The infiltrator situation here (fascist in disguise)

[hemlock]

Im wondering what is the infiltration situation here? Looking through several posts (outside the section for opposing views) Im noticing a few older posters and even a few newer ones that seem to have viewpoints that oddly conflict with their positioning (antifascist and antiracist but accepting of social darwinism, or opposing socialism and endorsing national capitolism yet asserting to be 'leftist').

Ill be honest. I found this site via posting on another site which was infiltrated with bonehead bigots from SF (wont name them, but you know of what site Im talking about). I did a search and it turns out SF has ongoing feuds with several other sites, this one among them and have engaged in lurk wars with the sites repeatedly. This site is one of the more legitimate oppositions to their little fascist movement, at least as far as 'out of the mainstream' sites go (a few others fit the bill as well, but are more mainstream news oriented).

How bad is the "closted SFronter' situation here? Ive noticed in the other forum I posted it (as well as others Ive noticed they attacked during their search) they tend not be to able to 'act the part' and usually their deranged ideology seeps through their posts, either via unsubtle endorsements of parts of neofascists ideals or in idling posts that aim to divide rather than point out logical discussion points.

[Sasha]

as far as we know they are always flushed out fast, if not, they dont say annything banworthy so who cares

[Sugar Hill Kevis]

It's not really a big deal; there are probably some committed members on here who are of an opposing ideology. At the end of the day nothing particularly covert gets discussed here and in order to maintain their persona they don't say anything that would get them banned, as psycho said; who cares. It's probably better that they at least get the exposure to leftist ideas.

[Wanted Man]

I have no idea, but I think we should make hemlock the NKVD chief just to be on the safe side.

[Os Cangaceiros]

I don't know about fascists, but there is a very sizable 5th column of spineless liberals who disgrace this board with their presence.

[Wanted Man]

Not to mention the fucking anti-worker bourgeois fascist imperialist class traitors.

[Widerstand]

I heard some people try to spread acceptance for imperialist institutions by messages hidden in their names. It's only rumors though.

[Kuppo Shakur]

Not to mention the fucking anti-worker bourgeois fascist imperialist class traitors.
And capitalists too.

[L.A.P.]

No I don't know what site you're talking about can I please know?

[Pretty Flaco]

Don't tell anybody... but I'm actually a racist, bigoted, ultra right wing, capitalist large business owner from Beverly Hills. But let's not let everybody know!

[Jazzhands]

according to bie, I'm under the control of a bourgeois fascist mind control ray.

[Obs]

I'm actually Barack Obama.

[Widerstand]

I'm actually Barack Obama.

I knew it!

[Rusty Shackleford]

Don't tell anybody... but I'm actually a racist, bigoted, ultra right wing, capitalist large business owner from Beverly Hills. But let's not let everybody know!
be prepared for a perma ban.


also, im actually Nick Griffin.

[AK]

I'm Bush Jr. Sup, guys?

[Thirsty Crow]

It's not really a big deal; there are probably some committed members on here who are of an opposing ideology. At the end of the day nothing particularly covert gets discussed here and in order to maintain their persona they don't say anything that would get them banned, as psycho said; who cares. It's probably better that they at least get the exposure to leftist ideas.

Um, why do you think that some committed members are of an opposing ideology?

[Honggweilo]

I'm actually marsella, but dont tell

[nuisance]

Im wondering what is the infiltration situation here? Looking through several posts (outside the section for opposing views) Im noticing a few older posters and even a few newer ones that seem to have viewpoints that oddly conflict with their positioning (antifascist and antiracist but accepting of social darwinism, or opposing socialism and endorsing national capitolism yet asserting to be 'leftist').

Ill be honest. I found this site via posting on another site which was infiltrated with bonehead bigots from SF (wont name them, but you know of what site Im talking about). I did a search and it turns out SF has ongoing feuds with several other sites, this one among them and have engaged in lurk wars with the sites repeatedly. This site is one of the more legitimate oppositions to their little fascist movement, at least as far as 'out of the mainstream' sites go (a few others fit the bill as well, but are more mainstream news oriented).

How bad is the "closted SFronter' situation here? Ive noticed in the other forum I posted it (as well as others Ive noticed they attacked during their search) they tend not be to able to 'act the part' and usually their deranged ideology seeps through their posts, either via unsubtle endorsements of parts of neofascists ideals or in idling posts that aim to divide rather than point out logical discussion points.
Out them then, if only for the lolz.

[Bilan]

Um, why do you think that some committed members are of an opposing ideology?

Because we've been watching you.

[synthesis]

"I have in my hands a list of 57 current and former moderators who are either in collusion or sympathy with William Jennings Bryan..."

[meow]

where damn thanks button?

[Dimentio]

Not to mention the fucking anti-worker bourgeois fascist imperialist class traitors.

Free GracchusBabeuf!

[Tavarisch_Mike]

Free GracchusBabeuf!

This. Some liberal attitudes (wich you can find in most places) and the animal rights shit.

[praxis1966]

I have no idea, but I think we should make hemlock the NKVD chief just to be on the safe side.

I was thinking Stasi, actually, but whatever blows your skirt up.

[ZombieGrits]

"i have in my hands a list of 57 current and former moderators who are either in collusion or sympathy with william jennings bryan..."

fuck william jennings bryan

[Jazzhands]

This. Some liberal attitudes (wich you can find in most places) and the animal rights shit.

you realize he wasn't being serious here? and if he was,

has he EVER posted anything of substance, ever? seriously.