Log in

View Full Version : In India, Forests Grow with Naxalite People’s War



AvanteRedGarde
21st December 2009, 13:53
(http://raimd.wordpress.com)

A new report has stunned and embarrassed imperialism and Indian compradors: forests are growing in tribal areas controlled by Naxalites, India’s Maoist-inspired revolutionaries. Some of the districts in which the Naxalites are based, Orissa, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh, have seen remarkable greening, leading to a marginal net gain of forests throughout India. Though it has received little media attention, the news came shortly before world leaders met in Copenhagen, purportedly to discuss curbing global climate change.


Naxalites claim they are fighting for the economic and social rights of India’s poorest. Their social base is the country’s peasants, forest-dwelling peoples and, to a lesser extend, the urban poor and sections of the intelligentsia. The Naxalite movement began as a peasant insurrection in 1967 against the ruling ‘Communist’ Party of India in West Bengal. It was led by leftist opposition within the Party, influenced by Maoism, then at its revolutionary height during the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. Today, Naxalites operate in over one-third of Indian and are organized into a number of groups. They claim to be carrying out a people’s war: leading guerrilla offensives against government forces, building independent bases of power and providing greatly-needed social reforms in areas under their control. Naxal base areas are said to be rich in iron, coal, bauxite, gold, uranium, magnesium and diamonds. Mining Companies are reluctant to enter these areas and it has been reported the investors have been scared away in areas where the Naxal presence has increased.


The Indian Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, has called Naxalism the country’s greatest internal security threat. In September of 2009, the Indian state launched Operation Green Hunt, a two-year military offensive against the Naxalite movement involving over 100,000 troops. Since 2005, the Indian state has funded anti-Naxal militias. The Indian media has also launched a public relations offensive against the revolutionaries. The Naxals are often called criminals and murderers. Rather than fighting for social welfare, the Indian state claims the Naxals seek political power.


For their part, the Naxals openly state they desire political power, saying they cannot reasonably implement necessary social changes without it. They say they have been pushed to this position from decades of exploitation and state violence and claim their own violence is defensive, aimed at compradors, government forces and other enemies of the people. It is estimated that 42 percent of Indians currently live under the international poverty line of $1.25/day (PPP).


Imperialism has nothing to offer but its own wretched self-preservation. The comprador Indian state has been adamant. India’s poor will suffer deepened and widened exploitation, continued division and sale of communal lands, the building of more ‘Special Economic Zones’ and the militarism necessary to enforce these measures. At the same time, in Copenhagen, imperialists haggle over who’s going to profit from the devastating climate change they acknowledge they’re creating.


Imperialism breeds resistance. The Indian Naxalites are fighting for a system which operates around the needs of people, not capital accumulation. It should be of no surprise that areas under their influence have seen growth in forest coverings. Revolutionary struggle and social change, as the Naxalites are attempting carrying out in swaths of India, are the only real solutions to global climate change.


Sources:
http://indianvanguard.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/maoist-areas-see-green-cover-rise/01-12-2009-001-020/
http://www.bannedthought.net/India/CPI-Maoist-Docs/Interviews/KishenjiInterview-091113.pdf
http://india-forums.com/news/article.asp?id=214457
http://www.thehindu.com/2009/10/12/stories/2009101257690100.htm

greymatter
21st December 2009, 16:18
Meanwhile: abandoned construction projects all over the United States attract flocks of birds. Clearly capitalism's days are numbered.

Richard Nixon
21st December 2009, 17:53
Meanwhile: abandoned construction projects all over the United States attract flocks of birds. Clearly capitalism's days are numbered.

That's what they said in 1930. Captialism has endured worse than this and it still has a long time to go.

danyboy27
21st December 2009, 23:02
its not really surprising. if you consider that only a small number of people living on this land actually use the forest for their everyday use.

the problem is, in real life AKA the material world, this wood could mean houses, schools,hospital construction project for many peoples, the possibility to get out of the stone age and move on to a more confortable modern life.

i am of course against corporatism and capitalism and i think the people should control their ressources.

a worker cooperative could manage the wood and give it to the people who need it, that would be awsome.

mykittyhasaboner
23rd December 2009, 02:09
^Cutting down forests for wood? It's gunna be 2010 in a few days man. Do people really need to rely on forests? If they want to get out of the "stone age" then wood isn't the answer.

The fact is it is very surprising and significant. Given that India is a playground for Western corporations and generally have a free pass to destroy the whole environment if they deem it profitable. The fact that Naxalites want to protect and preserve their land is something which everyone should regard as positive.

Bud Struggle
23rd December 2009, 02:17
^Cutting down forests for wood? ... Do people really need to rely on forests?

For wood? Technically yes.

danyboy27
23rd December 2009, 02:52
^Cutting down forests for wood? It's gunna be 2010 in a few days man. Do people really need to rely on forests? If they want to get out of the "stone age" then wood isn't the answer.

The fact is it is very surprising and significant. Given that India is a playground for Western corporations and generally have a free pass to destroy the whole environment if they deem it profitable. The fact that Naxalites want to protect and preserve their land is something which everyone should regard as positive.

wood isnt exactly what you could call the material of the future, but its a ressource like another. Of course this ressource belong to the people and should be carefuly managed by them in order to avoid future mudslide or deforestation.

greymatter
24th December 2009, 05:34
^Cutting down forests for wood? It's gunna be 2010 in a few days man. Do people really need to rely on forests? If they want to get out of the "stone age" then wood isn't the answer.What do you propose using instead of wood? Structural glass, or something more innovative like extruded biopolymers? I'm really not trying to be sarcastic, so please elaborate... I'm really curious to know what the material of the future is, so we can get this technology to the naxalites pronto. It's people in the developing world who are going to latch on to the really innovative sustainable technologies first, because they still have some ecosystems left to sustain. Maybe we should start a consortium to bring advanced enviro-tech to the developing world for free before union carbide moves in. Anyone in?

danyboy27
24th December 2009, 11:33
What do you propose using instead of wood? Structural glass, or something more innovative like extruded biopolymers? I'm really not trying to be sarcastic, so please elaborate... I'm really curious to know what the material of the future is, so we can get this technology to the naxalites pronto. It's people in the developing world who are going to latch on to the really innovative sustainable technologies first, because they still have some ecosystems left to sustain. Maybe we should start a consortium to bring advanced enviro-tech to the developing world for free before union carbide moves in. Anyone in?

you know, in canada we used to have problem with wood, then we instaured a system that allow the ecosystem to regenerate. its all about the wood chopping pattern and the qty allowed per year.

i am not a strong supporter of capitalism, but if this method work for a market economy it sure does apply for other economical system. instead of having capitalist who reap the ressources, it would be the naxalites.

sound fair to me.

greymatter
24th December 2009, 16:00
i am not a strong supporter of capitalism, but if this method work for a market economy it sure does apply for other economical system. instead of having capitalist who reap the ressources, it would be the naxalites.I don't know if you distinguish between capitalism and markets, or maybe between capital markets and markets for tangible goods, but don't you think that the naxalites would be better off if they had something to trade with the rest of the world for the things they need (guns, ammunition)? Maybe they've got some ideas and icons which would look really good on t-shirts. Something like that would help market their cause to the people of the rest of the world, and might help to create an impression that they're something more than an ultra-left terrorist group.

danyboy27
24th December 2009, 20:04
I don't know if you distinguish between capitalism and markets, or maybe between capital markets and markets for tangible goods, but don't you think that the naxalites would be better off if they had something to trade with the rest of the world for the things they need (guns, ammunition)? Maybe they've got some ideas and icons which would look really good on t-shirts. Something like that would help market their cause to the people of the rest of the world, and might help to create an impression that they're something more than an ultra-left terrorist group.

well, i dont really see why they should convince us. i think their principal goal should be to take care of their own.

if they collectively want not to use a verry useful ressource and keep having a 50 year old lifespan, that perfectly fine, its their choices.

but on the other hand, if they are forced not to use a certain ressource that could help them our, we got a big problem.