Log in

View Full Version : Unreported killings of Afghan civilians, deathsquad reports released from Wikileaks



Adi Shankara
26th July 2010, 01:59
from BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-10757344

Hidden US Afghan war details' revealed by Wikileaks

More than 90,000 leaked US military records have been published on the website Wikileaks, reportedly revealing hidden details of the Afghanistan war.

Three major news publications which have been shown the documents say they include unreported killings of Afghan civilians.
The huge cache of classified papers is decribed as one of the biggest leaks in US military history.


The White House has condemned the leaks as "irresponsible".


Reports by the UK daily The Guardian, the New York Times and the German weekly Der Spiegel say the leaked papers (http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Afghan_War_Diary,_2004-2010)reveal Nato concerns that neighbouring Pakistan and Iran are helping Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan.


The Pakistani ambassador in Washington said the "unprocessed" reports did "not reflect the current onground realities".
"The United States, Afghanistan and Pakistan are strategic partners and are jointly endeavoring to defeat Al-Qaeda and its Taliban allies militarily and politically," said Husain Haqqani.
The reports also suggest:


The Taliban has had access to portable heat-seeking missiles to shoot at aircraft.
A secret US unit of army and navy special forces has been engaged on missions to "capture or kill" top insurgents.
Many civilian casualties have gone unreported, both as a result of Taliban roadside bombs and Nato missions that went wrong.

The BBC's diplomatic correspondent Bridget Kendall says that although the documents reveal no dramatic new insights, they show the difficulties of the war and the civilan death toll.
The reports offer an unvarnished and grim picture of the Afghan war, she adds.
In a statement, US National Security Adviser Gen James Jones said such classified information "could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk, and threaten our national security".
He said the documents covered the period from 2004 to 2009, before President Obama "announced a new strategy with a substantial increase in resources for Afghanistan".
'Civilian deaths' Another US official said that Wikileaks - which specialises in making public untraceable material from whistleblowers - was not an objective news outlet and described it as an organisation that opposes US policy in Afghanistan.
Wikileaks is releasing the set of documents under the title Afghan War Diary. It says is has delayed the release of about 15,000 reports from the archive as part of a "harm minimisation process demanded by our source".
The Guardian and the New York Times say they had no contact with the original source of the leak, but spent weeks crosschecking the information.
The reports come as Nato says it is investigating reports that as many as 45 civilians died in an air strike in Helmand province on Friday.
Although an initial Nato investigation found no evidence, a BBC journalist visiting Regey village spoke to several people who said they had witnessed the incident.
They said the attack had come in daylight as dozens sheltered from fighting in nearby Joshani.
A Nato spokesman said international forces went to great measures to avoid civilian casualties.
"The safety of the Afghan people is very important to the International Security Assistance Forces," Lt Col Chris Hughes added.

The Vegan Marxist
26th July 2010, 02:21
Yes, going through the war logs right now. This is absolutely sickening, yet I'm not surprised. I'm helping in distributing all the leaked documents on my news page. It's going by "year-month (number of documents)": http://redantliberationarmy.wordpress.com/the-war-diary-the-afghan-war-exposed/

IllicitPopsicle
26th July 2010, 03:47
Related: I fuckin' love Wikileaks. :D

theAnarch
26th July 2010, 13:35
Gee..i kinda wonder why these people don't just rally around the kharzi government:blink:

punisa
27th July 2010, 09:57
Do you believe Wikileaks.org to be a rebel internet guerrilla that will show the world the top secret documents or is it some sort of media spin?
They published over 90,000 documents, but so far we haven't seen any real impact.
What is to be expected of this? And what sort of people run this show? I have some doubts as to what the founder recently said - is it possible that he or a group of people would dwell into this without some sort of ideology behind it?

I guess my confusion is similar as to the recent demonstrations in my country: let's protest and change everything, but we don't have a clue towards what.

Adi Shankara
27th July 2010, 09:59
Do you believe Wikileaks.org to be a rebel internet guerrilla that will show the world the top secret documents or is it some sort of media spin?
They published over 90,000 documents, but so far we haven't seen any real impact.


There hasn't been a real media impact because there are 90,000 documents and they are still being examined by the media and those who can pull strings. trust me, Wikileaks is such a serious threat to the power structure, the CIA plotted to destroy them in a covert operation:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barrett-brown/cia-state-department-appa_b_512050.html

LimitedIdeology
28th July 2010, 16:17
To be honest, none of the preliminary information surprises me.

The MIC covering its asses in official press reports to keep those stocks up!

The Guy
28th July 2010, 16:20
I think this is what MaoistRebelNews was trying to get at.

TOAHbUPH-M4

Red Commissar
28th July 2010, 16:28
I wonder what the apologists are doing. They came out in full force with the Iraqi chopper video.

We should try as hard as we can to make sure this is spread and people are aware of it, and prevent it from being buried like the chopper vid was.

Adi Shankara
28th July 2010, 20:27
I wonder what the apologists are doing. They came out in full force with the Iraqi chopper video.

We should try as hard as we can to make sure this is spread and people are aware of it, and prevent it from being buried like the chopper vid was.

They're busy in full force, defending NATO-led terror, under the guise that "it will cost lives the more attention is paid to these leaked documents" (even though if the USA and UK played by the book in the first place, there would be no reason for this to even be a concern).

Fedorov
29th July 2010, 05:47
Just as a side note, is anyone actually surprised by the information in this leak? I thought most people would assume this of just about any war, especially one waged by the US.

durhamleft
29th July 2010, 13:00
Just as a side note, is anyone actually surprised by the information in this leak? I thought most people would assume this of just about any war, especially one waged by the US.

Always nice to be told you're right.