Front Hugs are SINFUL now...

[Havet]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nss-mREqdfg



Attention, Christian kids: If you like not having sex, not speaking the Lord’s name in vain (http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/12/conservative-christian-says-censoring-n-word-is-anti-religious/), and not being gay (http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/18/guide-to-gay-wedding-discrimination/), then you’ll love the newest trend in policing typical adolescent behaviors in the name of God. It’s called the The Christian Side-Hug (http://stuffchristianslike.net/2008/04/106-the-side-hug/), and it’s here to help the devout avoid the temptation of full frontal hugging. Don’t worry—it’s cool, because they made a “rap” song about it.

According to Stuff Christians Like, there’s no “exact scripture reference” banning normal hugging. But the Side-Hug does significantly lower the “risk of two crotches touching,” which has got to be in the Bible somewhere. Here’s how you do it:
Instead of face to face, you go side to side, putting your arm around the person and your hip against their’s. Still having a hard time mastering it? Pretend you’re taking a photo and you’re both looking at the camera together. The side hug, or A frame as it is also called, is safe for the whole family, friendly and above all holy.

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/23/the-christian-side-hug-front-hugs-be-too-sinful/






:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

[greymatter]

I can see their haloed microphones glistening with the consecrated sweat of non-sinful young virgins.

I want to dose their chaste little girlfriends with LSD and show em' my third eye.

...she's my baby, she's my love, pixie queen of bible club...

[hugsandmarxism]

Hugs are sacred. We need more hugs... and more Marxism, but definitely MORE HUGS! Side hugs are a way of demonstrating contempt for humanity. So yeah. ;)

[Holden Caulfield]

I thought touching the crotches of others with your own crotch was the point of hugging?

[Imposter Marxist]

"huggin B Sinful!"
"gimme dat christian side hug"
These are the type of people who need to be bashed in the head with a spiked mace.
As Cenk said on Theyoungturks.com (I think) the guy who thought of stoping front hugs must have gotten erections every time he hugged, lol.

[Revy]

Nothing wrong with a "side hug", people hug in different ways, though the reason they are doing this is just stupid and laughable.

[Raúl Duke]

When I was reading the description and listening to the video I was like "this must be a joke" but considering that in the U.S. christianity has a tendency towards lunacy (this "side hug" bs is not possible in Puerto Rico or Latin-America; neither the catholics or protestants would consider it because they both see normal hugging as a good thing. The only sect which might think about it might be only the Jehovah's Witnesses) then I guess it's possible.


Stuff Christians LikeThis reminds me of the parody site "Stuff White People Like."

[Dr. Rosenpenis]

If I hadn't front hugged my family and friends so much, I would never have committed all those sins of the flesh

thank you for showing me the way, Jesus

[Dr. Rosenpenis]

front-hugging dogs may lead to bestiality, but as far I know, the Bible doesn't condemn that so it's ok

[NecroCommie]

So I can assume that I am going to hell... perfect! :rolleyes:

[GPDP]

I give side-hugs all the time, but that's because I'm kind of reserved and don't feel like giving full-hugs sometimes.

Also, I never new nudity was A-OK here so long as it doesn't feature erect dongs.

[NecroCommie]

I give side-hugs all the time, but that's because I'm kind of reserved and don't feel like giving full-hugs sometimes.
Hell! I'm so reserved that I'll do my everything to avoid hugs completely! My girlfriend is ofocourse completely another matter.

[Raúl Duke]

I have no problems in getting hugs...

although I consider myself a shy person.

[Dóchas]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN3WdIf0gnw&feature=SeriesPlayList&p=CB2E2418DDECE97B

this video is pretty funny he starts talking about it at about 1:30

[Havet]

I wonder if for these people [christians] hugging one's child in the front is a sin as well...:rolleyes:

[Richard Nixon]

This is sarcasm obviously.

[#FF0000]

Yeah I thought it was pretty obvious sarcasm too.

EDIT: Also did the Imperial March sample in it immediately stick out to anybody else?

[Hiero]

This is sarcasm obviously.

But there is an audience.

[Havet]

This is sarcasm obviously.

Does this look like sarcasm to you ? (http://egconference.org/2010/)

Because that is the website which promoted that event.

[Sasha]

fathers house? arent those that sect that bought ungdumshuset in copenhagen to only break it down ad led it lay barren for a couple of years to excorsise the demons of socialism and youth culture?