Log in

View Full Version : Apostrophes in Communism



¿Que?
14th April 2010, 22:18
I just had someone tell me that since there would be no property in communist society, there would be no necessity for the apostrophe to indicate a possessive noun in English.

The guy that told me that is one of those guys who you can't tell when they're being sarcastic and when they're being serious. Anyway, I just thought I'd share.

Axle
14th April 2010, 22:26
Getting rid of property is no excuse for improper grammar.

#FF0000
14th April 2010, 22:28
People would still own things. Like books. Cups. Appliances.

He is stupid.

the last donut of the night
15th April 2010, 00:10
People would still own things. Like books. Cups. Appliances.

He is stupid.

But they would not own apostrophes. Apostrophes would be a delicacy available solely to the party elite bureaucrats. They would enjoy them as a topping on the harvested lungs of white babies, which they had sought out because communists hate all white people.

elf
15th April 2010, 01:37
I just had someone tell me that since there would be no property in communist society, there would be no necessity for the apostrophe to indicate a possessive noun in English.

The guy that told me that is one of those guys who you can't tell when they're being sarcastic and when they're being serious. Anyway, I just thought I'd share.

That's slightly amusing. I hope that they don't mind if I steal it and start spreading the word that the possessive apostrophe will no longer be needed. It would certainly clear up "it's" vs "its" for all those people who (for obvious reasons) don't understand that "its" is the possessive. (Except, of course, Jim's hair is looking very nice, and how I admire Jane's poetry...)

cb9's_unity
15th April 2010, 01:46
I've seen something similar before. I saw someone say that communism would essentially erase the word 'mine'.

The Ben G
15th April 2010, 02:35
But they would not own apostrophes. Apostrophes would be a delicacy available solely to the party elite bureaucrats. They would enjoy them as a topping on the harvested lungs of white babies, which they had sought out because communists hate all white people.

Wait, so I hate myself? OH NO!

the last donut of the night
15th April 2010, 02:53
Wait, so I hate myself? OH NO!

Yeah. Just like Anti-zionist Jews hate themselves and Jews.

i hope people know im being ironic

Tablo
15th April 2010, 06:12
Send all apostrophes to the gulag!

9
15th April 2010, 07:25
one of those guys who you can't tell when they're being sarcastic and when they're being serious

These are my favorite people.

which doctor
15th April 2010, 07:28
People would still own things. Like books. Cups. Appliances.

He is stupid.
This is true, and it needs to be emphasized because a lot of people think communism is about sharing everything, which it's not.

In a Marxian sense, the term private property in capitalism refers to capital, of the means of production. Thus, when the collectivization or communal ownership of private property is called for, it is talking about bringing the means of production into common ownership, not individual items that people use. Your car, toothbrush, books, electronics, etc. will still be yours even when property is collectivized.

Bilan
15th April 2010, 07:30
Apostrophes embody capitalism. Bastards.

Rusty Shackleford
15th April 2010, 07:51
is your friend fond of orwellian newspeak?

if so, double plus good.

AK
17th April 2010, 14:47
Maoists' and Stalinists' penises are small.

See? You do indeed have apostrophes under communism.

the last donut of the night
18th April 2010, 03:19
Maoists' and Stalinists' penises are small.

See? You do indeed have apostrophes under communism.

Council Communists' sects are basically defunct nowadays.

See what I did there?;)

JazzRemington
18th April 2010, 03:35
I hear council communists aren't very good at sects to begin with. Oh sure, they all ballyhoo about action and what not, but when they get down it to, they fail at sects and leave each other tired, unfulfilled, and suffering from self-loathing.

the last donut of the night
18th April 2010, 05:48
I hear council communists aren't very good at sects to begin with. Oh sure, they all ballyhoo about action and what not, but when they get down it to, they fail at sects and leave each other tired, unfulfilled, and suffering from self-loathing.

theres only 5 of them though, so that may be the source of the problem

AK
18th April 2010, 08:55
Council Communists' sects are basically defunct nowadays.

See what I did there?;)
Yeah :cool:

Although I don't care, see.