Log in

View Full Version : Unusual things which turn you on



Pages : [1] 2

ContrarianLemming
22nd July 2010, 07:14
Unusual things which turn you on.

go on, tell us

Invincible Summer
22nd July 2010, 08:29
Gulags

http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/gulags2.jpg
















... and women who speak with French accents (both France French and Quebec French), really sleek track bikes, and women's lower back area where there's that little curve, and really sexy groovy electronic music.

Blackscare
22nd July 2010, 08:37
English accents.

Sasha
22nd July 2010, 08:42
women with powertools

AK
22nd July 2010, 09:02
Lenin's shiny balding head.

The Feral Underclass
22nd July 2010, 09:30
I came into this thread with the intention of providing a serious answer.

Anyway, this particular, unsual look in a man gets me all moist.

http://mathfactor.uark.edu/wp-content/uploads/us-gurnereast-dublin-georgia.jpg

Sperm-Doll Setsuna
22nd July 2010, 09:31
Scat.

owait, we weren't supposed to give serious answers? :blink:

AK
22nd July 2010, 09:34
Scat.

owait, we weren't supposed to give serious answers? :blink:
Stalinists get turned on by scat - proof at last!

al8
22nd July 2010, 09:35
Young women in bright red coats riding bikes - nothing has more of an air of sex, independence and freedom to itself than that. Oh man getting all dreamy just thinking about it.

Saorsa
22nd July 2010, 10:00
Monogamous long term relationships

Muzk
22nd July 2010, 10:13
porn

Taikand
22nd July 2010, 11:13
Monogamous long term relationships
Couldn't agree more.

Qayin
22nd July 2010, 11:17
sex

The Feral Underclass
22nd July 2010, 11:46
I am a vorarephile.

Terminator X
22nd July 2010, 12:15
Fat chicks.

EDIT: Ok, OK, that was a little harsh. Lets just say I'm into plump, "thick" young women.

The Feral Underclass
22nd July 2010, 12:19
Fat chicks.

Being turned on by overweight, infant poultry is very unusual.

Terminator X
22nd July 2010, 12:25
Being turned on by overweight, infant poultry is very unusual.

Well that is the idea of the thread though, no? :cool:

Sperm-Doll Setsuna
22nd July 2010, 12:29
Stalinists get turned on by scat - proof at last!

I doubt I'm representative! I also much fancy cute boys in women's garments. And some, uh, more disturbing things that that. :wub:

AK
22nd July 2010, 13:12
I doubt I'm representative! I also much fancy cute boys in women's garments. And some, uh, more disturbing things that that. :wub:
Like fancy cute boys in women's garments eating poop? Boy that's a weird mental image.

ContrarianLemming
22nd July 2010, 13:16
and women's lower back area where there's that little curve

YES

http://www.tattoo-designs-4u.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/startattoolowerback-267x300.jpg

ContrarianLemming
22nd July 2010, 13:17
Monogamous long term relationships

freak

Comrade Awesome
22nd July 2010, 13:17
Consensual sex in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation.

Sperm-Doll Setsuna
22nd July 2010, 13:58
Like fancy cute boys in women's garments eating poop? Boy that's a weird mental image.

Oh you, now you're making me horny.

leftace53
22nd July 2010, 14:05
Normalcy. Normal people turn me on these days.

Terminator X
22nd July 2010, 14:08
Normalcy. Normal people turn me on these days.

Define "normalcy" :confused:

piet11111
22nd July 2010, 16:34
YES

http://www.tattoo-designs-4u.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/startattoolowerback-267x300.jpg

This and women that can confidently drive motorcycles or off road vehicles (bonus if actually off road.)

Il Medico
22nd July 2010, 16:43
Getting asked what turns me on by a stranger over the internet. Hot shit right there!

Uppercut
22nd July 2010, 16:49
Hoxha always helps me get my rocks off.
http://apk2000.dk/netavisen/billeder/mels/hoxha_ww2.jpg

Mmmm fuck yeah

leftace53
22nd July 2010, 16:51
Define "normalcy" :confused:

Conformism at its finest. A masculine man who enjoys watching sports and has a 9-5 job in an office where he must look professional. No body mods, someone who pays their taxes on time, and someone who votes liberal.

mollymae
22nd July 2010, 17:32
consensual sex in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation.

that's a fucked up fetish man you deserve to go to prison

Terminator X
22nd July 2010, 17:36
Conformism at its finest. A masculine man who enjoys watching sports and has a 9-5 job in an office where he must look professional. No body mods, someone who pays their taxes on time, and someone who votes liberal.

And these are desirable qualities? Who knew? :)

manic expression
22nd July 2010, 17:38
Girls are always prettier when they're reading a book. Fact.

praxis1966
22nd July 2010, 17:40
Punk girls. Well, any hyper aggressive slightly unhinged woman really. I like the idea of a woman who's just as likely to sock you in the teeth as look at you.

Jazzhands
22nd July 2010, 17:45
http://www.lolbats.com/bathaw.jpg

danyboy27
22nd July 2010, 17:46
your mom.

ed miliband
22nd July 2010, 17:47
Girls are always prettier when they're reading a book. Fact.

Except if they're reading Ayn Rand.

Qayin
22nd July 2010, 20:23
Girls are always prettier when they're reading a book. Fact.

So you see a girl reading twilight...

NoOneIsIllegal
22nd July 2010, 20:26
http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/7/7e/Hankgasm.jpg

The Feral Underclass
22nd July 2010, 20:32
None of the things listed are really that unusual.

You people are really fucking vanilla.

praxis1966
22nd July 2010, 20:54
None of the things listed are really that unusual.

You people are really fucking vanilla.

It's not our fault you're a wierdo.

StoneFrog
22nd July 2010, 21:08
women covered in red ribbon, so that we both become bound within the ribbon.

Edit: and strong eyes, drives me crazy =P

Weezer
22nd July 2010, 21:29
I have a Crush Fetish.

A crush fetish is a desire to see small insects or animals crushed to death. Inanimate objects, such as cigarettes, fruit or toy cars, can also be crush fetish stimuli. The legality of crush erotica and the actual practice of crushing varies by region. There are currently no known laws forbidding the crushing of objects and insects, however the production or trade of crush erotica involving live vertebrates is condemned by animal rights activists and is illegal in many countries including the United States and Great Britain.

Rusty Shackleford
22nd July 2010, 21:33
pocket lint and that dust that collects on fan blades generally give me a raging clue.

Muzk
22nd July 2010, 21:45
I came into this thread with the intention of providing a serious answer.

Anyway, this particular, unsual look in a man gets me all moist.

http://mathfactor.uark.edu/wp-content/uploads/us-gurnereast-dublin-georgia.jpg

http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/6721/moist.jpg

Panda Tse Tung
22nd July 2010, 21:46
Girls are always prettier when they're reading a book. Fact.
This, if they have glasses.
I know, cliche...
edit: actually, come to think of it. It works without glasses as well.

Tablo
22nd July 2010, 21:57
I like mutilation..

Jazzratt
22nd July 2010, 23:05
Farting (sometimes, I don't just pop a boner whenever I or someone in my immediate vicinity guffs) and wrenching pains (such as one would get from being in an armlock, if I'm using the right term).

Bright Banana Beard
22nd July 2010, 23:45
Girls drinking bacardi and smoking weed at the same time, as long they ain't fat or overly ugly.

Il Medico
23rd July 2010, 00:02
Okay, I'll be serious now. A brawl between me and my lover. Nothing like getting punched in the face right before hot sex followed by heavy drinking.

Terminator X
23rd July 2010, 00:26
Axillary intercourse.

scarletghoul
23rd July 2010, 01:04
I like girls with big noses. Like, really big. Umm thats about it. ohh and girls dressed as living dead. and i wouldnt mind being mutilated by a catgirl.

nice variety there

scarletghoul
23rd July 2010, 01:05
Girls are always prettier when they're reading a book. Fact.
http://mikeely.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/marxism-study.jpg
You should be a Maoist. There's more where this comes from

Lenina Rosenweg
23rd July 2010, 01:14
This

http://www.marksowul.com/images/apoc.jpg

http://www.militarymodelling.com/sites/1/images/article_images_month/2009-07/soviettankunits%20(1).jpg

http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2008/10/23/633603568579775782-ak47.jpg

http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z259/prettyboy816/ak47_01.jpg

Lenina Rosenweg
23rd July 2010, 01:27
I doubt I'm representative! I also much fancy cute boys in women's garments. And some, uh, more disturbing things that that. :wub:

What are you wearing now?

Jazzhands
23rd July 2010, 02:08
http://mikeely.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/marxism-study.jpg
You should be a Maoist. There's more where this comes from

Chinese girls ftw

Uppercut
23rd July 2010, 03:33
i wouldnt mind being mutilated by a catgirl
http://bouquet100.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/10165cosplay_-_neko_girl.jpg

al8
23rd July 2010, 04:02
Mutilation isn't even sex, how can it possibly be hot!?

Ele'ill
23rd July 2010, 04:06
http://youknowwhatwe.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/velociraptor.jpg

Manifesto
23rd July 2010, 04:43
Women workers. Whether it be from a field to a factory to an office.

ContrarianLemming
23rd July 2010, 04:59
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_8QIXHkkTVBk/RkJEpCs6QDI/AAAAAAAAACc/MuV0pG2yPeo/s320/krystal.jpg

Chimurenga.
23rd July 2010, 06:29
http://bouquet100.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/10165cosplay_-_neko_girl.jpg

Rawr.

Sperm-Doll Setsuna
23rd July 2010, 06:45
What are you wearing now?

http://i25.tinypic.com/1239mis.png

Tablo
23rd July 2010, 06:51
Mutilation isn't even sex, how can it possibly be hot!?
Trust me, when you and your partner start cutting each other up with razor blades and punching needles through your nipples things start getting really hot. Or maybe that is just me... been a year since I did that since most girls aren't into it. :lol:

The Fighting_Crusnik
23rd July 2010, 06:54
http://i25.tinypic.com/1239mis.png

That is fricken hot...

For whatever reason I am turned on by people who are bloody and bruised after a fight and tom boys.

Tablo
23rd July 2010, 06:58
Only visual kei guy I like is Hizaki. He's soooo pretty! :blushing:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/Yashila/Maghi%20Stregoni%20Fanfic/Dame/hizaki350.jpg

Sperm-Doll Setsuna
23rd July 2010, 07:04
Trust me, when you and your partner start cutting each other up with razor blades and punching needles through your nipples things start getting really hot. Or maybe that is just me... been a year since I did that since most girls aren't into it. :lol:

That is quite hot indeed. :thumbup1:

Pretty Flaco
23rd July 2010, 07:09
Twilight. Nothing is sexier than that Edward Cullen!

ContrarianLemming
23rd July 2010, 07:41
Twilight. Nothing is sexier than that Edward Cullen!

Die.

The Ben G
23rd July 2010, 07:43
Crust Punk and Sexy Women. And Tom Warrior and Martin Eric Ain tuned in B.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rr-vXLRsE_Y&feature=related

AK
23rd July 2010, 07:47
twilight. Nothing is sexier than that edward cullen!

g.t.f.o.

AK
23rd July 2010, 07:48
http://mikeely.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/marxism-study.jpg
You should be a Maoist. There's more where this comes from
All of a sudden I am tempted to become a Maoist.

Pretty Flaco
23rd July 2010, 08:16
Die.


g.t.f.o.


Yeah, I like my women to sparkle in the sunlight, have no emotion, and to be the product of a middleaged woman's wetdream: so what?

Chambered Word
23rd July 2010, 09:47
Seagulls choking to death.

Invincible Summer
23rd July 2010, 10:27
All of a sudden I am tempted to become a Maoist.


In my experience, most Chinese people (at least here) think very poorly of Maoism. Internalization of propaganda I suppose. Then again, around here, the diaspora is primarily Hong Kong and Taiwanese migrants, and the latter have a historical beef with Mao so...

Quite a few people from "mainland" China that I've talked to seem pretty supportive of "Mao Zedong thought" though, although they wouldn't consider themselves communists.

ed miliband
23rd July 2010, 10:44
http://www.bobbywisecriticism.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/la-chinoise-1967-scene-02.jpg

Adi Shankara
23rd July 2010, 11:15
sexually: I get turned by pubic hair. I'm not talking an untrimmed wild forest--I just like it when a girl is unshaven. I also am really into M/s (master/slave) power play (and every relationship I've been in for some time has reflected this dynamic), rape fantasies, and "erotic humiliation".

(god, if Thomas Sankara was alive to see this, he'd curse me for sullying his name).

on-sexually, I'm a sucker for accents, esp. Indian accents. something that makes me go "damn hot" and "aww" at the same time when a girl has an accent as if she is from New Delhi. also hot: girls who love debating long meaningless conversations into the night, girls who dress hyper-feminine (I love it when they wear skirts, dresses, etc.) and girls who can be considered more "cute" than sexy or hot.

EDIT: the kind've M/s shit I'm into is more along the lines of Kajira, just, without the creepy names and tattoos and shit.

Sugar Hill Kevis
23rd July 2010, 11:58
foreign chicks; chiefly black/latina.

Il Medico
23rd July 2010, 12:28
Twilight. Nothing is sexier than that Edward Cullen!
I'd inclined to agree with you, if what you said wasn't a load of rubbish.

meow
23rd July 2010, 13:18
intelectual sophisticated conversation.
doesnt matter what topic.

of course i have to be actually capable of being attracted to the person in the first place. but it turns me on. bus to and from work with this one person. ooooh. hot.

The Feral Underclass
23rd July 2010, 14:11
Why do men keep using the word "chick" to describe women?

eyedrop
23rd July 2010, 14:12
I got no idea what turns me on and try not to analyse it to much so it stays mostly a mystery.

Those few times I've been in church during funerals, marriages and confirmations (or whatever you call that thing when you become an "adult") I always get bloodfilled downstairs. I'm not sure if that is anything specifically to do with sermons or if I get bored and start fantasizing to entertain myself.

AK
23rd July 2010, 14:20
You get hard during funerals? What the fuck?

ContrarianLemming
23rd July 2010, 14:40
Why do men keep using the word "chick" to describe women?

Silence, men are talking.

bailey_187
23rd July 2010, 14:49
Why do men keep using the word "chick" to describe women?

why do northern women call men "lads"?

we will never know

bailey_187
23rd July 2010, 14:50
sexually: I get turned by pubic hair. I'm not talking an untrimmed wild forest--I just like it when a girl is unshaven. I also am really into M/s (master/slave) power play (and every relationship I've been in for some time has reflected this dynamic), rape fantasies, and "erotic humiliation".

(god, if Thomas Sankara was alive to see this, he'd curse me for sullying his name).

on-sexually, I'm a sucker for accents, esp. Indian accents. something that makes me go "damn hot" and "aww" at the same time when a girl has an accent as if she is from New Delhi. also hot: girls who love debating long meaningless conversations into the night, girls who dress hyper-feminine (I love it when they wear skirts, dresses, etc.) and girls who can be considered more "cute" than sexy or hot.

EDIT: the kind've M/s shit I'm into is more along the lines of Kajira, just, without the creepy names and tattoos and shit.


:blink::blink::blink::blink::blink::blink:

eyedrop
23rd July 2010, 14:53
You get hard during funerals? What the fuck?
I'm aware that my brain is not very sane by most conventional standards, but it's not like I can decide when the subconscious part of the brain decides it should get horny.

It's not like we should self-repress any sexual non-harming reactions.


Looking at this thread in it's whole it paints a picture of this site being populated by mostly sexually insecure teenagers who haven't learned or admitted their sexual kinks. Or just boring normal A4 bots. I believe most people have some abnormal sexual kinks.

Sasha
23rd July 2010, 14:58
:blink::blink::blink::blink::blink::blink:

what? rape fantasies are extremly common esp under females and feminist men. being a big taboo and an in reality nono and all

Quail
23rd July 2010, 14:59
Why do men keep using the word "chick" to describe women?

Because women are small, furry and go cluck?:rolleyes:



No, actually if someone called me a chick I wouldn't be too impressed.

I think rape fantasies are more common than you'd think. Not my cup of tea though. Some of you guys are weird, I feel very vanilla:blushing:

leftace53
23rd July 2010, 14:59
You people are odd oods.

eyedrop
23rd July 2010, 15:04
You people are odd oods.
I'm pretty sure if you knew everything about your friends and their kinks which they don't even admit to their sexual partners or even themselfes you would be surprised by the amount of them that where "odd". People don't exclaim their sexual oddities to the world.

scarletghoul
23rd July 2010, 15:37
Rape fantasies are weird. Once, this girl sent me an erotic story she wrote about being raped,, i felt very uncomfortable and dont really talk to her much haha

Quail
23rd July 2010, 15:46
Rape fantasies are weird. Once, this girl sent me an erotic story she wrote about being raped,, i felt very uncomfortable and dont really talk to her much haha
Did you ask her to send it?

scarletghoul
23rd July 2010, 15:49
Did you ask her to send it?
We were talking about writing, and she mentioned that she wrote a story. So I said like "oh thats pretty cool " and she asked if I wanted to read it, so I said yes.. Didn't know it was even gonna be erotic though.

ContrarianLemming
23rd July 2010, 15:53
We were talking about writing, and she mentioned that she wrote a story. So I said like "oh thats pretty cool " and she asked if I wanted to read it, so I said yes.. Didn't know it was even gonna be erotic though.

..and?

link?

scarletghoul
23rd July 2010, 15:58
Its not very well written tbh, from a literary point of view id say it was poor at best.

The Feral Underclass
23rd July 2010, 16:04
I'm starting to grow an admin-dislike for this thread.

Os Cangaceiros
23rd July 2010, 16:08
Blood and gore.


Why do men keep using the word "chick" to describe women?

Is that word used in England at all? Everyone I know uses it here, women/girls included. It's like the female equivalent of "dude".

Os Cangaceiros
23rd July 2010, 16:10
Its not very well written tbh, from a literary point of view id say it was poor at best.

ROFL! "from a literary point of view" :lol:

It's not like someone was going to go over her rape fantasy with a red marker.

The Feral Underclass
23rd July 2010, 16:19
Blood and gore.



Is that word used in England at all? Everyone I know uses it here, women/girls included. It's like the female equivalent of "dude".

Why do you use a word that compares a woman to a defenceless, infant chicken?

Os Cangaceiros
23rd July 2010, 16:22
Why do you use a word that compares a woman to a defenceless, infant chicken?

It's actually a direct comparison to Jack Chick (http://www.chick.com/catalog/tractlist.asp).

Read and learn.

The Feral Underclass
23rd July 2010, 16:52
That was ridiculous.

Stop calling women chicks.

The Red Next Door
23rd July 2010, 17:00
Anime Violence.

Os Cangaceiros
23rd July 2010, 17:21
That was ridiculous.

That's why I knew you'd love it, Tatty.


Stop calling women chicks.

When did I?

S.Artesian
23rd July 2010, 17:27
Why do men keep using the word "chick" to describe women?

Comes from the Spanish "chica"-- girl.

The Feral Underclass
23rd July 2010, 17:37
Everyone just stop ittt!!!!!

Angry Young Man
23rd July 2010, 17:38
Belly buttons, football kits and boys who are slightly podgy but still a healthy weight. Unfortunately there isn't a term for that in porn. And they said the internet has everything >:(

Chambered Word
23rd July 2010, 18:03
^I love the poem in your sig, it speaks to my heart.

Jazzhands
23rd July 2010, 18:13
Twilight. Nothing is sexier than that Edward Cullen!

:cursing::cursing::cursing:COME ON!!!

Glenn Beck
23rd July 2010, 18:37
pocket lint and that dust that collects on fan blades generally give me a raging clue.

Oh god this.

Also the smells of gasoline, burnt plastic, ozone...


Why do you use a word that compares a woman to a defenceless, infant chicken?

Because I'd like to grind them up and shape them into nuggets to be breaded and deep fried.

That's my fetish.

Jazzhands
23rd July 2010, 18:43
actually I think gasoline smells kinda hot to be honest.

Glenn Beck
23rd July 2010, 18:58
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDsDL_BKPts

praxis1966
23rd July 2010, 19:06
That was ridiculous.

Stop calling women chicks.

Hahahaha I hate to tell you this, Tatty baby, but you don't have a monopoly on what is or isn't patriarchal. The word "chick" isn't going to be considered sexist no matter how hard you want it to be (especially since every second woman I've ever met uses the word).

The Feral Underclass
23rd July 2010, 19:10
Hahahaha I hate to tell you this, Tatty baby, but you don't have a monopoly on what is or isn't patriarchal. The word "chick" isn't going to be considered sexist no matter how hard you want it to be (especially since every second woman I've ever met uses the word).

That must be the shitist analysis of inherent prejudice in society since racists coined the phraze "I'm not racist. I've got black friends".

It's not a question of whether I want to consider it sexist, the fact is there is clearly an inherent prejudice in the word. It also doesn't alter the fact because women use it, since they live in a pre-conditioned gender oppressive society, where basic assumptions are just carried through, despite the inherent prejudice.

Yes, oppression is so engrained in our society that people who are oppressed don't even realise it's oppression.

And don't ever call me "baby" again.

Robocommie
23rd July 2010, 19:10
actually I think gasoline smells kinda hot to be honest.

It's REALLY hot if you take a match to it.

praxis1966
23rd July 2010, 19:22
That must be the shitist analysis of inherent prejudice in society since racists coined the phraze "I'm not racist. I've got black friends".

It's not a question of whether I want to consider it sexist, the fact is there is clearly an inherent prejudice in the word. It also doesn't alter the fact because women use it, since they live in a pre-conditioned gender oppressive society, where basic assumptions are just carried through, despite the inherent prejudice.

All statements of opinion, not fact, no matter how hard you try to argue your way around it. It just so happens that my anti-sexism extends as far as not telling women how to speak. Nevermind the false conflation.


Yes, oppression is so engrained in our society that people who are oppressed don't even realise it's oppression.

"Our society..." Hail, Britannia, rule the waves, huh? Nothing like a little cultural imperialism to put me off my lunch.


And don't ever call me "baby" again.

Look, I'm sorry if I offended you with that, but calm down, man. Christ.

Glenn Beck
23rd July 2010, 19:26
Don't worry about it praxis, he's just engaged in a little admin trolling.

praxis1966
23rd July 2010, 19:28
Don't worry about it praxis, he's just engaged in a little admin trolling.

Pretty much, lulz. It's just like the good ol' days around here. Me and TAT winding each other up, that is. The only thing missing is a CC.

Glenn Beck
23rd July 2010, 19:30
The only thing missing is a CC.

Oh now you've said it :scared:

praxis1966
23rd July 2010, 19:31
Oh now you've said it :scared:

Hahahaha Just everybody slow down a minute before things get out of hand. I'm only fucking around. Repeat: I'm only fucking around.

Os Cangaceiros
23rd July 2010, 19:51
TAT is so dreamy

Os Cangaceiros
23rd July 2010, 19:54
Oh god this.

Also the smells of gasoline, burnt plastic, ozone...



Because I'd like to grind them up and shape them into nuggets to be breaded and deep fried.

That's my fetish.

Same.

Also: S&M-themed images of nuns masturbating with crucifixes, set to gittery techno/noisecore/EBM and a strobe light, with the word "KILL" flashed in front of my face at regular intervals.

The Feral Underclass
23rd July 2010, 20:00
All statements of opinion, not fact, no matter how hard you try to argue your way around it.

Have you ever experienced social prejudice? I ask, because as a gay man, I have first hand experience with inherent homophobia. For example the way people use the word "gay" as a pejorative. Are you claiming that it's just a coincidence that this word has come to mean things which are bad?


It just so happens that my anti-sexism extends as far as not telling women how to speak. Nevermind the false conflation.

I'm not suggesting that you tell women how to speak, I am saying that words have inherent prejudices.


"Our society..." Hail, Britannia, rule the waves, huh? Nothing like a little cultural imperialism to put me off my lunch.

:blink:

How does that address what I've said? It seems totally unreal to me that you, an alleged anti-capitalist, can honestly be rejecting the notion that people who are oppressed live in their oppression without realising it.

What kind of anti-capitalist are you? I mean, aside from the obvious economic oppression that billions of workers live under and accept as perfectly acceptable, I can go into extensive detail about how the gay community responds to its oppression. For a start, let's look at TV shows like Will & Grace, not to mention the complete assimilation into hetero-normative society and the "gay scene" at large, which is isolationist and appeals to hetero-normative stereotypes. In order to be "free" the homos have become what the straight world has projected onto us.

This is just a few examples of how society is inherently oppressive and how those being oppressed live with it, without realising.

Now if you want to respond to this, then respond to it with an argument.

But I'm perfectly happy to expand on my point-of-view if you want.


Look, I'm sorry if I offended you with that, but calm down, man. Christ.

I'm not uncalm.


Pretty much, lulz.

Don't dismiss my point-of-view. I'm not messing around either. I'm being deadly serious.

praxis1966
23rd July 2010, 20:10
Have you ever experienced social prejudice? I ask, because as a gay man, I have first hand experience with inherent homophobia.

And I've had similar experiences only they've been with religious bigotry. Check out the thread here in chit-chat labeled "Correlations through a poll." I talk a little bit about it there. I've been called everything from a Satanist to an atheist and I've never been either. I even got jumped for it in elementary school. That's what it was like growing up in the Southeastern US.


Don't dismiss my point-of-view. I'm not messing around either. I'm being deadly serious.

I'm not dismissing it. You and I had this argument years ago so I don't really see the point in rehashing it. I was just taking the piss out of you.

eyedrop
23rd July 2010, 20:16
Can folks return to unusual things that turn you on? (Hint: if it is featured in findable porn it's not unusual)

praxis1966
23rd July 2010, 20:17
Can folks return to unusual things that turn you on? (Hint: if it is featured in findable porn it's not unusual)

Hijacking message board threads turns me on.

Invincible Summer
23rd July 2010, 20:40
can folks return to unusual things that turn you on? (hint: If it is featured in findable porn it's not unusual)

sol

Os Cangaceiros
23rd July 2010, 20:47
sol

http://www.femsa.com/en/assets/003/16430.jpg

That turns you on?

The Feral Underclass
23rd July 2010, 20:51
And I've had similar experiences only they've been with religious bigotry. Check out the thread here in chit-chat labeled "Correlations through a poll." I talk a little bit about it there. I've been called everything from a Satanist to an atheist and I've never been either. I even got jumped for it in elementary school. That's what it was like growing up in the Southeastern US.

Religious bigotry isn't the same as social oppression. You can't compare being an atheist to being black or gay or a woman.


I'm not dismissing it.

Clearly you are, since you've not actually responded to me in any significant way.


You and I had this argument years ago so I don't really see the point in rehashing it.

I have no recollection of that, but if you remain to be unmoved on this subject then you really need to sort that out.


I was just taking the piss out of you.

And I was challenging your inept, backward and fundamentally flawed, not to mention utterly stupid opinions.

Il Medico
23rd July 2010, 20:51
That turns you on?
Why wouldn't it? That bottle has some sexy curves. ;):D

praxis1966
23rd July 2010, 21:19
Religious bigotry isn't the same as social oppression. You can't compare being an atheist to being black or gay or a woman.

Just goes to show that you don't know what you're talking about. Had you ever been to the region of the US I grew up in you might know this isn't true. Fact: My brother, who is still a strict adherent to the tenets of Sant Mat, recently was incarcerated (the charges wound up being dropped, but he did several months in jail because he couldn't afford to make bail). Since the state of Florida doesn't recognize Sant Mat as a religion, his jailers refused to feed him a vegetarian diet. His body weight dropped 20% and he was seriously anemic by the time he got out. Further, I find it the height of egocentrism that you think that getting punched in the face for being black or gay is somehow worse than being punched in the face for being something other than a Protestant.


Clearly you are, since you've not actually responded to me in any significant way.

That's probably because I don't owe you a goddamned thing no matter how much you may think so. I'm under no obligation to explain myself to you or anybody else.


I have no recollection of that, but if you remain to be unmoved on this subject then you really need to sort that out.

It was years ago when the banned language policy was initially being debated. Anyway, you're not the boss of me, I am.


And I was challenging your inept, backward and fundamentally flawed, not to mention utterly stupid opinions.

No, you were once again demonstrating your overall attitude that you have a monopoly on the truth and anyone who disagrees with you must be inept, backward or stupid.

Taikand
23rd July 2010, 21:27
Sweaters, yep, sweaters, especially woolen ones, when worn by a girl ofc .And this V

intelectual sophisticated conversation.
doesnt matter what topic.

of course i have to be actually capable of being attracted to the person in the first place. but it turns me on. bus to and from work with this one person. ooooh. hot.

Lyev
23rd July 2010, 21:32
I am turned on immensely when chit-chat produces interesting and heated debates, because it's like trolling in the proper forum. Muzk turns me on also.

Jazzratt
23rd July 2010, 21:38
Can folks return to unusual things that turn you on? (Hint: if it is featured in findable porn it's not unusual) Well fuck. I'm totally usual. Then again given the vast array of porn one can find (if one looks hard enough) nearly everyone is.

EDIT: Cock, I just realised that I basically said "nearly everyone has usual tastes" which is pretty much the definition. Fuck me but I feel stupid.

gorillafuck
23rd July 2010, 21:54
Vaginas.

Jazzhands
23rd July 2010, 22:20
edsdl_bkpts

what the fuck did i just witness

The Feral Underclass
23rd July 2010, 22:29
Just goes to show that you don't know what you're talking about. Had you ever been to the region of the US I grew up in you might know this isn't true. Fact: My brother, who is still a strict adherent to the tenets of Sant Mat, recently was incarcerated (the charges wound up being dropped, but he did several months in jail because he couldn't afford to make bail). Since the state of Florida doesn't recognize Sant Mat as a religion, his jailers refused to feed him a vegetarian diet. His body weight dropped 20% and he was seriously anemic by the time he got out.

Yes, yes. That's all very good, but you haven't actually explained anything. Having a religion isn't an inalienable characteristic. Being gay or a woman or black is. Being oppressed because you choose to believe something, is not in any way the same as being oppressed for being born a certain way.

Yes, it's tragic that people suffer religions persecution, but to equate that with the historical, engrained, systematic oppression of peoiple who are born a certain way is not in any way comparable.


Further, I find it the height of egocentrism that you think that getting punched in the face for being black or gay is somehow worse than being punched in the face for being something other than a Protestant.That's because they're not the same...


That's probably because I don't owe you a goddamned thing no matter how much you may think so. I'm under no obligation to explain myself to you or anybody else.Well, as a matter of fact you are obligated to explain yourself. If you think it's perfectly OK for you to go around your life, never mind this board, defending ignorant points-of-view, you better believe you're obliged to explain yourself.

You're essentially claiming that there is no inherent oppression in society, namely in the words people speak. Well what about the use of the word "gay" as a pejorative? I'll ask again. Do you think that word came to be used as a pejorative completely coincidentally? Or do you think, by some crazy stretch, that people started using the word "gay" as a substitute for something bad because of it's historical connection to the social oppression of homosexuals...:ohmy:

All in all, if you think that using the word "gay" as a pejorative is OK, then you are essentially facilitating the oppression gay men, by allowing society to use our sexuality as a substitute for referencing shit. Erm, well. Thanks.


No, you were once again demonstrating your overall attitude that you have a monopoly on the truth and anyone who disagrees with you must be inept, backward or stupid.This isn't a game of "my opinion is better than yours". I've offered you a relatively reasoned argument in defence of my position. All you've done is tell me stories about your brother and said "you can't tell me what to do".

So far you have argued that having a religion is the same as being socially repressed (which is ridiculous to start with, since being gay, a woman or black is inalienable. Being a protestant isn't :rolleyes:). And then gone onto reject the argument that oppression is engrained in society to the point that people don't even realise it's oppression, which is absurd, since there are dozens of example of this being true. I even provided some for you.. All the while you're claiming you're an anti-capitalist, which I just can't understand, because if we are to follow your point of view to its conclusion, there wouldn't be capitalism, since everyone would have realised it was oppressing them.

And to top it all off, you've not provided one sensible explanation for why you think any of that. How can you not see how ridiculous that is?

Invincible Summer
23rd July 2010, 22:48
http://www.femsa.com/en/assets/003/16430.jpg

That turns you on?

I meant S.O.L. shit outta luck, i.e. what can't you find in porn?




Anyways, these are very sexy:

http://ecyclingshop.com/images/TRACK-PRO-1%202009.png

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/photos/uncategorized/2008/09/25/time4.jpg

http://www.thebicyclepath.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/dsc00933.JPG

Il Medico
23rd July 2010, 22:53
TAT, are you smoking something or have you finally gone off the deep end? How is 'chick' in anyway comparable to 'gay'. Saying 'Chick' is like saying 'guy' or 'dude' not using someone's sexuality as a bloody insult.

The Feral Underclass
23rd July 2010, 23:05
TAT, are you smoking something or have you finally gone off the deep end? How is 'chick' in anyway comparable to 'gay'. Saying 'Chick' is like saying 'guy' or 'dude' not using someone's sexuality as a bloody insult.

I'm not necessarily saying they are. But the word "chick" seems incredibly sexist and in fact a woman has expressed her dislike for being called it, in this very thread.

I mean, where does the word "chick" come from? The only reference I know is the small, defenceless, infant, poultry?

Perhaps it's more widely acceptable in America, but it's certainly not here.

gorillafuck
23rd July 2010, 23:06
TAT, are you smoking something or have you finally gone off the deep end? How is 'chick' in anyway comparable to 'gay'. Saying 'Chick' is like saying 'guy' or 'dude' not using someone's sexuality as a bloody insult.
Right on, groovy chick.


I mean, where does the word "chick" come from? The only reference I know is the small, defenceless, infant, poultry?

Perhaps it's more widely acceptable in America, but it's certainly not here.
Chick is from chica. Spanish for girl.

Tablo
23rd July 2010, 23:06
There is nothing even inherently wrong in using the word chick and to compare using that word to any homophobic or racist terms is insulting to everyone.

Also, religious discrimination in the southeastern US is about as bad as it gets in the western world. I never chose to be an Atheist.

praxis1966
23rd July 2010, 23:33
Yes, yes. That's all very good, but you haven't actually explained anything. Having a religion isn't an inalienable characteristic. Being gay or a woman or black is. Being oppressed because you choose to believe something, is not in any way the same as being oppressed for being born a certain way.

That's because you think religion has something to do with choice. It has more to do with who your parents are and where you grew up than anything else, making it a cultural phenomenon as much as anything else. I think you and I would both agree that religion/belief in God is irrational, but I would argue it's also something some people feel "compelled" about. To claim it's something that can just be switched off a la interior lighting is just as irrational not to mention simplistic and intellectually lazy. The fact is, people get born into religious households the same way they get born into a class or any other number of social constructs. Furthermore, the fact that other people who actually have some experience with the Southeastern US are now agreeing with me only solidifies in my mind that you really don't have the foggiest notion of what it's like there.


Yes, it's tragic that people suffer religions persecution, but to equate that with the historical, engrained, systematic oppression of peoiple who are born a certain way is not in any way comparable.

Says you. I disagree. Also, learn to spell.


That's because they're not the same...

In the mind and body of the person being persecuted they are exactly the same and that's what's really important. Motive really isn't nearly is much of an issue as is the psychology of the person on the receiving end of the abuse.


Well, as a matter of fact you are obligated to explain yourself. If you think it's perfectly OK for you to go around your life, never mind this board, defending ignorant points-of-view, you better believe you're obliged to explain yourself.

Meh, I don't think so. A) We've had this conversation before and I don't feel like it's necessary to repeat myself and B) I'm not that I'm under any obligation to explain myself just because you say so. I don't owe you a fucking thing.


You're essentially claiming that there is no inherent oppression in society, namely in the words people speak. Well what about the use of the word "gay" as a pejorative? I'll ask again. Do you think that word came to be used as a pejorative completely coincidentally? Or do you think, by some crazy stretch, that people started using the word "gay" as a substitute for something bad because of it's historical connection to the social oppression of homosexuals...:ohmy:

I never said that so don't put words in my mouth. My disagreement with you is on the word "chick." Not that words don't have any inherently oppressive intent. I agree with your position, generally speaking, I just disagree about this word in particular.


So far you have argued that having a religion is the same as being socially repressed (which is ridiculous to start with, since being gay, a woman or black is inalienable. Being a protestant isn't :rolleyes:).

No, what I meant was that religious bigotry was just as pernicious as any other kind of bigotry. You're intentionally misinterpreting what I said because, as usual, your intellectual dishonesty knows no bounds and all the smileys in the world won't change that.


And then gone onto reject the argument that oppression is engrained in society to the point that people don't even realise it's oppression, which is absurd, since there are dozens of example of this being true. I even provided some for you.. All the while you're claiming you're an anti-capitalist, which I just can't understand, because if we are to follow your point of view to its conclusion, there wouldn't be capitalism, since everyone would have realised it was oppressing them.

Another misstatement of my position to suit your own purposes.

Jazzratt
23rd July 2010, 23:42
I never said that so don't put words in my mouth. My disagreement with you is on the word "chick." Not that words don't have any inherently oppressive intent. I agree with your position, generally speaking, I just disagree about this word in particular. This is what I don't understand. It's fairly uncontroversially considered demeaning. It's part of the same creepy, dismissive and infantalising set of words as things like "baby" (or "babe"). The whole thing strikes me as, at absolute best, an incredibly poor word choice with unfortunate implications.

I don't really care about the religion argument either, because they're always frustrating but you're wrong and nothing you say will change that. Even if TAT doesn't have perfect spelling.

praxis1966
23rd July 2010, 23:58
This is what I don't understand. It's fairly uncontroversially considered demeaning. It's part of the same creepy, dismissive and infantalising set of words as things like "baby" (or "babe"). The whole thing strikes me as, at absolute best, an incredibly poor word choice with unfortunate implications.

Oh really? So when my girlfriend, whom you know very well used to post here quite often as EneMe, calls me "baby" or "babe" it's demeaning? Honestly, I think this is a cultural issue. What is it they say about the US and Britain? Two countries separated by a common language? Just think for a second about the differences in perception between our countries about the word "fanny" and I think you might understand what I mean. For the overwhelming majority of Americans that I know personally, and this includes women, "chick" isn't considered demeaning.


I don't really care about the religion argument either, because they're always frustrating but you're wrong and nothing you say will change that. Even if TAT doesn't have perfect spelling.

Is that so? So you're argument is that the kind of bigotry which played a part in leading me to anti-capitalism is somehow invalid? Like it or not, there are cultural differences here, especially when it comes to the societal perception of religion and how that differs in places like Britain versus places like the US. GB is a much more secular place than the US is, which is why I think this doesn't figure into the thinking of either you or TAT. Has it occurred, I wonder, to either of you why the religion portion of this argument is dividing respondents here along lines of nation of origin (similar to the way the word "chick"is)?

Os Cangaceiros
24th July 2010, 00:02
Britons call women "birds"! Whatta buncha sexist pigs!

The Feral Underclass
24th July 2010, 00:09
Praxis is a strange kind of revolutionary.

The Feral Underclass
24th July 2010, 00:11
Another misstatement of my position to suit your own purposes.

Explain how it's a "misstatement".

The Feral Underclass
24th July 2010, 00:13
Furthermore, the fact that other people who actually have some experience with the Southeastern US are now agreeing with me only solidifies in my mind that you really don't have the foggiest notion of what it's like there.

I don't need to have grown up in the south of the USA to know that alienable and inalienable characteristics are fundamentally different.

People can detach themselves from their religious beliefs. A black person can't detach themselves from being black.

Adi Shankara
24th July 2010, 00:15
:blink::blink::blink::blink::blink::blink:

why is this so shocking? it's not like I'm actually going to go out and rape a girl against her will. hence the word "fantasy". because when it's a fantasy, you usually have it in a perfected state while imagining it.

and besides, when I am with my girl and "force myself on her", it's not really rape when she's beckoning me to do it and tells me it gets her wet, is it?

The Feral Underclass
24th July 2010, 00:15
britons call women "birds"! Whatta buncha sexist pigs!

peoiple!!

Adi Shankara
24th July 2010, 00:15
Britons call women "birds"! Whatta buncha sexist pigs!

and American women call men "assholes"! :lol:

The pizza crazed Anarchist
24th July 2010, 00:23
ass worship, ballbusting, spanking , bdsm, being called a loser, cunnilingus, domestic servitude, face slapping, facesitting, femdom, flogging, hugs, cuddles, kisses and snuggles, humiliation, orgasm denial, small penis humiliation, strap-ons, and women spitting in my mouth. :D

praxis1966
24th July 2010, 00:25
Praxis is a strange kind of revolutionary.

To you, maybe. Then again, since I'm certain you don't have any idea what it was like to grow up where I did I'll take this cum grano salis.


I don't need to have grown up in the south of the USA to know that alienable and inalienable characteristics are fundamentally different.

People can detach themselves from their religious beliefs. A black person can't detach themselves from being black.

True, but that's not the point. The point is how someone on the receiving end of some kind of societal abuse perceives that abuse. And you do have to have grown up in the Southern US to understand how disgusting this kind of thing can be and how it can lead someone to certain positions, not least of which is a strengthening of religious conviction. To put it another way, I seriously doubt a Baptist kicking the crap out of a Muslim would lead that Muslim to any other conclusion than his/her religion is superior to Christianity. There's a reason why US "hate crime" legislation includes language about religion after all.


Explain how it's a "misstatement".

This...


I never said that so don't put words in my mouth. My disagreement with you is on the word "chick." Not that words don't have any inherently oppressive intent. I agree with your position, generally speaking, I just disagree about this word in particular.

The Feral Underclass
24th July 2010, 00:32
To you, maybe. Then again, since I'm certain you don't have any idea what it was like to grow up where I did I'll take this cum grano salis.

It's really actually irrelevant where you grew up.


The point is how someone on the receiving end of some kind of societal abuse perceives that abuse.It has nothing to do with perception. I once got told by a striaght, white, man that he knew what social prejudice was like because he used to get bullied at school for having long hair. Sure, he "perceived" it as social oppression, but it wasn't.

We're talking about reality. Facts. Not perception. Yes, religious persecution is unfortunate, but being persecuted for something you believe, is not the same, nor has it had the same historical ramifications of oppression against something that is not chosen for you. Something that you are born with. This isn't about "belief", it's about "being".

Women, gay people, black people. The oppression of all of these demographics is sown into the very fabric of our societies. They're engrained into the very fibre of how be act, and think and interact with the world. The oppression of gay people et al is so whole and complete in it's integration into the way we are, that even those being oppressed are not aware when they're being oppressed.


This...When I made the statement that people who suffer oppression are not aware of it, you dismissed that view as cultural imperialism.

Ele'ill
24th July 2010, 00:39
This thread was a really good idea. :thumbup1:

Jazzratt
24th July 2010, 00:43
Oh really? So when my girlfriend, whom you know very well used to post here quite often as EneMe, calls me "baby" or "babe" it's demeaning? No, but then you aren't a woman (are you?). I'm afraid though that the majority use of "baby" in the English language isn't, in fact, your girlfriend saying it to you. It's creepy fucking assholes using it on women.


Honestly, I think this is a cultural issue. What is it they say about the US and Britain? Two countries separated by a common language? Just think for a second about the differences in perception between our countries about the word "fanny" and I think you might understand what I mean. For the overwhelming majority of Americans that I know personally, and this includes women, "chick" isn't considered demeaning. I think it's lazy to put it all down to geography like that. You're talking about a term which basically implies neotony in the women to whom it is applied, almost like the use of the word "girl" to describe women in their thirties.

As for the "overwhelming majority of Americans" they (along with the overwhelming majority of Europeans) believed that "negro" was a perfectly acceptable description of people way back in the day too.



Is that so? So you're argument is that the kind of bigotry which played a part in leading me to anti-capitalism is somehow invalid?
I thought I said I wasn't making an argument. If what you just said is whatever loony paradoy of TAT's argument you're attacdking then, sure, whatever I believe it wholeheartedly.


Like it or not, there are cultural differences here, especially when it comes to the societal perception of religion and how that differs in places like Britain versus places like the US. GB is a much more secular place than the US is, which is why I think this doesn't figure into the thinking of either you or TAT. No matter how steeped in religion (and I don't believe America is as bad as you're making out) a place is that still doesn't make it inailenable. People can avoid persecution for religion far, far more easily than other traits about which they can do nothing.


Has it occurred, I wonder, to either of you why the religion portion of this argument is dividing respondents here along lines of nation of origin (similar to the way the word "chick"is)? In an argument that involved two people, until my post catapulted that into the stratospheric heights of 3 (unless I missed someone), I don't think it's right to try to draw that type of conclusion. There are a host of things that TAT & I have in common with each other that you do not have in common with us.

praxis1966
24th July 2010, 00:53
It's really actually irrelevant where you grew up.

No, it's not and you should know that. I'd like to see you tell that to your average Palestinian.


It has nothing to do with perception. I once got told by a striaght, white, man that he knew what social prejudice was like because he used to get bullied at school for having long hair. Sure, he "perceived" it as social oppression, but it wasn't.

Religious belief and long hair (unless you're talking to a Sikh) are not the same thing. Long hair, in this person's case, was something that guy made a conscious choice of. What your parents' religion is not something you can choose. For you to suggest that I somehow had a choice in primary school about my religion or the abuse I got for it is ludicrous.


We're talking about reality. Facts. Not perception. Yes, religious persecution is unfortunate, but being persecuted for something you believe, is not the same, nor has it had the same historical ramifications of oppression against something that is not chosen for you. Something that you are born with. This isn't about "belief", it's about "being".

Do you really expect me to believe that you know that little about human psychology? To the believer, God is real. The fact that you and I know differently is completely immaterial.


Women, gay people, black people. The oppression of all of these demographics is sown into the very fabric of our societies. They're engrained into the very fibre of how be act, and think and interact with the world. The oppression of gay people et al is so whole and complete in it's integration into the way we are, that even those being oppressed are not aware when they're being oppressed.

I agree completely. I just don't think that's the case with the word "chick" in the US. This goes exactly to my earlier points. It's your perception that leads you to believe that this is the case with the word in question. You stating that your opinion is a fact is an intellectually dishonest way of trying to lend undue weight to an argument that essentially boils down to differing cultural perceptions.


When I made the statement that people who suffer oppression are not aware of it, you dismissed that view as cultural imperialism.

No, what I dismissed as cultural imperialism was the phrase "Our society." With every successive post, you only demonstrate further that you have no idea what it's like living in the US. Your statement betrays a sentiment that living where you do is exactly the same as living where I do and therefore the same cultural mores and norms are applicable. They're not, hence the statement about cultural imperialism.

praxis1966
24th July 2010, 01:03
No, but then you aren't a woman (are you?). I'm afraid though that the majority use of "baby" in the English language isn't, in fact, your girlfriend saying it to you. It's creepy fucking assholes using it on women.

That's not really the case in the US. Perhaps it used to be, but as you say later on in your post, things change.


I think it's lazy to put it all down to geography like that.

I don't.


You're talking about a term which basically implies neotony in the women to whom it is applied, almost like the use of the word "girl" to describe women in their thirties.

Not here it doesn't.


As for the "overwhelming majority of Americans" they (along with the overwhelming majority of Europeans) believed that "negro" was a perfectly acceptable description of people way back in the day too.

See above.


I thought I said I wasn't making an argument. If what you just said is whatever loony paradoy of TAT's argument you're attacdking then, sure, whatever I believe it wholeheartedly.

I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to say here. If you wouldn't mind elaborating...


No matter how steeped in religion (and I don't believe America is as bad as you're making out) a place is that still doesn't make it inailenable. People can avoid persecution for religion far, far more easily than other traits about which they can do nothing.

You're right, they can. Sort of the same way TAT can avoid persecution by pretending he's straight given that he's a white male? It's not exactly a very accepting or tolerant way of looking at things, what you're arguing. Besides, the above statement doesn't hold fast if you're talking about Muslim women or Sikh men.


In an argument that involved two people, until my post catapulted that into the stratospheric heights of 3 (unless I missed someone), I don't think it's right to try to draw that type of conclusion. There are a host of things that TAT & I have in common with each other that you do not have in common with us.

Well there's Tsukae and Explosive Situation...

AK
24th July 2010, 01:28
Stop the intelligent debate - this is chit-chat.

Lyev
24th July 2010, 01:36
Stop the intelligent debate - this is chit-chat.Stop putting stuff in bold - this is chit-chat.

AK
24th July 2010, 01:50
Stop putting stuff in bold - this is chit-chat.
I can bold whenever and however I want.

Lyev
24th July 2010, 02:16
fuck off

Adi Shankara
24th July 2010, 02:41
ass worship, ballbusting, spanking , bdsm, being called a loser, cunnilingus, domestic servitude, face slapping, facesitting, femdom, flogging, hugs, cuddles, kisses and snuggles, humiliation, orgasm denial, small penis humiliation, strap-ons, and women spitting in my mouth. :D

thank god I'm not you. :laugh:

if someone tried to do that to me...They'd be very familiar with my front door.

I mean I've seen some strange fetishes and I know it's hypocritical to a large extent because I'm almost in the same situation, just the roles are reversed, but...mouth spitting? being called a loser?

I employ name calling too (to a degree) but it's never abusive like that, it's often for the purpose and intent to arouse, and mouth spitting...I don't even get that. lol

but I humiliate her. yes, when she is "bad" so to speak, she gets humiliated, and punished...but spitting is just...lol. my bad for being a hypocrite.

meow
24th July 2010, 02:44
dont stop debate! its turning me on :wub:

LebenIstKrieg
24th July 2010, 02:48
riots and war.

LebenIstKrieg
24th July 2010, 02:50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgUSxfvHtOs

Os Cangaceiros
24th July 2010, 03:22
AgUSxfvHtOs

I could listen to electro all day long.

(And sometimes do)

Ele'ill
24th July 2010, 04:40
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/06/21/article-0-056CF713000005DC-41_468x333.jpg

Il Medico
24th July 2010, 13:08
I'm not necessarily saying they are. Good, cause they're not.
But the word "chick" seems incredibly sexist I disagree. I don't see it as anymore sexist than any number of slang terms for the respective sexes. Language has produced some odd slang words. For example, in French a common slang term for a man is 'mecque' which literaly translates as 'pimp'. Or in England, where does 'bird' or 'bloke' come from? Who sat down in England and decided that the new slang term for women was 'bird'? Did they sit down and say, "Yes, well, those American wankers have a horribly sexist slang word for women, so we must come up with one that isn't, how bout instead of 'chick' we say 'bird'! Brillant!". I don't think there is any inherent sexism or degrading of woman in either, but perhaps I am wrong, but as of yet I have not seen any arguement of why chick is sexist besides "it seems" to be. (or at least what I have read, I see there has been quite a bit more going on in this thread since my last post)
in fact a woman has expressed her dislike for being called it, in this very thread. Perhaps I missed it, but the idea that someone actually called someone a chick strikes me as odd to begin with. I've never seen anyone walk up and say"Hey Chick, how ya doing?". It is more often used in the context of talking about a woman you don't knows name. Example: "I really like that hat." "What Hat?" "The one that chick by the fountain is wearing."


I mean, where does the word "chick" come from? It comes from chica I believe.
The only reference I know is the small, defenceless, infant, poultry? I don't think people who use the word chick are calling the woman they are referring to a baby chicken. No more than a person who calls a man 'guy' is saying that he is a Catholic radical trying to blow up parliament.


Perhaps it's more widely acceptable in America, but it's certainly not here.
I don't see what exactly is there to be 'acceptable'. Just seems like a difference between two dialects of English. There are actual sexist words that are widely used here. '*****' has taken on a similar role to that of **** in England, at least in the area I live. Young American seem as enamored with calling each other '*****es' and the English with calling each other '****s'.


No, but then you aren't a woman (are you?). I'm afraid though that the majority use of "baby" in the English language isn't, in fact, your girlfriend saying it to you. It's creepy fucking assholes using it on women.
Mate, I think this is a cultural difference right here. Praxis lives in the same rotten hellhole I do (If I remember correctly) and here, it quite simply isn't the case. The opposite is actually more common. I rarely hear men around here call women 'babe' or 'baby' (women they don't know that is) but quite literally don't go a day without someone (usual a woman) calling me any number of similar words. It is really just part of the culture in the American south. When I went to New York back in January I didn't have one person call me 'honey', 'babe', 'hun' or the like while I was there. But I wasn't off my plane bakc in FL ten minutes before a woman came up to me and said "Hun, do you know where the bathroom is?" I told her and she departed saying "Thanks honey".

Nwoye
24th July 2010, 15:24
when did all of our british members become experts on american culture and gender relations.

praxis1966
24th July 2010, 15:43
Praxis lives in the same rotten hellhole I do (If I remember correctly)

I used to live there. I'm one of the lucky escapees; I'm 31 now and I lived there for more or less all my life (excepting a brief sojourn in Alabama when my parents were in graduate school, but I was a small child then and don't remember much of it). Anyway, I think you're more or less dancing around the same thing I was trying to say which was primarily that TAT and Jazz were making an ethnocentric value judgment based on their own culture without consideration of the fact that the entire planet doesn't function like the British Empire. I doubt either one of them have come within 2000 miles of anyplace I've lived so I don't know how they'd pretend to know what those places are like.


when did all of our british members become experts on american culture and gender relations.

If I could give rep for chat posts I would for this one.

Achara
24th July 2010, 15:48
Unless you're a 16 year old girl from California referring to another 16 year old girl from California, and not a 20-odd something year old male communist posting on a political forum and you don't want to come across as a slimey loser, then I'd suggest you not refer to a woman as a 'chick.'

scarletghoul
24th July 2010, 15:52
Well, the amerikkkans made us ban c*nt, so they should let us ban ch*ck.

scarletghoul
24th July 2010, 15:54
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/06/21/article-0-056CF713000005DC-41_468x333.jpgthe jew in jurassic park looks like my dad

Sasha
24th July 2010, 16:43
riots

ContrarianLemming
24th July 2010, 17:09
Belly buttons, football kits and boys who are slightly podgy but still a healthy weight. Unfortunately there isn't a term for that in porn. And they said the internet has everything >:(

rule 34 no exceptions

Nwoye
24th July 2010, 19:34
Well, the amerikkkans made us ban c*nt, so they should let us ban ch*ck.
as the self-appointed representative of american revlefters I give you back your c-word so we can keep ours.

praxis1966
24th July 2010, 19:41
Well, the amerikkkans made us ban c*nt, so they should let us ban ch*ck.

Democracy's a real pain in the ass that way.

24th July 2010, 19:59
http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/3/32/Thehorror.jpg

ContrarianLemming
24th July 2010, 20:23
http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/3/32/Thehorror.jpg

What has been seen..cannot be unseen

ContrarianLemming
24th July 2010, 20:27
encylopedia dramatica has made me immune

24th July 2010, 20:30
What has been seen..cannot be unseen

You just fapped to a dead guy! ENJOY!

24th July 2010, 20:31
encylopedia dramatica has made me immune

I deleted it cuz I would get in trouble.

ContrarianLemming
24th July 2010, 20:33
I deleted it cuz I would get in trouble.

you deserve to be punished!

24th July 2010, 20:35
you deserve to be punished!

zomg! It goatse

lemon party lemon party

Adi Shankara
24th July 2010, 21:51
No, but then you aren't a woman (are you?). I'm afraid though that the majority use of "baby" in the English language isn't, in fact, your girlfriend saying it to you. It's creepy fucking assholes using it on women.

that's nonsense. in the USA, women call their boyfriends "baby" all the time, or "babe". as in "aww, what's wrong babe" or "I miss my baby, he got sent off to Iraq and will probably come back in a body bag". Basically, every woman and man in the country has used it for an affectionate term at one point or another.

How it's a sexist term is beyond me. Considering it's unisex in it's application, I'd say it's probably the least sexist term of endearment we have in the American English dialect.

ContrarianLemming
24th July 2010, 22:05
cut out the womyn nonsense and get back to the pervy shit

Chimurenga.
24th July 2010, 22:12
Chicks

Os Cangaceiros
24th July 2010, 22:14
http://www.marketharboroughcofe.co.uk/Content/5_photos/chicks1.jpg

WERD.

ContrarianLemming
24th July 2010, 22:31
http://www.marketharboroughcofe.co.uk/Content/5_photos/chicks1.jpg

WERD.

They don't turn you on? they're so cute!
perticulary in furry form.

synthesis
24th July 2010, 22:44
Someone was banned for using the word "chick" awhile back, so it's not like it's unimportant.

Anyways, nothing makes my cock a-doodle-doo quite like profound philosophical observations. The impossibility of objectivity? No Viagra for me, thanks.

ContrarianLemming
24th July 2010, 22:54
Anyways, nothing makes my cock a-doodle-doo quite like profound philosophical observations. The impossibility of objectivity? No Viagra for me, thanks.

all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration — we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. There is no such thing as death; life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves

- Bill Hicks


Someone was banned for using the word "chick" awhile back, so it's not like it's unimportant.

Any forum which deems a single word as means to ban is ruled by GODWINS LAW or womyn, thats repulsive.

synthesis
24th July 2010, 22:58
all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration — we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. There is no such thing as death; life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves

- Bill Hicks

Now I can't even go outside for at least a couple hours. Thanks a lot. :mad:

bailey_187
24th July 2010, 23:22
tbh, some of the words english people use to call girls are much much worse than "baby" or "chick", for example "mysize", "yats" or "gash"

girls in england seem to refer to men (usually their boyfriends) as "baby" more than the other way round too

Os Cangaceiros
24th July 2010, 23:54
Someone was banned for using the word "chick" awhile back, so it's not like it's unimportant.

Anyways, nothing makes my cock a-doodle-doo quite like profound philosophical observations. The impossibility of objectivity? No Viagra for me, thanks.

Who was that?! :blink:

I do remember Pawn Power and Comrade Rage having a big argument about the word at one point, in which CR defended it's use as part of "working class venacular" (which PP rightly pointed out was a bullshit excuse for the use of a word...even though personally I don't really have a problem with "chick").

synthesis
25th July 2010, 00:45
It was Vinny Rafarino, but I think it was fairly obvious that it was a pretense. He pissed a lot of people off, though I always enjoyed his colorful prose. He didn't really respect anyone in general - a quality I generally admire - so when he used the word to refer to Rosa L (I remember that it was something like: "This chick thinks X means Y! :D") it was pretty easy for her to spin it as a ban-worthy instance of sexism.

Chimurenga.
25th July 2010, 01:00
http://lizdurette.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/furries3.jpg

meow
25th July 2010, 03:43
Someone was banned for using the word "chick" awhile back, so it's not like it's unimportant.

Anyways, nothing makes my cock a-doodle-doo quite like profound philosophical observations. The impossibility of objectivity? No Viagra for me, thanks.
get your own perversion.thats mine. unless you want to hook up ;)

edit i guess not quite same. still im more then happy to hook up anyway. so long as you can talk the talk.

ed miliband
25th July 2010, 11:08
tbh, some of the words english people use to call girls are much much worse than "baby" or "chick", for example "mysize", "yats" or "gash"

girls in england seem to refer to men (usually their boyfriends) as "baby" more than the other way round too


That's pretty much the only word one of my friends uses for girls. :(

synthesis
25th July 2010, 11:30
get your own perversion.thats mine. unless you want to hook up http://www.revleft.com/vb/../revleft/smilies/wink.gif

edit i guess not quite same. still im more then happy to hook up anyway. so long as you can talk the talk.

The Internets: bringing people with absurdly specific fetishes together since 1962.

S.Artesian
25th July 2010, 11:35
This is the most entertaining thread I've read in a long time. I'm giggling like a school boy on his first date. Now that's weird.

El Rojo
25th July 2010, 16:44
the cocking handle on the SA80 / L85A1. The action on that weapon is lovely. Im too american in that respect.

as some yank said "all girls look the same in the dark, you should check out my gun collection!"

ContrarianLemming
25th July 2010, 17:07
requesting sticky for this historically significant thread.

Sugar Hill Kevis
25th July 2010, 20:19
requesting sticky for this historically significant thread.

Please, no..

Invincible Summer
25th July 2010, 20:47
AgUSxfvHtOs

This makes me want to rep you so bad

Aurora
26th July 2010, 03:10
requesting sticky for this historically significant thread.
Oh please, this is nothing on masturbation pt1 or 2 :rolleyes:

ContrarianLemming
26th July 2010, 21:38
Oh please, this is nothing on masturbation pt1 or 2 :rolleyes:

pics or it didn't happen

Iskalla
26th July 2010, 22:04
Revolutionary roleplay :mad:

27th July 2010, 00:30
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQy23hlBGpTk19am9yEu17FW0vUu7uoW FHoAia972kBvwrYmbQ&t=1&usg=__vScMWpIRq_QnTa0GiZlNACuJJ0U=


water

ContrarianLemming
27th July 2010, 00:56
Revolutionary roleplay :mad:

I'l be your emma goldman to my Durruti.. :thumbup1:

Jazzhands
27th July 2010, 02:06
this thread is glorious. :thumbup1: second the request for sticky.

chegitz guevara
27th July 2010, 02:52
This

http://www.militarymodelling.com/sites/1/images/article_images_month/2009-07/soviettankunits%20(1).jpg

http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2008/10/23/633603568579775782-ak47.jpg

http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z259/prettyboy816/ak47_01.jpg

I've read that book (because I like building Soviet tanks) and my buddy and I went out and shot the civilian version of the AK, the SKS.

Adi Shankara
27th July 2010, 02:57
water

lol remove that, you're going to end up banned

ContrarianLemming
27th July 2010, 03:18
lol remove that, you're going to end up banned

I don't think boobs are a biggy, you see them in PG's movies and day time TV, easy.

Il Medico
27th July 2010, 03:29
I don't think boobs are a biggy, you see them in PG's movies and day time TV, easy.
Hahaha. I always forget that a large part of the world aren't as big of prudes as America. Quite honestly, the only time you'll see boobs on TV here is if you order a porn channel. Or Cinemax. :lol:

piet11111
27th July 2010, 05:40
I've read that book (because I like building Soviet tanks) and my buddy and I went out and shot the civilian version of the AK, the SKS.

I am just out of bed but the SKS simonov i believe is an entirely different rifle.
You are talking about the one that came with a banyonet under the barrel right ?

Invincible Summer
27th July 2010, 06:21
http://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/Gallery%20B/Aprilia%20RSV4.Factory%20Superbike%2009%20%202.jpg

mollymae
27th July 2010, 08:41
Hahaha. I always forget that a large part of the world aren't as big of prudes as America. Quite honestly, the only time you'll see boobs on TV here is if you order a porn channel. Or Cinemax. :lol:

No kidding. Janet Jackson's boob falls out of her shirt at the Superbowl and it's national news for weeks.

27th July 2010, 09:07
Last time I checked this is RevLeft not stormfront. As Leftists we should embrace nudity and similar freedoms.

Adi Shankara
27th July 2010, 09:36
Last time I checked this is RevLeft not stormfront. As Leftists we should embrace nudity and similar freedoms.

it's strange...Stormfront is virulently anti-homosexual and anti-pornography...yet you get the most homoerotic undertones from some of those pictures they post and the threads where they describe the "strong, handsome white male" :laugh:

27th July 2010, 10:10
it's strange...Stormfront is virulently anti-homosexual and anti-pornography...yet you get the most homoerotic undertones from some of those pictures they post and the threads where they describe the "strong, handsome white male" :laugh:

http://www.mushytime.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/ugly_fat_man_big_tummy_funny_pictur.jpg

you know you want it

S.Artesian
27th July 2010, 15:38
SKS is a completely different weapon from an AK 47.

But be that as it may, anybody who gets sexually aroused by rifle needs to reconsider the meaning of the word "fetishism."


'The passions of the human heart are as twisted as a corkscrew.'--W.H. Auden.

And he certainly knew what he was talking about.

ContrarianLemming
27th July 2010, 18:22
Snowy landscapes are sexy.

S.Artesian
27th July 2010, 19:12
Snowy landscapes are sexy.

Women turn me on. That seems unusual given what has been designated as turn-ons in this thread.

Women, glorious women. Barefoot, in sandals, jeans, skirts, dresses, slacks, shorts; long hair, short hair, brown, red, pink, black, beige, tan, pale.

Pirate Utopian
27th July 2010, 19:21
This is one of the shittiest threads on revleft. It's like stepping into 4chan with all this bullshit.

Os Cangaceiros
27th July 2010, 19:22
Women turn me on. That seems unusual given what has been designated as turn-ons in this thread.

I guess that makes sense, considering the thread's title.

Sugar Hill Kevis
27th July 2010, 19:29
This is one of the shittiest threads on revleft. It's like stepping into 4chan with all this bullshit.

Thankyou

leftace53
27th July 2010, 20:10
women turn me on. That seems unusual given what has been designated as turn-ons in this thread.

Women, glorious women. Barefoot, in sandals, jeans, skirts, dresses, slacks, shorts; long hair, short hair, brown, red, pink, black, beige, tan, pale.

Sexist!!!

:)

Sasha
27th July 2010, 20:32
http://www.revleft.com/vb/attachment.php?attachmentid=7795&stc=1&d=1280258349

my new 2 stroke (sexy word already) 6 speed watercooled original and very rare honda engine...

S.Artesian
27th July 2010, 20:53
Sexist!!!

:)

Really? It's that obvious? I thought I had it pretty well hidden.

But yeah, no flies on you, you saw right through my deceptions, my euphemisms, use of code words... to what I really am..

As my first wife put it.... "a skirt-chasing bastard."

Uncle Hank
27th July 2010, 22:35
This is the image I get in my head when I see this thread on odd fetishes turn into a full-on debate about the issue of linguistic legitimacy of the slang term 'chick'; whether it is sexist or not:

http://www.filmsquish.com/guts/files/images/Dr.%20Strangelove.JPG

"Gentlemen, you can't be non-political in here, this is Chit-Chat!"

piet11111
28th July 2010, 05:41
This is the image I get in my head when I see this thread on odd fetishes turn into a full-on debate about the issue of linguistic legitimacy of the slang term 'chick'; whether it is sexist or not:

http://www.filmsquish.com/guts/files/images/Dr.%20Strangelove.JPG

"Gentlemen, you can't be non-political in here, this is Chit-Chat!"

Damn a strangelove reference i can not rep :crying:
Gentlemen no fighting in here ! this is the war room.

A.R.Amistad
28th July 2010, 06:33
i shouldnt have to answer this I think everyone already knows ;)

Andropov
28th July 2010, 18:48
TAT throwing the rattle out of the pram on wording of an allegedly "descriminatory word" when he himself starts a thread asking whats the point of welsh people.
I just dont think the word irony does this justice but I must say it confirms what I have always suspected that you are an A-Political fuckwit.
The absolute balls to castigate Praxis over his use of the word chick when you question "the point" of a whole nationality, your some dickhead.

ÑóẊîöʼn
29th July 2010, 11:48
BAAAAAAAAAWWW

Fixed.

Il Medico
29th July 2010, 11:50
imaginary numbers are fucking hot.

ContrarianLemming
29th July 2010, 12:05
imaginary numbers are fucking hot.

*removed image making fun at the expense of an an kid with downsyndrome*
verbal warning!
(psycho)

ÑóẊîöʼn
29th July 2010, 12:17
THIS! (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Trap)

Chambered Word
29th July 2010, 13:01
THIS! (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Trap)

'Didn't see that coming.'

That was funny as hell. :lol:

AK
29th July 2010, 13:14
*removed image making fun at the expense of an an kid with downsyndrome*
verbal warning!
(psycho)

Lemming got owned.

Sperm-Doll Setsuna
29th July 2010, 13:24
THIS! (http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Trap)

Mighty fine taste, sir. :cool:

ContrarianLemming
29th July 2010, 13:29
*removed image making fun at the expense of an an kid with downsyndrome*
verbal warning!
(psycho)


I honestly had no idea that's what it was, it was a pic I saw on uncylopedia, didn't know it was anti handicapped.

Thirsty Crow
29th July 2010, 14:48
I really cannot say that I'm turned on by anything unusual :(

Although I REALLY like women who wear nylons (of any kind) and other kinds of leggings.

Qayin
29th July 2010, 21:00
Although I REALLY like women who wear nylons (of any kind) and other kinds of leggings.
Yeah

S.Artesian
29th July 2010, 21:21
Thigh highs. And there's nothing unusual about that.

30th July 2010, 07:20
Admin note: Don't post pornographic or semi-pornographic pictures anywhere on this website.

OH HI GUYZ

Theoneontheleft
30th July 2010, 07:53
Madonna:)

ContrarianLemming
30th July 2010, 11:39
Admin note: Don't post pornographic or semi-pornographic pictures anywhere on this website.

OH HI GUYZ

what about "say what you want" thread?

The Feral Underclass
30th July 2010, 11:43
what about "say what you want" thread?

What about it?

Revolte_Wolf
30th July 2010, 12:12
I don't know if short hair counts as unusual, but that tends to get me goin' a bit. Or give me Tank Girl any day, Tank Girl turns me on. I also have a fetish for cheata print and the idea of handcuffs is a huge turn on.