Log in

View Full Version : The Bourgeoisie Under A Leftist Guise



4N4RCHY
10th March 2010, 10:57
Unfortunately, the bourgeoisie is trying to poison the minds of our children using simple, yet effective, phychological techniques. Although there are a few legitimate leftist parties, most of them are, in fact, the rich bourgeoisie in disguise.

Although we don't have to talk about the Social Democrats and their faux revolutions, there is much fake leftism that takes on a non-political guise and subtly plants our minds with decadence and materialism.

Everywhere from the movies to our news stations to our childrens' favorite MTV, we see deplorable depictions of bourgeoisie lust and product placement. Even the simple act of drinking from a brand-name bottle is an act of heresy against our noble working class cause.

Unfortunately, this is all coming from the Anarchists.

Yes, there are real, legitimate Anarchists out there, but most so-called Anarchists are liberals who defile the leftist name by wearing the Anarchist symbol as their own.

Usually used as a means of faux rebellion against the athourity, these plastic leftists purchase hundreds, if not thousands of dollars worth of brand-name punk garb to fit in with a group that they believe to be non-mainstream.

Let's put an end to this bourgeoisie invasion of our movement. When you meet an Anarchist, make sure that he/she is not some bourgeoisie/petit bourgeoisie poser trying to get attention. It is our duty to be sure that all members of the proletariat revolution are, indeed, proletariat.

Dimentio
10th March 2010, 11:08
Have met two anarchists throughout my days who fit the stereotype of rich kids who want to do revolt against daddy and wear anarchist clothes. Both are quite nice individuals, despite that one of them is a primmie.

The syndicalists I have met have all been from an industrial background, with a disproportionate amount of Finns in their ranks. Since Finns constitute a disproportionate amount of industrial workers, it is hardly surprising though.

The Zeitgeisters I have met have been the hardest to classify. Most of them would fall under the category "alienated petty-bourgeoisie" though.

Zanthorus
10th March 2010, 12:30
Hey I've got a crazy plan! Instead of complaining about how a minority in our minority group aren't real members of our minority we could start organising ourselves to make said minority within a minority irrelevant!

But yeah seriously, I think lifestylists and primmies are the least of our worrys.

AK
10th March 2010, 12:35
Hey I've got a crazy plan! Instead of complaining about how a minority in our minority group aren't real members of our minority we could start organising ourselves to make said minority within a minority irrelevant!
Hey slow down there. Some here on Revleft are thick as shit. "Some" being myself.

Zanthorus
10th March 2010, 12:43
Hey slow down there. Some here on Revleft are thick as shit. "Some" being myself.

lol, sorry. What I was trying to say was that worrying about lifestylists and primitivists not being "true" anarchists is pointless because it just takes time away from doing actual organising which could spread social anarchism to a wider audience and make other types of anarchism irrelevant.