Dialectics and theory of change/Redcat/Rosa

[Little Bobby Hutton]

Last night i spent an hour reading the red cat rosa thread, both were arguing about Maos theory of change, et both refused to answer each others questions.

I am not very good with dialectics or anti dialectics, could we use this thread for you both to give one point, then the other has to answer the question before he can ask his, maybe after the debate has finished we will see who people think is right.

For someone like me with no knowledge of dialectics, i would be very interested in having these two comrades debate and actually engaging rather than just both asking questions without the other answering.
No flaming, no questioning questions :)

[red cat]

Last night i spent an hour reading the red cat rosa thread, both were arguing about Maos theory of change, et both refused to answer each others questions.

I am not very good with dialectics or anti dialectics, could we use this thread for you both to give one point, then the other has to answer the question before he can ask his, maybe after the debate has finished we will see who people think is right.

For someone like me with no knowledge of dialectics, i would be very interested in having these two comrades debate and actually engaging rather than just both asking questions without the other answering.
No flaming, no questioning questions :)

I am willing to debate, but if Rosa plays with words, lies, or dodges my challenges again then I will leave this thread.

[Little Bobby Hutton]

OK i will ask a mod to regulate the discussion, one persons questions the other answers, no questioning questions or refusing to answer questions, iwho ever asks first question, the othger has to answer first

Excited lol :)

Also no really long posts, and no posts from others when they are in the middle of debating the important bits, cheers, redcat has said rosa can have the first question

[Rosa Lichtenstein]

Thanks for this LBH, but I will say everthing I have to say of this topic in the thread I began on it in Philosophy:

http://www.revleft.com/vb/maos-theory-change-t130879/index.html

And this one in Theory:

http://www.revleft.com/vb/mao-zedong-t121784/index4.html

Beginning with this post (which has yet to be responded to adequately, as the subsequent 'debate' shows):

http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.php?p=1594418&postcount=80

And Dialectics has been debated at length here:

http://www.revleft.com/vb/nti-dialectics-made-t103349/index.html

And links to the scores of threads there are at RevLeft (over the last five years) on dialectics have been collated here:

http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/RevLeft.htm

Anyway, this thread should not be in Politics, but in Philosophy or in Theory.

[red cat]

That qualifies as a long post because of those links. Summarize your opinion here if you want to debate.

[red cat]

The third link is her "opinion", but I guess opinions cease to be opinions once you put scientific arguments behind them, which is what Rosa did.

http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.php?p=1594418&postcount=80

This.

Are you willing to debate on behalf of Rosa ? If you are, then please say so. Otherwise please refrain from making any posts here that do not contribute to the debate.

[Little Bobby Hutton]

OK guys, no worries Comrades, i will have a look online for some material

Little Bobby.

[Leo]

moved to philosophy, as can be seen.