Log in

View Full Version : Harry Potter and JK Rowling the Red?



cyu
20th April 2010, 06:46
Excerpts from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article7096786.ece?print=yes

I keep having flashbacks to 1997... In January that year, I was a single parent with a four-year-old daughter, teaching part-time but living mainly on benefits, in a rented flat.

I had become a single mother when my first marriage split up in 1993. In one devastating stroke, I became a hate figure to a certain section of the press, and a bogeyman to the Tory Government... The Secretary of State for Wales, John Redwood, castigated single-parent families from St Mellons, Cardiff, as one of the biggest social problems of our day.

Between 1993 and 1997 I did the job of two parents, qualified and then worked as a secondary school teacher... I was clinically depressed. To be told, over and over again, that I was feckless, lazy even immoral did not help.

only 13 per cent of single parents are under 25 years old, the average age being 36. Fifty-two per cent live below the breadline... In spite of all the obstacles, 56.3 per cent of lone parents are in paid employment.

the Tories aim for less governmental support for the needy, and more input from the third sector: charity. It also reiterates the flagship policy so proudly defended by David Cameron last weekend, that of sticking up for marriage. To this end, they promise a half-a-billion pound tax break for lower-income married couples, working out at 150 per annum.

Maybe you know people who would legally bind themselves to another human being, for life, for an extra 150 a year? Perhaps you were contemplating leaving a loveless or abusive marriage, but underwent a change of heart on hearing about a possible 150 tax break? Anything is possible; but somehow, I doubt it. Even Mr Cameron seems to admit that he is offering nothing more than a token gesture when he tells us its not the money, its the message.

Nobody who has ever experienced the reality of poverty could say its not the money, its the message. When your flat has been broken into, and you cannot afford a locksmith, it is the money. When you are two pence short of a tin of baked beans, and your child is hungry, it is the money. When you find yourself contemplating shoplifting to get nappies, it is the money. If Mr Camerons only practical advice to women living in poverty, the sole carers of their children, is get married, and well give you 150, he reveals himself to be completely ignorant of their true situation.

How many prospective husbands did I ever meet, when I was the single mother of a baby, unable to work, stuck inside my flat, night after night, with barely enough money for lifes necessities? Should I have proposed to the youth who broke in through my kitchen window at 3am?

Let me therefore state, for the record, that I do not think it any more his fault that he spent his adolescence in the white tie and tails of Eton than that I spent the almost identical period in the ghastly brown-and-yellow stylings of Wyedean Comprehensive. I simply want to know that aspiring prime ministers have taken the trouble to educate themselves about the lives of all kinds of Britons, not only the sort that send messages with banknotes.

David Cameron tells us that the Conservatives have changed, that they are no longer the nasty party, that he wants the UK to be one of the most family-friendly nations in Europe, but I, for one, am not buying it. He has repackaged a policy that made desperate lives worse when his party was last in power, and is trying to sell it as something new. Ive never voted Tory before ... and they keep on reminding me why.

The Vegan Marxist
20th April 2010, 06:52
Well, given that Harry Potter is one of my favorite movie series', this is interesting to read & understand what Rowling went through during the times of which she started writing Harry Potter.

~Spectre
20th April 2010, 07:02
The eventual Utopian Wizarding world in Rowling's stories is exemplified by the ministry of magic that Harry Potter eventually joins ( and becomes chief enforcer of). It is a corrupt institution that permits world poverty via the separation of the wizard and muggle worlds. The ministry is in collaboration with Muggle bourgeoisie governments (as evidenced in half blood prince when the British Prime Minister is informed of Voldemort's paramilitary activity), and maintains an international system of finance capital, centered around the notorious Gringott's banking cartel.

The Vegan Marxist
20th April 2010, 07:26
The eventual Utopian Wizarding world in Rowling's stories is exemplified by the ministry of magic that Harry Potter eventually joins ( and becomes chief enforcer of). It is a corrupt institution that permits world poverty via the separation of the wizard and muggle worlds. The ministry is in collaboration with Muggle bourgeoisie governments (as evidenced in half blood prince when the British Prime Minister is informed of Voldemort's paramilitary activity), and maintains an international system of finance capital, centered around the notorious Gringott's banking cartel.

Actually, Harry became an Auror for the Department of Magical Law Enforcement. He despised the Ministry of Magic because of their corrupted ways & lack of doing anything for real justice. Although the Auror headquarters are located within the Ministry of Magic, the two operate differently, & under times in which the Aurors are needed more than ever, they are prevented from doing their duties & is rather conducted through corporate affairs under the Head Minister, himself.

~Spectre
20th April 2010, 08:20
Actually, Harry became an Auror for the Department of Magical Law Enforcement. He despised the Ministry of Magic because of their corrupted ways & lack of doing anything for real justice. Although the Auror headquarters are located within the Ministry of Magic, the two operate differently, & under times in which the Aurors are needed more than ever, they are prevented from doing their duties & is rather conducted through corporate affairs under the Head Minister, himself.


The Aurors are an organ for the wizarding bourgeoisie. They bring down magical state-power on all those seeking to change the basic exploitative power relationships of global society.

It's a vastly totalitarian state. The only criteria necessary for Auror use is essentially branding the state's target a "dark wizard". Who decides this? Conveniently, the ministry itself.

Even though the Utopian ending features Harry Potter, Hermione Granger, and Ron Weasley rising to power in the ministry, we as Marxists can see through this reformist smokescreen.

The Wizarding world will still allow billions of muggle working class to starve, political dissidents will still be hunted by Aurors, and the choking grip of Gringott's bank will continue to slowly drain the life out of society through the mechanisms of goblin run finance capital (which on her site JK has implied works in synch with muggle finance).

Westward-Individualism
20th April 2010, 08:26
I always saw Dumbledore as a Bakuninist not a Marxist, but maybe I'm looking at it through "rose" colored glasses.

I think Anarchism is a better home for gays then is Marxism -- seeing that Dumbledore is/was gay and was entirely anti-authority I'm thinking his beard leaned Bakunin not Marxist, smile.

[This was not a serious analysis - so don't flip out]

Invincible Summer
20th April 2010, 08:29
*Notices this is the "Politics" forum*

*Notices the debate on Harry Potter*

*Dies inside*

Q
20th April 2010, 08:29
The Aurors are an organ for the wizarding bourgeoisie.

Can this be moved to Chit-Chat? Like srsly http://static.1.ipbfree.com/uploads/ipbfree.com/cpcn/emo-emot-psyduck.gif

The Vegan Marxist
20th April 2010, 09:43
Can this be moved to Chit-Chat? Like srsly http://static.1.ipbfree.com/uploads/ipbfree.com/cpcn/emo-emot-psyduck.gif

haha, I couldn't agree more. I was hoping it would be.

Dimentio
20th April 2010, 09:49
Magically transferred to Chit-Chat

El Rojo
20th April 2010, 14:23
rowling the red? how much is she worth again?

Il Medico
20th April 2010, 14:27
rowling the red?
Sounds like a viking name. Just saying.

khad
20th April 2010, 14:33
Let me therefore state, for the record, that I do not think it any more his fault that he spent his adolescence in the white tie and tails of Eton than that I spent the almost identical period in the ghastly brown-and-yellow stylings of Wyedean Comprehensive. I simply want to know that aspiring prime ministers have taken the trouble to educate themselves about the lives of all kinds of Britons, not only the sort that send messages with banknotes.
The irony is that her ideal school, Hogwart's, is pretty much the Eton model minus the hazing and homoeroticism.

And public education officials in Harry Potter are suitably vilified.

Jazzratt
20th April 2010, 14:35
That depends on whether it's the Hogwarts of fan fiction or not.

Mendax
20th April 2010, 17:19
Dumbledore is obviously a Bash Back! member.

Angry Young Man
20th April 2010, 21:02
rowling the red? how much is she worth again?

How much was John Lennon worth when he was donating vast sums to the Workers' Revolutionary party? How much is Ken Loach worth? Anyway, for what it's worth, she's come out in support of Labour. Marxists aren't the only people allowed to hate tories.

gorillafuck
20th April 2010, 21:34
The eventual Utopian Wizarding world in Rowling's stories is exemplified by the ministry of magic that Harry Potter eventually joins ( and becomes chief enforcer of). It is a corrupt institution that permits world poverty via the separation of the wizard and muggle worlds. The ministry is in collaboration with Muggle bourgeoisie governments (as evidenced in half blood prince when the British Prime Minister is informed of Voldemort's paramilitary activity), and maintains an international system of finance capital, centered around the notorious Gringott's banking cartel.
I lol'd

Comrade B
25th April 2010, 06:03
rowling the red? how much is she worth again?
Being wealthy doesn't make you the enemy, it is how you get rich that makes a person an enemy... I don't think we can really call authors who were born into poverty class enemies.

People don't try to get rich because they want to be bourgeois, they get rich because being poor sucks.

Agnapostate
25th April 2010, 06:35
Damn, time's passed. I corresponded with her in...1999, I think. I tried writing her after The Goblet of Fire came out, but she was sufficiently popular at that point that I only got a Scholastic form letter. :lol:

And no, I can't find the letter and autographed photo that she sent me. :(