Log in

View Full Version : This is why the Maoists lifted the bandh



Saorsa
10th May 2010, 01:32
Strike forces the poor to eat seeds saved for planting

TEK NARAYAN BHATTARAI

PALPA, May 9: Impoverished Kumal families of Ghorbanda, Palpa living on daily wages had to eat maize kept as seeds during the six-day Maoist general strike.
Around 150 Kumal households in Chirtungdhara-7, Ghorbanda depend on daily labor for living and walk around seven kilometers to district headquarters Tansen for work. Around 90 percent of labor force in Tansen is supplied by these Kumals.

They couldnt work for wages during the strike and had nothing to eat except for the seeds. With enough rainfall, the vegetable garden is now ready but the Kumals dont have maize to sow nor do they have money to buy seeds.



The five-member family of Tilak Kumal, 35, ate 10 bunches of maize during the strike. We made do with two cobs for a person every day, Tilak said. Tilaks wife Dilsara was preparing soup of maize while this scribe reached their house Sunday morning.

We roast maize to eat. And then soak it in water to soften and make dal. We also make rice out of it. Its everything we have to eat, Dilsara added. A little addition of tomato makes it very tasty, she tried to paint a rosier picture.

Suka Maya, 76, said she had to make gruel of maize as she couldnt chew the roasted ones. I spent the days by eating a cup of gruel in the morning and evening, she rued. She said she has not had a grain of rice or lentils for the past five days as her son and daughter-in-law could not go to work.

The Kumals, however, are happy that the strike has finally been called back and now hope to buy seeds by working. But they fear whether it would be too late to sow maize by the time they save enough to buy seeds.

Chandrakala, who is pursuing Bachelor of Education and is the most educated Kumal in the village, said there was shortage of food in the village during the six-day strike. Everybody lived on half-filled stomach. The shops wouldnt sell on credit while there was no work to do, she reasoned.

Neighboring village of Magars in Chirtungdhara-8 is currently busy sowing maize, but the Kumals are now trying their best to buy seeds on time. We have to sow even after a week. Because we wont have anything to eat during a possible strike next year if we dont sow now, Tilak said.

http://www.myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=18420

chegitz guevara
10th May 2010, 03:35
Perhaps the Maoists could help these farmers out.

pranabjyoti
10th May 2010, 05:00
Can not we, the international supporters could arrange some monitory or commodity help to the Kumalis and other poorest of the poor people of Nepal to survive them during the strike and such struggling periods? I want to know others opinion.

kasama-rl
10th May 2010, 05:59
I think it will be a while before we know why specific tactical moves were taken. It seems premature to announce "why maoists lifted the strike" and then give this or that piece from the bourgeois press.

On one level, major strikes and struggles always hurt section of the people (so do civil wars, uprisings, peoples wars, etc.) by disrupting economic live and routine.

You really think that is the reasons revolutionary leaders call off major actions?

The Vegan Marxist
10th May 2010, 06:09
I think it will be a while before we know why specific tactical moves were taken. It seems premature to announce "why maoists lifted the strike" and then give this or that piece from the bourgeois press.

On one level, major strikes and struggles always hurt section of the people (so do civil wars, uprisings, peoples wars, etc.) by disrupting economic live and routine.

You really think that is the reasons revolutionary leaders call off major actions?

It could based on the level of such economic disruption. Would you not agree? Not saying this or that is the reason either, just asking.

Devrim
10th May 2010, 07:13
Can not we, the international supporters could arrange some monitory or commodity help to the Kumalis and other poorest of the poor people of Nepal to survive them during the strike and such struggling periods? I want to know others opinion.

I would say no. It is just not possible.

The first, though not the main reason, that I am very sceptical about these things is that money often does not get to strikers. I have been on strike over a dozen times times, and have never seen a penny of strike pay or solidarity money. The longest I was ever on strike for was three and a half weeks, which as I was very young at the time, had no savings and lived like many working class people 'one pay packet from disaster' was difficult. Nobody at our office (I was on the strike committee and would have known) received any money. We did see, however, various leftist groups and trade unions collecting money 'for us'.

Of course I am not implying that all of these people were personally dishonest. Many of them, particularly trade union groups, would have just given the money to our trade union (UCW, now CWU), who just didn't give any of it to the strikers*. Of course there are also other things. One of them would be the 'Militant' with their buckets which said:

Militant
Support the Postal WorkersWhich was actually collecting for their own organisation.

If you are going to give money to support strikers, I would always advocating giving it directly to the local workers and not to any union or political organisation.

More importantly though is just the practical impossibility of it. If we take the strike that I referred to above as an example there were 180,000 workers on strike. If you had given all of them 10 a week that would have been nearly 2,000,000 a week. Something that no small left organisation can afford, and what would 10 a week have done? At the time I was single without kids, and it wouldn't have been enough for me even. My rent alone was 25 a week. The sums involved are just enormous.

These things could only be supported by appeals to the class as a whole, not small groups of leftist militants.

I can see that in this case the money needed to support a family is obviously much less in that Nepal is a very poor country. The numbers of people involved are massive though, which leads to the same thing.

I am not saying that people shouldn't collect, or give money. There are advantages. When there is a big strike on collecting money in your workplace can give you the opportunity to raise the political issue of the strike.

I am just saying that a little consideration should be given to these things.

Devrim

*In fact the first pay packet we got after going back after three and a half weeks on strike showed deductions for union dues for the time we were on strike. Not only did we receive no strike pay, but we actually ended up paying the union for the privilege of going on strike, and them 'stitching us up'.