RadioRaheem84
23rd March 2010, 21:08
I really do not think so. My guess is that what the general right wing person wants is to go back to the Golden Age of the America, yet they fail to miss the fact that it was a very Keynesian, state controlled managed economy that held wages high because of unions and popular control. I think that because wages were so high, prices were controlled, capital flight was checked, that people rarely needed federal assistance so they were able to get by on their wages for the most part. For some reason, Americans saw all this as a staple of the "free enterprise" system not one gained through years of popular democratic struggle (and state planners).
A Friedmanite couldn't get hired at a federal office, academic post, much less a think tank one back in those days. They were very isolated.
My guess is that the right wing public is really more like a Buchanite Conservative; protectionist, pro-capitalist among the country not internationally, pro-police, pro-army, populist and anti-finance.
Why is it then that pundits like Limbaugh and Beck harken back to the days of Eisenhower, JFK, LBJ, Nixon....as the 'simpler' times? Those days were marked by heavy state interference in the market. No one dared mess with the gains won during the New Deal and beyond that until the late 70s.
A Friedmanite couldn't get hired at a federal office, academic post, much less a think tank one back in those days. They were very isolated.
My guess is that the right wing public is really more like a Buchanite Conservative; protectionist, pro-capitalist among the country not internationally, pro-police, pro-army, populist and anti-finance.
Why is it then that pundits like Limbaugh and Beck harken back to the days of Eisenhower, JFK, LBJ, Nixon....as the 'simpler' times? Those days were marked by heavy state interference in the market. No one dared mess with the gains won during the New Deal and beyond that until the late 70s.