Log in

View Full Version : Apple; Child Labor and Other Infractions



Wolf Larson
3rd March 2010, 20:03
[Everyone turn the volume up on your I-pods. I can honestly say I haven't bought one, even if I could afford it, after reading this, no thanks]

http://www.shanghaidaily.com/sp/article/2010/201003/20100302/article_429932.htm


COMPUTER giant Apple is using suppliers that break China's labor laws and provide poor working conditions. At least 11 children were found working last year in three factories, believed to be on the Chinese mainland, that assemble Apple's iPods, iPhones and Mac computers. Some suppliers were making staff members work more than 60 hours weekly and improperly disposing of hazardous waste, according to the United States-based company's annual supplier report released on its Website. Apple has supplier facilities elsewhere, including Taiwan, Singapore and Malaysia, but most of its products are assembled on the mainland.


"Apple required each facility to develop and institute appropriate management systems such as more thorough ID checks and verification procedures to prevent the future employment of underage workers," the company said in its Supplier Responsibility 2010 Progress Report. Apple China yesterday declined to comment. The report said Apple found three facilities that hired 11 workers under the minimum legal age of 16. In the report, Apple admitted at least 55 of the 102 plants that produce its goods were ignoring a company edict that staff must not work more than 60 hours a week.


Under Chinese labor laws, workers must not put in more than 49 hours weekly. Only 65 percent of the factories were paying staff the correct wages and benefits. Apple found 24 plants where workers were not even paid China's minimum wage of about 800 yuan (US$117) a month, the report said. It was not the first time that Apple's suppliers, which operated 102 facilities with 133,000 workers in 2009, have received negative publicity. It was reported last week that dozens of workers at a Suzhou factory, which manufactures products for Apple and Nokia, had been poisoned by n-hexane, a toxic chemical that can cause muscular degeneration and blurred vision. Last year, an employee at Taiwan-based Foxconn, one of Apple's biggest suppliers, committed suicide after being accused of stealing a prototype of a new-model iPhone.<br><br>

AND IN 2008

Apple has been violating California's labor laws for several years, a former employee charges. David Walsh has this week filed a lawsuit against the company, saying that in his work as a network engineer between 1995 and 2007, he was regularly made to work more than 40 hours a week without overtime pay (http://macnn.com/rd/107619==http://www.informationweek.com/news/management/compensation/showArticle.jhtml;?articleID=209903263). Walsh also complains of being forced to miss meals, and spend evenings and weekends on call without due compensation.
In detail, the suit contends that despite working standard daylight shifts as well, Walsh was expected to stay available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with support calls often arriving at his home after 11PM, preventing undisturbed sleep. Walsh in fact accuses Apple of deliberately misclassifying people such as himself, labeling them "management" so as to avoid investigation by the government of California.

The company "intentionally and deliberately created numerous job levels and a multitude of job titles," documents add, "to create a roadblock to discovery and class certification for all employees similarly classified as exempt."

Walsh's attorneys are petitioning to raise the case to class action status, on the basis that all of Apple's IT workers may be affected, including those on call for the company's retail stores. Unspecified damages are being sought, and Apple has yet to reply to the accusations.

CallMeSteve
4th March 2010, 00:05
Interesting, cheers for the post.

I don't own any Apple stuff, though really that was just because I hate their products and copyright protection software.

Whilst this may encourage people to boycott their products, the difference to their brand image and capital accumulation would be negligible, and as with all attempts to boycott a particular capitalist brand, it focuses too much on one company. For instance, I know people who won't buy Nestlé products because of their oppressive policies, but will drink Coke, use an iPod etc.

Wolf Larson
4th March 2010, 00:17
Interesting, cheers for the post.

I don't own any Apple stuff, though really that was just because I hate their products and copyright protection software.

Whilst this may encourage people to boycott their products, the difference to their brand image and capital accumulation would be negligible, and as with all attempts to boycott a particular capitalist brand, it focuses too much on one company. For instance, I know people who won't buy Nestlé products because of their oppressive policies, but will drink Coke, use an iPod etc.
I tend to flirt with no logo "lifestylism" in that regards although to take it to it's extreme is next to impossible or would take total commitment. One would have to live like Henry David Thoreau or Helen and Scott Nearing. I've actually debated homesteading but more needs to be done within society than simply separating yourself from the beast. Of course if we all lived as Helen and Scott Nearing lived it would solve a great deal of problems but you and I know that will never happen. Have you read 'Living The Good Life' OR 'The Making Of A Radical'?

Quail
5th March 2010, 23:30
Whilst this may encourage people to boycott their products, the difference to their brand image and capital accumulation would be negligible, and as with all attempts to boycott a particular capitalist brand, it focuses too much on one company. For instance, I know people who won't buy Nestlé products because of their oppressive policies, but will drink Coke, use an iPod etc.

It's pretty difficult to boycott everything that has been produced in an unethical way, and the depressing thing is that the vast majority of people either don't know or don't care about who has been exploited for the products they buy. It's more just a general problem of capitalism that it's near impossible to live without someone being exploited along the way. You can try to limit your personal impact, and make people more aware of things like this, but since our entire society is based on consumerism and exploitation, as an individual you're not going to make much of a difference.