Log in

View Full Version : Anti-Maoists demonstrate against the strike



Saorsa
7th May 2010, 09:37
This is the biggest demonstration in some time outside of Maoist-led demonstrations, if the numbers reported are accurate, which they probably aren't. Either way, it is a sign of desperation and a sign of the balance of forces. The Maoist can put half a million on the streets - the ruling class can only manage 20,000! :lol:

20,000 gather in Katmandu against Maoist strike

BINAJ GURUBACHARYA | May 7, 2010 03:10 AM EST |

KATMANDU, Nepal — Police fired warning shots Friday as thousands of protesters gathered in Nepal's capital to demand an end to a crippling general strike imposed by former communist guerrillas seeking the government's resignation.

The estimated crowd of 20,000 – including doctors, lawyers, business executives, singers, teachers, and daily wage laborers – demanded a halt to the six-day strike that has shut down transportation, businesses and schools in Katmandu and other cities.

It was the largest protest against the Maoist-imposed strike since it began Sunday. The Maoists want Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal to resign and hand power over to a Maoist-led administration. The government has said it won't bow to the demands.

The Maoists traditionally back their strike calls with the threat of violence against those who defy them, and their supporters went into Katmandu neighborhoods Friday to try to forcibly shut shops that owners opened for business.

Thousands of police in riot gear guarded the capital's streets to prevent violence.

Police reported at least two clashes Friday and officers shot weapons into the air and fired tear gas canisters to bring the situation under control. No information on casualties was immediately available.

The unrest has raised fears of renewed bloodshed in Nepal, where the Maoists ended their decade-old insurgency – which left an estimated 13,000 people dead – and joined a peace process in 2006. The communists won elections in 2008 and briefly led a coalition government. A dispute over the army chief's firing, however, split the coalition, leading to the formation of the current administration that the Maoists are trying to topple.

Residents opposed to the strike began lashing out on Thursday, assaulting strike supporters and setting a car on fire in scattered clashes in the capital and other towns.

The unrest comes as Nepal's Constituent Assembly, elected to draw up a new constitution, struggles to draft the charter before its term expires May 28.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20100507/as-nepal-maoist-protest/

Devrim
7th May 2010, 09:47
the six-day strike that has shut down transportation, businesses and schools in Katmandu and other cities.

...to try to forcibly shut shops that owners opened for business.



I have only read a few things about this strike, but these are very typical. Are there workers on strike because we never hear about it? I realise the working class is small in Nepal, but there are still some concentrations particularly in the textile sector. Have you heard about workers being on strike. To me a strike is the conscious activity of workers, not telling a small shop keeper he can't open. I would be interested to hear more info on it.

Devrim

Saorsa
7th May 2010, 10:07
The Maoist unions have organised the strike. The hotel workers, the restaurant workers, rickshaw drivers and so on are all on strike. The Maoist transport workers union commandeered almost every bus in Nepal to shuttle their supporters into Kathmandu - an example of workers control in action. Sources for all this can be found in the News from Nepal thread and on jedbrandt.net, amongst other places.

And who are the supporters forcing the closure of all businesses? They are class conscious workers and peasants struggling to bring about a revolution and bring down the old order of things. A revolution is an authoritarian act towards the exploiting classes and is only a liberating act for the oppressed.

Saorsa
7th May 2010, 10:54
This sheds some light: http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/brandt300410.html