Log in

View Full Version : Nepal fails to elect new PM for a fourth time



Chimurenga.
6th August 2010, 23:53
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-10898117

Politicians in Nepal have again failed to elect a new prime minister.

The country has been without a leader since Madhav Kumar Nepal stepped down more than a month ago.
He said that political in-fighting between his coalition government and opposition Maoist MPs meant he was unable to function.
It is the fourth time parliament has failed to nominate a new PM. A fifth round of voting has now been set for 18 August.
The result comes despite high hopes that the fourth round of voting in parliament would be successful.
Although Maoist leader Pushpa Kamal Dahal - or Prachanda - won more votes than his rival from the Nepali Congress party, it was still not enough to secure a majority.

Power vacuum

This is because many of the smaller parties abstained from voting, saying they felt neither candidate was acceptable.
Earlier this week, the Indian government sent an envoy to Nepal to help try to broker a deal between the three main parties that dominate politics in the country, but even this was not enough to break the stalemate.
Many parliamentarians say they have lost faith in the selection process.
"My view is these three parties should stay away from the government and focus on the constitution," said MP Sunil Pant, "and someone from the smaller parties, maybe from the young generation or women, should be a good candidate."
As time passes, there are fears that a prolonged power vacuum could weaken the state and lead to increased instability in a country recovering from a long civil conflict.

Homo Songun
8th August 2010, 08:35
If the UML and the Madeshi continue to abstain, then the power vacuum will cause the CA to become increasingly irrelevant, leading to a either a de facto UML ("caretaker") dictatorship or presidential Congress rule. Either way the old system is further de-legitimatized. Maoists win.

On the other hand, if the UML or the Madeshi cave and vote Prachanda, the
Maoists are placed back into power and they call the shots on the re-writing of the constitution. The UML and Congress of course will block the Maoists at every turn and be seen as feudal throwbacks and be further de-legitimatized. Maoists win.

If the Maoists "cave" and put up Bhattarai as a compromise candidate the
Maoists are placed back into power and they call the shots on the re-writing of the constitution. The UML and Congress of course will block the Maoists at every turn and be seen as feudal throwbacks and be further de-legitimatized. Maoists win. (However, if the basis of the incipient split is not mostly a subterfuge then there may be problems down the road.)

If the Maoist "split" is a fact and the UML and Congress peel the Bhattarites away from the UCPNM into a "left unity" government, then the Maoists lose.

Saorsa
8th August 2010, 12:55
^ Pretty much.

However real the differences are between Bhattarai and Prachanda, and we have no idea if these differences even exist, I very much doubt we'll see an actual split.

Chimurenga.
8th August 2010, 23:40
^ Pretty much.

However real the differences are between Bhattarai and Prachanda, and we have no idea if these differences even exist, I very much doubt we'll see an actual split.

I hope not.

I'm still kind of pessimistic as to them winning in elections.

The Vegan Marxist
9th August 2010, 01:03
I hope not.

I'm still kind of pessimistic as to them winning in elections.

I don't think they'll win either. Sooner or later, I believe they'll see that violent resistance may be the last hope for the Maoists to take control again.