Log in

View Full Version : LA Times: Cuba expands its limited free-market experiment



Kléber
18th April 2010, 20:15
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/14/opinion/la-ed-cuba15-2010apr15



Cuba expands its limited free-market experiment

In a shift driven by necessity, the communist government[sic] is divesting itself of small state-run barbershops and beauty shops, turning wage earners into entrepreneurs in return for 15% of revenue.

...

Private profits in communist Cuba? This is no joke. It's Havana's latest, limited experiment with the free market. The government is divesting itself of hundreds of state-run barbershops and beauty shops with three workstations or less, turning people who have been wage-earners for decades into small-time entrepreneurs who will pay the state 15% of average revenues in the area for the right to operate. Like some Cuban growers who are allowed to rent stalls from the government in farmers markets, and some cooks who run modest restaurants out of their homes, these hairstylists and manicurists will be entering the world of free-market competition. They will be allowed to set their own prices and presumably will succeed or fail on the quality of their cuts and mani-pedi services. Now, imagine that.

Since the 1959 revolution, Cuba has privatized most of its economy, with about 90% of legal activity now concentrated in government hands. President Raul Castro appears committed to the basic model, at least as long as his big brother is alive. But the latest shift is driven by necessity. In addition to the U.S. trade embargo, Cuba is suffering the same hardships as most other countries in the global recession. Tourism, nickel exports and remittances from the U.S., all of which are key sources of foreign currency, have fallen off. Cuba's elderly are living longer and the young need jobs. Castro recently declared that the government has a million employees too many on its payroll.

The cautious measures appear designed to relieve some of the pressure on the state without risking political challenge or creating significant private wealth. Furthermore, they are meant to limit opportunities for corruption, to encourage people to work harder and to draw some cash from the illegal, underground economy into government coffers; officials also have approved new licenses for private taxis while cracking down on unauthorized so-called gypsy cabs.

The changes are less ambitious than we'd wish and aren't irreversible. The government legalized self-employment in several retail services in 1993, then strictly limited the number of licenses available. But for Cubans, who deserve a better standard of living, these are positive steps -- profit-making jobs and free-market pedicures.
A bourgeois editorial of course, but it seems the elite is on a restorationist course more and more each day.

bailey_187
18th April 2010, 20:49
capitalist-roaders.

Nolan
18th April 2010, 21:13
Double post. At any rate I see no reason for barber shops to be run as part of the command economy. As long as they're run as cooperatives, like nearly all of the "private" sector in Cuba, it really means nothing.

Obs
18th April 2010, 21:14
The focus of the Cuban party right now should not be to worry about the state's budget, but the abolition of the state. The revolution cannot progress until they begin handing power over businesses to the workers.

State ownership is still ownership.

RedSonRising
18th April 2010, 21:41
Funny how the other thread's article stresses caution in these experiments while this one calls it an "expansion". The attempt seems to be to increase the income of the population while eliminating black-market prevalence, corruption, and service inefficiency. I can understand people's worries, but I'd have to see meaningful changes in property ownership to start jumping at cries of some dengist conspiracy.

Kléber
18th April 2010, 21:46
It's not some Dengist conspiracy of evil revisionists from hell. It's just social interests. The old generals who run the country may technically be overpaid civil servants, but they are not just ordinary members of the working class, they are an elite caste with a monopoly on political power and an objective interest in fattening their own pockets. Market reform helps them do that.

Thanks for mentioning the other article though, I did not see it, it's much better.

RadioRaheem84
19th April 2010, 01:09
Double post. At any rate I see no reason for barber shops to be run as part of the command economy. As long as they're run as cooperatives, like nearly all of the "private" sector in Cuba, it really means nothing.

Are private businesses in Cuba really run as co-ops?

FSL
19th April 2010, 01:20
Are private businesses in Cuba really run as co-ops?

Not at all, for example in this case, the girl that cuts the hair gets to boss the girl that does the nails around.




It's not some Dengist conspiracy of evil revisionists from hell. It's just social interests. The old generals who run the country may technically be overpaid civil servants, but they are not just ordinary members of the working class, they are an elite caste with a monopoly on political power and an objective interest in fattening their own pockets. Market reform helps them do that.



If there was a caste of old generals having monopoly of state power, then this could be an argument.

RadioRaheem84
19th April 2010, 04:05
Just how does the economy of Cuba work anyways when dealing with foreign investment and the like?

I hear that British pharmecuticals (when not hounded by the US Treasury) try to invest a lot in Cuba. I know that the Brits invest in tourism and tobaco. Venezuela, Russia in oil and China in something else, I forgot.

But does these private companies have to agree on having their business be state owned in order to operate? How does a United Colors of Bennetton open up in Cuba and do business?

Nolan
19th April 2010, 05:16
Are private businesses in Cuba really run as co-ops?

They are extremely common. For instance, the government has been turning over unproductive land to worker coops.

RadioRaheem84
19th April 2010, 05:18
Do private companies have to agree on having their business be state owned in order to operate? How does a United Colors of Bennetton open up in Cuba and do business?

http://www.revleft.com/vb/revleft/misc/progress.gif

Die Neue Zeit
19th April 2010, 05:22
I think it's some sort of joint venture whereby the state owns a majority stake (the venture takes the form of a corporation), like the oil ventures in Venezuela.

RadioRaheem84
19th April 2010, 05:42
Ah. This is where it gets complicated. For instance, Cupet, the State run oil company of Cuba jointly produces oil with Spanish company Repsol, the same conglomerate that swallowed up YPF, the former Argentine state owned energy firm. How is it that they can privatize a huge state owned firm but allow concessions for their firm in Cuba?


How does a company like United Colors of Benneton operate and stay in business when Cubans only make 20 a month? I am sure even in Cuban pesos that is not a whole lot, especially when wanting to buy nice clothes . Are there price controls on the clothes?

And as far as working conditions, even in the private tourist areas?