A question on Third World struggles

[Die Neue Zeit]

What political tendency would best describe this kind of struggle in the Third World? For obvious reasons it isn't exactly Maoist:

1) "Bloc of Dispossessed Classes and National Petit-Bourgeoisie"


A new "Bloc of Dispossessed Classes and National Petit-Bourgeoisie" in the Third World, but based on separate class organizations, would be: proletariat, hired hands performing unproductive labour (butlers, housemaids, and even military assembly line folks), proper lumpenproletariat (prostitutes where illegal, rank-and-file gangsters), coordinators (mid-level managers, academics with subordinate research staff, doctors without general practice businesses, and spetsy / "specialists"), and nationalistic petit-bourgeoisie of urban and rural areas.

No segment of the bourgeoisie is included, before or after the waging of the struggle below.

2) "People's War" based on #1 above, but also political strikes or strike waves in the cities (like in Cuba)

[red cat]

You have not included the peasantry in your struggle. Where is the PW going to start? In the cities?

[Die Neue Zeit]

"Petit-bourgeoisie of urban and rural areas," where "rural" is a clear reference to what you call "peasantry."

[red cat]

"Petit-bourgeoisie of urban and rural areas," where "rural" is a clear reference to what you call "peasantry."

It seems that you are denying the fact that the production relations in the countryside( of third-world countries) is feudal.

[Die Neue Zeit]

So is that your reason why you think the "national bourgeoisie" is needed, alongside the already-existing "national petit-bourgeoisie"?

[RedStruggle]

It seems that you are denying the fact that the production relations in the countryside( of third-world countries) is feudal.

How?

[red cat]

So is that your reason why you think the "national bourgeoisie" is needed, alongside the already-existing "national petit-bourgeoisie"?

More importantly, you seem to classify the peasantry as petit-bourgeois which is a very big mistake.

In semi-feudal semi-colonial countries, the national bourgeoisie is a vacillating ally of the revolution.

[AK]

More importantly, you seem to classify the peasantry as petit-bourgeois which is a very big mistake.

In semi-feudal semi-colonial countries, the national bourgeoisie is a vacillating ally of the revolution.
And then they get power blah blah blah same old shit.