Log in

View Full Version : Stalin innocent on Kirov murder



Das war einmal
7th December 2009, 23:20
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/12/01/world/international-us-russia-murder.html

ST PETERSBURG, Russia (Reuters) - Russia on Tuesday published previously secret documents that shed light on a notorious murder 75 years ago that historians say sparked the purges of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.
The mysterious killing of Stalin's rival Sergei Kirov on December 1, 1934 has remained one of the Kremlin's most closely guarded riddles for decades because many of the key documents were immediately classified by the secret police.
Kirov, a fiery Bolshevik revolutionary whose popularity among ordinary Communist Party members by far outshone that of Stalin, was shot dead in a corridor near his office in Leningrad, now St Petersburg, by a man called Leonid Nikolayev.
Historians have long suspected that Stalin had Kirov killed to eliminate a rival and a potential threat.
But documents released on Tuesday by Russia's domestic intelligence agency -- including Nikolayev's diary, published with the permission of his son -- painted a picture of a disillusioned Communist Party functionary acting alone, out of bitterness and revenge.
Nikolayev had tried hard to rise to the top of the Leningrad Party hierarchy but instead was told to go and work at a factory in a lower position.
He decided to take revenge on Kirov after he was thrown out of the party for "breaching party discipline," denied treatment in a sanitorium despite having heart problems, and could no longer get food rations available to party apparatchiks.
"You can eat yourself now -- no money, no food," the father of two wrote in his diary. "For themselves, they (party leaders) hold garages with automobiles, for us they have sodden bread."
GREAT TERROR
After a summary trial held in December 1934, a military court founded Nikolayev and 13 others guilty of taking part in a terrorist organization called "the Leningrad Center." They were immediately executed.
This alleged conspiracy -- for which the newly published documents provided no evidence -- gave Stalin the pretext to launch the first wave of mass purges that ravaged Russia. Millions were killed and countless others had their lives ripped apart as his Great Terror moved toward its peak in 1937-38.
"After the murder of Kirov, Leningrad's population shrank by 35,000 people in the first quarter of 1935," Tatyana Sukharnikova, director of the Kirov Museum, told journalists and scientists.
"But there was neither cholera nor plague in the city at the time. This was a purge of the city -- complete with evictions, executions and (concentration) camps," she said, presenting yellowed pages of documents on an electronic screen.
The new evidence supported the theory, first expounded by politician and historian Alexander Yakovlev in 1990, that Nikolayev was a "lone terrorist," not part of a bigger plot.
"I am dying for political convictions," the assassin wrote several weeks before shooting Kirov.
"There is no free choice of life, I must die. I want to die with the same happiness that I was born with ... The strike must be made without the slightest miss."
(Writing by Dmitry Solovyov, editing by Mark Trevelyan)

bailey_187
7th December 2009, 23:30
Good article

Unfortunatly, this will take years before it becomes accepted knowledge for history teachers in schools. We are still taught myths about the USSR since disproven by the archives being opened (e.g. that millions were executed, repeated in this article itself)

RED DAVE
8th December 2009, 00:09
So:

(1) Stalin didn't have Kirov killed;

(2) Stalin used Kirov's assassination as the justification for mass purges.

RED DAVE

Leo
8th December 2009, 00:14
Uh... I'm sorry but this doesn't really prove anything. The claim was never that Nikolayev himself was an agent of the NKVD or knowingly worked for them. Quite the contrary, it is that Nikolayev was used unknowingly by the NKVD. Here'd wikipedia's account of the events with all its sources:


The Leningrad office of the NKVD (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NKVD) was responsible for Kirov’s security, headed by Kirov’s close friend, Feodor Medved (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Feodor_Medved&action=edit&redlink=1). Stalin reportedly ordered the NKVD Commissar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Commissar), Genrikh Yagoda (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genrikh_Yagoda), to replace Medved with Grigory Yeremeyevich Yevdokimov (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grigory_Yeremeyevich_Yevdokimov&action=edit&redlink=1), a close associate of Stalin. However, Kirov intervened and had the order countermanded. According to Alexander Orlov (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Orlov), Stalin then ordered Yagoda to arrange the assassination. Yagoda ordered Medved’s deputy, Vania Zaporozhets (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vania_Zaporozhets&action=edit&redlink=1), to undertake the job. Zaporozhets returned to Leningrad in search of an assassin; in reviewing the files he found the name of Leonid Nikolaev (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Nikolaev).[1]

Leonid Nikolaev was well-known to the NKVD, which had arrested him for various petty offences in recent years. Various accounts of his life agree that he was an expelled Party member and failed junior functionary with a murderous grudge and an indifference towards his own survival. He was unemployed, with a wife and child, and in financial difficulties. According to Orlov, Nikolayev had allegedly expressed to a 'friend' a desire to kill the head of the party control commission that had expelled him. His friend reported this to the NKVD.[1]

Zaporozhets then allegedly enlisted Nikolayev’s 'friend' to contact him, giving him money and a loaded 7.62 mm Nagant M1895 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagant_M1895) revolver.[1] However, Nikolaev's first attempt at killing Kirov failed. On 15 October 1934, Nikolaev packed his Nagant revolver in a briefcase and entered the Smolny Institute (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smolny_Institute) where Kirov worked. Although he was initially passed by the main security desk at Smolny, he was arrested after an alert guard asked to examine his briefcase, which was found to contain the revolver.[1] A few hours later, Nikolayev’s briefcase and loaded revolver were returned to him, and he was told to leave the building. Though Nikolaev had clearly broken Soviet laws, the security police had inexplicably released him from custody; he was even permitted to retain his loaded pistol.[2]

With Stalin's approval, the NKVD had previously withdrawn all but four police bodyguards assigned to Kirov. These four guards accompanied Kirov each day to his offices at the Smolny Institute, and then left. On 1 December 1934, the usual guard post at the entrance to Kirov's offices was left unmanned, even though the building served as the chief offices of the Leningrad party apparatus and seat of the local government.[1] [3] According to some reports, only a single friend and unarmed bodyguard of Kirov's, Commissar Borisov, remained.[3] [4] Other sources[who? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words)] state that there may have been as many as nine NKVD guards in the building. Whatever the case, given the circumstances of Kirov's death, as former Soviet official and author Alexander Barmine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Barmine) noted, "the negligence of the NKVD in protecting such a high party official was without precedent in the Soviet Union."[2]

On the afternoon of 1 December Nikolaev arrived at the Smolny Institute offices. Unopposed, he made his way to the third floor, where he waited in a hallway until Kirov and Borisov stepped into the corridor. Borisov appears to have stayed well behind Kirov, some 20 to 40 paces (some sources allege Borisov parted company with Kirov in order to prepare his luncheon).[4] As Kirov turned a corner, passing Nikolaev, the latter drew his revolver and shot Kirov in the back of the neck.[4]


^ a (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Orlov_5-0) b (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Orlov_5-1) c (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Orlov_5-2) d (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Orlov_5-3) e (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Orlov_5-4) f (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Orlov_5-5) Orlov, Alexander, The Secret History of Stalin's Crimes, New York: Random House (1953)
^ a (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Barmine.2C_Alexander_1945_p._252_6-0) b (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Barmine.2C_Alexander_1945_p._252_6-1) c (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Barmine.2C_Alexander_1945_p._252_6-2) Barmine, Alexander, One Who Survived, New York: G.P. Putnam (1945), p. 252
^ a (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Barmine.2C_Alexander_1945_pp._247-252_7-0) b (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Barmine.2C_Alexander_1945_pp._247-252_7-1) Barmine, Alexander, One Who Survived, New York: G.P. Putnam (1945), pp. 247-252
^ a (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Knight_8-0) b (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Knight_8-1) c (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Knight_8-2) d (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#cite_ref-Knight_8-3) Knight, Amy, Who Killed Kirov? The Kremlin’s Greatest Mystery, New York: Hill and Wang (1999), ISBN 9780809064045 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780809064045), p. 190

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Kirov#The_Kirov_Assassination

Intelligitimate
8th December 2009, 01:59
No one serious has believed this since the 1980s. Orlov has long been discredited as a reliable source, as well as Barmine (his first biography doesn't even mention anything about Stalin having Kirov killed! He "remembered" this information in a piece written much later, where he cites other unreliable sources like Boris Nikolaevsky).

The Author
8th December 2009, 04:13
The new evidence supported the theory, first expounded by politician and historian Alexander Yakovlev in 1990, that Nikolayev was a "lone terrorist," not part of a bigger plot.

Yakovlev did not put forward this "theory." This was knowledge known for decades. Yakovlev was the one who as head of the Kirov commission in 1989 and 1990 tried very hard to implicate Stalin as personally responsible for the murder of Kirov, following the falsified claims of Khrushchev in an attempt to soil Koba's name. Yakovlev was one of Gorbachev's associates who assisted in glasnost and perestroika and believed until his death in 2005 in the idea that Stalin had Kirov killed despite the evidence to the contrary- in fact, on the History Channel "documentary," "Stalin: Man of Steel" Yakovlev mentioned this remark and his belief (Yakovlev spoke with arrogant disdain when interviewed- a lying bastard). This article fails to mention Yakovlev's actual position and demonstrates clearly to me that some of what it has to say is not accurate and worth a lot of skepticism.

I start to believe more and more that there were other causes for the purges besides the murder of Kirov. I think the leadership saw the bureaucratic deficiencies in the Party and state apparatus and decided it was time to clean the Augean stables.

Intelligitimate
8th December 2009, 04:38
I think the leadership had a genuine fear of a Fifth Column, overreacted in a panicked way to real conspiracies, and applied poor methods in rooting out "wreckers" and whatnot, along with egging on the significant amount of genuine support for this campaign among the masses.

Getty extensively refutes the idea that this was used as some sort of reaction by the party against elements of the opposition. Nothing about the initial reaction, nor the reaction in the months following the murder of Kirov, fit with that theory. See Getty's discussion in his Origins.