Log in

View Full Version : Tamil People’s Liberation Army Formed in Sri Lanka



mosfeld
10th December 2009, 21:46
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Tamil People’s Liberation Army Formed in Sri Lanka

http://southasiarev.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/sri-lanka-women-ltte.jpg?w=300&h=244

New Tamil group People’s Liberation Army vows to start fresh war

A Marxist group of Tamil militants with connections to the Palestinian Liberation Organisation and Cuba is preparing to mount a new insurgency in Sri Lanka six months after the Government declared an end to the 26-year-old war there.

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) was founded in eastern Sri Lanka four months ago and has vowed to launch attacks against government and military targets unless its demands for a separate Tamil homeland are met.

“This war isn’t over yet,” Commander Kones, head of the PLA’s Eastern District military command, told The Times during a night meeting in a safe house in the east of the country last week.

“There has been no solution for Tamils since the destruction of the LTTE [Tamil Tigers] in May. So we have built and organised the PLA and are ready to act soon. Our aim is a democratic socialist liberation of the northeast for a Tamil Eelam [the desired Tamil state].”Kones, a nom de guerre, claimed that the PLA had 300 active members and expected to recruit 5,000 volunteers from the 280,000 Tamil civilians recently freed from detention camps.

He said that the PLA, commanded by a ten-man committee, was an entirely separate organisation from the LTTE, but said that former LTTE cadres would be able to join the organisation provided that they swore their allegiance to the PLA’s political aims.

“There are former LTTE members in the PLA now,” he said. “But the LTTE was an extremist organisation that fought only for itself rather than the people’s needs.

“It is totally destroyed now and I don’t worry about it. We are socialist ideologues and we are trying to draw different Tamil groups together for a people’s struggle, a people’s war.”

Although the PLA’s capabilities remain unclear, it includes in its ranks several experienced insurgents who fought against the government forces in Sri Lanka in the 1980s before falling foul of the LTTE and either leaving the country or becoming dormant.

Commander Kones, now in his forties, had himself been given guerrilla training at a camp in Uttar Pradesh, India, in 1983, where his trainers included fighters from the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO).

“We still have a relationship with the PLO, as well as Cuba and Indian Maoist groups,” he said. “They fight for their rights just as we do.”

During later action against government forces in eastern Sri Lanka he was imprisoned and tortured, before escaping from the country to live in Europe.

The threat of an aspiring new Tamil insurgent group comes at a complicated time for the Sri Lankan authorities.The unified image that accompanied their decisive victory over the Tamil Tigers in May has been eroded. The architect of that victory, General Sarath Fonseka, has become embroiled in a political scrap with the incumbent President Mahinda Rajapaksa as both men vie for a presidential election victory next month.

Their rivalry could split the vote of the Sinhalese majority, offering the swing vote to the country’s Tamil minority, who have yet to declare their political allegiance. A new round of violence during this period could have a dramatic reversal on efforts to stabilise the country.

“We are much more politically skilled than the LTTE ever were and know how to avoid the ‘terrorist’ label that they acquired,” Kones said.

“Our enemy is simply the Government here, and we fight just for Tamil rights. We are not against the international community,” he said. “Indeed, we want them to support us in pressurising the Sri Lankan Government.”

Kones said that he had no intention of trying to emulate the Tigers’ style of warfare, but suggested a more asymmetric strategy involving attacks by widely dispersed PLA cells. However, he added that his targets would include economic and administrative centres, as well as military forces.

Other PLA insiders said that one of their likely first fights would be with groups of former LTTE cadres led by the infamous Colonel Karuna. Karuna split from the LTTE ranks in 2004 and later joined the Government, but still holds influence in eastern Sri Lanka.

“We are getting stronger by the day, much stronger than any other group,” Kones said. “The day of action is close.”

A few nights after meeting Commander Kones, deep in a rural area, The Times encountered three young PLA recruits waiting for a guide to take them to one of the organisation’s jungle training camps. Two were 15 years old, one was 16. “The PLA sound very interesting to us,” they said. “They are the only ones now doing something for the Tamil people.”

Theirs was not, however, a pervading sentiment. Shattered by their experiences in the war zones this year, depressed by their subsequent incarceration in detention camps, few Tamils expressed any great enthusiasm for a return to war.

“I’m not interested in Eelam,” Raja Muragaswaran, 31, who was released from a camp last month, said. “I lost everything that I had ever worked for in the name of Eelam. How many died for Eelam, and all for what? We just want peace.”

Andrei Kuznetsov
10th December 2009, 22:00
This vodka-and-tonic I'm drinking right here? This goes out to y'all. Keep goin' strong, Tamil people!!!

bcbm
10th December 2009, 22:28
Keep goin' strong, Tamil people!!!

woo


few Tamils expressed any great enthusiasm for a return to war.

Pogue
10th December 2009, 22:49
This vodka-and-tonic I'm drinking right here? This goes out to y'all. Keep goin' strong, Tamil people!!!

Wow, I bet they're all well pleased.

I think this organisation would do better for itself if it acted as an armed defencd militia for the Tamils, as opposed tot rying to fight an insurrectionary war. It could aid in the reconstruction and political struggle of the Tamil people.

bailey_187
10th December 2009, 22:55
This PLA has ties with Cuba, but i heard Cuba supported the assault of LTTE? Did i hear wrong? Or what?

bailey_187
10th December 2009, 22:57
Is this article goig to be the Times tomorow? Need a copy to show my Sri Lanken friend.

Steve_j
10th December 2009, 23:04
I beleieve it was in the times a few days ago


Im a staunch supporter of tamil independence however i dont think this group will fair any better just because they label themselves marxists.

Would love to be proved wrong though!

Pogue
10th December 2009, 23:10
I beleieve it was in the times a few days ago


Im a staunch supporter of tamil independence however i dont think this group will fair any better just because they label themselves marxists.

Would love to be proved wrong though!

I agree, thats why I think they'd do better as a self-defence organisation, what do others think about this?

Steve_j
10th December 2009, 23:14
I agree, thats why I think they'd do better as a self-defence organisation, what do others think about this?


Agree 100 % but...... the question is what is self defence? dont mean to be picky but some times the best form of defence is offence.

Sometimes....

Pogue
10th December 2009, 23:15
Agree 100 % but...... the question is what is self defence? dont mean to be picky but some times the best form of defence is offence.

Sometimes....

I don't really know the situation in terms of violence against Tamils in Sri Lanka but I imagined some form of Black Panther style group to be honest. Maybe I'm being naive. Perhaps someone can tell me if this would be neccesary/work?

Steve_j
10th December 2009, 23:20
it goes quite deep. will try and find a link to a radio documentry some comrades and i did.

This is not to say i am hold unwavering support for the ltte and the numerous other groups, and our docu is biased because we intensionaly made it that way to combat the srilankan government propaganda (it ranks alongside iran and zimbabwe in terms of press freedoms although it is a "democracy")

Steve_j
10th December 2009, 23:24
cool someone archived it.

Any spoken word by the narator is generally accepted fact. Any spoken word by the tamils is a mixture of accepted fact, their personal perspective or experience.

http://www.archive.org/details/StateTerrorInSriLanka-ATamilPerspective

Steve_j
10th December 2009, 23:27
For me this is essential reading

http://www.thesundayleader.lk/20090111/editorial-.htm

This is a letter written by a prominant singhalese journlist (not tamil) prior to his murder.

He was sympathetic to the tamil cause.

Pogue
10th December 2009, 23:28
I'll give it a read. Do you think a self-defence militia could function purposefully in Sri Lanka?

Steve_j
10th December 2009, 23:40
I'll give it a read. Do you think a self-defence militia could function purposefully in Sri Lanka?

To a certin extent. The LTTE ran a practical mini state with its own air force, navy and army with their own inistitutions such as banks that offered the best loan rates in the whole region of asia.

They were by no means "Terrorists"

Well no more so than say the United Kingdom. They were organised and well trained and had support of such groups of the PLO. Whilst self defence militia could be useful, it is a question as to what extent. We are talking about a minority here, many of which have been held in detention camps for the past year and they are facing and extreemly militarised nation (the military leader that ran the operations that destroyed the ltte is now running for president) so they are stuck between a rock and a hrad place. Any comunity organised defence will and has been in the past been met with extreemly violent supression against the tamil population.

Edit: Its streaming audio,,, so no walls of text :)

bailey_187
10th December 2009, 23:41
Am i right in assuming the PLA is Maoist too?

Glenn Beck
10th December 2009, 23:54
Am i right in assuming the PLA is Maoist too?

If it's linked to Cuba and the PLO, probably not

Steve_j
11th December 2009, 00:06
Although i have head reports elsewhere (sorry i checked but could not supply links) that they are linked to inidan sepertists movements which could draw a possible link. Until they state the definitions of their ideology its best not to assume anything. And just hope for the best.

RedAnarchist
11th December 2009, 00:42
Is this article goig to be the Times tomorow? Need a copy to show my Sri Lanken friend.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6946605.ece

mosfeld
11th December 2009, 18:18
This PLA has ties with Cuba, but i heard Cuba supported the assault of LTTE? Did i hear wrong? Or what? They signed some UN charter which solely denounced the LTTE and praised Sri Lanka for their "defense of human rights" or something ridiculous. Other ALBA countries did so as well.


Back in May 2009 the United Nations Human Rights Council passed a resolution commending Sri Lanka for dealing with the humanitarian crisis caused by the civil war. The resolution also condemned the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam for attacks on civilian populations and alleged use of human shields. Cuba and 28 other state members voted to pass the resolution. (2) To draw a moral equivalence between the Liberation Tigers and the Sri Lankan state fails to account for material reality. Typically, the UN failed to recognize the difference between violence in the service of liberation and violence in the service of oppression. Along with Cuba, both Brazil and Nicaragua voted for the resolution. Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez also gave encouraging words to Sri Lanka at that time. (3)
Read more here (http://monkeysmashesheaven.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/cuba-alba-nations-condone-sri-lanka-revisionism-further-exposed/).

cyu
11th December 2009, 20:03
Agree 100 % but...... the question is what is self defence? dont mean to be picky but some times the best form of defence is offence.

I'd classify anything as "non-violent civil disobedience" if it's done in public without causing bodily harm to anyone.

I'd classify anything as "self defence" if it's fighting back / protecting one another when others are trying to cause you bodily harm.

In other words, you might consider the following self-defence: Armed militants show up at the local legislature. They simply occupy the building and carry out the votes themselves. If they are attacked, then it's self-defence if they fight back.

However, that scenario is pretty dumb. You don't need to actually occupy the legislature to overthrow the old regime. The legislature is just a symbol and not the real seat of power.

The real seats of power occur in two places: (1) The media (2) Wherever the minions of capitalists are called in to enforce their claims to "property"

For the media, you could assume control the same way as described with the legislature above - except this time, assuming democratic control actually has real value: you can now communicate ideas and events to the general population without having it first filtered by the top-down structure of the capitalist media organization.

At the points of resource control, self-defense is easy. Help protect the employees / peasants / workers from any minions of the capitalist class that try to order them around. (And try to enable them to protect themselves with access to weapons, tactics, etc.) As long as they are protected, the economy keeps going, since they are the ones doing the work anyway. The main difference is that the "fruits of their labor" remain in their own hands, instead of being grabbed by the capitalist and his minions.

scarletghoul
12th December 2009, 00:16
This is pretty glorious news. The whole subcontinent is becoming infested with PPW :cool:


I think this organisation would do better for itself if it acted as an armed defencd militia for the Tamils, as opposed tot rying to fight an insurrectionary war. It could aid in the reconstruction and political struggle of the Tamil people.
This sounds like reformism to me.. Unless you mean as a tactic like 'Survival Pending Revolution', which is what the Black Panthers did. Their main goal was still revolution, but the survival and defense of the Black community was the first step towards this in their view. Anyway the situation of the Tamils isn't quite the same as with Black Americans. Blacks are dispersed all over the USA, surrounded by and trapped in white Amerika, while the Tamils are concentrated and form a majority in the North of the country. In other words, a war of regional seperatism is possible with the Tamils whereas Black America would only really be able to liberate themselves with a revolution of the whole USA.


Im a staunch supporter of tamil independence however i dont think this group will fair any better just because they label themselves marxists.

Would love to be proved wrong though!
They've already hinted at their differant style to the LTTE; it looks like they'll be engaging in a proper asymetric Maoist-style Peoples' War. This has shown itself to be a pretty successful style of guerrilla warfare so expect to see some differant results if this really takes off.

Am i right in assuming the PLA is Maoist too? If it's linked to Cuba and the PLO, probably not Whatever their official tendency, they're clearly heavily influenced by Maoism. From reading the article, it seems they'll be operating with Maoist strategy.