Log in

View Full Version : "Build a People's Army of a New Type" by Lin Biao



The Vegan Marxist
10th May 2010, 08:51
The reason I'm posting this is because I find it to have significance when it comes to the formation of the People's War & what is taking place during the People's War in Nepal.

Build a People’s Army of a New Type

“Without a people’s army the people have nothing. ” This is the conclusion drawn by Comrade Mao Tse-tung from the Chinese people’s experience in their long years of revolutionary struggle, experience that was bought in blood. This is a universal truth of Marxism-Leninism.

The special feature of the Chinese revolution was armed revolution against armed counter-revolution. The main form of struggle was war and the main form of organization was the army which was under the absolute leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, while all the other forms of organization and struggle led by our Party were co-ordinated, directly or indirectly, with the war.

During the First Revolutionary Civil War, many fine Party comrades took an active part in the armed revolutionary struggle. But our Party was then still in its infancy and did not have a clear understanding of this special feature of the Chinese revolution. It was only after the First Revolutionary Civil War, only after the Kuomintang had betrayed the revolution, massacred large numbers of Communists and destroyed all the revolutionary mass organizations, that our Party reached a clearer understanding of the supreme importance of organizing revolutionary armed forces and of studying the strategy and tactics of revolutionary war, and created the Workers’ and Peasants’ Red Army, the first people’s army under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.

During the Second Revolutionary Civil War, the Workers’ and Peasants’ Red Army created by Comrade Mao Tse-tung grew considerably and at one time reached a total of 300,000 men. But it later lost nine-tenths of its forces as a result of the wrong political and military lines followed by the “Left” opportunist leadership.

At the start of the War of Resistance Against Japan, the people’s army led by the Chinese Communist Party had only a little over 40,000 men. The Kuomintang reactionaries attempted to restrict, weaken and destroy this people’s army in every conceivable way. Comrade Mao Tse-tung pointed out that, in these circumstances, in order to sustain the War of Resistance and defeat the Japanese aggressors, it was imperative greatly to expand and consolidate the Eighth Route and New Fourth Armies and all the guerrilla units led by our Party. The whole Party should give close attention to war and study military affairs. Every Party member should be ready at all times to take up arms and go to the front.

Comrade Mao Tse-tung also incisively stated that Communists do not fight for personal military power but must fight for military power for the Party and for the people.

Guided by the Party’s correct line of expanding the revolutionary armed forces, the Communist-led Eighth Route and New Fourth Armies and anti-Japanese guerrilla units promptly went to the forefront at the very beginning of the war. We spread the seeds of the people’s armed forces in the vast areas behind the enemy lines and kindled the flames of guerrilla warfare everywhere. Our people’s army steadily expanded in the struggle, so that by the end of the war it was already a million strong, and there was also a militia of over two million. That was why we were able to engage nearly two-thirds of the Japanese forces of aggression and 95 per cent of the puppet troops and to become the main force in the War of Resistance Against Japan. While resisting the Japanese invading forces, we repulsed three large-scale anti-Communist onslaughts launched by the Kuomintang reactionaries in 1939, 1941 and 1943, and smashed their countless “friction-mongering” activities.

Why were the Eighth Route and New Fourth Armies able to grow big and strong from being small and weak and to score such great victories in the War of Resistance Against Japan?

The fundamental reason was that the Eighth Route and New Fourth Armies were founded on Comrade Mao Tse-tung’s theory of army building. They were armies of a new type, a people’s army which whole-heartedly serves the interests of the people.

Guided by Comrade Mao Tse-tung’s theory on building a people’s army, our army was under the absolute leadership of the Chinese Communist Party and most loyally carried out the Party’s Marxist-Leninist line and policies. It had a high degree of conscious discipline and was heroically inspired to destroy all enemies and conquer all difficulties. Internally there was full unity between cadres and fighters, between those in higher and those in lower positions of responsibility, between the different departments and between the various fraternal army units. Externally, there was similarly full unity between the army and the people and between the army and the local government.

During the anti-Japanese war our army staunchly performed the three tasks set by Comrade Mao Tse-tung, namely, fighting, mass work, and production, and it was at the same time a fighting force, a political work force and a production corps. Everywhere it went, it did propaganda work among the masses, organized and armed them and helped them set up revolutionary political power. Our armymen strictly observed the Three Main Rules of Discipline and the Eight Points for Attention, carried out campaigns to “support the government and cherish the people”, and did good deeds for the people everywhere. They also made use of every possibility to engage in production themselves so as to overcome economic difficulties, better their own livelihood and lighten the people’s burden. By their exemplary conduct they won the whole-hearted support of the masses, who affectionately called them “our own boys”.

Our army consisted of local forces as well as of regular forces; moreover, it energetically built and developed the militia, thus practising the system of combining the three military formations, i.e., the regular forces, the local forces and the militia.

Our army also pursued correct policies in winning over enemy officers and men in giving lenient treatment to prisoners of war. During the anti-Japanese war we not only brought about the revolt and surrender of large numbers of puppet troops, but succeeded in converting not a few Japanese prisoners, who had been badly poisoned by fascist ideology. After they were politically awakened, they organized themselves into anti-war organizations such as the League for the Liberation of the Japanese People, the Anti-War League of the Japanese in China and the League of Awakened Japanese, helped us to disintegrate the Japanese army and co-operated with us in opposing Japanese militarism. Comrade Sanzo Nosaka, the leader of the Japanese Communist Party, who was then in Yenan, gave us great help in this work.

The essence of Comrade Mao Tse-tung’s theory of army building is that in building a people’s army prominence must be given to politics, i.e., the army must first and foremost be built on a political basis. Politics is the commander, politics is the soul of everything. Political work is the lifeline of our army. True, a people’s army must pay attention to the constant improvement of its weapons and equipment and its military technique, but in its fighting it does not rely purely on weapons and technique, it relies mainly on politics, on the proletarian revolutionary consciousness and courage of the commanders and fighters, on the support and backing of the masses.

Owing to the application of Comrade Mao Tse-tung’s line on army building, there has prevailed in our army at all times a high level of proletarian political consciousness, an atmosphere of keenness to study the thought of Mao Tse-tung, an excellent morale, a solid unity and a deep hatred for the enemy, and thus a gigantic moral force has been brought into being. In battle it has feared neither hardships nor death, it has been able to charge or hold its ground as the conditions require. One man can play the role of several, dozens or even hundreds, and miracles can be performed.

All this makes the people’s army led by the Chinese Communist Party fundamentally different from any bourgeois army, and from all the armies of the old type which served the exploiting classes and were driven and utilized by a handful of people. The experience of the people’s war in China shows that a people’s army created in accordance with Comrade Mao Tse-tung’s theory of army building is incomparably strong and invincible.

Proletarian Ultra
10th May 2010, 15:39
I have not read this work, but Lin Biao was a revisionist whose theories led to the initial defeat of Maoism in the 1970's.

Not everything published in Communist leaders' names is their own work.

The Vegan Marxist
10th May 2010, 19:18
I have not read this work, but Lin Biao was a revisionist whose theories led to the initial defeat of Maoism in the 1970's.

Can you explain why exactly Lin was a revisionist? I always perceived Deng as the reason behind China's socialist rise.

RED DAVE
10th May 2010, 20:09
The experience of the people’s war in China shows that a people’s army created in accordance with Comrade Mao Tse-tung’s theory of army building is incomparably strong and invincible.So how has this mighty peoples army become the tool of the world's largest capitalist class?

RED DAVE

Comrade B
10th May 2010, 22:11
Lin Biao was a popular figure in Chinese politics, competing with Mao Zedong. Mao had him killed because of the the competition for popularity between them. The funny thing is, Lin Biao did a lot to revitalize Mao's cult of personality. After Lin Biao's death, China launched the Anti-Confucius Anti-Lin Biao campaign, a movement to smash up historical religious items. Lin Biao's name was tagged onto this to connect him to the past cruelty of Confucius social structure. It is sort of like how Stalin had portraits of himself and Lenin painted to connect him to something to be admired, just in the reverse.

This is why Maoists think that Lin Biao was a revisionist.

Atlee
10th May 2010, 22:19
Lin Biao was on the same level as Mao and as the last poster indicated it caused problems internally like any tendency of the Left does because of the differences of opinion; however this is not why I am posting, I have caught up to a book on war time that might be of interest to some here: The Sorrow of War by Bao Ninh who was a North Vietnam soldier. Maybe this might help to understand the nature of real guerilla warfare from the first person perspective.

Palingenisis
10th May 2010, 22:25
Can you explain why exactly Lin was a revisionist? I always perceived Deng as the reason behind China's socialist rise.

If anything he was an Ultra-Leftist...MonkeySmashesHeaven praise him a lot. I think he was right in his majior fight with Mao (he saw US Imperialism as the biggest enemy while Mao thought it was Soviet Social-Imperialism).

The Vegan Marxist
11th May 2010, 00:24
If anything he was an Ultra-Leftist...MonkeySmashesHeaven praise him a lot. I think he was right in his majior fight with Mao (he saw US Imperialism as the biggest enemy while Mao thought it was Soviet Social-Imperialism).

I know who you're talking about. Been friends with him for a while. That's who pointed me to Lin's work.

Palingenisis
11th May 2010, 01:35
The Lin Biaoist version of third worldism views the whole first world proletariat as reactionary and advocates a global peoples' war in which the first world proletariat has no role.

Lin Biao also built a cult of personality around Mao. This was imitated by CPs abroad and the idea of a foreign personality cult clashed with the patriotic sentiment of the masses. ".

No MIM and MSH has that line....But its classic Marxism that the nation that oppresses another forges its own chains and that often the "luck" of communist movements in the Imperialist countries often depends on blows struck against those Imperialism in the colonies (or neo-colonies).

"
Marx had already clearly recognized the significance of this. In his time it was admittedly mainly an English problem: the problem of England’s relation to Ireland. And Marx stressed with the greatest force that, ‘questions of international justice apart, it is a precondition of the emancipation of the English working class to transform the present enforced union – in other words, slavery of -Ireland, if possible into an equal and free alliance and, if necessary, into total separation’. For he had clearly seen that the exploitation of Ireland was, on the one hand, an important bastion of English capitalism which was already- at that time uniquely – monopolist in character, and on the other, that the ambiguous attitude of the English working class to this issue divided the oppressed, provoked a struggle of exploited against exploited instead of their united struggle against their common exploiters, and that therefore only the struggle for the national liberation of Ireland could create a really effective front in the English proletariat’s struggle against its own bourgeoisie."

Luckas in 1924 (he did become a revisionist later I know).

http://www.marxists.org/archive/lukacs/works/1924/lenin/ch04.htm

Saorsa
11th May 2010, 01:59
I don't think Dave does deserve a warning for that, it's a fair question which the UCPN (M) has actually posed itself.

http://kasamaproject.org/2009/03/23/communist-party-of-nepal-maoists-responds-to-rcp-critique-june-2006/


History is a witness that the proletarian class had succeeded in establishing its power in almost one-third of the globe, with the breath-taking sacrifice of millions in the twentieth century. The imperialist world system of war and aggression for loot and plunder of the poor nations and people of the under-developed countries was under threat from the socialist system. Poverty, deprivation, corruption, unemployment, etc. – the general phenomena of the capitalist mode of production – had been basically eliminated from those socialist countries.

But questions have come up as to why those proletarian powers turned into their opposites without any bloodshed, right after the demise or capture of the main leadership? Why did Comrade Stalin fail to control the emergence of revisionists from within the Party he had led, despite that he did his best, including forceful suppression against them? Why did the CPC under Mao’s leadership, despite that it launched the Cultural Revolution, fail to stop revisionist Deng and his clique from grabbing power after his demise? Why did the Russian Red Army that was able to defeat the fascist Hitler and his powerful army with the sacrifice of about 20 million Russian patriots, fail to retain proletarian power after the death of Comrade Stalin? Why did the Chinese PLA, which was able to defeat Japanese imperialist aggression and 5.5 million in the Chinese reactionary army, turn out to be a silent spectator when the revisionist Deng clique grabbed power? Why did the Vietnamese people’s army, which was able to defeat the US army, the strongest army in the world, and equipped with the most sophisticated weapons, fail to notice the transfer of proletarian power into its opposite? These and alike are the questions for which we are trying to find correct answers. Only cursing the revisionists does not solve the problem.

pranabjyoti
11th May 2010, 02:18
So how has this mighty peoples army become the tool of the world's largest capitalist class?

RED DAVE
Very simple. The Chinese revolution, from the very beginning is more dependent on peasants i.e. petty-bourgeoisie than workers. There wasn't sufficient working class in China during the time of revolution to continue the revolution themselves. Therefore, after the revolution and as time goes on, the petty-bourgeoisie reveals its own character and slowly began to turn to be bourgeoisie. Mao repeatedly called China a "New Democratic" state, not even "socialist" state. That's a very clear indication that he was well aware of the character of the revolution he leaded.
Until and unless, there is strong workers international, that can fight with this kind of petty-bourgeoisie tendency, there is always a high chance of countries turning bourgeoisie, specially Asian countries, where moribund feudalism is also a enemy and often the more a danger than capitalist-imperialism.

The Vegan Marxist
11th May 2010, 02:20
This is what comrade red cat told me:
"Lin Biaoism is mainly associated with the assertion that a new era beyond Leninism has started, in which imperialism will fall very easily, with a "final push" from the proletariat . This idea led to military and political blunders by many CPs. The present Maoist CPs maintain that the era of Leninism is continuing at present.

The Lin Biaoist version of third worldism views the whole first world proletariat as reactionary and advocates a global peoples' war in which the first world proletariat has no role.

Lin Biao also built a cult of personality around Mao. This was imitated by CPs abroad and the idea of a foreign personality cult clashed with the patriotic sentiment of the masses. "

You're a troll and deserve a warning for this. Secondly, how does China have the "largest capitalist class"? Just because China has the highest population does not mean they are all capitalists.

I was wondering where Comrade Andrew (monkeysmashesheaven) gained the views of how anyone within the first world is a role-less reactionary & deserves to be exterminated through third world revolution. Thanks for this though.