View Full Version : Combating the Presuppositions.....
RadioRaheem84
15th November 2009, 16:46
OK, I hope that this thread becomes a long one because I would really like to touch upon just what Capitalists/Libertarians/Liberals and Conservatives presuppose when it comes to the free market. Why is it such a wonderful system in their eyes? What is the logic they presuppose in order to believe it's inherently flawed? I would like to learn them that way I can watch out for them in the future.
Can someone start this thread off by offering a typical presupposition the capitalist holds and then rebutting it? We can start with the most basic and then move to the more nuanced ones.
Thanks!
Vladimir Innit Lenin
15th November 2009, 16:59
It is based on self interest.
I find that most arguments with capitalists start as follows:
-I explain about socialism
-They explain about how socialism MUST lead to dictatorship and deaths and how the free market leads to freedom and democracy.
-As I refute their points (e.g. democracy in capitalism not really being democratic - having a vote every few years between who i want to ignore my views and exploit my labour for the next few years), they gradually come round to saying the following:
- That capitalism is the 'least bad' system and that even though it has many faults (they have to say this because I have given several irrefutable examples) it is better than socialism because socialism murders people (Despite me explaining that it is in fact to the contrary, and that capitalism is a more barbaric system).
Oh and all capitalists pre-suppose the following:
Stalin killed 50-100million people and was responsible alone for the cold war, as was the entire USSR
Castro is a murderous tyrant.
All people living in socialist countries walk around in a sea of grey and never smile unless instructed to by the government
Chavez is somehow a dictator, despite having more electoral credibility than Bush or Brown. Makes me lol that does.
eyedrop
15th November 2009, 17:01
I can start with something from an article by Akerlof and Stiglitz, who won the nobelprize in 2001.
"The last 3 decades a current in economics has constructed models which assumes that markets works perfect. This assumption has overshadoved a lot of research which helps explain why markets aren't always working perfectly, -yes, why there actually exists very spread market flaws."
http://www.dagsavisen.no/meninger/article451948.ece
Found an Enlglish version of the article (http://burmadigest.info/2009/10/26/let-a-hundred-theories-bloom/)
RadioRaheem84
15th November 2009, 18:39
Thanks guys. Keep em coming. This is good stuff.
Also on a side note, I think John Bellamy Foster has a great new book out called the Great Financial Crisis and its Consequences.
Anyone ever heard of Richard Wolf of U-Mass Amherst? Great stuff on his website.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.