Log in

View Full Version : Organizing for the Anti-Capitalist Transition



Die Neue Zeit
16th December 2009, 04:13
Organizing for the Anti-Capitalist Transition (http://seminario10anosdepois.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/organizing-for-the-anti-capitalist-transition/) by David Harvey




The historical geography of capitalist development is at a key inflexion point in which the geographical configurations of power are rapidly shifting at the very moment when the temporal dynamic is facing very serious constraints. Three percent compound growth (generally considered the minimum satisfactory growth rate for a healthy capitalist economy) is becoming less and less feasible to sustain without resort to all manner of fictions (such as those that have characterized asset markets and financial affairs over the last two decades). There are good reasons to believe that there is no alternative to a new global order of governance that will eventually have to manage the transition to a zero growth economy. If that is to be done in an equitable way, then there is no alternative to socialism or communism. Since the late 1990s, the World Social Forum became the center for articulating the theme another world is possible. It must now take up the task of defining how another socialism or communism is possible and how the transition to these alternatives are to be accomplished. The current crisis offers a window of opportunity to reflect on what might be involved.

Q
16th December 2009, 07:46
Could you write a teaser before you ask us to read the whole wall of text? Thanks.

Die Neue Zeit
16th December 2009, 15:38
The first paragraph doesn't say much, but there you go!

Q
16th December 2009, 15:51
The first paragraph doesn't say much, but there you go!

You're so funny :p

mikelepore
16th December 2009, 18:10
I wish leftist authors would write like scientists submitting to journals.

Abstract: Your goal (the "what") - one sentence. Your program (the "how") - one sentence. Now that you already have the central ideas, those who have the time today to receive the details may want to read the whole article. Those who don't allocate the time to read the whole article still have the central idea.

Is David Harvey's central point that he wishes to communicate "The historical geography of capitalist development is at a key inflexion point in which the geographical configurations of power are rapidly shifting...."? I seriously doubt it.

This isn't a mystery novel, where the important information comes at the end. The important information is supposed to come first.

Dimentio
16th December 2009, 19:02
I wish leftist authors would write like scientists submitting to journals.

Abstract: Your goal (the "what") - one sentence. Your program (the "how") - one sentence. Now that you already have the central ideas, those who have the time today to receive the details may want to read the whole article. Those who don't allocate the time to read the whole article still have the central idea.

Is David Harvey's central point that he wishes to communicate "The historical geography of capitalist development is at a key inflexion point in which the geographical configurations of power are rapidly shifting...."? I seriously doubt it.

This isn't a mystery novel, where the important information comes at the end. The important information is supposed to come first.

That is the method which is used by NET and most similar organisations. ^^

ellipsis
16th December 2009, 20:52
Boo hoo are there to many big words? I rather enjoyed that snippet.

bcbm
16th December 2009, 21:38
Boo hoo are there to many big words?

i don't believe that was the problem.

Die Neue Zeit
17th December 2009, 05:55
This isn't a mystery novel, where the important information comes at the end. The important information is supposed to come first.

Research paper approaches can be direct or indirect. I myself prefer the indirect approach, but with a teaser that is more relevant to the point I'm trying to get across. Harvey's intro is loaded with words that are past the Grade 12 level (though I'm very comfortable with them), and doesn't hint at the development of political parties. In other words, his teaser was bad.