Log in

View Full Version : US Surge In Rightwing Extremists & Militias



Communist
7th March 2010, 02:31
.
US Facing Surge In Rightwing
Extremists And Militias

Civil rights report shows 250% rise in
'patriot' groups Economy and media conspiracy
theories fuel growth (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/04/us-surge-rightwing-extremist-groups)

By Chris McGreal
Guardian (UK)
March 2010


A report by the Southern Poverty Law Centre says that
the rapid increase in rightwing extremist groups is a
partly down to government conspiracy theories in the
mass media. Photograph: Mike Mergen/AP

The US is facing a surge in anti-government extremist
groups and armed militias, driven by deepening
hostility on the right to Barack Obama, anger over the
economy, and the increasing propagation of conspiracy
theories by parts of the mass media such as Fox News.

The Southern Poverty Law Centre, the US's most
prominent civil rights group focused on hate
organisations, said in a report that extremist
"patriot" groups "came roaring back to life" last year
as their number jumped nearly 250% to more than 500
with deepening ties to conservative mainstream
politics.

The SPLC report, called Rage on the Right, said the
rise in extremist groups was "a cause for grave
concern" given their propensity to use violence during
their heyday in the 90s, most notably with the Oklahoma
City bombing that killed 168 people. It added that the
issues driving support for such groups were
increasingly populist and that "signs of growing
radicalisation are everywhere".

"Patriot groups have been fuelled by anger over the
changing demographics of the country, the soaring
public debt, the troubled economy and an array of
initiatives by President Obama that have been branded
"socialist" or even "fascist" by his political
opponents," the report said.

"Already there are signs of . violence emanating from
the radical right. Since the installation of Barack
Obama, rightwing extremists have murdered six law
enforcement officers. Racist skinheads and others have
been arrested in alleged plots to assassinate the
nation's first black president. One man from Brockton,
Massachusetts - who told police he had learned on white
supremacist websites that a genocide was under way
against whites - is charged with murdering two black
people and planning to kill as many Jews as possible on
the day after Obama's inauguration. Most recently, a
rash of individuals with anti-government, survivalist
or racist views have been arrested in a series of bomb
cases."

The report says the patriot movement has "made
significant inroads into the conservative political
scene" in part driven by a growing view of the US
administration "as part of a plot to impose 'one-world
government' on liberty-loving Americans".

"The Tea Parties and similar groups that have sprung up
in recent months cannot fairly be considered extremist
groups, but they are shot through with rich veins of
radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism," the
report says.

The SPLC notes that the rise comes as part of a
deepening disillusionment with government in which just
one quarter of Americans think government can be
trusted. It said that a recent poll found that the
anti-tax Tea Party movement is viewed in more positive
terms than the Democratic or Republican parties.

"The signs of growing radicalisation are everywhere.
Armed men have come to Obama speeches bearing signs
suggesting that the 'tree of liberty' needs to be
'watered' with 'the blood of tyrants'. The Conservative
Political Action Conference held this February was co-
sponsored by groups like the John Birch Society, which
believes President Eisenhower was a communist agent,
and Oath Keepers, a patriot outfit formed last year
that suggests, in thinly veiled language, that the
government has secret plans to declare martial law and
intern patriotic Americans in concentration camps," the
SPLC said.

The report says that, unlike during the 1990s, the
patriot movement's core ideas are more widely
propagated and accepted by prominent politicians and
some in the mass media, such as the Fox News presenter
Glenn Beck.

"As the movement has exploded, so has the reach of its
ideas, aided and abetted by commentators and
politicians in the ostensible mainstream," said the
report. "Beck, for instance, reinvigorated a key
patriot conspiracy theory - the charge that the federal
emergency management agency is secretly running
concentration camps - before finally 'debunking' it."

How far such language is now part of the mainstream
political discourse was confirmed by Politico today,
which reported that it had obtained a Republican
national committee document detailing plans to raise
election funds with "an aggressive campaign
capitalising on 'fear' of President Barack Obama" and a
promise to "save the country from trending toward
socialism".

In the presentation, the administration is portrayed as
"the Evil Empire", and Obama as the Joker in Batman.

Patriot groups and militias are planning a march on
Washington next month ostensibly in defence of the
right to carry guns.

.

Dermezel
7th March 2010, 02:35
They will form an alliance with the Republican party in order to fully negate what little vestiges of democracy remain, and with technology at the level it is their power will then be nearly absolute. A popular front (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_front) must be forged against this, with a united front (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_front) at its core.

chegitz guevara
7th March 2010, 03:33
The Popular Front has been a disaster every single time it was tried, and it has never failed to stop fascism. Only a united front can do so.

Dermezel
7th March 2010, 04:29
The Popular Front has been a disaster every single time it was tried, and it has never failed to stop fascism. Only a united front can do so.

Actually Mao used it to defeat the Japanese fascists.

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-2/mswv2_26.htm



If the capitalist road of bourgeois dictatorship is out of the question, then is it possible to take the socialist road of proletarian dictatorship?
No, that is not possible either.

Without a doubt, the present revolution is the first step, which will develop into the second step, that of socialism, at a later date. And China will attain true happiness only when she enters the socialist era. But today is not yet the time to introduce socialism.

The present task of the revolution in China is to fight imperialism and feudalism, and socialism is out of the question until this task is completed. The Chinese revolution cannot avoid taking the two steps, first of New Democracy and then of socialism. Moreover, the first step will need quite a long time and cannot be accomplished overnight. We are not utopians and cannot divorce ourselves from the actual conditions confronting us.

This does not mean you ignore socialist politics, but expedient political alliances may be necessary. Lenin himself followed this when he introduced the NEP and worked alongside petty bourgeoisie anarchists. Trotsky himself admitted this when he made treaties with the bourgeoisie rulers of Germany during World War 1. Even after a Revolution socialist nations will probably have to conduct trade and form convenient alliances with bourgeoisie nations.

To say that we are to never ally with Social Democrats (who are a bourgeoisie party in a great many respects in every country) is to tie the hands of the proletariat exactly when they need to be unfettered. The proletariat have the right to make strategic alliances.

Red Commissar
7th March 2010, 05:26
The same thing happened when Clinton was elected, and they eventually burned themselves out.

It'll keep us busy on the Anti-Fascist end though :thumbup1:

RadioRaheem84
7th March 2010, 05:29
A.) While I am sure the SPLC is right about the massive upsurge in right wing extremism, they're for the most part an organization that makes a profit off of civil rights politics. They're sort of a racket.

B.) The article points out that the heydays for right wing anti-NWO violence was during the 90s when Clinton, a Democrat, was in office. I swear, these right wingers cannot stand losing in a democratic election! NO liberal, progressive or leftist was out blowing up buildings, harrasing conservatives, inciting violence and what not over Bush I and W.

They blame Obama for violating their constitutional right to always win! When they were in power for 12 years they got their way and when ever they didn't they would shit complain about anti-Americanism among their opponents until they caved in under pressure. Now when they're not in power, they complain about anti-Americanism among Democrats trying to appease their consituents.

These right wingers are delusional, violent and utterly vile in my eyes and they'll stoop to anything to get their way.

ZombieGrits
7th March 2010, 05:36
this worries me. if they do gain a lot of popularity, denouncing them as fascist isn't gonna do much, since to accuse people of opposing politics of being 'fascist' is pretty much de rigeur, people have learned to ignore it

RadioRaheem84
7th March 2010, 05:39
How far such language is now part of the mainstream
political discourse was confirmed by Politico today,
which reported that it had obtained a Republican
national committee document detailing plans to raise
election funds with "an aggressive campaign
capitalising on 'fear' of President Barack Obama" and a
promise to "save the country from trending toward
socialism".OK, so basically:

The capitalist class and the GOP fund wild and crazy organizations that they know are full of shit so they can capitalize on the anti-Obama hysteria. They're using these groups as a base to push back any reform by Obama? I mean how sick is this Party? What if they grow out of control?

We're fucking back to square one because of the neo-liberals; socialists vs. nationalists.

Are we going to be involved in street brawls with right wing proto-fascists soon?

Dermezel
7th March 2010, 05:47
this worries me. if they do gain a lot of popularity, denouncing them as fascist isn't gonna do much, since to accuse people of opposing politics of being 'fascist' is pretty much de rigeur, people have learned to ignore it

You call them fascist in socialist/leftist camps, and fundamentalists/corporatist/neo-cons in front of the general public. The categories overlap so you are not being dishonest.

Robespierre2.0
7th March 2010, 15:05
Why not call a spade a spade? Sure, they're not brandishing fasces or swastikas, but all the ingredients are there.
- An elitist movement using anti-elite rhetoric
- extensive use of scapegoats
- rabid anti-leftism
- distrust of big business / fawning over small business
- calling for revolution / national revival

I think a big part of the left's strategy should actually be calling these people out for their racist/fascist characteristics. People with this kind of mentality can support a system that has institutionalized the oppression of minorities, but when asked about it, they'll say, "I'm not racist, I have a few black friends!"
We can't let them get away with that. We need to show people how this system is INTRINSICALLY racist, sexist, and imperialist, and that involves picking apart our culture and ideological state apparatuses- Politicizing things that people don't like to politicize.
Therein lies most of the problem- Because people assume these things are depoliticized, they don't see how they shape our ideas and attitudes.

I feel that America's a powderkeg, and that we need to use this issue to 'draw a line in the sand'. The masses will be forced to make a choice.
I'd venture to think that most people don't want to think of themselves as racist, so that's our advantage.

chegitz guevara
7th March 2010, 15:14
Actually Mao used it to defeat the Japanese fascists.

A military alliance is not a popular front.

chegitz guevara
7th March 2010, 15:17
Are we going to be involved in street brawls with right wing proto-fascists soon?

uhm, yes. (http://www.revleft.com/vb/socialists-fascists-clash-t122426/index.html?t=122426&highlight=fascists+socialists+clash)

chegitz guevara
7th March 2010, 15:19
Why not call a spade a spade? Sure, they're not brandishing fasces or swastikas, but all the ingredients are there.
- An elitist movement using anti-elite rhetoric
- extensive use of scapegoats
- rabid anti-leftism
- distrust of big business / fawning over small business
- calling for revolution / national revival

These are superficial aspects of fascism, form, not essence. The essence of fascism is that it is a mass movement of the enraged middle classes, supported by the highest levels of the capitalist class. The Tea Party fits this definition to a "T."

The Red Next Door
7th March 2010, 21:05
Maybe we should forms a militia of our own, if the situation get 100 times worst than the 90's.

Nolan
8th March 2010, 03:06
Maybe we should forms a militia of our own, if the situation get 100 times worst than the 90's.

Guess who the federal government will fuck with.

RadioRaheem84
8th March 2010, 03:21
The essence of fascism is that it is a mass movement of the enraged middle classes, supported by the highest levels of the capitalist class. The Tea Party fits this definition to a "T."

I don't see these movement going anywhere but taking a fascist route. I mean their insistence on taking down make believe enemies makes them delusional and dangerous. I could totally see them storming into a liberal politicians office and taking him out to be tarred and feathered because they think he is a "Marxist".

It just depends on how far the capitalist class is willing to keep agitating them. I mean are they willing to go all the way and instigate violence against their political opponents? Are they just wanting to stop reform in Congress? I mean if they allow for this to go too far, they will regret it.

They have to know that most of the stuff they direct the right wing media to say is bullshit. They can't be as stupid as the tea party members as to believe their own BS propaganda.

chegitz guevara
8th March 2010, 03:30
Guess who the federal government will fuck with.

Someone did form a red militia, in Maine, IIRC. An anarchist comrade and I keep talking about forming a red gun club down here, but we never get around to it. At the very least, it would give me a way to focus my frustrations and blow some shit up. :wub:

MaoTseHelen
8th March 2010, 03:33
They tend to ignore it, but this goes for both right and left. There was a severe backlash against pacifism in the Bush years and it's not going to change with the economy getting shittier and shittier for the working class and more particularly the youth.