Log in

View Full Version : Pluralist Economist Seeks Knowledge, Comradeship!



RommelDAK
24th May 2010, 01:33
Howdy from Texas, comrades! Im an economist with an interest in all schools of thought in my discipline: Marx, Austrian, Feminist, Neoclassical, New Institutionalist, Post Keynesian, Institutionalist, etc. I, personally, lean most heavily towards the last two, but Ive learned something from every approach and wish economists in general were more open. In fact, I feel that so strongly that I once served as director of this association (International Confederation of Associations for Pluralism in Economics):

.icape.org

(had to leave off the www at the beginning as I don't have sufficient posts to be permitted to include a link in a message)

Actually, this bit off the front page is mine:


ICAPE is dedicated to the idea that pluralism and intellectual progress are complements. This is not to say anything goes, but that each tradition of thought (Austrian, feminist, old and new institutionalist, Marxian, neoclassical, Post Keynesian, social economics, Sraffian, etc.) adds something unique and valuable to economic scholarship. Achieving productive discussion and debate across schools of economic thought is not a simple matter. There are many institutional and practical obstacles to pluralism. It is precisely by helping to remove those obstacles that ICAPE hopes to render a service to the community of economists throughout the world.

I am currently working on a book comparing schools of thought in economics with an emphasis on their current activities and not just their histories. Probably a dozen or so people will buy it, but it keeps me off the streets!

So I am here mainly from scholarly curiosity and I may post a bit in the theory forum (have some questions regarding the socially useful part of socially useful labor).

Solidarity!

John

P.S. To be honest, I came across this place because I did a Google search for Marxist music! I am a big fan of The Clash, The Housemartins, and Gang of Four and wondered what else I might be able to find in that same vein.

Raúl Duke
24th May 2010, 03:29
Welcome

You'll be surprised that not only you may find a few people versed in Marxist economics, Keynesian, or Sraffian (although I don't remember if the members most knowledgeable in this stuff are still around...they may be but not sure) but also even neo-classical and Austrian/Misean (although these last 2 are in our OI section).

RommelDAK
24th May 2010, 03:35
As a matter of fact, I just discovered the economics subforum (and made a post)!

Zapatas Guns
24th May 2010, 05:55
Hey welcome. Cool another Texan. I found this place by accident too. :thumbup1:

Q
24th May 2010, 06:24
Welcome :)

I look forward to discussions.

Chambered Word
24th May 2010, 11:47
Welcome, nice to meet you. :)

I don't know if that's you in your avatar or not but IIRC personal pictures are not allowed on RevLeft.

RommelDAK
24th May 2010, 12:44
Thx, all! Ooops, will change pic!

RommelDAK
24th May 2010, 12:46
There, now it's John Maynard!

Elementnh4
2nd June 2010, 05:52
What do you think about an economy divided into two parts, wants and needs. needs handled in a communal format where people are delegated responsibility for other people in their communnity and food water healthcare and shelter are all handled to meet everyone's needs to the best of the state's abilities. As for wants, they can be handled with current monetary policies be cause wants are infinite they are subject to scarcity. This still maintains economic for incentive while at the same time providing people those inalienable rights and freedoms where a piece of paper isn't so attached to survival and people are expected to contact and help people they can self appoint to be responsible for or the state will appoint someone for them to be stay in contact with, visit, take care of and help.

thomasludd
8th June 2010, 06:24
What do you think about an economy divided into two parts, wants and needs. needs handled in a communal format where people are delegated responsibility for other people in their communnity and food water healthcare and shelter are all handled to meet everyone's needs to the best of the state's abilities. As for wants, they can be handled with current monetary policies be cause wants are infinite they are subject to scarcity. This still maintains economic for incentive while at the same time providing people those inalienable rights and freedoms where a piece of paper isn't so attached to survival and people are expected to contact and help people they can self appoint to be responsible for or the state will appoint someone for them to be stay in contact with, visit, take care of and help.

Comrade, can you use bullets?:)