Corruption is the greatest threat to Communist Party of Cuba

[sunfarstar]

Corruption is the biggest threat to Communist Party of Cuba. I recently saw an article in Cuba, is a well-known Cuban scholar to write. He writes: If the Cuban regime has been the disintegration of subversion, the interests of some people ready to carve up. Then, these people will be who? One can not ignore the fact is. It will be some high-level Cuban Communist Party bureaucrats. One might support the dissidents in Cuba. This is not surprising. However, in reality, those dissidents in Cuba is isolated. The Cuban Communist Party is the real high-level bureaucratic corruption, counter-revolutionary. Cuban media have some low-level coverage of official corruption. However, I think the Cuban Communist Party should be to eradicate corruption from the system construction breeding sources. This may need another revolution. China will have great significance. This will be a great experiment.

腐败是古巴共产党最大的威胁。我最近看到古巴的一篇文章，是一位古巴的著名学者写的。他写到：如果，古巴政 权被颠覆解体，某些人准备瓜分利益。那么，这些人会是谁呢？一个不容忽视的事实是。它将是古巴共产党内的某 些高层官僚。有人也许会支持古巴国内的不同政见者。这不奇怪。但是，在现实中，那些古巴国内的不同政见者只 是孤立的。而古巴共产党内高层官僚的腐败才是真正的反革命。古巴媒体有一些低层官员的腐败现象报道。但是， 我觉得古巴共产党应该从制度建设上根除腐败滋生的来源。这也许需要另一场革命。它将对中国也有很大的意义。 这将是伟大的实验。

[Delenda Carthago]

In the case of bureaucratic corruption, it is a "there is no alternative" case for socialist parties of 20th century.When the people are not capable to organise by themselves and they need the party to intervent, the causality is for the party members to become bureaucrats. In the case of Cube, where many people from the revolution are still alive,it was milder all these years.As the time passes, this will become more and more ruff.

People need to let 20th century socialism let go. It was an experiment that failed.It gave us lots of things,it tought us a lot,but it was a failure.And it was a failure because it was too soon. today we speak on an other basis.Today the time has come for revolutions that will achieve not just socialism,but communism.

[red cat]

People need to let 20th century socialism let go. It was an experiment that failed.It gave us lots of things,it tought us a lot,but it was a failure.And it was a failure because it was too soon. today we speak on an other basis.Today the time has come for revolutions that will achieve not just socialism,but communism.

I am dying to post a face-palm image.

[Delenda Carthago]

I am dying to post a face-palm image.
I m talkin about objective not subjective factors

[chebol]

Corruption is one of the single greatest threats to any revolution, and the Cuba one is no different, a point that Fidel has made repeatedly, from the Escalante Affairs of 1961 and 1968 to the open period of the 80's and again over the past couple of decades.

Is there corruption in the Cuban CP and society? Hell yes. Is it critical? Not yet, but the ongoing isolation of Cuba, plus the temptation of a half-formed revolution in Venezuela rife with corruption and the added pressure of Chinese "socialism" mean that the battle is being had out now.

Which means a higher - and somewhat more discerning - level of solidarity than in the past is required of supporters of the Cuban Revolution.

[pranabjyoti]

Corruption is one of the single greatest threats to any revolution, and the Cuba one is no different, a point that Fidel has made repeatedly, from the Escalante Affairs of 1961 and 1968 to the open period of the 80's and again over the past couple of decades.

Is there corruption in the Cuban CP and society? Hell yes. Is it critical? Not yet, but the ongoing isolation of Cuba, plus the temptation of a half-formed revolution in Venezuela rife with corruption and the added pressure of Chinese "socialism" mean that the battle is being had out now.

Which means a higher - and somewhat more discerning - level of solidarity than in the past is required of supporters of the Cuban Revolution.
I agree, after all, something replacing the present Cuban system with a pro-capitalist inclination would be much worse.
The way, the "scholar" describes the Cuban society, doesn't seem that he is happy with the present system, we should be careful about that kind of "intellectuals".

[What Would Durruti Do?]

Power corrupts. You have hierarchies, you're gonna have corruption. You would think the authoritarians would finally realize this after the 10,000th failure.

[Robocommie]

Power corrupts. You have hierarchies, you're gonna have corruption. You would think the authoritarians would finally realize this after the 10,000th failure.

I'm not an authoritarian, but the truth is, to have a society you need organization, and for there to be organizations there has to be leaders. Civilization requires leadership - it's just there also needs to be checks and balances on things so that no one is too powerful, and there needs to be accountability to democratic oversight.

[the last donut of the night]

Power corrupts. You have hierarchies, you're gonna have corruption. You would think the authoritarians would finally realize this after the 10,000th failure.

I assume your justification for this is human nature? Because lots of other people say that, and I don't think they're on our side...

[What Would Durruti Do?]

I'm not an authoritarian, but the truth is, to have a society you need organization, and for there to be organizations there has to be leaders. Civilization requires leadership - it's just there also needs to be checks and balances on things so that no one is too powerful, and there needs to be accountability to democratic oversight.

Well, I disagree. Hierarchies and leaders are antithetical to anarchism.


I assume your justification for this is human nature? Because lots of other people say that, and I don't think they're on our side...

Justification for what? Power corrupting? I wouldn't say it's so much human nature as it is a highly evidenced phenomenon visible all throughout human existence. So if that's what you mean, then I suppose it could be attributed to human nature as those in power rarely wish to relinquish it.

If I had power over people I honestly can't say that my political ideology would be enough for me to give freedom to those I control. My mindset and worldview would most likely be entirely different than it is now.

[Robocommie]

Well, I disagree. Hierarchies and leaders are antithetical to anarchism.


It most certainly is, but what's that got to do with anything? I'm not anarchist, and neither was the character of the Cuban Revolution.

[What Would Durruti Do?]

It most certainly is, but what's that got to do with anything? I'm not anarchist, and neither was the character of the Cuban Revolution.

Just telling you why I disagreed. :p

[Robocommie]

Just telling you why I disagreed. :p

I appreciate that you have a different perspective on it, but I really do believe there must be leadership.