Log in

View Full Version : CLR James



Lenina Rosenweg
4th September 2010, 16:49
CLR James was an important but under recognized revolutionary figure, in my opinion. He was a cricket player and sports announcer from Trinidad. He went to England in the early 30s I believe. He was briefly connected with the CPGB but then he became a Trotskyist.He wrote "World Revolution" which was basically about the degeneration of the Comintern. It was a masterful Trotskyist analysis although it also personally slammed Trotsky himself for not "being a man" and standing up for himself.

James was active in the US SWP for a time. He met Trotsky in Mexico and discussed the African-American struggle in the US. Trotsky felt the black struggle was extremely important but admitted he didn't know much about it (he actually thought black Americans had their own language, which except for the Gullah people is obviously not true).Interestingly Trotsky himself seemed to advocate black nationalism while his comrades took the "orthodox Trotskyist" view of a united struggle.

He wrote the "Black Jacobins" about Toussaint L'overture and the Haitian Revolution which is a masterpiece.

After WWII James in collaboration w/Raya Dunskayava, Grace and James Lee Boggs (both important and fascinating people) developed a theory of state capitalism. His "Forest-Johnson Tendency" bounced between the Shachtmanites and the SWP for a while.He sharply criticized the opportunism and degeneration of the FI and people like Mandel and Pablo.

James eventually moved towards a type of syndicalism. His "Facing Reality" group was an influence on DRUM and on the French Socialism or Barbarism group.

CLR James seems to have been one of the few Marxists to actively like sports and pop culture.He thought that is the best way to reach the working class. In his old age he would spend all day in his London flat watching football, soap operas and game shows, to the surprise of his visiting comrades.

Post-modernists have used and abused him. In his writings that I've read he comes off as a fiery revolutionary.

He's fallen in between the cracks. Many Trots feel a bit uncomfortable with him, ML don't know what to make of him.

Anyway what do people think of James? I don't agree w/everything he said or did but he seems like a real hero.

graymouser
4th September 2010, 19:13
James's book The Black Jacobins is a widely recognized classic and one of the best Marxist histories to come out of the Trotskyist tradition. His subsequent evolution was away from Trotskyism - that's not said as an insult, just a fact. He was a brilliant guy but like a lot of intellectuals who came around the Marxist movement couldn't always keep on a solid political course.

The politics of his later period are inconsistent and impressionistic, which is pretty much what you would expect. His theory of state capitalism avoids none of the usual flaws of such a theory, and I think his politics were influenced more by an erratic orientation to the third world liberation movements, which didn't pan out as he thought.

I have a bit of bookshelf devoted to James but I really think his post-1940 work has little of the importance of what he did in the period before the split from the SWP.

RED DAVE
4th September 2010, 19:22
There is a biography of him available from Amazon

http://www.amazon.com/C-L-R-James-Artist-as-Revolutionary/dp/0860919323

RED DAVE

anticap
5th September 2010, 01:27
If I have to start watching American Idol then count me out of the revolution.

Optiow
5th September 2010, 01:31
I believe he was a good man, and at the time he used an oppressed people's (Afro-Americans) as a starting point for the world revolution. While people may scoff at him now, he did want to help oppressed people's in America, and he tried to do it not through the peaceful protest ways (like MLK) but through socialism, because it preached equality.

He was a good man, and is one of my faovrite socialists to research.

Rosa Lichtenstein
6th September 2010, 23:02
Here's a useful link:

http://www.clrjamesinstitute.org/

But, as great a Marxist as he was, his writings on dialectics are a tragic waste of paper.