View Full Version : British Invaders Torture boys as young as 13, some pulled off the street
BonnyPortmore
14th November 2009, 19:33
Electrocution
rape
sexual humiliation
dog attack
hood and water
stress positions and burns
How the fuck can we have shit like help for heroes for these evil bastards.
My mum said what do you think the iraqis do to the british they capture.
Well most of these iraqis were civilians, two i doubt the resistence rapes them and i would understand as the brits and yanks are an OCCUPATION force.
This shit is not even suprising, we as suposed marxists need to help the iraqi and afghans liberate their nations, all this bullshit talk on forums and websites, what does it do?
wjo does it help?
the left needs to grow a fucking spine and help the people marxism is for, the oppressed, the working class.
Why even say you are socialists, i agree we have to wait for the conditions for revolution, but we must fight imperialism wherever it rears its ugly head.
Or we could sit on revleft and get the green little cubes and become mods while people like nicj griffin walk around without fear of a bullet.
No fight left in the cause anymore.
Olerud
14th November 2009, 19:53
hypocrite...
BonnyPortmore
14th November 2009, 20:05
we will see
gorillafuck
14th November 2009, 20:11
Why do people seem to always come onto this forum assuming that everyone who uses it is not active in any way at all outside this forum?
Lyev
14th November 2009, 20:16
Electrocution
rape
sexual humiliation
dog attack
hood and water
stress positions and burns
Have you got any sources for these things? I'd like to read a bit more on them. I have heard of absolutely horrible instances of the Americans torturing Iraqis back in about 2004. There's also this: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/13/falluja-cancer-children-birth-defects where children are being born with horrendous defects, one child was born with two heads, due to chemicals and whatnot from the fighting in Iraq over the past years.
Vladimir Innit Lenin
14th November 2009, 21:01
Firstly, you have not linked or sourced your claims to anywhere.
Secondly, although I, of course, in no way condone the imperialist wars that are being conducted at the moment, your anger is mistakenly (for once) attributed to the capitalists. I am afraid that these things happen in war; wrong they are, but it is something that happens, and is one of the less shocking revelations at the moment, in all honesty.
Lastly, it is not so simple as me getting a red flag and running around the streets shouting 'Murder, Murder'. Indeed, you will remember that even the most voluminous, well organised and coherent anti-war movements of our time, Stop The War, failed to stop the imperialists getting their wicked way.
The first battle is to educate people and propagate our views. At the moment our views are not widespread, the 'triumph' of Capitalism 1989-91 has seen to this. However, you must understand that our first task is to build a mass movement; only then can we pick our time to attack, in a more physical sense, the wretched class.
BonnyPortmore
14th November 2009, 21:24
the only battle worth fighting is through the barrel of a rifle.
a revolution without guns, are you crazy.
Anyone who is not willing to shed blood in places like iraq afghanistan do not deserve the title of marxist and know deep down that doing nothing but talk to people in the first world is pointless, try fighting with comrades in the battlegrounds of the oppressedf nations, not sitting in a first world nation telling other first worlders how once the third world has waited for us commies in the first world to educate all our society we will then do something about the massacres by OUR nations troops against their peoples civilians.
Crux
15th November 2009, 00:41
I am sorry to say, but shooting people does not make a revolution.
Just what do you think you can achieve by writing this here?
BonnyPortmore
15th November 2009, 00:46
piss off plastic socialists:)
Crux
15th November 2009, 00:56
piss off plastic socialists:)
Grow the fuck up. You know nothing about people here, so don't presume you do. So what are you doing here anyway?
BonnyPortmore
15th November 2009, 01:01
relaxing after a strenuous guerrilla war
:rolleyes:
i am browsing you ass what does it look like
god look it up
Crux
15th November 2009, 01:10
relaxing after a strenuous guerrilla war
:rolleyes:
i am browsing you ass what does it look like
god look it up
Only, joke's on you.
Luisrah
15th November 2009, 01:12
the only battle worth fighting is through the barrel of a rifle.
a revolution without guns, are you crazy.
Anyone who is not willing to shed blood in places like iraq afghanistan do not deserve the title of marxist and know deep down that doing nothing but talk to people in the first world is pointless, try fighting with comrades in the battlegrounds of the oppressedf nations, not sitting in a first world nation telling other first worlders how once the third world has waited for us commies in the first world to educate all our society we will then do something about the massacres by OUR nations troops against their peoples civilians.
I respect your opinion, and I like the way you want to agitate things.
But the thing is, a communist/anarchist that talks to other people about their views and gains new comrades is already helping to end those horrible things you mentioned.
It isn't as simple to get a gun and travel somehwere far, where you have no friends nor connections to try to kill some of the world's most dangerous forces in some of the world's most dangerous places.
And one question, are you shedding blood in Iraq or Afghanistan?
Or are you not marxist?
BonnyPortmore
15th November 2009, 01:14
i will be shedding or rather spilling blood in the future.
I am quite sure of that
Crux
15th November 2009, 01:22
i will be shedding or rather spilling blood in the future.
I am quite sure of that
Me, I plan to take part in a revolution. That's why I agitate, organize, protest. I may not be doing this under much physical threat, save for the occasional police violence or fascist attacks, but you know it's about the workingclass not shooting things.
BonnyPortmore
15th November 2009, 01:27
its about shooting enemies of the working class.
And when has sweden ever fought fascism ?
Oneironaut
15th November 2009, 01:47
i will be shedding or rather spilling blood in the future.
I am quite sure of that
You are being ridiculous. Keep that shit out of this forum. On another note, I feel like Radical is back.
BonnyPortmore
15th November 2009, 01:52
i am no rapper comrade, and what is wrong with what i said
Oneironaut
15th November 2009, 01:53
i am no rapper comrade, and what is wrong with what i said
Are you serious? If you were planning on flying under the radar, you could have dropped your fetish of violence for at least 200 posts.
What is wrong is that cops crawl this sight, and you my friend are making bait.
BonnyPortmore
15th November 2009, 02:01
you seriously think i am radical?
i am not but he is a respected comrade and speaks of our cause not some beurcratic bull
9
15th November 2009, 02:19
Haha, clearly, you are Radical.
Spirit of Spartacus
15th November 2009, 09:00
i will be shedding or rather spilling blood in the future.
I am quite sure of that
Well.
Comrade, I think you'll like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu_RxTo3_zU
BonnyPortmore
15th November 2009, 11:15
look at my ip address mods, i am not radical
LeninBalls
15th November 2009, 13:24
Firstly, you have not linked or sourced your claims to anywhere.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/14/iraq-abuse-claims-british-troops
http://english.aljazeera.net//news/europe/2009/11/2009111415227734281.html
Those poor innocent working class soldiers. :(
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.