Log in

View Full Version : Iranian workers form workers' councils



Patchd
20th January 2010, 00:26
http://iranlaborreport.com/Unions/Steel.html

I originally got this off an Iranian friend from the Worker-Communist Party Iran, it has been translated in the link above.



As the escalating economic crisis is eroding the workers living standards and as the government of Mahmood Ahmadinejad is preparing to implement its draconian Subsidies Rationalization Law, the pace of resistance by workers is showing unmistakable signs of an upsurge. We are clearly witnessing the rebirth of the labor movement in Iran after nearly 25 years. Below is the text of a statement by a labor group in the Isfahan Steel Company, one of the country’s largest, which was issued last Sunday, January 17. The translation has been provided by Network of Iranian Labor Unions (NILU). It has to be noted that these workers are operating in complete secrecy and at a considerable risk to themselves. Iran Labor Report (http://iranlaborreport.com/index.html)will continue reporting on such activities in the weeks and months to come as they are unfolding.


A Better Life is Every Worker’s Right
The Isfahan Steel Company (ISC) has been one of the largest industrial enterprises in all Iran. Nevertheless, despite many small and large efforts by workers throughout the years to improve their working condition, they have been strenuously deprived of the right to have a workers-led organization of their own to defend their rights and just demands.
In this connection, faced with an uncertain future and generally worsening conditions, and mindful of the crushing weight of the economic crisis on the workers’ shoulders, we, a group of ISC workers, have decided to form the “Ad Hoc Council of the Isfahan Steel Workers”,whose mission it is to unify the workers’ ranks and defend their rights.
Clearly, since the Council has commenced its work under conditions of underground activity and its members are by necessity not openly elected by the rank and file, it has decided to qualify itself as ad hoc. However, the Council pledges to have an open and free election encompassing the entire labor force the moment conditions allow for open activity. Up until that day, the Council, as the only existing representative of the ISC labor, will spare no effort to defend each and every worker’s right, while keeping everyone informed of its deliberations with periodic statements.
The Council’s guidelines, general outlook and positions are as follows:


The Council believes that all workers should be seen on equal footing and that blatant and/or subtle discrimination among the workers between the permanent and the temporary or subcontracted workers are artificial divisions created not by the workers themselves but by the country’s decision-makers. These people are the ones responsible for these problems and they are the ones who must answer for them. As a result, the Council believes that the discriminatory policies serve the express purpose of dividing the workers’ ranks.



The Council is of the opinion that strikes are an inalienable right of every worker. Under conditions where some workers have not been paid in well over 6 or 8 months, strikes are the only weapon in their hands. The Council states its unconditional solidarity with the courageous workers at Shoja Ehia Gostaran Espadan, Nasooz Azar, Isargaran Hadid, Nasir Bonyad, and all the other enterprises where strikes have taken place.



The Council would like to alert all permanent workers against the danger of decisions by management to delay or forgo the payment of their due wages, overtime pay and bonuses. In that event, the Council urges all workers to resort to hunger strike, “white strike” (such as slow-downs or limited disruption in production line) and finally a full strike as both defensible and legitimate initiatives.



The Council views the factory’s policy of blaming the workers for any and all safety mishaps in and around factory grounds - particularly those resulting in death or permanent disability - as cruel and inhumane. It believes that the primary cause of accidents are harsh working conditions, antiquated equipment and the management’s constant pressure on the workers for faster and larger production quotas.



The Council considers the minimum wage for “direct-contract” and sub-contractual workers set at 400,000 Tomans ($400)--at a time when the ‘poverty line’ for an urban family is officially set at 800,000 Tomans ($800) per month--to be patently unjust for workers and their families. The Council further calls for the gradual rollback of discrimination between all contractual workers and permanent workers.



The Council firmly believes that privatization of the Isfahan Steel will leave a ruinous and lasting effect on the workers’ lives and livelihood. The disastrous results of the reconstruction period is a constant reminder to us. Isfahan Steelworkers are witnessing them first-hand every day.



The Council strongly condemns the company’s multi-million-Toman venture in the soccer team while permanent workers’ wages and bonuses have been paid tardily, and while temporary/contractual wages are falling under the poverty level. The Council considers this gross injustice to all the workers.



The Council considers Atashkar, the management’s internal weekly journal, to be merely a forum for self-aggrandizement and peddling of the management’s ludicrous claims - such as the one about production and delivery of rails to the National Iranian Railroad—that absolutely fools no one. The Council therefore demands the publication of reports on workers’ wages, the workers’ strike actions, full coverage of shop-floor accidents resulting in death and disability, announcement of names of workers who have lost their lives on account of accidents and finally a tally of all monthly work-related incidents in the weekly Atashkar.



Considering the total absence of conditions for open activity, the Council calls upon all workers to set up autonomous labor cells throughout Isfahan Steel. It is our strong belief that without forming these cells, the workers will not be able to advance their aims in any meaningful way. The prime goals of these cells would be to disseminate news and information, to unify the rank and file, and to elect individuals who can represent them and provide leadership for their efforts. These cells could take form on the basis of friendship networks, sports and recreation links, in-house loan associations, etc.



We shake your hands in solidarity;
The Ad Hoc Council of the Isfahan Steel Workers For the text in Farsi: http://rowzane.com/fa/annonce-archiev/60-kargari/745-170110-esfahan.html

Axle
20th January 2010, 00:52
Let's hope this spreads.

Solidarity with our brave Iranian comrades.

MarxSchmarx
20th January 2010, 08:26
Let's hope this spreads.

Solidarity with our brave Iranian comrades.

Indeed. These comrades, the shit and oppression they have to work under, it shames the rest of us.

Devrim
20th January 2010, 10:08
I think that some of the terms used by the 'Worker Communists' are very misleading in English whether intentionally so or not.

There are obviously no workers' councils in Iran, nor were there any in Basra in Iraq as they were claiming a couple of years ago. What this appears to be is a small group of militants, not a workers' council.

Workers' councils are formed in revolutionary periods by masses of workers. This isn't one of them.

Devrim

bcbm
20th January 2010, 10:14
I think that some of the terms used by the 'Worker Communists' are very misleading in English whether intentionally so or not.

could you elaborate on this?


There are obviously no workers' councils in Iran, nor were there any in Basra in Iraq as they were claiming a couple of years ago. What this appears to be is a small group of militants, not a workers' council.

do you have a link to more information on this?

Patchd
20th January 2010, 12:08
I think that some of the terms used by the 'Worker Communists' are very misleading in English whether intentionally so or not.

There are obviously no workers' councils in Iran, nor were there any in Basra in Iraq as they were claiming a couple of years ago. What this appears to be is a small group of militants, not a workers' council.
You're right, this is a small group of militants (or so it seems), but with the recent history of Iranian labour struggles (commencing from the 2009 May day march, a march which hadn't taken place once for the past 30 years), this may turn out positively, and their fellow workers could possibly join in.

In addition, the Isfehan metal workers have not historically been the most radical section of the Iranian working class, Tehran bus drivers, oil workers etc... could possibly get inspired by this act and organise something similar of their own. Whilst this is a temporary council, and one formed by not all the workers there, we'll have to wait and see how it develops and whether or not it will be repressed (which it probably would - but what would the consequences of that be?).

What I'm also wondering is what role this 'council' will take, whether it'll be a simple mediation union role, or whether it aims to actually take control of production and distribution within the workplace.

On the point of it not being a revolutionary situation, the clerical elite (reformist and conservative) seems to think otherwise, it would be bad news for the reformists as well, as Mousavi has already told the protesters to go home, any further developments would be completely independent from the reformists. Protests are continuing, and there have been reports of some in the Iranian elite, as well as state officials attempting to seek asylum abroad for fears of a revolution and the revenge that would be dished out to them.

Theocracy threatens bloodbath as mass movement grows (http://hopoi.org/?p=989)
'Reformists' fear revolution (http://hopoi.org/?p=991)

Devrim
20th January 2010, 14:06
could you elaborate on this?

Yes, sure. A workers' council is not merely a self selected small group of political militants who proclaim themselves to be a 'workers' council'. It is the product of massive class struggle. I think that if we were to chart a way that workers' councils could develop, one would imagine the starting point to be a mass meeting electing a strike committee of delegates, and then similar sort of strike committees coming together to form a workers' council. Thus a workers' council is not something that is formed in one factory alone, but something, which brings together delegates from different workplaces. If we look back to the Russia revolution, and the Russian word 'Soviet', we see that the talk is of the Petrograd Soviet, not, for example, the Putilov Works Soviet.

It is something that we believe can only be set up by the mass of workers during a high level of class struggle, not by a voluntarism of a small group of militants.


do you have a link to more information on this?

Do you mean the events in Basra, or the Isfahan thing under discussion now?

If it is Basra, from Wiki:


The Federation of Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq (FWCUI) is the second largest union federation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_federation) in Iraq (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq).
The federation was formed by members of the Union of the Unemployed of Iraq (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Union_of_the_Unemployed_of_Iraq&action=edit&redlink=1), which is connected to the Worker Communist Party of Iraq (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_Communist_Party_of_Iraq) as a left-wing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing) alternative to the Iraqi Federation of Trade Unions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_Federation_of_Trade_Unions). The latter is currently the only legally recognized union federation in Iraq; it is closely connected to the Iraqi Communist Party (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_Communist_Party), an organization which opposed the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 but decided to work with the new political institutions established after the occupation.


This "legal recognition" of one union federation over another is a violation of the International Labour Organisation's Convention 87 on Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise, to which Iraq and all the occupying powers are signatory.([1] (http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/convdisp1.htm),look for Convention 87; Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Association_and_Protection_of_the_Right _to_Organise_Convention,_1948).)

The FWCUI opposes both the U.S. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S.)-led occupation of Iraq (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_Iraq) and the Islamist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamist) elements of the Iraqi insurgency (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_insurgency), and it is often repressed by both the foreign and Islamist forces. Many anti-war (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-war) movements around the world have provided venues for FWCUI speaker tours. A third labor formation known as the Federation of Oil Unions in Iraq (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_of_Oil_Unions_in_Iraq) also exists.
The FWCUI's members have led a number of strikes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strike_action), and are particularly strong around the Basra (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basra) region.


If it is these events, then no. However as I said above workers' councils emerge during large scale workers' struggles. There just isn't the level of struggle in Iran at the moment to see them emerge. Also if you read the text. They obviously mean something very different than what it is usually taken to mean.

The word that is used in the Persian texts, 'Shuravi' is a derreitive of the Arabic word 'Shura', which means 'consultation', though in the past it has also been used to mean 'soviet' in Persian. I think that committee would possibly be a better English translation than workers' council.

Devrim

Devrim
20th January 2010, 14:34
On the point of it not being a revolutionary situation, the clerical elite (reformist and conservative) seems to think otherwise, it would be bad news for the reformists as well, as Mousavi has already told the protesters to go home, any further developments would be completely independent from the reformists. Protests are continuing, and there have been reports of some in the Iranian elite, as well as state officials attempting to seek asylum abroad for fears of a revolution and the revenge that would be dished out to them.

I think that the question of whether there is a revolutionary situation in Iran is a very important one. The first thing that I would like to point out is that I am very suspicious of the HOPI group's reporting. Not because I think that they are lying about events. I am not suggesting this at all. I simply don't have much faith in their analysis.

I think that they seem to get 'over excited' about the events and make it sound like a revolution is coming. I don't think that is the case. Let me give an example from your second link,‘Reformists’ fear revolution:


They [the Coordinating Committee for the Setting Up of Workers’ Organisations] point out that the level and depth of workers’ struggles show radicalism and levels of organisation and that the Iranian working class is the only force capable of delivering radical democracy.

This sounds all well and good, but then when they talk later in the same section about the actually class struggle in Iran all we get is this:


]Last week a number of prominent labour activists, including Vahed bus worker Mansour Ossanlou, who are currently in prison (some incarcerated for over a year) were sacked from their jobs for ‘failing to turn up at work’, which prompted protests in Vahed depots and the Haft Tapeh sugar cane plant. In late December workers at the Lastic Alborz factory went on strike demanding payment of unpaid wages. This week workers have been holding protests at dozens of workplaces, including the Arak industrial complex, the Mazandaran textile factory, at the Polsadr metro construction and in Tonkabon.

So a calm look at the facts reveals that there has only actually been one strike that they can mention recently, that 1,400 workers at the Lastic Alborz factory. I don't think that that plus a few other protests means that there is a massive wave of workers' struggles. In Turkey at the moment, there is one big important strike with about 12,000 tobacco workers and nearly twenty smaller strikes. I don't think we are approaching revolution here either.

To us the protests seem to be winding down:


So where do the communists stand on events in Iran today? That the Green movement is a completely bourgeois movement with nothing to offer workers seems to us very clear. Also it seems that it is also losing momentum. While the initial protests brought hundreds of thousands out into the streets, the numbers today seem to be getting smaller and smaller. It seemed possible in the early days of the struggle that the working class might make impose itself on the situation. After the repression used by the police against demonstrators in Tehran, workers at the massive Khodro car factory walked out on a twenty four hour strike, not in support of either candidate in the election, but against the violence used by the state. Apart from a few statements from the bus drivers union though, this was the limit of workers participation in the movement as workers. Yes, of course there were many workers involved in the protests, but they were there as isolated individuals, not as a collective force. In these situations, in a cross class movement, which all of the various reports coming out of Iran from different leftist groups seem to agree that it was, without acting as a collective force, workers can only be submerged in the great mass of ‘the people’, a mass that is being used by other class forces to further their own interests.
What the ICC wrote in 1979 commenting on the Iranian revolution still rings true today. In fact the absence of the working class from the struggles of the last year confirms it: “For all the talk of people in the streets overthrowing the regime, what was clear in 1979 was that the strikes of the Iranian workers were the major, political element leading to the overthrow of the Shah's regime. Despite the mass mobilisations, when the ‘popular' movement - regrouping almost all the oppressed strata in Iran - began to exhaust itself, the entry into the struggle of the Iranian proletariat at the beginning of October 1978, most notably in the oil sector, not only refuelled the agitation, but posed a virtually insolvable problem for the national capital, in the absence of a replacement being found for the old governmental team. Repression was enough to cause the retreat of the small merchants, the students and those without work, but it proved a powerless weapon of the bourgeoisie when confronted with the economic paralysis provoked by the strikes of the workers.”

The Mousevi movement will slowly fade away, possibly with some of their demands being incorporated into state policy. Iran is not on the verge of any revolution. The coming months will see the death of the ‘Green Movement’, not that of the regime. This could be a very bloody process, but unless workers can enter the struggle in their own interests, not those of bickering politicians, it is what inevitably must happen.



but with the recent history of Iranian labour struggles (commencing from the 2009 May day march, a march which hadn't taken place once for the past 30 years), this may turn out positively, and their fellow workers could possibly join in.


Yes, it could happen, but at this point it doesn't seem likely.


Devrim

Die Neue Zeit
20th January 2010, 14:51
Devrim, the only reason why there were soviets formed "spontaneously" that were capable of spanning whole cities is because Russia's industrial workers were a sparse minority of the population.

This council is akin to the 1905 soviets (not a revolutionary period) or the 1917 factory committees.

Devrim
20th January 2010, 15:05
This council is akin to the 1905 soviets (not a revolutionary period) or the 1917 factory committees.

No this council is not akin to those things. They were organisations elected by masses of workers, and this as the texts describes is a nothing of the sort.

Devrim

Patchd
20th January 2010, 15:42
Thanks for the contribution Devrim, point taken.