Log in

View Full Version : Benefits to Run Out for 900,000 Unemployed



Louisiana
31st October 2009, 02:04
BY BRIAN WILLIAMS
Unemployment benefits are ending for hundreds of thousands of workers who have been without a job for six months, and in some cases for up to a year and a half. The National Employment Law Project estimates that an additional 900,000 workers will lose their benefits by the end of the year.

States provide 26 weeks of unemployment benefits. More than half of those receiving these payments are jobless after the benefits end. In September, for example, a record 5.4 million people had been unemployed for longer than six months.

For many no longer eligible for state benefits, the federal government has provided extended payments, in some cases for up to 53 additional weeks. But even these are being exhausted. Congress is currently discussing a further extension of benefits for another 14 weeks, plus an additional six weeks in states where unemployment rates, averaged over three months, exceed 8.5 percent. Meanwhile, the number of workers filing initial jobless claims has been more than half a million for 48 straight weeks, reported Market Watch October 15.

According to data released October 15 by the Barack Obama administration, 30,383 jobs have been created or saved through federal government stimulus contracts with businesses. An October 19 White House report estimated that 250,000 school jobs have been saved or created from federal grants to states. When the $787 billion stimulus package was passed by Congress earlier this year the president claimed that it would create or save 3.5 million jobs over two years.
The capitalist rulers have poured hundreds of billions of dollars into shoring up the nations largest banks, in hopes of getting lending going again, and for programs to encourage consumer spending. But this has had no effect on alleviating the economic crisis, which is rooted in declining capitalist production worldwide. U.S. factories in September operated at 70.5 percent of their capacity, more than 10 percent below the average in the years 1972 through 2008.

Source: The Militant

Uncle Ho
31st October 2009, 04:11
How many people will have to be screwed before we rise up and do something about it?

It is baffling to me how a nation with so many guns can be so passive when the power to enact radical change lies within their gun cabinets

chegitz guevara
31st October 2009, 16:33
How many people will have to be screwed before we rise up and do something about it?

It is baffling to me how a nation with so many guns can be so passive when the power to enact radical change lies within their gun cabinets

It's not about being screwed. It's about feeling powerless. As long as we think we can't do anything, we won't do anything. Instead of acting collectively, people will act out individually: killing themselves, going on killing sprees against perceived oppressors, turning to drugs and alcohol or religion, etc.

Although I appreciate a possible additional 20 weeks of unemployment, if the Senate would stop dicking around and pass it, what I really need is more money. I can't afford rent, electricity, phone, internet, and gas, let alone food, on $300 a week. Not including food, that's about $150 a month more in expenses than I get. Even if I cut out the internet and just use the library, I still need an additional $80 to break even, and I'm still not eating.

proudcomrade
31st October 2009, 17:41
Another thing about the unemployment system in the US is that the program forces people to look for aggressively, and then take, full-time hours in some of the shittiest, worst-paying and worst-turnover jobs imaginable, all in the name of "welfare to work" "reform" a la Clinton. I speak of this from personal experience. This, in turn, not only leaves the unemployed worker in all kinds of dire straits when the unbearably shitty job either expires (temp) or forces them to quit (which the gov't. then uses as justification to kick the person off of the program entirely for "refusal to work"), and leaves participants with resumes that trap people in dead ends; it also fucks the national economy and distorts the labor force even further, artificially bumping up employment statistics and worsening the dominance of shitty retail, janitorial or secretarial work from hell. Meanwhile, the middle class continues screaming its comfy head off about "having to support those people" who "don't work", and demanding that politicians cut the scraps of the program that remain, because goodness forfend that anybody ever have to pay taxes. :rolleyes:

Middle America will not have the luxury of oppressing the unemployed in this manner for very much longer. Unemployment and poverty- coming to a suburb near you!

chegitz guevara
1st November 2009, 16:19
Unemployment isn't as bad as welfare. In Florida, you're not required to take a job outside your career field and you are not required to accept an offer for less than 80% of your previous pay, unless you apply for it knowingly. So, I can't be forced to go work at Burger King, for example. You are required to apply to an average of three jobs a week. Very occasionally, they even check.

Right now, Florida is so hammered that unemployment is overwhelmed. You cannot even get a human being on the phone. It literally took me a week a few months ago to get a hold of a person, and that required me to sit on the phone for hours and days, pressing redial.

Psy
1st November 2009, 16:39
It's not about being screwed. It's about feeling powerless. As long as we think we can't do anything, we won't do anything. Instead of acting collectively, people will act out individually: killing themselves, going on killing sprees against perceived oppressors, turning to drugs and alcohol or religion, etc.

Here most turn to crime. When most jobs in the inner-cities of the rust-belt pay only $300 a week, stealing cars and robbing stores is a far more attractive occupation.



Although I appreciate a possible additional 20 weeks of unemployment, if the Senate would stop dicking around and pass it, what I really need is more money. I can't afford rent, electricity, phone, internet, and gas, let alone food, on $300 a week. Not including food, that's about $150 a month more in expenses than I get. Even if I cut out the internet and just use the library, I still need an additional $80 to break even, and I'm still not eating.

Just think about people that work 8 hours for 5 days for only $300.

Uncle Ho
1st November 2009, 20:01
Here most turn to crime. When most jobs in the inner-cities of the rust-belt pay only $300 a week, stealing cars and robbing stores is a far more attractive occupation.

If only we could direct these criminals to strike the bourgeoisie instead of their own community, we could have some justice.


Just think about people that work 8 hours for 5 days for only $300.

People work for a lot less on the reservations, where the average wage for the employed (Which is not many, by the way) is $3.75/hr