Log in

View Full Version : Warning- Spart League working as spies for Feds



Dermezel
8th August 2010, 16:26
I know several people in the group, and I am warning other leftists right now that they are reporting information to the Feds in an attempt to purge what they call "fake leftists"/rivals. The argument is that "fake leftists" are more damaging then even right-wingers or the Federal government. Though I think there is more to it then that.

I do not disagree with all their politics, in fact I agree with the ideas of Permanent Revolution, but I think other leftist groups need a heads up about this shady cult.

Barry Lyndon
8th August 2010, 16:35
I know several people in the group, and I am warning other leftists right now that they are reporting information to the Feds in an attempt to purge what they call "fake leftists"/rivals. The argument is that "fake leftists" are more damaging then even right-wingers or the Federal government. Though I think there is more to it then that.

I do not disagree with all their politics, in fact I agree with the ideas of Permanent Revolution, but I think other leftist groups need a heads up about this shady cult.

No fan of the Sparts, but-

Evidence? That is a serious charge.

Sam_b
8th August 2010, 16:39
This accusation is nothing new, and it would be naive to think that there are no longer state monitors and infiltrators in revolutionary organisations.

Conquer or Die
9th August 2010, 22:42
This is nonsense. The Sparts are a joke in Los Angeles. I assume they're a joke everywhere else.

CIA doesn't give a fuck about the 4th international. CIA doesn't give that much of a fuck for Hugo Chavez. CIA ran out of fucks after they bungled Castro and Vietnam. Nobody is going to lend them any more fucks in the future unless they're killing indigenous people on oil land.

Bud Struggle
9th August 2010, 22:51
This is nonsense. The Sparts are a joke in Los Angeles. I assume they're a joke everywhere else.

CIA doesn't give a fuck about the 4th international. CIA doesn't give that much of a fuck for Hugo Chavez. CIA ran out of fucks after they bungled Castro and Vietnam. Nobody is going to lend them any more fucks in the future unless they're killing indigenous people on oil land.

I think that's pretty much true. I doubt the CIA is much afraid of RevLeft or any of the Internationals 1 thru 5 (I believe that was the last one.)

They have bigger fish to fry with sending drones to kill those pesky Moslems. There no money catching in Communists these days. :(

Barry Lyndon
9th August 2010, 23:25
This is nonsense. The Sparts are a joke in Los Angeles. I assume they're a joke everywhere else.

CIA doesn't give a fuck about the 4th international. CIA doesn't give that much of a fuck for Hugo Chavez. CIA ran out of fucks after they bungled Castro and Vietnam. Nobody is going to lend them any more fucks in the future unless they're killing indigenous people on oil land.

The CIA certainly gave enough of a 'fuck' for that 2002 coup, the 2003 oil strike, and a few assassination plots.

Conquer or Die
10th August 2010, 00:45
The CIA certainly gave enough of a 'fuck' for that 2002 coup, the 2003 oil strike, and a few assassination plots.

Yeah....... not so much. I'm sure an assassination plot was formulated by some guy deep in the recesses of the Pentagon who decided to justify his salary by not thinking of ways to kill muslims but Chavez has repeatedly conflated his own ego with the CIA. Chavez is no Castro, and if the CIA could take down Allende they could certainly riddle holes into Chavez.

Seriously though, nobody gives a fuck about the fourth international. I went to one of their meetings with a couple of friends and...... damnit, they were pathetic.

Victory
10th August 2010, 07:55
This is well-known.
Have you not seen how they want to practically legalise paedophilia?
They want to end the age limit to have sex and have shown support for;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man-Boy_Love_Association

RGacky3
10th August 2010, 10:06
Yeah....... not so much. I'm sure an assassination plot was formulated by some guy deep in the recesses of the Pentagon who decided to justify his salary by not thinking of ways to kill muslims but Chavez has repeatedly conflated his own ego with the CIA. Chavez is no Castro, and if the CIA could take down Allende they could certainly riddle holes into Chavez.

They took down Allende, and they tried to take down Chavez, they failed, and if they tried and failed again it would be such an embarrasment, but "your sure" part of that paragraph is just you wanting it to be sure. I'm pretty sure the biggest socialist in the Americas is on America's raydar.

Conquer or Die
10th August 2010, 19:36
They took down Allende, and they tried to take down Chavez, they failed, and if they tried and failed again it would be such an embarrasment, but "your sure" part of that paragraph is just you wanting it to be sure. I'm pretty sure the biggest socialist in the Americas is on America's raydar.

Just like those terrorist funding monarchists in Saudi Arabia.

Oh, fucking wait, that's actually not the case :rolleyes:

Ned Kelly
11th August 2010, 09:21
This is a serious charge but would not surprise me at all, the Spart League in Australia are well known for their determination to attack all other left groups whilst seemingly leaving the right alone.

RGacky3
11th August 2010, 10:37
Just like those terrorist funding monarchists in Saudi Arabia.

Oh, fucking wait, that's actually not the case :rolleyes:

Except they fund fox news and make American corporations money :), (America really does'nt give a rats ass about terrorism, if they did they would be out of most of the middle east, that would kill terrorist organizations)

Bud Struggle
11th August 2010, 15:23
Except they fund fox news and make American corporations money :), (America really does'nt give a rats ass about terrorism, if they did they would be out of most of the middle east, that would kill terrorist organizations)

Half right. If there were no oil in the middle east--the US wouldn't be there. The US cares about terrorism because it affects our supply of oil. Without the oil there would be no US involvment and it wouldn't matter if ther eas terrorism or not.

Of course the Radical Moslems are nuts, too--so that doesn't help matters.

RGacky3
11th August 2010, 16:57
Your right, I should rephrase, the Unied States does'nt care about terrorism in of itself.

It affects the oil supply when it comes to Iraq (if you consider insurgents terrorists, which I do not), but in the rest of the world, its really just the symbol of resistance and independance which matters, which if it effects the countries that have oil, will affect the United States oil supply.

Its similar to Socialists in Latin America, what scares the US the most is the attidude of independance and autohomy from the US, which is why a socialist in a dirt poor country where the US does'nt have much economic interest will be opposed vigorously, because the attitude is dangerous to corporate interests.

That being said, Radical Muslims are nuts, but you oppress people long enough, sometimes they listen to nutty people, before imperialism radical islam was really a fringe minority.