Governor??
15th May 2010, 23:49
Greetings.
I am anti-fascism. I do not believe that a sole profit motive can create the ideal society and will tend to the level fascism we see today in big banks and Wall Street merging with Government. I consider organized crime to be fueled by solely a profit motive. Therefore, organized crime would be categorized as "capitalistic" -- and extremely dangerous to the wealth and wellbeing of the remainder of society. I am anti-capitalism in that respect.
I believe the goal of anarchism is noble as persons act as sovereigns thereby honoring the equal rights of other sovereigns. However, without law -- I believe we would see a form of organized criminals rise to power as "super-capitalists" and robber barons in an alpha wolf "survival of the fittest" top down society. Therefore anarchism seems incapable of producing the result of liberty from the tyranny of a top down hierarchy.
I would ideally seek the results of co-sovereigns emerging to create the ideal society.
I do not believe that socialism is capable as a system to produce this result either. Unfortunately, the State becomes a corporation and robber barons arise in a socialist system as the people are disempowered by the loss of private property and free will. The State itself becomes a "super monopoly corporation" with a dictator and industrialists acting as the capitalist robber barons. The robber barons have thus been given absolute power and the people are seduced into absolute slavery believing they have achieved equality through the State.
I am a sovereigntist politically and a charitist economically.
Where a communist would say "comrade" -- I would see a "co-sovereign". The equality is present without loss of personal power to robber barons or the State.
As a charitist, I would believe that every person has an inherent right to a living wage, education, healthcare, and personal home ownership. To secure that right, the robber barons must be stood against and their power denied. (This can be accomplished structurally.) Then, the economy must be released to production. As sovereigntists, we must focus on the inclusiveness of an expanding economy to release wealth to the entire population of community and then to the world.
In brief, a charitist is not a capitalist nor a socialist. The "ideal man" must arise to love his neighbor as himself as a sovereigntist in a community of co-sovereigns. Therefore, the most powerful form of economy is produced by charity in "free will socialism" which surrenders no power to monopoly, corporation, ... thus State... thus robber baron... and maintains personal sovereignty and the control of private property. This system is capable of bringing the entire world to a position of home ownership, living wage, education, healthcare, and expanding economy in the accumulation of expanding wealth capable of providing not only necessity but wealth to all mankind in exponential growth.
Robber barons are the greatest adversary of charitist economy for they seek sole profit motive to themselves and amass power -- then out of greed seek to diminish the rights and benefits of others rather than to provide for same (as does the charitist).
So, I am neither right nor left, I think. I would agree with the goals of the left in securing the rights of the people -- but would believe the path to securing those rights is through expanding liberty, prosperity, and opportunity as co-sovereigns in a charitist system of free will.
I believe that if the robber barons are effectively "shut out" of the system structurally from gaining power through fascism -- that is the key to releasing the power of the charitist system.
I am creating my own political and economic system which is neither right nor left - as I view it.
So, that is my introduction. I came onto the forum to discuss Detroit - a matter of interest to me.
I am anti-fascism. I do not believe that a sole profit motive can create the ideal society and will tend to the level fascism we see today in big banks and Wall Street merging with Government. I consider organized crime to be fueled by solely a profit motive. Therefore, organized crime would be categorized as "capitalistic" -- and extremely dangerous to the wealth and wellbeing of the remainder of society. I am anti-capitalism in that respect.
I believe the goal of anarchism is noble as persons act as sovereigns thereby honoring the equal rights of other sovereigns. However, without law -- I believe we would see a form of organized criminals rise to power as "super-capitalists" and robber barons in an alpha wolf "survival of the fittest" top down society. Therefore anarchism seems incapable of producing the result of liberty from the tyranny of a top down hierarchy.
I would ideally seek the results of co-sovereigns emerging to create the ideal society.
I do not believe that socialism is capable as a system to produce this result either. Unfortunately, the State becomes a corporation and robber barons arise in a socialist system as the people are disempowered by the loss of private property and free will. The State itself becomes a "super monopoly corporation" with a dictator and industrialists acting as the capitalist robber barons. The robber barons have thus been given absolute power and the people are seduced into absolute slavery believing they have achieved equality through the State.
I am a sovereigntist politically and a charitist economically.
Where a communist would say "comrade" -- I would see a "co-sovereign". The equality is present without loss of personal power to robber barons or the State.
As a charitist, I would believe that every person has an inherent right to a living wage, education, healthcare, and personal home ownership. To secure that right, the robber barons must be stood against and their power denied. (This can be accomplished structurally.) Then, the economy must be released to production. As sovereigntists, we must focus on the inclusiveness of an expanding economy to release wealth to the entire population of community and then to the world.
In brief, a charitist is not a capitalist nor a socialist. The "ideal man" must arise to love his neighbor as himself as a sovereigntist in a community of co-sovereigns. Therefore, the most powerful form of economy is produced by charity in "free will socialism" which surrenders no power to monopoly, corporation, ... thus State... thus robber baron... and maintains personal sovereignty and the control of private property. This system is capable of bringing the entire world to a position of home ownership, living wage, education, healthcare, and expanding economy in the accumulation of expanding wealth capable of providing not only necessity but wealth to all mankind in exponential growth.
Robber barons are the greatest adversary of charitist economy for they seek sole profit motive to themselves and amass power -- then out of greed seek to diminish the rights and benefits of others rather than to provide for same (as does the charitist).
So, I am neither right nor left, I think. I would agree with the goals of the left in securing the rights of the people -- but would believe the path to securing those rights is through expanding liberty, prosperity, and opportunity as co-sovereigns in a charitist system of free will.
I believe that if the robber barons are effectively "shut out" of the system structurally from gaining power through fascism -- that is the key to releasing the power of the charitist system.
I am creating my own political and economic system which is neither right nor left - as I view it.
So, that is my introduction. I came onto the forum to discuss Detroit - a matter of interest to me.