Log in

View Full Version : Why capitalism is doomed to production-stalling



Dean
18th April 2010, 05:36
...and centralization of economic power:

The interaction of economic entities, when correlated toward mutual self interest, consistently serve an increasingly marginal population. Typically, this is called "conflict of interests:"


In any case, it has become increasingly clear that tax evasion is but a piece of a troubling larger picture. The states of New York, Texas and Massachusetts sued the bank in 2008, accusing it of misleading investors about risks in its auction-rate securities market. UBS executives dumped their own holdings when the supposedly safe investments took a nosedive, yet continued to recommend them to customers. In Puerto Rico, a Bloomberg News reporter found (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a7jT9c2Pr1jg&refer=home), UBS had created its own closed-loop system for generating profits —it advised the Commonwealth to issue bonds, marketed the bonds to investors through UBS mutual funds, and then loaned the mutual funds money so they could buy the bonds. As James Cox, a Duke law professor and expert on finance and law said at the time, “I’ve never seen such a blatant series of conflicts of interest.”

The story runs deeper (http://www.whowhatwhy.com/the-game-that-goes-on-and-on-2.html), and it only indicts the state as an enabler of capitalist interests - that is, the market works, and the state has proved in its existence as a market defined system (that is responsive to sale - called bribery in politics) that capitalist propertarianism is the driving feature of political bodies today.

Havet
18th April 2010, 12:19
... that capitalist propertarianism is the driving feature of political bodies today.

How about something we don't know, for a change?

LeftSideDown
20th April 2010, 07:50
...and centralization of economic power:

The interaction of economic entities, when correlated toward mutual self interest, consistently serve an increasingly marginal population. Typically, this is called "conflict of interests:"



The story runs deeper (http://www.whowhatwhy.com/the-game-that-goes-on-and-on-2.html), and it only indicts the state as an enabler of capitalist interests - that is, the market works, and the state has proved in its existence as a market defined system (that is responsive to sale - called bribery in politics) that capitalist propertarianism is the driving feature of political bodies today.

Because of government interference? I assume thats what you're asserting.

RGacky3
20th April 2010, 12:40
Because of government interference? I assume thats what you're asserting.

They are one in the sameis waht he's saying. The Market is a state institution.

Dean
20th April 2010, 13:19
Because of government interference? I assume thats what you're asserting.

Government interference is just one method of capitalist hegemony. It's laughable to claim that just the one institution is responsible for all of the problems with the free market system.

But its a great scapegoat for those who support the status quo and economic centralization.

RGacky3
20th April 2010, 17:20
It's laughable to claim that just the one institution is responsible for all of the problems with the free market system.

But its a great scapegoat for those who support the status quo and economic centralization.

Exactly, its like blaiming gun manufactures for all murder.