Log in

View Full Version : What revleft user would make the most dangerous ruler?



AK
30th June 2010, 00:15
I'm going to go with Yet Humanity Lives On or pranabjyoti at this moment.

Nolan
30th June 2010, 00:23
Alpha Fappa

Lyev
30th June 2010, 00:33
Faptain Pooba

danyboy27
30th June 2010, 00:34
red cat

Sam_b
30th June 2010, 00:34
Psy because he has no concept of actual reality.

Nolan
30th June 2010, 00:37
Exfapiate number two.

Pirate Utopian
30th June 2010, 00:37
Malte. Would supply Israel with all sorts of weapons.

Nolan
30th June 2010, 00:39
RED CAT for president!

AK
30th June 2010, 00:40
Exfapiate number two.
What? Can't come up with one for Lyev? Do it properly or don't do it at all.

Sam_b
30th June 2010, 00:41
Malte. Would supply Israel with all sorts of server space and Che keyrings

Fixed.

Lyev
30th June 2010, 00:41
Exfapiate number two.Good try comrade, but that doesn't quite work. I guess it's just testament to the fact that Stalinists are rubbish at everything, especially when it comes to making funny names, and they can't build socialism either.

Nolan
30th June 2010, 00:44
Good try comrade, but that doesn't quite work. I guess it's just testament to the fact that Stalinists are rubbish at everything, especially when it comes to making funny names, and they can't build socialism either.

Hey, we succeed at eating children and vodka. That has to count for something.

Nolan
30th June 2010, 00:45
What? Can't some up with one for Lyev? Do it properly or don't do it at all.

I can't really be arsed (I'm feeling british today)

Oh and congrats on being revlefts number one wanker.

Sam_b
30th June 2010, 00:45
What about thinking Belarus is a 'ghost of the USSR'?

Lyev
30th June 2010, 00:46
What about thinking Belarus is a 'ghost of the USSR'?Well you didn't find chimp-frog rape amusing so you're a wanker too.

Nolan
30th June 2010, 00:46
What about thinking Belarus is a 'ghost of the USSR'?

What about it, sammy? Still think I said Belarus was socialist?

Sam_b
30th June 2010, 00:47
so you're a wanker too.

duh

Sam_b
30th June 2010, 00:49
Still think I said Belarus was socialist?

but THE COMMUNISTS HAVE THE MOST SEATS!


by the way, the current flag:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/Flag_of_Belarus.svg/800px-Flag_of_Belarus.svg.png

Sam_b
30th June 2010, 00:49
I'm not sure, but I believe the coat of arms really takes you back.

danyboy27
30th June 2010, 00:49
i would make a dangerous leader too, but surely less efficient.

AK
30th June 2010, 00:51
Oh and congrats on being revlefts number one wanker.
I thought that honour was bestowed upon you.

Nolan
30th June 2010, 00:53
but THE COMMUNISTS HAVE THE MOST SEATS!

I KNOW RITE???


by the way, the current flag:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/Flag_of_Belarus.svg/800px-Flag_of_Belarus.svg.png

And the flag in the Soviet era:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Byelorussian_SSR.svg

It hasn't changed much compared to everyone else. T'was the point.

Sam_b
30th June 2010, 00:54
Didn't say it in that thread though eh champ

Nolan
30th June 2010, 00:54
I thought that honour was bestowed upon you.

Nay brother, thou hast earned the honour.

AK
30th June 2010, 00:56
Nah, you can have it, really. I'm feeling generous today.

Nolan
30th June 2010, 00:57
Nah, you can have it, really. I'm feeling generous today.

But I am not worthy!

AK
30th June 2010, 00:58
I think you're probably the most worthy wanker on this board :)

Nolan
30th June 2010, 01:00
I think you're probably the most worthy wanker on this board :)

I know u r but wut am i

AK
30th June 2010, 01:02
A douche.
It applies to us both, see.

Lyev
30th June 2010, 01:05
Let's solve this: you're both wankers. And on that note, I'm away to bed, good night comrades.

Nolan
30th June 2010, 01:07
Looks like lyevs going to have a wank. bye bye

Sean
30th June 2010, 01:09
Holden, he has such a personality cult around him it would go Juche before long.

Os Cangaceiros
30th June 2010, 01:27
Holden, he has such a personality cult around him it would go Juche before long.

...with BobKindless as the chief architect of state ideology.

Il Medico
30th June 2010, 03:43
Honestly I wouldn't trust half of this board with a pop sickle stand yet alone a government.

GracchusBabeuf
30th June 2010, 03:52
GracchusFapeuf. I will not allow all my reading Stalinist literature which explains in detail how to take over the world and become a ruthless dictator go to waste.:thumbup1::thumbup1::thumbup1:

Pretty Flaco
30th June 2010, 04:41
I would be the most dangerous ruler... the most dangerous to the capitalist system!:redstar2000:

Fullmetal Anarchist
30th June 2010, 11:26
Fuck having rulers. In honestly I'd probably shoot you after you've taken power and you know what the best bit is? I'd do it with one of these from a couple of miles away.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSK1jwu_NoU

Tis awesome.

Subcomandante Marcos.
30th June 2010, 11:36
he says in the video, if your the bad guy its over.

or if your a mother child father of afghanistan behind that wall, thgen its over, as is so often the case.

ContrarianLemming
30th June 2010, 11:36
vegan marxist
red fascist

ÑóẊîöʼn
30th June 2010, 12:52
Hey, I reckon I would be pretty fucking awful.

Wanted Man
30th June 2010, 12:56
I'm not sure, but I believe the coat of arms really takes you back.

:lol: This may well be the new "Third Reich started with one man."

Fullmetal Anarchist
30th June 2010, 13:17
Hey, I reckon I would be pretty fucking awful.

I don't disagree your place is a dictatorship...

I can't help it if I'm clumsy.

Jazzratt
30th June 2010, 17:42
I don't disagree your place is a dictatorship...

I can't help it if I'm clumsy.

Ah yes, I remember this sort of thing. Yeah NoXion would be a terrible leader, he's an autocratic motherfucker. No concept of worker's democracy or consensus decision making.

Uppercut
30th June 2010, 19:13
Ismail might be pretty rough. He's Hoxhaist, but it wouldn't surprise me if he starting locking up Maoists for being "revisionist".

Q
30th June 2010, 20:44
Q

Martin Blank
30th June 2010, 21:10
Me, because I have artillery and know how to use it.

Raúl Duke
30th June 2010, 22:45
Honestly I wouldn't trust half of this board with a pop sickle stand yet alone a government.

This

There are even a few who would have me sent to a re-education camp over smoking some reefer.

Pirate Utopian
30th June 2010, 22:56
This

There are even a few who would have me sent to a re-education camp over smoking some reefer.
Well, you are putting the left in disrepute.

Os Cangaceiros
1st July 2010, 00:31
So does Weezy.

Looks like you're going to the camps right along with us.

Imposter Marxist
1st July 2010, 00:32
Sam_B is the most dangerous. He'd kill anyone who attempts to joke.

2nd July 2010, 08:46
Brother No.1

AK
2nd July 2010, 09:47
^ Changed my mind and seconded Blasphemy's post.

Chambered Word
2nd July 2010, 15:39
Brother No.1

+1

Adi Shankara
2nd July 2010, 15:50
Basically, anyone who calls someone "reactionary", or gives negrep for having an opinion contrary to one's one.

I can think of a number of users like that. it gets old.

But if I have to choose one user, it'd be "Monkey Riding Dragon", because she belongs to the Avakian cult, and once defended Pol Pot as "an efficient, effective ruler who was framed by the west"...that was chilling.

ÑóẊîöʼn
2nd July 2010, 18:24
Basically, anyone who calls someone "reactionary", or gives negrep for having an opinion contrary to one's one.

I can think of a number of users like that. it gets old.

I think you are confusing criticism with suppression.

Blackscare
2nd July 2010, 19:16
Me, because some days I'm all for the cause of the masses, and others I'm a total misanthrope.

I'd nuke the Falkland islands just so neither side got em. Then I'd build a Denny's on the irradiated crater. Waffles taste best when served at 2 am by a single mother of two who now has cancer because you made her work at the crater denny's.

Sam_b
2nd July 2010, 19:24
"I make the Gand Slams, but still they never come..."

2nd July 2010, 19:29
Guys it's not fun if you say it's yourself....

Die Rote Fahne
2nd July 2010, 19:40
I'd be a glorious leader. Amirite?

2nd July 2010, 19:54
sigh

Spawn of Stalin
3rd July 2010, 00:43
Me and bailey would be a recipe for disaster. But I'd probably say the most dangerous would be Jacob Richter, Jacob would simply bore the proletariat to death with endless speeches about German social democracy, Karl Kautsky, or some other theoretical stuff, it would be interesting to see though, JR would probably actually get my vote.

Spawn of Stalin
3rd July 2010, 00:44
Actually scratch that I'd easily be more dangerous

Lyev
3rd July 2010, 00:50
Actually scratch that I'd easily be more dangerouswell you are Stalin...

Sir Comradical
3rd July 2010, 01:47
Anyone in the restricted section.

AK
3rd July 2010, 02:07
Anyone in the restricted section.
There are plenty of users who should be in there, but aren't.

Sir Comradical
3rd July 2010, 02:13
There are plenty of users who should be in there, but aren't.

You mean the people who disagree with you?

AK
3rd July 2010, 02:19
You mean the people who disagree with you?
No, I mean the bat-shit insane nutjobs (those who aren't me) like pranabjyoti and Brother No. 1 - they both have this weird obsession with "PURGES ARE AN ESSENTIAL PART OF BUILDING THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT. HURR DURR".

Rusty Shackleford
3rd July 2010, 04:42
No, I mean the bat-shit insane nutjobs (those who aren't me) like pranabjyoti and Brother No. 1 - they both have this weird obsession with "PURGES ARE AN ESSENTIAL PART OF BUILDING THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT. HURR DURR".


well, you wouldnt want your revolution to be betrayed by a bunch of turncoats would you? *cough* china and soviet union *cough*

AK
3rd July 2010, 05:14
well, you wouldnt want your revolution to be betrayed by a bunch of turncoats would you? *cough* china and soviet union *cough*
It might have something to do with the notion that corruption and/or greed is almost a certainty in a system where the most power is granted to those at the top.

Rusty Shackleford
3rd July 2010, 05:16
It might have something to do with the notion that corruption and/or greed is almost a certainty in a system where the most power is granted to those at the top.

thats why you give everyone guns! so they can all purge eachother.

AK
3rd July 2010, 05:26
Mutual purging: Everybody wins :thumbup:

Chambered Word
3rd July 2010, 05:38
well, you wouldnt want your revolution to be betrayed by a bunch of turncoats would you? *cough* china and soviet union *cough*

No we certainly wouldn't, that's what worker's democracy is for, comrade. :)

Rusty Shackleford
3rd July 2010, 05:55
No we certainly wouldn't, that's what worker's democracy is for, comrade. :)

i agree. but, there needs to be some sort of constitution to guide it. it could keep people like gorbachev or wen jibao from coming to power.

and one that doesnt fail LIKE the chinese or soviet ones

AK
3rd July 2010, 05:56
i agree. but, there needs to be some sort of constitution to guide it. it could keep people like gorbachev or wen jibao from coming to power.

and one that doesnt fail LIKE the chinese or soviet ones
Our principles keep anyone from coming into power...
An anarchist system is not designed to accommodate individuals with the power and authority to rule over others. The common argument of "but anarchism would let capitalists to take control" is bullshit. A centralised government would be much more susceptible to subjugation by capitalists, etc. because the "capitalist roader" in question - along with their accomplices - need only gain control of the topmost level of hierarchy to impose their will on everyone below. An anarchist system would only fall to such a low if the system itself were completely destroyed and replaced with a hierarchical one - not fitting in with the strawman of an anarchist system's weak resistance to infiltration and sabotage by those already inside the system. The only way that internal sabotage could lead to the downfall of an anarchist system is if the vast majority of those living in an anarchist society suddenly became overcome with capitalist principles - highly unlikely.

Rusty Shackleford
3rd July 2010, 06:34
im just going to end this now and say i dont want to argue. its tiresome and i only struck up the argument in a half assed attempt at trolling. i spent my whole day on cracked.com :blushing:


anyways. worst/dangerous ruler?

Anyone remember Uncle Ho? the guy who could turn any thread into one about killing capitalists, reactionaries and all that?

this is an invasion
3rd July 2010, 11:11
Psy, cause he gets a boner for militarism.

Dimentio
3rd July 2010, 11:25
Give the most cuddly and cute user here absolute power, and that user will be shown to be the devil himself incarnated in human form. :laugh:

9
3rd July 2010, 13:24
But I'd probably say the most dangerous would be Jacob Richter, Jacob would simply bore the proletariat to death

^

Bilan
3rd July 2010, 14:15
Me.
The national anthem would be "Moon river", and everyone would have to wear peacoats.
Non compliance would result in concentration camps, wherein everyone would have to watch Breakfast at Tiffany's and read Wilde's poetry.

lame.

Sam_b
3rd July 2010, 14:16
You're right. That would suck.

9
3rd July 2010, 14:28
indeed. And Breakfast at Tiffany's is shit.

Robocommie
3rd July 2010, 14:59
I think bcbm would be the most dangerous. He'd become a rightist and usurp the revolution for bureaucratic rule simply for the "irony", that damn hipster.

BeerShaman
3rd July 2010, 15:56
Die Neue Zeit
He's an unrepentant marxist! :-P:D

BeerShaman
3rd July 2010, 15:57
Mutual purging: Everybody wins :thumbup:
Ahahhahah! You 're real fun!:lol:

3rd July 2010, 20:39
There are plenty of users who should be in there, but aren't.

And theres also people who shouldn't be there....like mutualists. They consider themselves "revolutionary left" so let's hear their point of view. Honestly if Stalinists can be here so should they. Especially since Proudhon had a pretty big influence to Bakunin.

Os Cangaceiros
3rd July 2010, 20:47
I wish that Kevin Carson would post on this site. Some of his polemics are second to none, especially against Lew Rockwell and the rest of the clowns at the Ludwig Von Mises Institute.

#FF0000
3rd July 2010, 20:53
No, I mean the bat-shit insane nutjobs (those who aren't me) like pranabjyoti and Brother No. 1 - they both have this weird obsession with "PURGES ARE AN ESSENTIAL PART OF BUILDING THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT. HURR DURR".

His politics are more developed and more thought out than yours though.

Muzk
3rd July 2010, 21:06
Tyrlop

Tablo
3rd July 2010, 22:14
Uncle Ho, whatever happened to him?

Lyev
3rd July 2010, 22:29
TyrlopI agree, because he's a great troll.

Rusty Shackleford
3rd July 2010, 22:34
Uncle Ho, whatever happened to him?
banned for the reason of the thread that got subcommandante marcos banned yesterday. violence fetishism.

Muzk
4th July 2010, 13:33
I agree, because he's a great troll.


Revolution! says:
*tyrlop
*hllo
tyrlop says:
*fuck u
*hard weekend hard party
*3 different girls
Revolution! says:
*if youre the dictator of the world would you appoint me minister of propaganda?
tyrlop says:
*nope, you're too stupid for that
Revolution! says:
*why
*thats not nice
tyrlop says:
*you would be minister of agriculture
Revolution! says:
*thats good enough
tyrlop says:
*and we would be sure there would be famine

Tyrlop
4th July 2010, 13:41
i'm not a troll

AK
4th July 2010, 13:49
^ That's so funny it's going in my sig.

Chambered Word
4th July 2010, 17:41
i'm not a troll

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
http://image55.webshots.com/155/2/71/38/423027138PMmlnf_ph.jpg

4th July 2010, 20:26
Tyrlop is just adorable;)

Saorsa
5th July 2010, 10:29
This thread lacks sufficient mention of me.

Jimmie Higgins
5th July 2010, 12:10
Comrade Alastair because of his secret police made up of glock-wielding pandas.

5th July 2010, 19:13
This thread lacks sufficient mention of me.

Please don't attention-whore this thread..

bcbm
5th July 2010, 19:39
I think bcbm would be the most dangerous. He'd become a rightist and usurp the revolution for bureaucratic rule simply for the "irony", that damn hipster.

:thumbup1:

Saorsa
6th July 2010, 08:46
Please don't attention-whore this thread..

No need to be jealous.

DaComm
6th July 2010, 08:56
Captain Cuba because he's a hipster dufus that would kill many innocent people via firecrackers. Or anyone that says that phrase "hurr durr" for that matter.