Log in

View Full Version : Fort Hood soldiers protest repeated deployments



Rusty Shackleford
8th August 2010, 02:03
http://www.pslweb.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=14341&news_iv_ctrl=1261

The author is an Iraq war veteran and co-founder of March Forward!. To read more statements from March Forward!, click here (http://www.marchforward.org/)
http://www.pslweb.org/images/content/pagebuilder/64673.jpg
GIs, veterans, military families and supporters
picket outside Ft. Hood While Pres. Obama is touting the Iraq war as all but over, thousands of soldiers continue to be sent to patrol Iraq’s streets, where violence is climbing to its highest level in two years.
Among those thousands of GIs are a very large number who have previously been deployed, and as a result are suffering psychological trauma.
The rising trend of active-duty military suicides culminated in June with the highest monthly total in U.S. military history. There is no debate over the cause of the suicide epidemic: repeated deployments with severely inadequate treatment in between.
The U.S. military has been exposed for intentionally denying GIs a post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis to keep the number of deployable troops at a high level. But even those who are diagnosed with PTSD, traumatic brain injury, or military sexual trauma (as a result of sexual harassment or sexual assault during military service) are not exempt from deployment. The Army and Marines are sending wounded troops with recognized psychological trauma from previous deployments on more tours.
Sending traumatized soldiers back to the place they were traumatized to endure another grueling tour, further deepening their wounds, is the type of cruel treatment of GIs that has characterized the handling of the wars by the generals and politicians.
GIs stand up and fight back
One of the units notorious for sending PTSD casualties on deployment after deployment is the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment at Fort Hood, Texas. As Obama seeks applause for “ending” the war in Iraq, there are busloads of GIs suffering from PTSD, TBI and MST waiting to ship off to another tour in Iraq this month.
For this deployment, however, Fort Hood soldiers have begun standing up. Soldiers inside the unit are reporting a bleak situation regarding the mental health of many of its troops, and have begun organizing with other veterans and supporters to inspire those troops to exercise their right to refuse to let their lives be thrown away.
On July 30, approximately 30 active-duty soldiers, veterans, military families and supporters held a rally outside the gates of Fort Hood with a large banner directed at Colonel Allen, commander of 3rd ACR, which read “Col. Allen … Do Not Deploy Wounded Soldiers!” Demonstrators also carried placards that read: “Tell the brass: Kiss my ass!” and “They lie, we die!”
The demonstration was at a main entry point for the base, so thousands of active-duty GIs and their families passed by the demonstration. Many also joined. Fort Hood Military Police sent vehicles and troops to intimidate the demonstrators, fearing a growing movement. Soldiers at Fort Hood have held several similar protests in the past, each time bringingin new GIs into the movement.
The protest was organized from Under the Hood café, an anti-war GI coffee house off base. One of the organizers of the protest, Michael Kern, is an active-duty soldier at Fort Hood and a member of March Forward!. After coming home from Iraq with PTSD and TBI, and facing being sent on more deployments, he became active in the anti-war movement.
“We’re not out here protesting our brothers and sisters in 3rd ACR,” he says. “We’re here to stand with them, but to stand with them against the brass. The officers have proven that they don’t care about our lives. We’re out here to tell those soldiers about to deploy that they have the right to resist being used and mistreated.”
This protest coincides with mounting frustration and plummeting morale throughout the U.S. military as a result of repeated deployments to two brutal, colonial-type occupations. GIs everywhere are organizing against the criminal mistreatment of veterans, and against the crime of sending us to die for the oil giants, the military-industrial complex and the banks.
The only way psychologically wounded soldiers will receive the treatment they deserve, and the only way to prevent thousands more from being killed and wounded in these wars, is if GIs take our lives into our own hands—to stand up and fight together against the chain of command, which has proven to be incapable of justly deciding our fate. That is what is happening at Fort Hood and throughout the military

Im honestly so glad to see soldiers stand up for themselves. A Friend of mine is involved in the veterans movement as well and so i feel a bit of a connection to this.

The Douche
8th August 2010, 04:29
How is march forward not a competing organization with IVAW? Why is it a good idea to split the veterns movement? I'm an IVAW member (inactive), and I'm all for a politically radical veterans movement, but this just seems like PSL decided to start their own cause they couldn't dominate IVAW.

Rusty Shackleford
8th August 2010, 04:58
How is march forward not a competing organization with IVAW? Why is it a good idea to split the veterns movement? I'm an IVAW member (inactive), and I'm all for a politically radical veterans movement, but this just seems like PSL decided to start their own cause they couldn't dominate IVAW.
how would i know. i didnt create it i didnt even know about it until today.

The Douche
8th August 2010, 05:00
how would i know. i didnt create it.

You're a PSL member? Its your party, and your party's front group. Shouldn't you be able to defend it?

Rusty Shackleford
8th August 2010, 05:05
You're a PSL member? Its your party, and your party's front group. Shouldn't you be able to defend it?


I cant really comment on it. I dont know the dynamics of the veterans movement and im still a candidate.

i could imagine that the IAVA may have been too slow to address the issue? Certainly this organization would also happen to be more progressive than others and possibly more to the point.

EDIT: Looks like the IAVA as a political entity seeks reform and will get reform. March Forward! Seeks revolution, whether it gets it or not is up in the air. I have a friend in the IAVA, i can talk to him about the two, im sure he knows much. Ive been interested in the veterans movement but had no idea about the political forces within it.

The Red Next Door
8th August 2010, 05:34
I cant really comment on it. I dont know the dynamics of the veterans movement and im still a candidate.

i could imagine that the IAVA may have been too slow to address the issue? Certainly this organization would also happen to be more progressive than others and possibly more to the point.

EDIT: Looks like the IAVA as a political entity seeks reform and will get reform. March Forward! Seeks revolution, whether it gets it or not is up in the air. I have a friend in the IAVA, i can talk to him about the two, im sure he knows much. Ive been interested in the veterans movement but had no idea about the political forces within it.

I learn about it, at the conference i went to.

Rusty Shackleford
8th August 2010, 05:35
I learn about it, at the conference i went to.
which conference?

The Douche
8th August 2010, 05:39
Yeah IVAW is officially non-politically aligned, but the leadership is dominated by socialists in many areas.

Is march forward actually, openly political, and actually calling for revolution?

Kassad
8th August 2010, 05:42
You're a PSL member? Its your party, and your party's front group. Shouldn't you be able to defend it?

Iraq Veterans Against the War tends to take liberal positions on some issues, which is why the ANSWER Coalition felt it necessary to promote a different organization which takes an unconditional anti-imperialist standpoint. If you have any other questions, contact March Forward! at the e-mail they have provided. We do deeply apologize that some organizations have taken a liberal trend, but we also realize the alternatizes that need to be taken to promote an anti-imperialist movement against the war.

The Douche
8th August 2010, 05:50
I read the 10 point program for March Forward, I like it. I would probably join if I thought it would do any good.

Lolshevik
8th August 2010, 07:35
I dunno if membership in both March Forward! and IVAW is allowed but in either case I wouldn't frame it as an issue of "communist front group versus grassroots activists." March Forward! clearly has the more advanced program here, it serves as a pole of attraction for those elements who want to get active but don't have time for liberalism... I wouldn't say the two groups are enemies though, in fact in these cases the more militant group can sometimes pull the reformist group into a stronger, more left direction by the force of its example.

Rusty Shackleford
8th August 2010, 07:47
Im sure IAVA also includes the officers corps and brass. I read their article on BP and it seems like one of the first things they are worried about is BP and some terrorist. not the root cause of the problem.

The Douche
8th August 2010, 15:17
Yeah, if you notice, in my last post I clearly say that I like the 10 point program, and membership in both groups is allowed, apparently March Forward was started by some people involved in IVAW.

And I never accused it of being "communist front group vs. grassroots activists". I had not been shown MF's program, so I wasn't aware that they actually have revolutionary demands.

Like I said, I would join if I thought it would mean something.

KurtFF8
8th August 2010, 15:42
Also MF is much smaller than IVAW from what I understand, although I'm not too familiar with the politics of groups like these so I don't know what the relationship that MF has to the anti-war veteran movement as a whole.

Kassad
8th August 2010, 18:26
Also MF is much smaller than IVAW from what I understand, although I'm not too familiar with the politics of groups like these so I don't know what the relationship that MF has to the anti-war veteran movement as a whole.

March Forward! is an affiliate of the ANSWER Coalition. Read about them on the website. Obviously, it's much smaller because it has only been around for around a year. They were founded after the March 21st, 2009 Pentagon march, if I recall correctly. Unlike IVAW, March Forward! takes a strictly anti-imperialist viewpoint and also demands things like healthcare and education, not war. They also stand in solidarity with resistance forces standing up to US imperialism, along as war resisters. IVAW has some pretty liberal standpoints, which is why March Forward! was founded in the first place.

The Red Next Door
9th August 2010, 07:38
which conference?
socialism in may

AK
9th August 2010, 08:21
This would be so cool if it developed into something like what happened in Vietnam.
http://libcom.org/history/vietnam-gi-resistance

The Douche
9th August 2010, 14:44
Well, I joined.:thumbup1:

Rusty Shackleford
13th August 2010, 05:11
ha, the whole time you were talking about IVAW when i thought you were talking about IAVA. wow.