't succeed, try, try again.

Havet
16th September 2010, 22:14
I think you need a cup of Joe.

lol (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMcdzc1TkO4)

Bud Struggle
17th September 2010, 01:01
- 3,873 gazillion Marxists can't be wrong.


Closer to 3,873 in total. :D

ckaihatsu
17th September 2010, 01:21
Hmmmmm, picked the easy one out of the bunch and then made a lightweight quip from it, huh?

Bud Struggle
17th September 2010, 01:25
Hmmmmm, picked the easy one out of the bunch and then made a lightweight quip from it, huh?

They were all easy--it was einie, mienie, minie, mo. :D

How's this one:



- Stop conflating Stalinism with a truly post-capitalist global workers' society.

Hey, I post on RevLeft--you mean that that Stalinism isn't the wave of the Communist future???? I never would have known it from what
I read there!

Nolan
17th September 2010, 01:47
Well the problem with that is there's no such thing as stalinism. Unless youre talking about the Soviet Union while Stalin was leader.

Bud Struggle
17th September 2010, 02:00
Well the problem with that is there's no such thing as stalinism. Unless youre talking about the Soviet Union while Stalin was leader.


:D

I bet the next thing you going to tell me is that there's no such thing as totalitarianism! :D

Anyway, only joking around.

Nolan
17th September 2010, 02:13
:D

I bet the next thing you going to tell me is that there's no such thing as totalitarianism! :D

Anyway, only joking around.

Meaningless word with completely subjective, inconsistent application that was made to create a convenient connection between two fundamentally opposing ideologies. No one in your average American high school questions the labeling of the Soviet Union as "totalitarian" while on the same page we're told the tsars, Franco and Pinochet were just "authoritarian" or "heavy handed leaders" or some bullshit. Or for that matter why the US wasn't totalitarian when it killed and booted natives off of their land against their will to make way for white settlers. And while we're on the subject of high school, the naked propaganda you get in the US public education system would have been the pride of any "totalitarian" state.

anticap
17th September 2010, 02:16
Well the problem with that is there's no such thing as stalinism. Unless youre talking about the Soviet Union while Stalin was leader.

That's what it means, yes: the policies of Stalin. Those who support Stalin and his policies are Stalinists whether they like that label or not, and whether Stalin endorsed it or not. The alternative to this is that we accept their absurd claim that what is called "Stalinism" is merely Leninism carried forward. There are differences between Leninism and Stalinism, which honest people recognize and concede.

I really don't see what the revulsion to the label is all about. If one supports Stalin then they should own it. All they do when they shrink from the label is implicitly concede to their critics that supporting Stalin is bad.

Nolan
17th September 2010, 02:18
That's what it means, yes: the policies of Stalin. Those who support Stalin and his policies are Stalinists whether they like that label or not, and whether Stalin endorsed it or not. The alternative to this is that we accept their absurd claim that what is called "Stalinism" is merely Leninism carried forward. There are differences between Leninism and Stalinism, which honest people recognize and concede.

I really don't see what the revulsion to the label is all about. If one supports Stalin then they should own it. All they do when they shrink from the label is implicitly concede to their critics that supporting Stalin is bad.

Whatever you say buddy I don't want to get into this now.

Bud Struggle
17th September 2010, 02:34
Meaningless word with completely subjective, inconsistent application that was made to create a convenient connection between two fundamentally opposing ideologies. No one in your average American high school questions the labeling of the Soviet Union as "totalitarian" while on the same page we're told the tsars, Franco and Pinochet were just "authoritarian" or "heavy handed leaders" or some bullshit. Or for that matter why the US wasn't totalitarian when it killed and booted natives off of their land against their will to make way for white settlers. And while we're on the subject of high school, the naked propaganda you get in the US public education system would have been the pride of any "totalitarian" state.

Victrix malorum patientia est.

Nolan
17th September 2010, 02:51
Victrix malorum patientia est.

Braccae tuae aperiuntur.

iwwforever
17th September 2010, 19:34
I really don't see what the revulsion to the label is all about. If one supports Stalin then they should own it. All they do when they shrink from the label is implicitly concede to their critics that supporting Stalin is bad.[/QUOTE]

I own it...

When generations of poor peasants were exploited in the work camps it was considered a necessary part of society. When Stalin sent the propertied class to the same camps it was called murder.

Bud Struggle
17th September 2010, 19:39
I really don't see what the revulsion to the label is all about. If one supports Stalin then they should own it. All they do when they shrink from the label is implicitly concede to their critics that supporting Stalin is bad.

I own it...

When generations of poor peasants were exploited in the work camps it was considered a necessary part of society. When Stalin sent the propertied class to the same camps it was called murder.

Words like "Stalinism" amd "Totalitarianism" allow Uber-Authoritarian Communist to concoct some of the most delightful word salads:


Meaningless word with completely subjective, inconsistent application that was made to create a convenient connection between two fundamentally opposing ideologies. No one in your average American high school questions the labeling of the Soviet Union as "totalitarian" while on the same page we're told the tsars, Franco and Pinochet were just "authoritarian" or "heavy handed leaders" or some bullshit. Or for that matter why the US wasn't totalitarian when it killed and booted natives off of their land against their will to make way for white settlers. And while we're on the subject of high school, the naked propaganda you get in the US public education system would have been the pride of any "totalitarian" state.

:D

Nolan
17th September 2010, 20:36
Words like "Stalinism" amd "Totalitarianism" allow Uber-Authoritarian Communist to concoct some of the most delightful word salads:



:D

Salads are yummy

Bud Struggle
17th September 2010, 21:13
The problem is that it is difficult to control language. Words float in and out of useage. I mean honestly, for Communists to go on and on saying that certain words like "Stalinism" don't even exist--well that just smacks of Stalinism, doesn't it?

:D

Nolan
17th September 2010, 21:26
The problem is that it is difficult to control language. Words float in and out of useage. I mean honestly, for Communists to go on and on saying that certain words like "Stalinism" don't even exist--well that just smacks of Stalinism, doesn't it?

:D

Oh the word exists. That's for certain.

Bud Struggle
17th September 2010, 21:32
Oh the word exists. That's for certain.

So what are you trying to do--change the meaning of it?

ckaihatsu
20th September 2010, 03:55
---





Do you think after your Revolution that there will be courses in school on the wonders of Free Enterprise?





Post-Classical Mythology 201





The Japanese move set off warnings of an outbreak of competitive currency devaluations, similar to those that contributed in the 1930s to a collapse in world trade. "It almost gives everyone else the right to intervene unilaterally and trigger a competitive devaluation process," said Noriko Hama of Japan's Doshisha University.

The Wall Street Journal quoted Denis Gould, AXA Investment Managers' director of investment for Asia, as doubting the long-term effectiveness of unilateral interventions in lowering the value of the yen. "To make this move stick," he said, "it needs the US to play, as well as the Chinese." He continued, "Nobody will do it in a coordinated manner because nobody wants their currency going up. Everywhere in the world there are problems with economic growth."

Ted Truman of the Peterson Institute in Washington said, "This action is symptomatic of the sense that at the moment it is every country for itself."

http://wsws.org/articles/2010/sep2010/curr-s18.shtml