Communist motivational poster(s)

[NecroCommie]

I made this one just now. Feedback please.

Also, please post yours if you have one. I also just might make more of these if there are any worthwhile ideas.

http://www.revleft.com/vb/picture.php?albumid=666&pictureid=5835

[28350]

I'd take out western

[Chimurenga.]

and make the text a little lighter.

[Sugar Hill Kevis]

Oh lord...

[RedStarOverChina]

http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d62/RedStarOverChina/hot.jpg

All the motivation I ever need.

[proudcomrade]

^^^ Can we ditch the sexist exploitation, please? :rolleyes:

[lombas]

http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d62/RedStarOverChina/hot.jpg

All the motivation I ever need.


And now Soviet styled?

:D:thumbup1:

[AK]

And now Soviet styled?

:D:thumbup1:
Oh so Soviet. What with the Maoist women and the Chinese text and all.

[it_ain't_me]

and make the text a little lighter.

and delete the whole thing and start over.

[Guerrilla]

http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/5116/automotivator.jpg

[AK]

Fixed
http://i870.photobucket.com/albums/ab264/AlphaKappa95/automotivator.jpg

[Guerrilla]

http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/9760/automotivator2n.jpg

[InuyashaKnight]

Very funny, Thanks!

[AK]

http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/9760/automotivator2n.jpg
It's what we do best.

[RedStarOverChina]

Fixed
http://i870.photobucket.com/albums/ab264/AlphaKappa95/automotivator.jpg
:laugh:

[LC89]

^^^ Can we ditch the sexist exploitation, please? :rolleyes:

make one to exploit men to compensate it.

[Urko]

http://cheezhawtness.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/4a5c0d4d-c3a1-473c-aee7-572c5899f966.jpg

[Queercommie Girl]

Oh so Soviet. What with the Maoist women and the Chinese text and all.

Soviet is supposed to be internationalist, not European or Russian.

Why is it that Chinese texts and non-European culture cannot be considered Soviet?

Human civilisation did not begin in Europe. Nor will it end in Europe. The days of Eurocentric cultural domination of the world are gone forever.

"Soviet" literally means "worker's council", it has nothing to do with any kind of "regional cultural form", whether European or Asian or African. If a cultural style originates and depicts the social settings of a worker's state ruled by worker's councils, then it is by definition "Soviet", period. It does not matter whether the particular forms of the worker's councils are located in Russia or America or China or Kenya.

[Queercommie Girl]

^^^ Can we ditch the sexist exploitation, please? :rolleyes:

Is proudly showing off the female body and form necessarily exploitative?

If it was a poster showing fit muscular men, would you consider it to be exploitative too?

Why can't women show off their bodies in exactly the same way as men do?

Technically, sexist exploitation would only refer to cases where some form of commercialisation, such as prostitution and commercial pornography, are involved.

Marxism is not opposed to human sexuality. We are only opposed to the commercialisation of human sexuality.

[Marxist]

Agree with that !

[Sir Comradical]

http://images.starcraftmazter.net/4chan/commie/my_stance_on_communism_and_socialism.jpg

This is a good one. Ignore the picture of Stalin if you don't like him, it's still a good poster.

[Urko]

ooooh snap! gotta write that down so I'll have it for the next time when I get in an argument with my teacher...

[AK]

Why is it that Chinese texts [...] cannot be considered Soviet?
Because, last I could recall, Chinese wasn't an official language within the Soviet Union - and I highly doubt any state (as internationalist as it may be) would produce propaganda of a minority ethnic group whose language doesn't even have any official status. So don't you go and accuse me of Eurocentrism.

[Queercommie Girl]

Because, last I could recall, Chinese wasn't an official language within the Soviet Union - and I highly doubt any state (as internationalist as it may be) would produce propaganda of a minority ethnic group whose language doesn't even have any official status. So don't you go and accuse me of Eurocentrism.

Soviet doesn't equal Soviet Union, but it's a much broader term.

Given the population size of China, suppose the whole world becomes socialist, the Chinese is hardly an "insignificant ethnic minority". And ethnic minority languages should be used anyway if there is genuine national rights.

I'm talking about "Soviet" in the general sense, not just the historic Soviet Union.

[AK]

Soviet doesn't equal Soviet Union, but it's a much broader term.

Given the population size of China, suppose the whole world becomes socialist, the Chinese is hardly an "insignificant ethnic minority". And ethnic minority languages should be used anyway if there is genuine national rights.

I'm talking about "Soviet" in the general sense, not just the historic Soviet Union.
Well, aside from the soviet councils that were set up in the Maoists' early days, there isn't any connection between the Chinese and "soviets". I was talking about the word "soviet" as a demonym and adjective.

Also, "ethnic minority languages should be used anyway if there is genuine national rights" is true and national rights in the USSR could be called into question.

[Queercommie Girl]

Well, aside from the soviet councils that were set up in the Maoists' early days, there isn't any connection between the Chinese and "soviets". I was talking about the word "soviet" as a demonym and adjective.

Also, "ethnic minority languages should be used anyway if there is genuine national rights" is true and national rights in the USSR could be called into question.

I use the term "Soviet" in a general political sense, not in a historical sense.

And even historically, you are wrong, because you are being semantical. The People's Republic of China always had "soviets", we just don't call them by that name. Because "soviet" is a Russian cultural term, not a Chinese cultural term. Unless one is a Russian nationalist, I don't see why Russian culture has to be transferred at the same time socialism is transferred to China. In Chinese "soviets" are called "weiyuanhui", but the objective meaning is exactly the same. In Germany "soviets" are called "betriebsrat", but again this is all just semantics, the actual meaning is completely identical.

Of course, the weiyuanhui under Mao were somewhat distorted and didn't have enough genuine democracy, but that's another matter.

But what I meant is that suppose in the future all of Earth is under a single genuine socialist system, then such a system must also be multi-cultural so "soviet" wouldn't just refer to European cultural norms.

[AK]

I use the term "Soviet" in a general political sense, not in a historical sense.

And even historically, you are wrong, because you are being semantical. The People's Republic of China always had "soviets", we just don't call them by that name. Because "soviet" is a Russian cultural term, not a Chinese cultural term. Unless one is a Russian nationalist, I don't see why Russian culture has to be transferred at the same time socialism is transferred to China. In Chinese "soviets" are called "weiyuanhui", but the objective meaning is exactly the same. In Germany "soviets" are called "betriebsrat", but again this is all just semantics, the actual meaning is completely identical.

Of course, the weiyuanhui under Mao were somewhat distorted and didn't have enough genuine democracy, but that's another matter.

But what I meant is that suppose in the future all of Earth is under a single genuine socialist system, then such a system must also be multi-cultural so "soviet" wouldn't just refer to European cultural norms.
Dude, I don't give a fuck. When we refer to differences in culture and language between something that is Chinese and something that is "Soviet", we refer to whatever is "Soviet" as coming from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. I'm not the one being semantic here, you are.

[Queercommie Girl]

Dude, I don't give a fuck. When we refer to differences in culture and language between something that is Chinese and something that is "Soviet", we refer to whatever is "Soviet" as coming from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. I'm not the one being semantic here, you are.

We are not using the term "soviet" in the same sense then. I was using the term "soviet" as in "worker's councils" in general, not just from the historical USSR.

This itself doesn't matter so much, but to reject Eurocentrism is important. My essential point is simply that a socialist society must be multi-cultural and diverse with cultural contributions from every part of the world, and not just based on European or Western culture.

I consider the struggle against cultural imperialism to be very important.

[Sasha]

http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2010/8/6/d98ca91a-9e80-4d73-8faf-113d83b435d1.jpg

[Invincible Summer]

Is proudly showing off the female body and form necessarily exploitative?

If it was a poster showing fit muscular men, would you consider it to be exploitative too?

Why can't women show off their bodies in exactly the same way as men do?

Technically, sexist exploitation would only refer to cases where some form of commercialisation, such as prostitution and commercial pornography, are involved.

Marxism is not opposed to human sexuality. We are only opposed to the commercialisation of human sexuality.

Well it's at the very least objectification and playing on the whole "exotic Asian beauty/concubine" image.

[Queercommie Girl]

Well it's at the very least objectification and playing on the whole "exotic Asian beauty/concubine" image.

Not really in this case. These women are soldiers, not concubines or prostitutes. It's precisely a sign of empowerment against commercialised objectification.

Sexual objectification is not in itself reactionary. It's just a part of human sexuality. When a woman sleeps with a man, she in a sense self-objectifies herself for her partner, and vice versa. The only thing that is reactionary is commercialised sexual objectification which has the effect of portraying a submissive, caricatured kind of female sexuality as a servant to the male chauvinist sexual ego.

[Invincible Summer]

Not really in this case. These women are soldiers, not concubines or prostitutes. It's precisely a sign of empowerment against commercialised objectification.

[...]

The only thing that is reactionary is commercialised sexual objectification which has the effect of portraying a submissive, caricatured kind of female sexuality as a servant to the male chauvinist sexual ego.

Well, I suppose it's a matter of perspective, but that's just what I see here. I doubt this picture is meant to rouse women into feeling empowered.

And yes, the women depicted are supposed to be soldiers, but it's (subtly) making use of the "exotic Asian lover/concubine/lotus flower/dragon lady" discourse

[Queercommie Girl]

Well, I suppose it's a matter of perspective, but that's just what I see here. I doubt this picture is meant to rouse women into feeling empowered.

And yes, the women depicted are supposed to be soldiers, but it's (subtly) making use of the "exotic Asian lover/concubine/lotus flower/dragon lady" discourse

I think you might be right sister. And this shows that I'm not genuinely "womanly" enough as I still look at women through male eyes. :(

(But then since I'm bi-sexual maybe that's why - do you think lesbian women are sexually attracted to women in a different way than men?)

You know I don't actually support every instance of transgenderism. I don't think every subjective instance of "being trans" is objectively genuine. If all transgenderism entails is some dirty old hetero man who likes to cross-dress and aggressively hit women in lesbian toilets, then I actually identify as a "transphobe" in such a case. Those people are lumpen-proletarians, not genuinely transgendered.

In a nutshell, I completely reject male transphobia, but I don't completely reject female "transphobia".

[Kayser_Soso]

Depicting beautiful women is not sexist exploitation. Context is very important. For one thing, nobody is being exploited in this case as they are drawings. Second, they are not being depicted in a negative manner, nor do they appear to be selling any product(my Chinese is a bit rusty though). And how the hell is the depiction of a beautiful Asian woman an example of the "exotic concubine"? By that logic any photo of a smiling Asian woman is somehow a negative image?

[RedStarOverChina]

And yes, the women depicted are supposed to be soldiers, but it's (subtly) making use of the "exotic Asian lover/concubine/lotus flower/dragon lady" discourse
The poster itself is made by some Chinese dude...I think he can be excused for being an "exotic Asian lover". As to how they can be associated with the other weird stuff you mentioned, I have no clue.

[Kayser_Soso]

The poster itself is made by some Chinese dude...I think he can be excused for being an "exotic Asian lover". As to how they can be associated with the other weird stuff you mentioned, I have no clue.

I guess Asian people aren't allowed to depict the beauty of their own people without producing some kind of fetish porn. This sucks because now I cannot allow my wife to be in any photos(and I must destroy all her family albums), as she is technically "Asian." How am I going to explain this to her?

[Comrade Marxist Bro]

Ya just can't do better in keeping political consciousness alive than with a hefty stash of sexy motivational images! :blushing:

http://www.commujism.com/

[NecroCommie]

Thanks Comrade Marxist, I will never ever get a boner ever again ever.

[Invincible Summer]

I think you might be right sister. And this shows that I'm not genuinely "womanly" enough as I still look at women through male eyes. :(

I'm not a woman, btw.


(But then since I'm bi-sexual maybe that's why - do you think lesbian women are sexually attracted to women in a different way than men?)
They could be. I have no clue. I actually don't know any lesbians, only gay men.



Depicting beautiful women is not sexist exploitation. Context is very important. For one thing, nobody is being exploited in this case as they are drawings.
True.

But to play devil's advocate - and this is stretching it a bit I know - can't one say that the image and concept of the Chinese woman is being exploited (not in a Marxist sense obviously)?



Second, they are not being depicted in a negative manner,
This is very subjective, but I have to agree to an extent. They're not sexually depicted and surrouding some man, sure. But the sexualization and militarization can very likely imply "serving" a man as well as she "serves" the country.


nor do they appear to be selling any product(my Chinese is a bit rusty though).
Yeah probably not.


And how the hell is the depiction of a beautiful Asian woman an example of the "exotic concubine"? By that logic any photo of a smiling Asian woman is somehow a negative image?
I said it was subtle. And what I'm trying to get as is that hyper-sexualizing an Asian female subject does take a bit from such Orientalist discourse. It does get into a bit of a grey area though and gets problematic: why can't Asian women be sexual without dipping into Orientalist conceptions of them?



I guess Asian people aren't allowed to depict the beauty of their own people without producing some kind of fetish porn. This sucks because now I cannot allow my wife to be in any photos(and I must destroy all her family albums), as she is technically "Asian." How am I going to explain this to her?
Way to exaggerate everything I've said. I never said it was some "fetish porn" or that all depictions of Asian women are disgusting and should be censored.

All I'm arguing (somewhat as a devil's advocate) is that sexualizing a female subject to certain extents can be seen as a form of objectification. Why do the women have to have D-cup breasts and their uniforms busted open? Why do they wear short-shorts? Why do the bottom two have faces that are much like many hyper-sexualized perfume ads? Does serving the Chinese people put them into some sort of state where they must exude pseudo-orgasmic sexuality? It's safe to say that this is for the male gaze.

But I realize that the side I'm arguing for has its problems. Why can't we depict women erotically without it being problematic? Why do typical sexualized depictions of women tend to put them in subservient positions? Is there a way to depict them as beautiful and sexual beings without the male gaze?

[Salmonella]

Fixed
http://i870.photobucket.com/albums/ab264/AlphaKappa95/automotivator.jpg

That is a art drawn by a chinese female artist...

[Kayser_Soso]

But to play devil's advocate - and this is stretching it a bit I know - can't one say that the image and concept of the Chinese woman is being exploited (not in a Marxist sense obviously)?

No.



This is very subjective, but I have to agree to an extent. They're not sexually depicted and surrouding some man, sure. But the sexualization and militarization can very likely imply "serving" a man as well as she "serves" the country.

I think that's reading a lot into it.






I said it was subtle. And what I'm trying to get as is that hyper-sexualizing an Asian female subject does take a bit from such Orientalist discourse. It does get into a bit of a grey area though and gets problematic: why can't Asian women be sexual without dipping into Orientalist conceptions of them?

I don't know, maybe because any time they are depicted in a slightly sexual manner someone brings this up?






All I'm arguing (somewhat as a devil's advocate) is that sexualizing a female subject to certain extents can be seen as a form of objectification. Why do the women have to have D-cup breasts and their uniforms busted open? Why do they wear short-shorts? Why do the bottom two have faces that are much like many hyper-sexualized perfume ads? Does serving the Chinese people put them into some sort of state where they must exude pseudo-orgasmic sexuality? It's safe to say that this is for the male gaze.

But I realize that the side I'm arguing for has its problems. Why can't we depict women erotically without it being problematic? Why do typical sexualized depictions of women tend to put them in subservient positions? Is there a way to depict them as beautiful and sexual beings without the male gaze?

But depicting them erotically is going to naturally lead to this. Plus, I still don't see how they are depicted in a subservient manner. The fact that they are soldiers implies the opposite.

[AK]

That is a art drawn by a chinese female artist...
OK.... and?

[Nothing Human Is Alien]

"Soviet" literally means "worker's council"

Soviet (сове́т) just means council. Рабочих советов means workers council in Russian.


it has nothing to do with any kind of "regional cultural form", whether European or Asian or African.

So why not use the language which we are speaking here and just call them workers councils?

Like it or not, the word soviet is and will be seen as the word Soviet (e.g. having to do with the USSR).

[Sasha]

http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2010/8/6/d98ca91a-9e80-4d73-8faf-113d83b435d1.jpg


hihi, i made this just to post it in this thread and now it made it to the front page on the demotivational blog (http://verydemotivational.com/2010/08/21/demotivational-posters-s-c-a-j/) :lol:

[welshexile1963]

http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d62/RedStarOverChina/hot.jpg

All the motivation I ever need.


LMAO! I agree!!!!

[welshexile1963]

http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/5116/automotivator.jpg


LMAO! Even better!!!

[Knight of Cydonia]

hihi, i made this just to post it in this thread and now it made it to the front page on the demotivational blog (http://verydemotivational.com/2010/08/21/demotivational-posters-s-c-a-j/) :lol:
:lol: yes it is ...:thumbup1: ayway, good one, mate.

[El Chuncho]

Showing beautiful women is not sexist if they do the same for beautiful men. Also showing beautiful people is not necessarily exploitation, unless they are actually being exploited...meaning that they are truly being objectified. There is no real evidence that the image above is objectifying women, and people should not be so rash without knowing the artist's intent. Soviet propaganda posters featured had beautiful and strong workers.

People are making wild assumptions about the picture above. Who says the artist doesn't think that women should just be proud of their beauty and not hide it away? The artist herself is a woman. Who says she is trying to interest men (which in itself is not exactly wrong, because saying that women can be attractive and political is not too negative. Both women and men should have the right to look at images - even photographs rather than drawn representations - of beautiful people; maybe it is just a celebration of beauty, the human form). And saying that such images endorse exotic dragon lady Asians stereotypes is erroneous as the image is Chinese made by a Chinese artist. I doubt Chinese people view Chinese women as exotic and concupiscent. And not all Asians are the same, for instance Japanese people are very different to Chinese, and Chinese different to Vietnamese, so we should not lump them all in as ''Asians''. This image is about a depiction of Chinese women.

Leftists have to get past this hyper-sensitivity to sexuality, especially as the right has traditionally censored sexuality and nudity. The human body is not something that should be looked on as either ugly or exploited if shown. Some of the greatest works of arts - such as David or Venus - have been celebrations of the beauty of the human form.

Anyway, the main thing I have seen in this thread is someone saying - jokingly - that they are attracted to Chinese communist women in such attire. This was then followed by the claim that he is sexist or exploitative. How is finding something attractive negative? It is natural. I could find dark-tanned naked men with chip and dale collars attractive, I could find pale naked women with ribbons in their hair attractive, I could find little grubby men in cardigans attractive, or spotty women with aprons etc. (tastes differ!) but that doesn't mean I objectify them and do not respect them as fellow human beings! :rolleyes:

I find my partner very attractive, and I completely and utterly love and respect them. Attraction does not equal objectivity. Objectifying is when you view someone only as a commodity and not as an equal human being with feelings, equal rights and opinions.

[Susurrus]

http://de-motivational-posters.com/images/communism-looks-like-the-party-is-over.jpg
http://de-motivational-posters.com/images/communism-now-in-3-d.jpg

[Comrade Jandar]

^^^ Can we ditch the sexist exploitation, please? :rolleyes:

Oh, come on. :laugh:

[Agent Ducky]

http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2011/020/7/1/communism_demotivational_by_captainvendetta-d37nnyx.jpg
Made it myself because puns.

[Susurrus]

A couple of my own creation:
http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2012/1/15/e98da4b6-d015-4dc6-8ad0-bfd66c75ab68.jpg

http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2012/1/15/a64e7286-2f20-4b99-ab3e-bfc7c2312900.jpg

[ColonelCossack]

http://images.starcraftmazter.net/4chan/commie/my_stance_on_communism_and_socialism.jpg

This is a good one. Ignore the picture of Stalin if you don't like him, it's still a good poster.

That's sick

"sick" as in really really cool, in case you aren't familiar with colloquialisms.

[Tovarisch]

LMAO! Even better!!!
I don't see how that is sexist at all. What, does Marx forbid showing a group of women holding flags? The drawing depicts the natural beauty, the women in the picture are not succumbing to wearing makeup or lipstick or fancy clothes to make themselves appear more "beautiful". The women also don't look weak, but quite muscular actually. There is absolutely nothing wrong with celebrating the beauty of the human body, quite a bit of Soviet propaganda posters contain pictures of muscular men and women holding up hammers and sickles. If you think this picture is sexist, then you probably think the smilies on this website are racist as well, since they are all yellow and round

[TheGodlessUtopian]

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTE7xt-BOJuIE7poOSfnvUrLwDz1WaiLtbmx6XmEWKKEMf4AdDQ
Zombie revolution!


http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQl-ovBj91gR5IJ1r-Hpvn02hj7kLAmM0JzBn9uw7skx2FYL1RdeA

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ7mUR2JJ-0Amr1L7VOg_pAfq4_n6c0taueIKKmRwFBEV9DbJWb

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ-xR4DRnTJRPk3fPNoWCPWvRFsYpFpJIQ8FLzfTOhjoE95AVAHkA

[TheGodlessUtopian]

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRv3xmxNNPuFnfs3w6PqO8tXlwhvRU14 RmVj3eANjIR94KXVxdg

..no cappies...hmmmm...

[Astarte]

http://a4.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/131/54a1f79654b643ca857e96965de230f5/l.jpg
"Uh, gee, hey Wally, what does RSFSR mean anyway?"

[Renegade Saint]

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRv3xmxNNPuFnfs3w6PqO8tXlwhvRU14 RmVj3eANjIR94KXVxdg

..no cappies...hmmmm...
I... don't... think that picture really conveys the message the text is trying to get across...

[Tovarisch]

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRv3xmxNNPuFnfs3w6PqO8tXlwhvRU14 RmVj3eANjIR94KXVxdg

..no cappies...hmmmm...
That's right, no cappies, just dictators and a disturbing lack of almost any electricity...

[TheGodlessUtopian]

I... don't... think that picture really conveys the message the text is trying to get across...

I don't think so either...man,sometimes the anti-communists can suck even at propaganda.

Here is another oddly phrased picture...

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQXteqN9VxTXb-n5PPWBgSoOLSlmq0C2tzPtkSWgftkzru1_AaYsw
- - - - - -

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT1T4Uwxx4vleFjSmxf01C4f2QI50_TI 90J8l56GfN0IJrFHNKn



http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRT9GZoovYSOtaOrSeSTOCWaU5MZj2Uf NJHdu3Samb07aVXSFP8

[Susurrus]

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT1T4Uwxx4vleFjSmxf01C4f2QI50_TI 90J8l56GfN0IJrFHNKn


It looks like Marx just ate Stalin's last doughnut or something.

[Tovarisch]

I don't think so either...man,sometimes the anti-communists can suck even at propaganda.

Here is another oddly phrased picture...

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQXteqN9VxTXb-n5PPWBgSoOLSlmq0C2tzPtkSWgftkzru1_AaYsw

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRT9GZoovYSOtaOrSeSTOCWaU5MZj2Uf NJHdu3Samb07aVXSFP8
Ahaha, the top one made me jump out of my seat:laugh:

The bottom one would look very good with text IMO

[Ele'ill]

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/june2010/280610top.jpg

[Ele'ill]

http://radicalactivismvisualarchive.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/3web.jpg

[Comrade Samuel]

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100720075734/cnc/images/d/d3/Ra3_propaganda.png

This was from some obscure video game I played a long time ago but its still one of my favorite images ever.

[Susurrus]

This was from some obscure video game I played a long time ago but its still one of my favorite images ever.

Red Alert 3 is not obscure.

http://0.tqn.com/d/compactiongames/1/0/b/E/1/redalert3_003.jpg
http://images.ea.com/games/redalert3/Artwork/Soviets/RA3_Soviet_Conscript.jpg

[Comrade Samuel]

Red Alert 3 is not obscure.

That's what it was, couldent quite put my finger on the name. I did like it but the acting was the funniest thing I've ever seen.

Nevertheless it was full of cool soviet images and what not.

[Susurrus]

Bwahaha, just found this one...
http://i.imgur.com/yV1pa.jpg

[Agent Ducky]

Bwahaha, just found this one...
http://i.imgur.com/yV1pa.jpg

Dammit! You beat me to it! I still wonder what the heck he's even eating in this picture?

[Susurrus]

Dammit! You beat me to it! I still wonder what the heck he's even eating in this picture?

It looks like chicken or a sandwich.

[El Chuncho]

It looks like chicken or a sandwich.

Or a chicken sandwich, maybe? :marx:

[Susurrus]

Or a chicken sandwich, maybe? :marx:

More likely a sandwich chicken. :drool:

[Agent Ducky]

I think there's a tortilla there though. So maybe it's a ginormous chicken quesadilla sandwich thing.

[Zulu]

http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/6826/crisisg.jpg