Log in

View Full Version : Dubai crisis jolts markets, but early fears ease



KurtFF8
28th November 2009, 07:09
Source (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091128/ap_on_bi_ge/dubai_debt_fallout;_ylt=AjInzidAR3OhEHkdyGxczVis0N UE;_ylu=X3oDMTM1b2xrYXFtBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkxMTI4L2 R1YmFpX2RlYnRfZmFsbG91dARjcG9zAzEwBHBvcwM3BHB0A2hv bWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5faGVhZGxpbmVfbGlzdARzbGsDZHViYW ljcmlzaXNq)



By STEVENSON JACOBS, AP Business Writer Stevenson Jacobs, Ap Business Writer – 2 hrs 6 mins ago
NEW YORK – Dubai's debt crisis rattled world financial markets Friday, raising concerns that some banks could further tighten lending and stall the global economic recovery.
The possible spillover effects centered on fears that international banks could suffer big losses if Dubai's investment arm defaulted on its $60 billion debt. Stock and commodity markets tumbled in New York, London and Asia as investors flocked to the U.S. dollar as a safe haven.
But earlier concerns that the crisis might trigger another financial meltdown seemed to ease after some analysts downplayed the risks for U.S. banks, which are thought to have little exposure to the Middle Eastern city-state.
U.S. stocks fell sharply but rebounded from their lows as investors concluded that the damage might be contained. The Dow Jones industrial average lost about 155 points, or roughly 1.5 percent, in a shortened trading day, and other stock averages also sank. Oil prices plunged as much as 7 percent before recovering some ground later in the day.
"I don't think the collateral damage is going to be that great," said Jeffrey Saut, chief investment strategist at Raymond James. "People will dig into this over the weekend, but I think balance sheets have healed enough to withstand a shock like this."
Still, the crisis in Dubai pointed to the vulnerability of the global economy despite signs of recovery. Last year's credit debacle left major banks with billions in losses, forcing them to reduce lending to consumers and businesses.
Access to credit has improved in recent months, but analysts said Dubai's woes could make some banks more cautious. That could further squeeze lending and weaken the recovery after the deepest recession in decades.
"What we need for the economic momentum to continue is for banks to feel confident about lending, and clearly what has happened in the last 48 hours is not a step in the right direction," said David Williams, banking analyst at Fox-Pitt Kelton in London.
Dubai's troubles caught investors by surprise. A year after the global slump derailed the city-state's dizzying growth, its main investment arm, Dubai World, revealed this week it was seeking at least a six-month delay on repaying its $60 billion debt. Credit agencies responded by slashing debt ratings on Dubai's state companies, saying they might consider the plan a default.
In recent years, Dubai has expanded with ambitious, eye-catching projects like the Gulf's palm-shaped islands and the world's tallest skyscraper in hopes of becoming a tourist-friendly Middle Eastern metropolis. In the process, though, the state-backed networks nicknamed Dubai Inc. have racked up $80 billion in red ink. The emirate may now need another bailout from its oil-rich neighbor Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates.
In Europe, stock markets rebounded after Wall Street fell less than feared. Earlier, stock indexes in Hong Kong and South Korea tumbled 5 percent in response to the previous day's Dubai-related losses in Europe.
The Dubai crisis caused the dollar to spike higher against the euro and pound but slump against the yen, another traditional safe haven. Speculation that the Bank of Japan might intervene by buying dollars or selling yen to aid Japanese exports helped the dollar recover after it had fallen to a 14-year low against the yen.
European banks appeared to be at most risk if Dubai World can't pay its bills. London-based lenders HSBC Holdings and Standard Chartered could face losses of $611 million and $177 million respectively, according to early estimates from analysts at Goldman Sachs. Both have substantial Middle East operations.
South Korea estimated the country's financial institutions have just $88 million in exposure. Construction firms from Japan, Australia and South Korea behind Dubai's recent development boom also might be on the hook.
Among U.S. banks, Citigroup Inc. had $1.9 billion in exposure to the United Arab Emirates as of 2008, according to a JPMorgan research note. But it's unclear how much of that was related to Dubai. Citigroup declined to comment.
In the U.S., Dubai World owns at least eight office buildings and hotels, including the Mandarin Oriental and W Union Square hotels in New York and the Fontainebleau in Miami Beach, according to data supplied by Real Capital Analytics. Its projects also include Dubai World's and casino operator MGM Mirage's deal to build the CityCenter project on the Las Vegas Strip.
Between October 2005 and April 2008, Dubai World bought 10 U.S. properties for about $9.7 billion, the Real Capital Analytics data showed. Two of those properties, both office buildings in New York, were sold in November 2007 for a combined $2.4 billion.
But Dubai World's problems likely won't have a major effect on the U.S. commercial real estate market, said Dan Fasulo, managing director of Real Capital Analytics.
"They didn't acquire enough," Fasulo said. "They have only been active for a few years."
But the effect on the banking system could eventually touch businesses and consumers. Even if most banks could absorb any Dubai-related losses, the emirate's troubles could lead them to reevaluate and scale back lending. That would make it harder for companies to borrow and to help sustain the global recovery, analysts said.
Others expressed concern that Dubai's woes could stall the buying behind asset booms in emerging markets in Asia and Latin America, which have attracted enormous capital amid investor enthusiasm for regions with rapid economic growth.
"I think it will make investors realize they need to be more discriminating about emerging markets," said Arjuna Mahendran, head of Asian investment strategy at HSBC Private Bank in Singapore.
___
AP Researcher Bonnie Cao in Beijing and AP Business Writers Jeremiah Marquez in Hong Kong, Tim Paradis and Stephen Bernard in New York, Adrian Sainz in Miami, Kelly Olsen in Seoul and Yuri Kageyama in Tokyo contributed to this report.


Looks like yet another potential for derailing this "recovery" that is ongoing. Of course since the nature of the recovery lacks any significant restructuring, it's not too surprising that things like this quickly arise to threaten the "progress" that's been made so far.

punisa
28th November 2009, 10:34
Thanks for sharing this info, Dubai came as no surprise as majority of the city is built on speculative oil capital.
What somewhat surprises me is how this crisis is still maintained, I thought that situation with big shots will get much worse till now.
But is seems everything is back in business, for example Microsoft seems to be doing quite well with new Windows 7.

As for Dubai, I think its a prime example of an unstable economy. They never actually had the real economy anyway, when you build all your dreams on exporting oil you are so dependent on your importing countries that you let them pull the plug whenever they want.
Probability what happened is that the US is securing more and more resources from its occupied territories in the Middle East so Dubai will be let to sink into the the desert.

Anyway, one image I found ironic - take a look what is written on the skyscraper to the left:

http://fauxsocialite.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/dubai_night_skyline.jpg

Potemkin
28th November 2009, 17:29
I think this is yet another attempt to downplay the significance, and continued vulnerability, of global capital at this moment. Especially in the United States, economists are no more than propagandists, as we have repeatedly seen lately, with the heralding of a premature "end" to the global depression (after denying we were in one until over a year later), and their continued attempts to downplay seemingly large events, such as this. I don't think we've reached the bottom, and I think the people that will be (and are being) hurt primarily are, of course, the poor and working classes.

Potemkin
28th November 2009, 17:46
I would also like to add that we should be trying to analyze the significance of this moment. It seems to me that if capitalism survives this ongoing crisis, it will be much harder to be a working person in the world. The consolidations that we've seen in the economic sector in the United States indicates to me that personal credit will be harder to acquire, as there are now fewer lenders with significantly larger market shares, and more power for them within the market. Of course, this consolidation perhaps makes them more vulnerable if/when something like this happens again (as there are even fewer companies to merge with), but in the short-term, it spells more power for capitalism and more misery for workers.

On the other hand, I could imagine a scenario in which a degenerated capitalism limps on for a while, never really recovering. In this case, I would argue that we will really start to see the rise of more fascistic forms of government. By this I mean that, because capitalism really controls the government in most instances, we will start to see capitalism increasingly leveraging its remaining economic pressure on the state to enforce (by force) its economic arrangements. To me, and I think others have said this -- I'm not claiming it to be 100% my own unique view -- a degenerated capitalism looks a lot like fascism.

Not to mention a rise of fascism in a different sense -- that is, the rise of neo-fascist groups (as we have seen in the United States) that gain popularity by scapegoating immigrants and minorities during this depression. The left needs to be a loud an active member in this void, posing a class analysis rather than a race-based analysis, if there is to be any hope of protecting what little remains for the working-class.

RadioRaheem84
28th November 2009, 19:06
I am surprised that the left hasn't risen up against the machine that is Dubai! It is the perfect example of neo-liberalism put into hyper-drive. The only reason for the horrid exploitation of workers is due to the rapid expansion and development of the city. The massive profits the construction companies reign in is due to the extremely low pay of the workers. The result is the introduction of more and more luxurious hotels and homes that can only be afforded to the super wealthy.

The ecological disaster; the dumping of sewage into the beaches because the waste facilities cannot keep up with the rapid expansion, the UAE alone has a bigger carbon footprint than the USA and UK!

And not to mention the massive advertisement and marketing campaign to sell Dubai as the paradise everyone has been waiting for. Everyone from celebrities, politicians to rich moguls like Richard Branson flock to the city to pitch it to other rich snobs. They fostered an environment to where much of the problems were largley neglected for a long time because 'liberals' liked it.

And last a state that is largely on the side of industry, shuts down free press and censors the media in order for it to not hinder profits. A state that doesn't allow for workers to strike or bargain for wages.

I mean this is the neo-liberal agenda in plain light. The media glitz and glamor of the new liberal upper class that loves luxury and cares little for human need. Propped up by the lies and propaganda by the big banking analysts, the media and marketing firms. It's only now that the media is catching up to reality when it's no longer profitable to ignore the facts!

Dubai is probably the BEST case against neo-liberalism we've had in a long time because all the elements are there for people to see in broad daylight.

punisa
29th November 2009, 02:46
Everyone from celebrities, politicians to rich moguls like Richard Branson flock to the city to pitch it to other rich snobs.
I hope these will soon be among the extinct species.

KurtFF8
29th November 2009, 17:21
UAE to back banks amid Dubai meltdown (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091129/ap_on_bi_ge/ml_dubai_meltdown;_ylt=Atgia_oEMiAK6uax1mXRs5is0NU E;_ylu=X3oDMTJ2ZmsyNzhqBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkxMTI5L21 sX2R1YmFpX21lbHRkb3duBGNwb3MDMgRwb3MDNgRwdANob21lX 2Nva2UEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yeQRzbGsDdWFldG9iYWNrYmF u)




By BARBARA SURK and TAREK EL-TABLAWY, Associated Press Writers Barbara Surk And Tarek El-tablawy, Associated Press Writers – 1 hr 29 mins ago
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates – The United Arab Emirates' central bank said Sunday it would offer additional liquidity to banks, signaling a push by the federal government to reassure investors worried about the country's banking sector and its exposure to Dubai's crushing debt.
Global equity markets were set to reopen Monday, and investors are worried about a routing similar to that seen last week after Dubai's chief engine for growth, Dubai World, announced it wanted more time to pay some of its roughly $60 billion in debts.
The UAE's official WAM news agency said the central bank issued a notice to Emirati banks and foreign banks with branches in the country saying it would make available "a special additional liquidity facility linked to their current accounts at the central bank." The statement said the facility can be drawn upon at a rate of 50 basis points — half a percent — above the three-month Emirates interbank offered rate.
International investors reacted with shock and outrage at Dubai World's announcement Wednesday that, as part of its restructuring effort, it would ask creditors to delay repayment of its debt and that of its real estate arm, Nakheel, until at least May. Nakheel has a $3.5 billion bond coming due in December.
The company's roughly $60 billion in debt makes up the brunt of the at least $80 billion Dubai owes as a result of a meteoric decade-long growth boom that saw the tiny city-state transformed into a Middle Eastern Las Vegas, New York and Los Angeles all wrapped into one. Dubai World was a key driver of that growth, with interests ranging from ports to real estate.
In the days since the announcement, Dubai officials have gone to neighboring Abu Dhabi, the oil-rich home to the federal government for a series of meetings. Some analysts have speculated that the timing of Dubai World's announcement — on the eve of a three-day Islamic holiday — caught even Abu Dhabi's rulers by surprise, putting them under pressure to act decisively in a bid to shore up confidence in the country's banks.
Emirati banks are believed to be shouldering a large chunk of Dubai's debts, and international ratings agencies have either downgraded the ratings of some of the country's banks — or at least placed them on review for further downgrades — citing exposure to Dubai World's debt.
The central bank's statement was also aimed mitigating any negative fallout on the country as a whole, with concerns that Abu Dhabi would be branded with the same iron of pessimism and skepticism that Dubai will likely endure for years to come.
The UAE's banking system is "more sound and liquid than a year ago," the bank said.
Dubai World's call for more time is seen by many analysts as a classic case of over-extension — a tale of a city-state whose dreams for development propelled it to stardom with its indoor ski-slopes, man-made islands and world's tallest tower.
But that dream was built on borrowed time and money, and as the global recession hammered Dubai, driving property prices down by 50 percent in a year, forcing layoffs and project delays and cancellations, the emirate no longer had access to the easy credit on which it had pinned its growth.
It simply couldn't pay.
At the beginning of the year, it launched a $20 billion bond program, of which $10 billion was snapped up by the UAE's central bank. The same day Dubai World issued its murky statement about a debt-extension, the emirate's government said a new $5 billion bond issuance had been bought up by two banks majority owned by Abu Dhabi.
While the Dubai World statement made clear that the bonds were not linked to its debt woes, it was obvious that the emirate had little recourse but to turn to Abu Dhabi, whose more conservative growth was fueled by the same oil that Dubai lacks.
Dubai's debt saga is not new.
It's been obvious for some time that the emirate owes more money than it can repay. But what remained unclear was the overall extent of the debt load and what officials were doing to avert a panic at a time when the world was in the nascent stages of emerging from its worst recession in over six decades.
UAE newspaper Al-Itihad on Sunday quoted an unidentified Dubai World official as saying the conglomerate, over the past few months, "totally rejected the idea of selling some of its good investment and real estate assets at low prices."
The official said that any asset sale needed to be in a "commercially fair manner in order to achieve (Dubai World's) long-term strategic objectives, away from ... economic pressures."
___
El-Tablawy reported from Cairo.

ComradeMan
29th November 2009, 17:25
"My grandfather rode a camel, my father rode a camel, I drive a Mercedes, my son drives a Land Rover, his son will drive a Land Rover, but his son will ride a camel." Sheikh Rashid bin Saeed Al Maktoum
http://www.gluckman.com/DubaiBiz.html