View Full Version : Elitist and hipsters.
The Red Next Door
10th August 2010, 03:51
what do you think of them, and are they a problem when they participate in revolutionary movements?
Who?
10th August 2010, 03:59
I don't think we should discriminate against any individual group, so long as they help the cause.
Although I feel as if most hipsters are probably lifestylists than authentic revolutionaries, I'm not going to judge the whole group based on that perception. I'm sure there are plenty of authentically red comrades among the them.
727Goon
10th August 2010, 04:02
Man, fuck them niggas, I swear I care about everything but them niggas.
Raúl Duke
10th August 2010, 04:03
elitists=/=hipsters...
It's just a subculture...
supposedly some people on revleft are hipsters.
The Douche
10th August 2010, 04:07
A lot of people might call me a hipster.
Raúl Duke
10th August 2010, 04:22
A lot of people might call me a hipster.
Me too...
Ele'ill
10th August 2010, 04:36
The only thing worse than another theory thread is another thread that will inevitably turn into a lifestylists vs 'revolutionary' thread.
http://www.peterf.net/blog/content/binary/picard-facepalm.jpg
leftace53
10th August 2010, 04:46
Yea, I'm sure I could be classified as a hipster...and an elitist.
Regardless, we shouldn't leave anyone out as there is bound to be a few revolutionaries everywhere.
x359594
10th August 2010, 04:47
Hipster isn't a fixed category. As near as I can tell the expression emerged in the 1940s to signify urban cultural dissidents, both black and white.
In his roman-a-clef novel Junky (written in 1949 and published in 1953) William Burroughs used the expression "hipster be-bop junkies" to distinguish a certain class of heroin addicts from the "old time junkies."
These 1940s hipsters were often jazz fans and connoisseurs of the avant garde in the arts, worked low income jobs and included both men and women. They pushed the boundaries in their sexual behavior by engaging in interracial relationships, homosexuality and bi-sexuality. Politically they were cynics, soured on communism and the New Deal and disdainful of "good old fashioned Republicanism and the squares who believe in all that jive while the big grab goes on in Washington and Moscow."
The term hippie originally meant "baby hipster" and was meant as a term of opprobrium, but the hippies of the 1960s took it on gleefully.
Myself, I'm a 59 year old post-beat.
The Douche
10th August 2010, 04:49
I hate old people.:laugh:
KC
10th August 2010, 04:50
I'm a hipster and I'm probably smarter than you.
Widerstand
10th August 2010, 04:51
People call me Hipster because I listen to Neutral Milk Hotel, Crystal Castles and Animal Collective, shop at Thrift Stores, buy organic food, am vegan, shop Fairtrade products, go to underground art exhibitions, watch plays at the theater, refuse to read crime novels and refuse to watch TV. I totally can't understand it, the only thing hipster I do is wearing a post-ironic Korn shirt.
Magón
10th August 2010, 06:13
People call me Hipster because I listen to Neutral Milk Hotel, Crystal Castles and Animal Hotel, shop at Thrift Stores, buy organic food, am vegan, shop Fairtrade products, go to underground art exhibitions, watch plays at the theater, refuse to read crime novels and refuse to watch TV. I totally can't understand it, the only thing hipster I do is wearing a post-ironic Korn shirt.
What the fuck? Neutral Milk Hotel (great band by the way, love their stuff,) is considered Hipster? :blink: Damn... The only other thing I could incorporate with being Hipster, would be that most wear thrift store plaid shirts and checkered Vans shoes. :laugh:
Saorsa
10th August 2010, 06:45
All hipsters should be shot on sight.
Raúl Duke
10th August 2010, 06:57
Neutral Milk Hotel (great band by the way, love their stuff,) is considered Hipster?
It's indie...but now-a-days some people find indie-hipster to be interchangeable.
I heard of this band but I'm more familiar with other bands (Of Montreal, The Apples in Steroe, Olivia Tremor Control) from the same originating record label-collective (elephant 6).
Across The Street
10th August 2010, 06:59
That's harsh money.
Kayser_Soso
10th August 2010, 07:35
Sub-cultures have virtually nothing to do with revolution.
infraxotl
10th August 2010, 07:47
There are worse subcultures to deal with. Goths, juggalos, crusties, etc.
People call me Hipster because I listen to ... Animal Hotel
A band so obscure, it can't be found on wikipedia/what/waffles? What a dedicated hipster.
~Spectre
10th August 2010, 08:10
All hipsters should be shot on sight.
Take the knife off the Ak and gut these niggas?
Revy
10th August 2010, 08:27
I'm more of a nerd than a hipster, thank you very much. Too socially awkward to care much about being "hip".
Elitists suck.
Obs
10th August 2010, 08:40
All hipsters should be shot on sight.
I've missed you.
Telemakus
10th August 2010, 08:56
Roughly speaking, being hipster implies that you're adopting a particular ideology, look, genre etc. because of it being praised in social circles, and not because you actually like it or feel a real connection with its values. All appearance, no substance. (which, btw, probably isn't a conscious decision, as in "hm... this thing is popular and makes me look better than everyone else, I think I'll join in")
This is a problem for any ideology, because hipsters love to show off their "appreciation" for the ideology, without actually believing in the values of the ideology, or really understanding it - and end up making a mockery of whatever it is they've latched on to. This is one reason why 90% of everything is crud.
As the thread's replies indicate, many of you have seen the negative effects of this in regards to things like music taste. Revolutionary hipsters would eventually end up degrading the movement and giving it a very poor ([slash] even poorer) public image, as hipster infiltration generally does.
Decommissioner
10th August 2010, 09:01
This is dumb. As other have stated, a lot of people (that is, people ignorant of certain subcultures) would call me "hipster". I listen to hardcore/post hardcore music, as well as indie, I am in a post hardcore band, I participate in the local scene to a great extent (book shows, play music etc etc.) I look similar to my friends (band tees, jeans), I like the simplicity and I like to rep the things I love. If I were to care about fashion to an extravagant sense (swooped hair cut, kitsch clothing etc etc), would that be a crime? People should look how they want to look, and listen to what they want to listen to. If you come to me and said "linkin park is emo", you would quickly be corrected on your mistake, as you would be wrong. Is this elitist?
People lump a lot of subcultures under the generic "hipster" or "scene" category. Frankly I find it dumb. Chances are if you call something hipster, it probably isn't even hipster (even considering the very loose and ambiguous definition of hipster). I like to ride bikes, i've been called a "hipster faggot" for that. Hell, even some crustie friends of mine (some of them actually being revolutionary anarchists) have been labeled hipsters. It is as if the label "hipster" is broadening to include any subculture that dominated by young white college kids into whatever music they listen to. If you don't occupy the role of a "good ol boy" or whatever socially accepted "white person" role that is tolerated in your area, you must be some sort of weird culture loving liberal hipster type. This seems to come from both sides of the hipster hating camp, those who view them as dumb liberal white kids (conservative), and those that view them as spoiled, racist college kids (left). Examples of both can be found within the ever expanding, all encompassing "hipster" subculture, however I would stress most people associated within our music scene identify with left politics (lifestylist, revolutionary and otherwise) and a good deal come from middle class backgrounds, and many haven't even gone to college (such as myself).
It's all nonsense, and very embarrassing on behalf of those who choose to hate what they do not know (whether it be "hipsters" "scenesters" "gangstas" "punks"). I would be very embarrassed if I were to lump underground hip hop (and those into that lifestyle) with mainstream hip hop, and furthermore go on to question the groups revolutionary potential. I am a person that likes to be informed, even if such things don't necessarily pertain to me. Given that, sometimes I find it odd when leftists start threads such as this, or bash certain subcultures (and not even do it right) since being into revolutionary politics itself is somewhat of subculture at this juncture in time. It takes an analytical mind and thirst for what is unknown to just reject what you've been told all your life. Perhaps most feel they just find certain matters beneath them, and true, the nuances of certain subcultures probably isn't important in the grand scheme of things. Even still, parading an ignorance of such subcultures as a virtue is foolish nonetheless.
I am lead to conclude that the image of the "hipster" is a stereotype. Theres truth in the stereotype, if you want to look for specific examples (ie "I know this one guy.."), but it is a stereotype. This issue would otherwise be frivolous, but considering it is being brought up in the politics forum on a revolutionary left message board, I think misconceptions need to be addressed.
Decommissioner
10th August 2010, 09:09
Roughly speaking, being hipster implies that you're adopting a particular ideology, look, genre etc. because of it being praised in social circles, and not because you actually like it or feel a real connection with its values. All appearance, no substance. (which, btw, probably isn't a conscious decision, as in "hm... this thing is popular and makes me look better than everyone else, I think I'll join in")
This is a problem for any ideology, because hipsters love to show off their "appreciation" for the ideology, without actually believing in the values of the ideology, or really understanding it - and end up making a mockery of whatever it is they've latched on to. This is one reason why 90% of everything is crud.
As the thread's replies indicate, many of you have seen the negative effects of this in regards to things like music taste. Revolutionary hipsters would eventually end up degrading the movement and giving it a very poor ([slash] even poorer) public image, as hipster infiltration generally does.
I find this definition to be correct. It would degrade the movement if people were to latch on merely for cool points.
The problem is, people don't really seem to understand fully what a hipster even is. Seeing as how people who are not hipsters are being labeled as hipsters by people who are different from them, it seems to have turned into a blanket term for any subculture a person doesn't seem to like.
The strange part about it is, there cant be such thing as a culture completely comprised of hipsters, since there has to be a genuine culture for hipsters to latch onto and degenerate.
Communist Guy
10th August 2010, 10:14
Well, I don't think we should really care too much about these small groups. If they want to help the cause then thats great but I don't think we should be for or against them.
Across The Street
10th August 2010, 10:28
Cultures come and go, no matter how they are defined. Most people who are into mainstream music and enjoy nothing more have absolutely nothing valid to say. This generation alive right now, we aren't contributing to a better planet in very many significant ways. We have been witness to the death of many cultures, some dying as we speak, begging to be kept alive. Most hipsters can be described as revolutionary. It's not as if every person you meet who you might label as hipster has no thoughts.
black magick hustla
10th August 2010, 13:54
there are hipsters in the anarchist scene. they are called insurrectionists
The Douche
10th August 2010, 14:47
there are hipsters in the anarchist scene. they are called insurrectionists
I was an insurrectionary anarchist long before I was anything close to a hipster.
Three years ago this thread would've been about punks or crusties, now its about hipsters, big fuckin deal.
727Goon
10th August 2010, 15:33
Except that punk was generally a working class subculture, while hipsters are generally fuck ass rich kids pretending to be poor.
bricolage
10th August 2010, 15:43
Except that punk was generally a working class subculture, while hipsters are generally fuck ass rich kids pretending to be poor.
Joe Mellor was the well off son of a diplomat before he changed his name to Joe Strummer and started signing for the Clash...
Raúl Duke
10th August 2010, 15:48
while hipsters are generally fuck ass rich kids pretending to be poor. not everyone who has been labeled hipsters are rich.
Not every hipster is pretending to be poor, some flaunt their art degrees (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9lmvX00TLY&feature=player_embedded), i-phone 4s, etc.
The term, as it's being increasingly used, is (as Decommisioner mentioned) so ambiguous and somewhat meaningless because different things have been called hipster before. Perhaps there are "many flavors" of hipster, but many things labeled under the umbrella of hipster are not really so inter-related.
However,
Telemakus has an interesting point. One could define hipster as one who's latched onto indie (and/or a variety of other things) and than added some stupid stuff (like "hipster irony" or whatever) and are in it just for the appearance/coolness of it all (yet they fail to seem cool, etc; like some people I saw in Brooklyn). But even than, this doesn't account the other things that has been labeled hipster before. It's even gotten to the point where the term indie has become synonymous with hipster (whereas indie is mostly a music genre, hipster includes some other subcultural aspects outside of indie).
727Goon
10th August 2010, 15:49
Most punk fans, at least back in the 70's and 80's, were working class. Now it's mostly a middle class suburban thing though.
ComradeOm
10th August 2010, 15:54
Sub-cultures have virtually nothing to do with revolution.I don't think anyone suggested that they did. This isn't about lifestylism because nobody has claimed that there is something inherently revolutionary about obscure bands or skinny jeans* or that these are positive steps on the road to social transformation
*I'm assuming here that 'hipsters' more or less translates as 'indie kid'
The Douche
10th August 2010, 15:56
Except that punk was generally a working class subculture, while hipsters are generally fuck ass rich kids pretending to be poor.
Or is it working class kids appropriating the image of a subculture created by rich kids? There are more than just a few hipsters over on the RAAN board who've been around for a little while.
I would'nt call myself a hipster, but, do I listen to lo-fi and indie? Yes. Do I wear skinny jeans and v-necks? Yes. Do I have a members only jacket? Yes. Do I ride a fixie? I'm building one right now.
But I also listen to hardcore and still regularly attend shows. I can't afford an iphone. Art as a concept is totally lost on me. And I certainly don't have a degree, I go to community college.
Sugar Hill Kevis
10th August 2010, 16:54
Roughly speaking, being hipster implies that you're adopting a particular ideology, look, genre etc. because of it being praised in social circles, and not because you actually like it or feel a real connection with its values. All appearance, no substance. (which, btw, probably isn't a conscious decision, as in "hm... this thing is popular and makes me look better than everyone else, I think I'll join in")
This is a problem for any ideology, because hipsters love to show off their "appreciation" for the ideology, without actually believing in the values of the ideology, or really understanding it - and end up making a mockery of whatever it is they've latched on to. This is one reason why 90% of everything is crud.
As the thread's replies indicate, many of you have seen the negative effects of this in regards to things like music taste. Revolutionary hipsters would eventually end up degrading the movement and giving it a very poor ([slash] even poorer) public image, as hipster infiltration generally does.
So people in flanel shirts are going to degrade the revolutionary movement more than crusties (no disrespect) or socially awkward leninists who would sooner talk to the first member of the working class they actually meet about dialectical materialism than how their day's been? Be easy.
Being 'hipster' doesn't imply adopting a specific ideology, even if you're going to be 'roughly speaking'. Especially as the term is often applied externally. The first time I heard the term was when I was called it. Ignorant of any alleged ideology that's attached. Obviously there are groups of people who are consumed entirely by the stereotypes of what a hipster is and let it dominate their personality and actions. But, a comrade's a comrade, regardless of how they dress.
For the record, I wouldn't exactly consider myself a hipster...
black magick hustla
10th August 2010, 17:05
ive been called a hipster a few times too. idk, i guess i like bizarre humour, obscure facts, banter and weird music????? anyhow, there are shitty hipsters and good hipsters anyway. shit hipsters are the ones almost completely consumed by irony and nihilism. good hipsters are people who read camatte.
man i am going to make fuckin bordiga so hip. cursing democracy and calling for revolutionary totalitarianism with a straightface has so much hipster potential
Widerstand
10th August 2010, 17:15
What the fuck? Neutral Milk Hotel (great band by the way, love their stuff,) is considered Hipster? :blink: Damn... The only other thing I could incorporate with being Hipster, would be that most wear thrift store plaid shirts and checkered Vans shoes. :laugh:
NMH is considered Hipster, yes. Or well, Indie. But everything linked to Indie or Pitchfork is considered Hipster these days.
There are worse subcultures to deal with. Goths, juggalos, crusties, etc.
FUCKING MAGNETS HOW DO THEY WORK
I can't take juggaloes serious >_>
A band so obscure, it can't be found on wikipedia/what/waffles? What a dedicated hipster.
Animal Collective*
Except that punk was generally a working class subculture, while hipsters are generally fuck ass rich kids pretending to be poor.
I don't see the point in pretending to be poor. Or in fetishizing the working class' living standard in general. I just don't get it through my head. Why would anyone mind luxuries like watching plays or operas or going to art exhibits? They should be available to everyone, yes, but boycotting them because they aren't seems pointless.
Magón
10th August 2010, 17:23
...as hipster infiltration generally does.
Whenever I hear something like that, I always think of this quote: "I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids!"
- General Jack Ripper (Doctor Strangelove)
Obviously replace Communist with Hipster. :lol:
The Douche
10th August 2010, 17:24
ive been called a hipster a few times too. idk, i guess i like bizarre humour, obscure facts, banter and weird music????? anyhow, there are shitty hipsters and good hipsters anyway. shit hipsters are the ones almost completely consumed by irony and nihilism. good hipsters are people who read camatte.
man i am going to make fuckin bordiga so hip. cursing democracy and calling for revolutionary totalitarianism with a straightface has so much hipster potential
Is Camatte hip now? I literally just made a thread like last week on the RAAN board about him. My hipster staus=confirmed.
A.R.Amistad
10th August 2010, 17:37
Why isn't this in Chit Chat?
Fietsketting
10th August 2010, 17:43
Maybe its cause people want to put a tag on everybody?
RadioRaheem84
10th August 2010, 18:36
If any of ya'll saw me, you would think I was a preppy ass mofo. So let's not disparage anyone that is a potential revolutionary.
727Goon
10th August 2010, 18:45
Or is it working class kids appropriating the image of a subculture created by rich kids? There are more than just a few hipsters over on the RAAN board who've been around for a little while.
I would'nt call myself a hipster, but, do I listen to lo-fi and indie? Yes. Do I wear skinny jeans and v-necks? Yes. Do I have a members only jacket? Yes. Do I ride a fixie? I'm building one right now.
But I also listen to hardcore and still regularly attend shows. I can't afford an iphone. Art as a concept is totally lost on me. And I certainly don't have a degree, I go to community college.
Oh I always associated being a hipster with like being a stuck up rich artist type. I dont really have any problems with indie kids or fixie kids, hell I wear skinny jeans and V necks as well even though I listen to rap and punk. I think its cause I came up skating and skaters sort of dress with that sort of style. But fuck elitists period.
Blackscare
10th August 2010, 18:47
Man, fuck them niggas, I swear I care about everything but them niggas.
So that's cool on here now? I guess if you're quoting some rapper.
727Goon
10th August 2010, 18:50
Yes that is cool now, and yes, I am quoting some rapper.
Ele'ill
10th August 2010, 19:02
...crusties, etc.
What's this? Another 8 pages?
Who?
10th August 2010, 19:23
Oh I always associated being a hipster with like being a stuck up rich artist type. I dont really have any problems with indie kids or fixie kids, hell I wear skinny jeans and V necks as well even though I listen to rap and punk. I think its cause I came up skating and skaters sort of dress with that sort of style. But fuck elitists period.
Same here, I associated hipsters with being wealthy, fake, artsy brats from the suburbs. I felt like they were only expousing left wing beliefs because it was fashionable in their particular social circle. I personally have nothing against genuine leftists who happen to wear skinny jeans and/or listen to indie music. Heck, I even own a copy of In the Aeroplane over the Sea.
However elitism is generally counterproductive to furthering our cause.
The Douche
10th August 2010, 19:58
So that's cool on here now? I guess if you're quoting some rapper.
He's black
x359594
10th August 2010, 21:06
...I associated hipsters with being wealthy, fake, artsy brats from the suburbs. I felt like they were only expousing left wing beliefs because it was fashionable in their particular social circle...
So is that an accurate description of hipsters today? A far cry from the people called hipsters in the 1940s and 50s when the hipster life style included unconventional sexuality and drug use that brought hipsters in contact with law enforcement and scandalized the bourgeois moral order.
The Douche
10th August 2010, 22:06
So is that an accurate description of hipsters today? A far cry from the people called hipsters in the 1940s and 50s when the hipster life style included unconventional sexuality and drug use that brought hipsters in contact with law enforcement and scandalized the bourgeois moral order.
Nah a hipster is anybody into stuff that's trendy right now like thrift stores, indie music and fixed gear bikes. Oh...and cocaine
Who?
10th August 2010, 22:09
It's just the way I perceived them at first, so I got where a lot of these folk were coming from. I know that many hipsters aren't wealthy, fake or artsy brats. It obviously isn't very accurate, the sub-culture, like most, draws from all walks of life.
Here's a quick summary from Wikipedia about the contemporary hipsters:
Hipster is a slang term that first appeared in the 1940s, and was revived in the 1990s and 2000s often to describe types of young, recently-settled urban middle class adults and older teenagers with interests in non-mainstream fashion and culture, particularly alternative music, indie rock, independent film, magazines such as Vice and Clash, and websites like Pitchfork Media. In some contexts, hipsters are also referred to as scenesters.
"Hipster" has been used in sometimes contradictory ways, making it difficult to precisely define "hipster culture" because it is a "mutating, trans-Atlantic melting pot of styles, tastes and behavior[s]."One commentator argues that "hipsterism fetishizes the authentic" elements of all of the "fringe movements of the postwar era—beat, hippie, punk, even grunge," and draws on the "cultural stores of every unmelted ethnicity" and "gay style", and "regurgitates it with a winking inauthenticity."
Boyle1888
11th August 2010, 02:00
WTF is a hipster? Seriously
bcbm
11th August 2010, 02:16
WTF is a hipster? Seriously
nobody knows but everyone hates them
gorillafuck
11th August 2010, 02:30
Neutral Milk Hotel sucks.
this is an invasion
11th August 2010, 04:07
I like fixed gear bikes.
Jimmie Higgins
11th August 2010, 04:36
Neutral Milk Hotel sucks.That's such a hipster thing to say.
The funny thing about hipsters is that almost all hipsters deny their hipster identity. Honestly, in my view hipsters were a lot more boring and obnoxious 5-6 years ago. Now "hipster" is just like emo because it has spread beyond the small groups in gentrified areas of cities (which means, yes, many of them seemed to be trust-funders to me several years back) and is part of general youth culture.
Really, the only thing that separates "good" youth culture from "bad" youth culture is the time-period we live in. In apolitical times, the main underground scenes are all apolitical - in more turbulent times, there is a more turbulent dynamic at play.
Back a few years ago, the defining feature of hipsters that I ran across was their aloof attitude (and coke snorting and pill popping). I think it had less to do with hipsters themselves and more to do with living at a time when a lot of people felt that the government was just going to do terrible things and we are all just powerless to do anything about it, so we might at well be frivolous and cynical. Now people that I meet that could be defined as hipster seem to be more engaged in things going on and more sincere. I think that's the recession effect.
KC
11th August 2010, 04:42
Except that punk was generally a working class subculture, while hipsters are generally fuck ass rich kids pretending to be poor.
I know probably every "hipster" in Milwaukee and almost all of them are working part- or full-time jobs with little or no health insurance and pursuing what they love.
In short, you're an idiot.
Homo Songun
11th August 2010, 04:56
The funny thing about hipsters is that almost all hipsters deny their hipster identity. Honestly, in my view hipsters were a lot more boring and obnoxious 5-6 years ago. Now "hipster" is just like emo because it has spread beyond the small groups in gentrified areas of cities (which means, yes, many of them seemed to be trust-funders to me several years back) and is part of general youth culture.
Honest question: Who are these "trust fund" idlers that everyone is always taking about? Is there just lot more fabulously wealthy people than I thought? Or maybe is it that people with trust funds tend to know a shit load of people? This starting to make me feel paranoid.
Homo Songun
11th August 2010, 05:06
Except that punk was generally a working class subculture, while hipsters are generally fuck ass rich kids pretending to be poor.
I know probably every "hipster" in Milwaukee and almost all of them are working part- or full-time jobs with little or no health insurance and pursuing what they love.
In short, you're an idiot.
Moreover, Punk was never mainly about the working class, it was always openly a middle class thing. The original punks were art student types in the big cities (lol hipsters), and then later on in the early eighties the bands that ended up pioneering hardcore always sang and talked predominately about alienation, suburbia, and other classically middle class themes. Any history of punk will discuss this at great length.
KC
11th August 2010, 05:11
It's stupid to call punk either working class or middle class. It was bigger than some "class phenomenon". Your all idiots.
Homo Songun
11th August 2010, 05:41
hm, heres me thinking being determines consciousness.:blink:
Mindtoaster
11th August 2010, 06:25
The stereotype of hipsters as being rich kids acting poor comes from Manhattan, where they're often bankers or real estate agents
I don't think you really see that in other hipster scenes.
Raúl Duke
11th August 2010, 06:29
The stereotype of hipsters as being rich kids acting poor comes from Manhattan, where they're often bankers or real estate agents
Those are yuppies...
Everyone knows that all the hipsters are in Brooklyn (perhaps, as the stereotype goes, going to Pratt) and Queens. Williamsburg is considered the "hipster capital" but only for those with the money; many people end up living in more cheaper areas in Queens/Brooklyn.
727Goon
11th August 2010, 07:06
Also lets not forget that rich NYC hipsters gentrify the fuck out of neighborhoods and are thus scum.
Jimmie Higgins
11th August 2010, 07:25
Honest question: Who are these "trust fund" idlers that everyone is always taking about? Is there just lot more fabulously wealthy people than I thought? Or maybe is it that people with trust funds tend to know a shit load of people? This starting to make me feel paranoid.I don't know - it's my fall-back explanation for people I meet who own art galleries and shit but never seem to sell enough paintings to pay for it all. Fair enough, most don't last, so it could be that they got loans or something.
My other explanation for these acquaintances who don't seem to have a regular source of income is that they are dealers (I don't mean art) who just haven't told me that that's where their money comes from.
They should tell me - if they have good shit, that is.
Ztrain
11th August 2010, 09:22
:Dhipster is in the eye of the beholder but it seem to me that most hipsters would hang out in the coffee shop and talk about revolution rather than participate...people have identified me as indie kid thou along with punk and ska kid
Raúl Duke
11th August 2010, 16:28
Also lets not forget that rich NYC hipsters gentrify the fuck out of neighborhoods and are thus scum.
This reminds me of putting the blame on the immigrant when it's the boss who's in charge of hiring and firing.
Likewise, it's the landlords and developers who are in charge of increasing rent.
It's always the capitalist, not the consumer or worker, what is the source of economic woes.
Lyev
11th August 2010, 16:38
Yesterday I saw hipster at the airport with the obligatory moustache wearing leather trousers, a sailors hat, and a white t-shirt with child-like scribble on it. He was thus reactionary (and elitist) and should have no place in the revolutionary leftist movement.
howblackisyourflag
11th August 2010, 17:18
Yesterday I saw hipster at the airport with the obligatory moustache wearing leather trousers, a sailors hat, and a white t-shirt with child-like scribble on it. He was thus reactionary (and elitist) and should have no place in the revolutionary leftist movement.
Correct comrade, only strong anti-hipsterism rhetoric and pro-forkliftism will bring the revolution to fruition.
Ztrain
11th August 2010, 17:53
They seem like they would spend more time talking about revolution in a cofee shop than actually revolting of course on chick thought I was an indi guy even though I listen to punk,ska and grindcore
gorillafuck
11th August 2010, 18:28
Moreover, Punk was never mainly about the working class, it was always openly a middle class thing. The original punks were art student types in the big cities (lol hipsters), and then later on in the early eighties the bands that ended up pioneering hardcore always sang and talked predominately about alienation, suburbia, and other classically middle class themes. Any history of punk will discuss this at great length.
Some punk was from working class backgrounds and some from middle class backgrounds. Punk music doesn't have a class character, it's stupid to try to assign one to it. I hate how some socialists try to determine the class character of everything on the planet.
Speaking of which, what is the class character of pokemon?
Mindtoaster
11th August 2010, 18:40
Those are yuppies...
Everyone knows that all the hipsters are in Brooklyn (perhaps, as the stereotype goes, going to Pratt) and Queens. Williamsburg is considered the "hipster capital" but only for those with the money; many people end up living in more cheaper areas in Queens/Brooklyn.
The yuppies in New York have BECOME hipsters.
http://newyork.timeout.com/articles/features/4840/why-the-hipster-must-die
this is an invasion
11th August 2010, 18:50
Moreover, Punk was never mainly about the working class, it was always openly a middle class thing. The original punks were art student types in the big cities (lol hipsters), and then later on in the early eighties the bands that ended up pioneering hardcore always sang and talked predominately about alienation, suburbia, and other classically middle class themes. Any history of punk will discuss this at great length.
Alienation is only a middle class thing?
Raúl Duke
11th August 2010, 19:19
The yuppies in New York have BECOME hipsters.Maybe but I doubt it; more as they are/will displace hipsters (or whatever) geographically.
For example, I was at Boerum Hills/Cobble Hills, Brooklyn. It was a very gentrified place but most people in the area seemed more like late 20s-early 30s professionals, some already married and with kids. They seemed less like the stereotype hipster (and there were more hipsters commuting to Manhattan than here) and more like the usual yuppies who are obsessed with organic foods and what not. This area was never marketed towards hipsters (while Williamsburg and Greenpoint were) only yuppies
I went to Greenpoint (above Williamsburg; I think) and there were more mid-20s people and the area had a more hipster vibe. But another trend is also occurring, actual 'hipsters' (or bohemians) are being displaced by yuppies (maybe you can call them yuppie "hipsters") and tend to than move to other more cheaper areas (while, at least in the case of Williamsburg, still going there for nightlife/venues). For example, at this venue I was at in Greenpoint/Williamsburg there were a lot of people who lived in other more cheaper areas outside Greenpoint/Williamsburg (Red Hook, Bedford-Stuyvesant, Bushwick, and areas in Queens).
Also, I bet who wrote that article is a hipster...since some hate each other (themselves :confused:)
Revy
11th August 2010, 20:28
and now a haiku, performed in green:
I am a hipster
yeah maybe you are one too
let's be hipsters yeaaaaaah.
thesadmafioso
11th August 2010, 20:34
Why should we bother judging someone politically based upon whatever social trends they do or do not follow? Honestly, the leftist movement is fragmented and weak enough as it is, I really do not think we have the liberty of excluding people based upon what subculture they subscribe to at the moment.
Though I can see situations arising in which ones social devotions could clash with their proclaimed political alignment, so my previous statements are open to alteration based upon context and circumstance, as they should be when dealing with a question that deals with such a vague and difficult to define subject matter.
Ele'ill
11th August 2010, 22:06
Yup, there are certain activities that attract groups of people that like those activities. That's life. You have people that like to drink with coworkers at a local bar. You have people that like to smoke hash and watch Lord Of The Rings extended edition ala marathon style- there are people that like to dress up and go to shitty shows- Some people like to collect lots of cats- some people really like bicycling others like traveling- some like political theory without action- some like to lift weights and congregate at BBQ's with fellow lifters- ....
This is life- this is what we- as organizers, activists and potential organizers and activists have to work with. An elitist attitude will get you all kinds of defense mechanisms and the shields will go up. This isn't post revolution- we have a lot of information to hand around and there will be a lot of minds to change.
Also, there are people that are 'hipsters' that are very invovled there are people who are 'thugs' that are very involved there are people who are everything in between that are very involved in leftist struggle but let's just promise never to have another thread like this again for as long as this particular forum is up and running?
What Would Durruti Do?
12th August 2010, 00:22
i know a lot of wealthy hipsters, but that probably has more to do with the fact that I live in an extremely wealthy city than it does anything to do with hipsterdom.
the majority of hipsters I know (myself included as I'm also occasionally called a hipster), however, are students/dropouts, or lower class workers.
so this "rich fake suburbanite artists" definition just doesn't jive with me. There are way more hipsters in the cities than the suburbs.
Ele'ill
12th August 2010, 02:29
i know a lot of wealthy hipsters, but that probably has more to do with the fact that I live in an extremely wealthy city than it does anything to do with hipsterdom.
the majority of hipsters I know (myself included as I'm also occasionally called a hipster), however, are students/dropouts, or lower class workers.
so this "rich fake suburbanite artists" definition just doesn't jive with me. There are way more hipsters in the cities than the suburbs.
I agree but I wouldn't say that there are more lower class workers in the city- there are huge sections of 'suburbs' that are very low income.
A lot of the non-city people get labeled as 'rich' but that isn't accurate at all- and I'm not saying that's what you're saying.
Yeah so I basically agree with what you said
Ignore the swill
"The keyyyboard has been drrriinnking...etc'
Sugar Hill Kevis
12th August 2010, 03:16
Chit-chat?
Magón
12th August 2010, 03:25
There are worse subcultures to deal with. Goths, juggalos, crusties, etc.
A band so obscure, it can't be found on wikipedia/what/waffles? What a dedicated hipster.
Juggalos from what I've seen and heard, are pretty downright hilarious. And I don't mean that in the sense of a 5 year olds birthday party, with a silly clown making all the children laugh, I'm just talking about how they describe some of themselves, and why they became a Juggalo or whatever the female equivalent is to the male one. (I hardly pay attention to them, so I'm not up on my Juggalo ed.) They're just downright hilarious to me.
TwoSevensClash
12th August 2010, 03:26
This reminds me of putting the blame on the immigrant when it's the boss who's in charge of hiring and firing.
Likewise, it's the landlords and developers who are in charge of increasing rent.
It's always the capitalist, not the consumer or worker, what is the source of economic woes.
They wouldn't raise the price if the hipsters didn't flock there and be willing to pay 200% more then the original people. The hipsters are the part of the reason for increase. Though I do agree that the landlords share more of the blame.
Bilan
12th August 2010, 03:29
They wouldn't raise the price if the hipsters didn't flock there and be willing to pay 200% more then the original people. The hipsters are the part of the reason for increase. Though I do agree that the landlords share more of the blame.
You're a fool.
As is everyone who is posting in this thread.
Including me.
Homo Songun
12th August 2010, 03:35
Some punk was from working class backgrounds and some from middle class backgrounds.
True.
Punk music doesn't have a class character,
False.
it's stupid to try to assign one to it.
No. What is stupid is thinking that music, along with every other manifestation of culture in a given society, can possibly emanate from the minds of humans without being a reflection of the very society which the minds in question find themselves situated. And as a very non-stupid person once said, "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles" -- necessarily implying the existence of different class positions in the culture.
Of course, you don't need to be a Marxist to know the class outlook of Punk. Like I said, any book on the subject could tell you that.
Think about how stupid it would sound to say that hip-hop had no racial character, or romantic ballads had no sexual character. Then why the hell would music have no class character?
I hate how some socialists try to determine the class character of everything on the planet.Dude, its revleft.com. If you are getting sick of it, may I suggest the rest of the Internet (http://google.com/)?
TwoSevensClash
12th August 2010, 03:43
You're a fool.
As is everyone who is posting in this thread.
Including me.
Maybe, but still if they didn't move to those neighborhoods the rent wouldn't of skyrocketed in such a short period of time and the original inhabitants wouldn't of been forced out.
Bright Banana Beard
12th August 2010, 03:45
gosh, NYC are being gentrified thanks to hipsters/yuppies!
727Goon
12th August 2010, 04:59
I know probably every "hipster" in Milwaukee and almost all of them are working part- or full-time jobs with little or no health insurance and pursuing what they love.
In short, you're an idiot.
Right and they all come from the suburbs and could go back to living off mommy and daddy if they had to. They aren't working class, they're not forced to sell their labor, they just do it because its ironic or some shit.
Raúl Duke
12th August 2010, 06:32
^^^
"I'm soooooo prole, more prole than those goddamn hipsters; working-class hipsters who 'may not go back home' cannot exist"
A fucking sub culture does not automatically equate to a certain kind of class status; such an idea is ridiculous.
There are rich and poor of each sub cultures; it's all relative. There are people who think they're straight up gangster from the barrio who suck up to their parents.
On this site itself there are people representative of many subcultures.
What Would Durruti Do?
12th August 2010, 07:55
^^^
"I'm soooooo prole, more prole than those goddamn hipsters; working-class hipsters who 'may not go back home' cannot exist"
A fucking sub culture does not automatically equate to a certain kind of class status; such an idea is ridiculous.
There are rich and poor of each sub cultures; it's all relative. There are people who think they're straight up gangster from the barrio who suck up to their parents.
On this site itself there are people representative of many subcultures.
Exactly. The idea that we should exclude a certain subculture is ridiculous. I don't even care if we're talking about old English Dandies who idolize the bourgeois here.
We need all the help we can get, period. I don't care what subculture someone comes from, if they want to help destroy capitalism or the state, then great.
infraxotl
12th August 2010, 10:22
some flaunt their art degrees (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9lmvX00TLY&feature=player_embedded),
the fuck did i just watch
bricolage
12th August 2010, 13:15
Right and they all come from the suburbs and could go back to living off mommy and daddy if they had to. They aren't working class, they're not forced to sell their labor, they just do it because its ironic or some shit.
having a shit job is well ironic.
'toilet cleaners; in it for the lulz'
Ravachol
12th August 2010, 13:31
I was an insurrectionary anarchist long before I was anything close to a hipster.
Three years ago this thread would've been about punks or crusties, now its about hipsters, big fuckin deal.
Over here in mainland Europe it's still about crusts so meh. Guess we're lagging behind a bit :rolleyes:
Right and they all come from the suburbs and could go back to living off mommy and daddy if they had to. They aren't working class, they're not forced to sell their labor, they just do it because its ironic or some shit.
While that comment was pretty funny it's completely wrong. I know plenty of working-class kids who are hipsters and I can assure you they don't have a single penny to spare. Most shop at thrift stores because it's fashionable but mainly because it's affordable.
On the other hand, I know tons and tons of (petit-)bourgeois faux-punx or skins running around town claiming they're "working class 'n all lads OI!OI!OI!" while working in corporate finance or some shit :rolleyes:
Subcultures don't have a homogenous class character.
Bilan
12th August 2010, 14:53
Maybe, but still if they didn't move to those neighborhoods the rent wouldn't of skyrocketed in such a short period of time and the original inhabitants wouldn't of been forced out.
Welcome to capitalism, buddy. What, you think if there were no bourgeois hipsters, this wouldn't happen?
Come on now.
Raúl Duke
12th August 2010, 15:19
the fuck did i just watch
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
Delenda Carthago
12th August 2010, 15:19
I freakin LOVE hipsters.
When my life is fucked up,when I feel like nothing I do is worth shit,when I feel trapped in an endless dead end situation called "surviving",when puting a gun in my mouth seems the only logical thing to do,I look at them and I think to myself:You are not that bad.
And just like a miracle,I feel ready for another battle!
gorillafuck
12th August 2010, 16:01
No. What is stupid is thinking that music, along with every other manifestation of culture in a given society, can possibly emanate from the minds of humans without being a reflection of the very society which the minds in question find themselves situated. And as a very non-stupid person once said, "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles" -- necessarily implying the existence of different class positions in the culture.
Then what is the class character of pokemon fandom?
Of course, you don't need to be a Marxist to know the class outlook of Punk. Like I said, any book on the subject could tell you that.I listen to a shitload of punk and I've watched American Hardcore and it all seems fairly diverse in regards to class makeup. A lot of early hardcore bands were from California suburbs, Choking Victim were squatting after they were homeless people.
Think about how stupid it would sound to say that hip-hop had no racial character, or romantic ballads had no sexual character. Then why the hell would music have no class character?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOk_0BpyC44
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfy9ZqKUJjU
Would you consider these two songs to both overall have the same "class character"? (Ignoring the fact that not all suburban people are middle class). Though I see why you think punk has a middle class character if you sincerely think of alienation as a middle class phenomena (which is absurd).
theeuphioanswer
12th August 2010, 20:36
For a thread that's supposed to be bashing elitist behaviors, this thread appears to be quite hypocritical.
Lyev
12th August 2010, 21:12
Seriously, how on earth has this generated 5 pages? It's a complete non-issue that's been turned into a mountain and we don't want it becoming another shitty forklift or dog thread. For a start, "hipster" is completely ambiguous anyway - are we talking about someone who loves jazz or someone who wears American Apparel? What the fuck is a hipster? Any attempt at somehow guessing someone's personality or "revolutionary potential" by some vaguely defined subculture is going to be completely nonsensical from the start. How can you try and gauge whether one person or another can be "allowed" into the leftist movement simply because of their clothes or the music they like?
bcbm
12th August 2010, 21:32
y'all just wish you looked this good
Bright Banana Beard
12th August 2010, 21:33
Seriously, how on earth has this generated 5 pages? It's a complete non-issue that's been turned into a mountain and we don't want it becoming another shitty forklift or dog thread. For a start, "hipster" is completely ambiguous anyway - are we talking about someone who loves jazz or someone who wears American Apparel? What the fuck is a hipster? Any attempt at somehow guessing someone's personality or "revolutionary potential" by some vaguely defined subculture is going to be completely nonsensical from the start. How can you try and gauge whether one person or another can be "allowed" into the leftist movement simply because of their clothes or the music they like?
The one who drinks Pabst, own Iphone or Ipad or anything Apple made product and think they are living "post-lifestyle."
Ravachol
12th August 2010, 23:16
y'all just wish you looked this good
Pah, I don't need v-necks, distressed denim or slipons to look like a hot motherfucker!
Although I am wearing distressed denim right now...
727Goon
13th August 2010, 01:06
I dont mind any particular subculture or style of dress, I just hate suburban kids pretending to be poor, or elitist art school snobs, and thats what I always thought hipster meant. If by hipster your talking about indie or fixie kids or whatever, I dont have a problem with working class kids who like indie or ride fixed gear bikes or dress in that style.
bcbm
13th August 2010, 01:29
Pah, I don't need v-necks, distressed denim or slipons to look like a hot motherfucker!
ironically (lol) i don't have any of those things.
Ravachol
13th August 2010, 02:13
ironically (lol) i don't have any of those things.
Heh, how Ironic :p
I just don't get the whole v-neck thing those people are into, turtlenecks OK but v-necks...
bcbm
13th August 2010, 02:28
turtlenecks, are you fucking kidding me?
Ravachol
13th August 2010, 02:30
turtlenecks, are you fucking kidding me?
It's not like I'd wear one.. Not really my style brah :rolleyes: But I think they look less ridiculous than v-necks. But perhaps that's because v-necks are mainly worn by preps here in the Netherlands.
Sugar Hill Kevis
13th August 2010, 02:32
Brother needs to circumcise his jumpers...
bcbm
13th August 2010, 02:34
It's not like I'd wear one.. Not really my style brah :rolleyes: But I think they look less ridiculous than v-necks. But perhaps that's because v-necks are mainly worn by preps here in the Netherlands.
the only people who wear turtlenecks are like... i can't even think of anyone. old ladies? beat poets? me when i was 11? nobody cool, that's for sure.
Os Cangaceiros
13th August 2010, 02:39
I used to be a little anti-hipster. Not so much anymore, though...they mostly just amuse me now.
bcbm
13th August 2010, 02:46
you hung out with me too much
Os Cangaceiros
13th August 2010, 02:48
I think that's what happened too.
Ele'ill
13th August 2010, 02:57
when puting a gun in my mouth seems the only logical thing to do,I look at them and I think to myself:You are not that bad.
I misread this as "..I think to myself: You are not that dead."
Thought it was pretty neat.
KC
13th August 2010, 05:59
I have v-necks because they let my chest hairs breeeeeeeeaaaaaathe.
Bilan
13th August 2010, 06:08
I have v-necks because they let my chest hairs breeeeeeeeaaaaaathe.
:lol:
Ravachol
13th August 2010, 14:33
the only people who wear turtlenecks are like... i can't even think of anyone. old ladies? beat poets? me when i was 11? nobody cool, that's for sure.
Dutch Hipsters, that's who wear them. This obviously doesn't invalidate your statement AT ALL.
Il Medico
14th August 2010, 07:19
Some people would call me a hipster, and I don't mind it when they do. I shop at thrift store, I am into fashion, and artsy stuff, listen to a lot of music that is considered 'indie' (of Montreal, Neutral Milk Hotel, Architecture in Helsinki, etc). I know a lot of 'hipsters' and I quite like them, I daresay. I find there are a lot more 'hipsters' that are from dirt poor communities around here (Like the infamous "MoonLake") than there are from the rich areas.
Qayin
14th August 2010, 07:30
Cardigans man
Sperm-Doll Setsuna
14th August 2010, 07:42
Speaking of which, what is the class character of pokemon?
It's all about revolutionary transformation, maaan
KC
14th August 2010, 07:45
Cardigans man
I own this and you don't:
http://i35.tinypic.com/33nxmqg.jpg
black magick hustla
14th August 2010, 20:03
i dont listen to neutral milk hotel or that bullshit i listen to black metal and powerviolence
Lyev
14th August 2010, 20:19
So is this guy a hipster? to me, he looks a bit elitist.
http://www.r8ix.com/aron/turtleneck.jpg
Adi Shankara
14th August 2010, 20:52
So is this guy a hipster? to me, he looks a bit elitist.
http://www.r8ix.com/aron/turtleneck.jpg
who the hell is this fool?
Raúl Duke
14th August 2010, 21:20
Not a hipster, at least according to any of the many US definitions; at least not fashionably a hipster.
Lyev
15th August 2010, 00:21
who the hell is this fool?oops sorry, we're not allowed to post personal pictures!
Pavlov's House Party
15th August 2010, 00:54
http://i.imgur.com/8YMrp.gif
Same with the flannel shirts. Quebec is like a vortex that strips everything hipsters claim ironic away.
Qayin
15th August 2010, 13:54
I own this and you don't:
:'(
Sad that you identified my avatar, your the first.
Chambered Word
16th August 2010, 16:24
Juggalos have to be worse.
Os Cangaceiros
16th August 2010, 17:16
i dont listen to neutral milk hotel or that bullshit i listen to black metal and powerviolence
yah becuz no hipsters listen to black metal or anything.
black metal = metal 4 hipsters
The Douche
16th August 2010, 17:21
Or powerviolence, hello ceremony. (I just went to a ceremony show a week or two ago)
Ravachol
19th August 2010, 21:43
yah becuz no hipsters listen to black metal or anything.
black metal = metal 4 hipsters
I honestly don't get that fad. Over here black metal is still the exclusive domain of fat kids with long, unkempt black-dyed hair crying out to Odin or god knows who about how 'grimdark', 'kvlt' and 'frostbitten' their life in mom's basement is.
Still, I tend to enjoy black metal now and then...
The Red Next Door
19th August 2010, 22:03
Over here black metal is still the exclusive domain of fat kids with long, unkempt black-dyed hair
You just describe a friend of mine who listen to metal. hehehe :D except his black hair is natural.
leftace53
19th August 2010, 22:49
I honestly don't get that fad. Over here black metal is still the exclusive domain of fat kids with long, unkempt black-dyed hair crying out to Odin or god knows who about how 'grimdark', 'kvlt' and 'frostbitten' their life in mom's basement is.
Still, I tend to enjoy black metal now and then...
Agreed. This is why I listen to power metal :lol:
Ele'ill
20th August 2010, 01:18
Anybody that participated in this thread- but then went on to list 'what they are'- is a hipster.
Ravachol
20th August 2010, 11:35
Anybody that participated in this thread- but then went on to list 'what they are'- is a hipster.
I'm working class baby!
black magick hustla
20th August 2010, 21:59
I honestly don't get that fad. Over here black metal is still the exclusive domain of fat kids with long, unkempt black-dyed hair crying out to Odin or god knows who about how 'grimdark', 'kvlt' and 'frostbitten' their life in mom's basement is.
Still, I tend to enjoy black metal now and then...
yea, a lot of black metal culture has gotten old as hell. when it started, it was hella reactionary but in a sense, it was p. real. a bunch of alienatedd kids from bumfuck nowhere in norway burning down churches and preparing for an incoming insurrection to destroy judeo-christian civilization and bring back nordic honor. however wrong and disgusting their views where, i appreciate the history of black metal as the expression of anger and alienation.
Il Medico
21st August 2010, 05:18
All this talk of black metal made me think of this song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aPupUX2s_A&feature=search
Widerstand
21st August 2010, 05:28
All this talk of black metal made me think of this song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aPupUX2s_A&feature=search
N7piTcDllnY
Take that!
Il Medico
21st August 2010, 05:31
N7piTcDllnY
Take that!
For a second I thought you were going to post music as a rebuttal. I see I was wrong.
Widerstand
21st August 2010, 05:33
For a second I thought you were going to post music as a rebuttal. I see I was wrong.
For a second I was thinking about discussing black metal, then I figured posting a youtube link might be better ... But maybe I should've picked that one instead:
8ABbEh6RClg
Il Medico
21st August 2010, 05:42
For a second I was thinking about discussing black metal, then I figured posting a youtube link might be better ... But maybe I should've picked that one instead:
8ABbEh6RClg
:lol: Whats with the Kiss wannabes with swords?
And the every time the guy with the bright orange key-tar showed up, I couldn't help but laugh.
Widerstand
21st August 2010, 05:45
They are covering German Christmas songs comrade. Shit's br00tal trve kvlt as fuck!
Angry Young Man
21st August 2010, 08:06
Politically they were cynics, soured on communism and the New Deal and disdainful of "good old fashioned Republicanism and the squares who believe in all that jive while the big grab goes on in Washington and Moscow."
From this moment on, nobody will be able to read these lines without imagining that it's the Spirit of Jazz saying them.
Why's my hat on fire?
Raúl Duke
21st August 2010, 13:07
All this talk of black metal made me think of this song:
-aPupUX2s_A
:thumbup1:
Ravachol
22nd August 2010, 21:17
For a second I was thinking about discussing black metal, then I figured posting a youtube link might be better ... But maybe I should've picked that one instead:
8ABbEh6RClg
Black Metal yeah
nq2SxzUJg7I
Buitraker
22nd August 2010, 21:27
elitists=/=hipsters...
It's just a subculture...
supposedly some people on revleft are hipsters.
Best reply
leftace53
23rd August 2010, 01:58
Are these hipster shoes?
http://dropdeadgorgeousdaily.typepad.com/.a/6a00e5540cf58c883401156f204574970c-800wi
They seem to be from american apparel, so is it safe to assume that they are indeed hipster shoes?
Bilan
23rd August 2010, 02:28
Are these hipster shoes?
http://dropdeadgorgeousdaily.typepad.com/.a/6a00e5540cf58c883401156f204574970c-800wi
They seem to be from american apparel, so is it safe to assume that they are indeed hipster shoes?
Yes.
leftace53
23rd August 2010, 02:45
Yes.
In that case, I am a hipster.
Widerstand
23rd August 2010, 03:39
American Apparel clothes are pretty nice though, I like all my shirts I got from them ;s
Bright Banana Beard
23rd August 2010, 07:00
Anyone who bought clothes from American Apparel is a hipster.
Tru Fax.
The Douche
23rd August 2010, 16:56
I have a jacket from AA, and last time I went to urban outfitters another customer asked me for help cause they thought I worked there. Obviously I could be considered a hipster.
leftace53
23rd August 2010, 17:02
AA is too expensive for me. I spend an average of 7 dollars on a shirt, and 17 dollars on pants.
Il Medico
23rd August 2010, 22:15
In that case, I am a hipster.
I guess so Am I.
I don't shop at AA though. You can probably find a pair of those in Ross for a lot less.
Honggweilo
3rd September 2010, 11:27
everyone claiming not to be a hipster ( especially the ones claiming to be working class :p) are hipsters. Only people who claim to be hipsters are not, just posers
I'm hipster as fuck, so i'm a fucking poser, the rest of you are all a bunch of fucking hipsters
ed miliband
4th September 2010, 11:08
I ocassionally shop at American Apparel and Urban Outfitters (only when money allows). I get most of my clothes in vintage stores that aren't too expensive. I listen to a lot of underground music and read publications like The Wire. I hang out in places where people who would be described a hipsters hang out.
Still, I don't think hipsters actually exist: there is no one, unique hipster style; hipsters do not all listen to a particular type of music; nobody chooses to identify as a hipster. You might meet a "hipster" who wants to channel Lou Reed whilst another will be heavily influenced by hip hop fashion. A "hipster" might like Wolves in the Throne Room or Lady Gaga. A "hipster" might have long hair or short hair or no hair. Unlike other subcultures "hipster" has very few discernible or unique 'things', and can accomodate a very large variety of styles and tastes.
It seems to me people just throw the label "hipster" at things they perceive to be cooler than them.
Das war einmal
4th September 2010, 12:36
everyone claiming not to be a hipster ( especially the ones claiming to be working class :p) are hipsters. Only people who claim to be hipsters are not, just posers
I'm hipster as fuck, so i'm a fucking poser, the rest of you are all a bunch of fucking hipsters
I praise your logic
Ele'ill
4th September 2010, 18:43
The creation of this thread was based on elitism- which is ironic- which means this thread is a hipster.
Il Medico
4th September 2010, 19:52
The creation of this thread was based on elitism- which is ironic- which means this thread is a hipster.
And Hipsters love irony, the bastards.
Commiechu
4th September 2010, 20:33
Most hipsters are useless...many will wear a Che short for example without knowing who he is, a Kaffiyeh, and will listen to "revolutionary" music 24/7 without any real revolutionary thought.
Who?
4th September 2010, 20:35
And Hipsters love irony, the bastards.
The ultimate hipster would probably wear something like this:
http://rlv.zcache.com/die_hipster_scum_tshirt-p235410750249420446y2px_400.jpg
Il Medico
4th September 2010, 20:41
The ultimate hipster would probably wear something like this:
http://rlv.zcache.com/die_hipster_scum_tshirt-p235410750249420446y2px_400.jpg
I have that shirt....fuck.
Pirate Utopian
4th September 2010, 20:42
And Hipsters love irony, the bastards.
It's ironic that you of all people call them bastards.
Il Medico
4th September 2010, 20:43
It's ironic that you of all people call them bastards.
Well, I do love irony.
Pirate Utopian
4th September 2010, 20:59
Hipster!
Il Medico
4th September 2010, 21:26
Hipster!
:scared: omg!
ed miliband
5th September 2010, 11:45
Most hipsters are useless...many will wear a Che short for example without knowing who he is, a Kaffiyeh, and will listen to "revolutionary" music 24/7 without any real revolutionary thought.
What the fuck? I have never, ever seen a "hipster" wear a Che Guevara shirt or a keffiyeh (in Britian at least keffiyehs are quite a mainstream fashion item now). I don't think any hipsters would be seen dead in either item of clothing, considering one actually identifiable element of being a hipster is having a sense of style, and Che t-shirts are especially lacking in sartorial appeal. Your point about the music is just ridiculous.
Where do people get this shit from?
The Red Next Door
5th September 2010, 15:52
What the fuck? I have never, ever seen a "hipster" wear a Che Guevara shirt or a keffiyeh (in Britian at least keffiyehs are quite a mainstream fashion item now). I don't think any hipsters would be seen dead in either item of clothing, considering one actually identifiable element of being a hipster is having a sense of style, and Che t-shirts are especially lacking in sartorial appeal. Your point about the music is just ridiculous.
Where do people get this shit from?
Experience ?
ed miliband
5th September 2010, 15:52
?
The Red Next Door
5th September 2010, 15:57
?
made correction above
bricolage
5th September 2010, 16:01
Most hipsters are useless...many will wear a Che short for example without knowing who he is, a Kaffiyeh, and will listen to "revolutionary" music 24/7 without any real revolutionary thought.
I'm more concerened about people who wear Che shirts having knowledge of who is, think a keffiyah is a coherent political statement and who listen to 'revolutionary' music... whilst claiming to have 'revolutionary' thought.
ed miliband
5th September 2010, 16:22
made correction above
Okay... let's say a man is dressed head-to-toe in pink and yellow, bright pink and yellow. Would you call this man a goth? Let's say a woman is dressed in a very smart suit and has short, clean hair. Would you call her a hippie? There is nothing to suggest that the man wearing pink and yellow is a goth, nor is there anything to suggest the woman wearing the suit is a hippie, and so presumably you would not call the man a goth or the woman a hippie?
If you saw somebody wearing a Che Guevara t-shirt and a keffiyeh what would make you assume they were a hipster? Go and have a look at the website lookbook.nu - you'll find a lot of hipster fashion, and do you see anybody wearing a Che t-shirt or whatever?
It just seems to me people will label anything they don't like as "hipster" if they think it has an air of pretension or could be considered "cool" (and honestly, there is nothing more uncool than Che Guevara t-shirts). I highly doubt that the people 'Christopher Hill' has complained about are actually "hipsters", and aren't just people he doesn't particularly like.
But yeah, go and look at lookbook, go and read hipster runoff and look at some tumblr blogs, visit American Apparel, Urban Outfitters or a vintage store. I bet you won't find anyone like 'Christopher Hill' has spoken about.
The Red Next Door
5th September 2010, 16:58
Okay... let's say a man is dressed head-to-toe in pink and yellow, bright pink and yellow. Would you call this man a goth? Let's say a woman is dressed in a very smart suit and has short, clean hair. Would you call her a hippie? There is nothing to suggest that the man wearing pink and yellow is a goth, nor is there anything to suggest the woman wearing the suit is a hippie, and so presumably you would not call the man a goth or the woman a hippie?
If you saw somebody wearing a Che Guevara t-shirt and a keffiyeh what would make you assume they were a hipster? Go and have a look at the website lookbook.nu - you'll find a lot of hipster fashion, and do you see anybody wearing a Che t-shirt or whatever?
It just seems to me people will label anything they don't like as "hipster" if they think it has an air of pretension or could be considered "cool" (and honestly, there is nothing more uncool than Che Guevara t-shirts). I highly doubt that the people 'Christopher Hill' has complained about are actually "hipsters", and aren't just people he doesn't particularly like.
But yeah, go and look at lookbook, go and read hipster runoff and look at some tumblr blogs, visit American Apparel, Urban Outfitters or a vintage store. I bet you won't find anyone like 'Christopher Hill' has spoken about.
I agree with you.
Obzervi
5th September 2010, 19:31
Most hipsters aren't serious about revolution. They are just doing it for the image participating in the capitalistic system at the same time. They are entrenched in White Privilege and drive out minorities from their own living areas through gentrification.
bricolage
5th September 2010, 20:10
Most hipsters aren't serious about revolution. They are just doing it for the image participating in the capitalistic system at the same time. They are entrenched in White Privilege and drive out minorities from their own living areas through gentrification.
fuck class struggle, fight the hipsters.
Il Medico
5th September 2010, 20:16
They are entrenched in White Privilege and drive out minorities from their own living areas through gentrification.
ummm....not all hipsters are white.
Bad Grrrl Agro
6th September 2010, 03:48
I think hipster boys are hot.
Who?
6th September 2010, 03:58
I think hipster boys are hot.
I have a total crush on Kevin Barnes. :wub:
But who doesn't these days?
The Douche
6th September 2010, 04:05
Okay... let's say a man is dressed head-to-toe in pink and yellow, bright pink and yellow. Would you call this man a goth? Let's say a woman is dressed in a very smart suit and has short, clean hair. Would you call her a hippie? There is nothing to suggest that the man wearing pink and yellow is a goth, nor is there anything to suggest the woman wearing the suit is a hippie, and so presumably you would not call the man a goth or the woman a hippie?
If you saw somebody wearing a Che Guevara t-shirt and a keffiyeh what would make you assume they were a hipster? Go and have a look at the website lookbook.nu - you'll find a lot of hipster fashion, and do you see anybody wearing a Che t-shirt or whatever?
It just seems to me people will label anything they don't like as "hipster" if they think it has an air of pretension or could be considered "cool" (and honestly, there is nothing more uncool than Che Guevara t-shirts). I highly doubt that the people 'Christopher Hill' has complained about are actually "hipsters", and aren't just people he doesn't particularly like.
But yeah, go and look at lookbook, go and read hipster runoff and look at some tumblr blogs, visit American Apparel, Urban Outfitters or a vintage store. I bet you won't find anyone like 'Christopher Hill' has spoken about.
Lol, AA and UO both have sold keffiyehs, until they came under fire for the politics of it. Che isn't very hipster, but keffiyehs are, and there are very different kinds of hipsters. I know people who meet the definition in my mind (irony, culture appropriation, fixed gear bikes, liberal arts study wtc) who look nothing alike fashion wise. Lookbook is a really fashionista kind of hipster place, and not representative of the everyday hipsters who ride bikes, drink cheap beer, read adbusters and go to college.
Il Medico
6th September 2010, 04:06
I have a total crush on Kevin Barnes. :wub:
But who doesn't these days?
qft
Bad Grrrl Agro
6th September 2010, 04:33
I have a total crush on Kevin Barnes. :wub:
But who doesn't these days?
crushes are overrated...
9
6th September 2010, 05:00
ummm....not all hipsters are white.
are you sure?
Il Medico
6th September 2010, 05:01
are you sure?
Yes.
Bad Grrrl Agro
6th September 2010, 05:06
Yes.
Seconded!
9
6th September 2010, 05:09
that's news to me :P
Bad Grrrl Agro
6th September 2010, 05:15
that's news to me :P
Get with the times, grandma.
9
6th September 2010, 05:19
I have never met a nonwhite hipster.
Bad Grrrl Agro
6th September 2010, 05:25
I have never met a nonwhite hipster.
I was seeing a guy who was a nonwhite hipster.
I was gong to point out that I'm Mexican American, but I don't consider myself a hipster.
Who?
6th September 2010, 05:25
I have never met a nonwhite hipster.
I used to be in a rock 'n' roll group with one. :thumbup1:
Il Medico
6th September 2010, 05:26
I have never met a nonwhite hipster.
Find them and meet them:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MPvDBGrKaXc/ShRU6DFqo9I/AAAAAAAAAlI/O27FaHzsido/s400/black-hipsters.jpg
Widerstand
6th September 2010, 05:29
Find them and meet them:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MPvDBGrKaXc/ShRU6DFqo9I/AAAAAAAAAlI/O27FaHzsido/s400/black-hipsters.jpg
dat style
Bad Grrrl Agro
6th September 2010, 05:30
Find them and meet them:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MPvDBGrKaXc/ShRU6DFqo9I/AAAAAAAAAlI/O27FaHzsido/s400/black-hipsters.jpg
The second guy from the right is really cute.
Il Medico
6th September 2010, 05:31
dat style
Indeed. The Guy in the Pea Coat is suave as hell.
Bad Grrrl Agro
6th September 2010, 05:32
Indeed. The Guy in the Pea Coat is suave as hell.
(Fans self)
Who?
6th September 2010, 05:35
I dig the guy on the far left's jacket.
Il Medico
6th September 2010, 05:39
(Fans self)
When I read that, this is what I imagined:
http://www.artfagcity.com/wordpress_core/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/southern-belle.jpg
I've been in the south too long when I associate fanning ones self with southern belles.
The Red Next Door
6th September 2010, 05:41
the second guy from the right is really cute.
lame
Os Cangaceiros
6th September 2010, 07:20
Hipsters are actually a pretty diverse group. There are plenty of bad things one can say against hipsters, but being racially homogenous is not one of them.
Bad Grrrl Agro
6th September 2010, 11:08
When I read that, this is what I imagined:
http://www.artfagcity.com/wordpress_core/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/southern-belle.jpg
I've been in the south too long when I associate fanning ones self with southern belles.
I always could see myself more as a high class mexican woman.
Ravachol
6th September 2010, 23:05
I have never met a nonwhite hipster.
There are actually plenty around here, especially amongst university educated immigrant youth.
9
7th September 2010, 01:49
There are actually plenty around here, especially amongst university educated immigrant youth.
Meh. It's probably because I live in the "White American Bastion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwestern_United_States)".
Raúl Duke
8th September 2010, 01:52
The creation of this thread was based on elitism- which is ironic- which means this thread is a hipster.
And Hipsters love irony, the bastards.
:lol::thumbup1:
Most hipsters are useless...many will wear a Che shirt for example without knowing who he is, a Kaffiyeh, and will listen to "revolutionary" music 24/7 without any real revolutionary thought.
In my experienceThat's not a hipster (che is overrated and if revolutionary music is RATM, hipsters will think it's trash), that which you describe is in fact the target demographic for this website, in my experience.
ummm....not all hipsters are white.
It's arguable that the majority are white, especially in specific areas. However, in places where one could claim there's a high hipster population, particularly Brooklyn, one can find immigrant and African American hipsters.
Even in my boondock area, I might have seen a few ethnic minority people who might be 'hipster' in some loose sense.
I have a total crush on Kevin Barnes. :wub:
But who doesn't these days?
:thumbup1::thumbup1::thumbup1:
Honggweilo
8th September 2010, 14:50
so people in flanel shirts are going to degrade the revolutionary movement more than crusties (no disrespect) or socially awkward leninists who would sooner talk to the first member of the working class they actually meet about dialectical materialism than how their day's been? Be easy.
Being 'hipster' doesn't imply adopting a specific ideology, even if you're going to be 'roughly speaking'. Especially as the term is often applied externally. The first time i heard the term was when i was called it. Ignorant of any alleged ideology that's attached. Obviously there are groups of people who are consumed entirely by the stereotypes of what a hipster is and let it dominate their personality and actions. But, a comrade's a comrade, regardless of how they dress.
For the record, i wouldn't exactly consider myself a hipster...
qft, people who call everyone with some cultural interest a "pretentious hipster artsy-farts" are just jealous talentless philistine losers
Honggweilo
8th September 2010, 15:18
all hail the king of leftist artsy-fartsy hipsterdom baby!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4foy9RuzMqE
CJCM
8th September 2010, 16:14
all hail the king of leftist artsy-fartsy hipsterdom baby!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4foy9RuzMqE
Ahh Hipsterism is Masochism?
Honggweilo
9th September 2010, 22:59
how is that remotely macho XD?
praxis1966
10th September 2010, 00:20
how is that remotely macho XD?
He said masochism, not machoism...:glare: Masochism is the act of deriving pleasure from pain. Anyway, I wish Sid Viscious were still around. He'd show that guy the real meaning of masochism and then kick his ass.
bcbm
10th September 2010, 02:56
Anyway, I wish Sid Viscious were still around. He'd show that guy the real meaning of masochism and then kick his ass.
nah he'd probably be too fucked on heroin
Bad Grrrl Agro
10th September 2010, 03:26
nah he'd probably be too fucked on heroin
yeah probably...
Pavlov's House Party
10th September 2010, 04:52
The ultimate hipster would probably wear something like this:
http://rlv.zcache.com/die_hipster_scum_tshirt-p235410750249420446y2px_400.jpg
wouldn't the ultimate hipster dress like a jock and join the army?
Honggweilo
10th September 2010, 08:40
I misread apperantly.. blame lysdexia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTbwCsjN4Ek
THE hipster themesong XD
also a good summary of hipsters :cool:
BeerShaman
10th September 2010, 11:55
I don't think we should discriminate against any individual group, so long as they help the cause.
Although I feel as if most hipsters are probably lifestylists than authentic revolutionaries, I'm not going to judge the whole group based on that perception. I'm sure there are plenty of authentically red comrades among the them.
Agreed!
BeerShaman
10th September 2010, 11:57
What the fuck? I have never, ever seen a "hipster" wear a Che Guevara shirt or a keffiyeh (in Britian at least keffiyehs are quite a mainstream fashion item now). I don't think any hipsters would be seen dead in either item of clothing, considering one actually identifiable element of being a hipster is having a sense of style, and Che t-shirts are especially lacking in sartorial appeal. Your point about the music is just ridiculous.
Where do people get this shit from?
You are all hipsters there. that's why!:lol:
Magón
10th September 2010, 23:09
He said masochism, not machoism...:glare: Masochism is the act of deriving pleasure from pain. Anyway, I wish Sid Viscious were still around. He'd show that guy the real meaning of masochism and then kick his ass.
More like showing the guy masochism, through kicking his ass! :thumbup1:
praxis1966
10th September 2010, 23:26
nah he'd probably be too fucked on heroin
He managed to kill Nancy's psychotic ass when he was fucked out of is mind on heroin, so I don't see why he wouldn't be able to take that hairless tool box.
I misread apperantly.. blame lysdexia
:lol:Well played, sir.
More like showing the guy masochism, through kicking his ass! :thumbup1:
:lol: Perhaps you're right...
ed miliband
11th September 2010, 07:19
This is a bit shit but also a bit good, and it's clearly made by people that actually know what hipsters are (and are probably actually hipsters themselves):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVmmYMwFj1I
When I got linked to it yesterday it had 301 views, now it's all over the net. Weird.
Honggweilo
11th September 2010, 21:03
He said masochism, not machoism...:glare: Masochism is the act of deriving pleasure from pain. Anyway, I wish Sid Viscious were still around. He'd show that guy the real meaning of masochism and then kick his ass.
Sid Vicious can bring it on, ill kick his ass anytime
Honggweilo
11th September 2010, 21:04
More like showing the guy masochism, through kicking his ass! :thumbup1:
:rolleyes:
Dimentio
11th September 2010, 21:14
I hate hipsters, but my new glasses would make me look like one.
In fact, I hate all subcultures :D
I'm always going out in black jeans, a leather jacket and a black t-shirt with some monster on it. When I go to leftist events, people who haven't seen me before automatically assume I'm some kind of fascist :D
Il Medico
11th September 2010, 21:18
I hate hipsters, but my new glasses would make me look like one.
In fact, I hate all subcultures :D
I'm always going out in black jeans, a leather jacket and a black t-shirt with some monster on it. When I go to leftist events, people who haven't seen me before automatically assume I'm some kind of fascist :D
Wait...
You hate hipsters.
And you wear ironic clothes.
......
Hipster!
Widerstand
11th September 2010, 21:42
Wait...
You hate hipsters.
And you wear ironic clothes.
......
Hipster!
I think he was being ironic.
Dimentio
11th September 2010, 22:32
Wait...
You hate hipsters.
And you wear ironic clothes.
......
Hipster!
I don't wear them because of any particular reason. I haven't really changed my clothing style at all.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.