Log in

View Full Version : October 22, 2009: Courageous Voices Against Police Brutality



redwinter
29th October 2009, 09:54
http://www.revcom.us/a/181/NDP_Reports-en.html

October 22, 2009
Courageous Voices Against Police Brutality, Repression, and Criminalization of a Generation

“The justice system is taking our children’s lives every day. They are either jailing our kids or killing them.”
—Natasha Williams, whose 17-year-old son Corey Harris was killed by an off-duty cop on September 11, speaking at the Chicago October 22 rally


“The Champaign police need to be stopped. They can’t mess with us just because of what we look like or where we at. They can’t kill us. We are not going to let them.”
—Friend of 15-year-old Kiwane Carrington, killed by police on October 9, speaking at October 22 protest in Champaign, Illinois


Across the U.S. on October 22, people took to the streets to march, rally, and demand a stop to police brutality, repression, and the criminalization of a whole generation of youth. Revolution is still learning about all that happened in various cities and towns—we encourage readers to send in letters and photos about the day (send to [email protected]). In the centerfold of this issue are some of the photos we have received, which give a sense of those who stepped forward and the spirit of October 22 this year. The following are some snapshots from the protests.



*****

Oakland—After downtown rally of 200 people, a march took off to protest at the Oakland Police department. Later, there was a significant convergence in the East Oakland neighborhood where Brownie Polk (killed by police in August) lived.

Chicago—The downtown Federal Plaza rally opened with a dramatic reading of 25 names of just some of those killed by the Chicago police since summer 2007. Among the speakers was Pastor Melvin Brown, who has played an important role in the protests demanding justice for Mark Anthony Barmore, a 23-year-old Black man killed by cops in Rockford in upstate Illinois. Students came from a number of high schools, including a full bus load from one school. Later, people rededicated a South Side park, where Corey used to play ball, as the Corey Harris Memorial Park.

Los Angeles—In a city with sharp divides between different nationalities, Latino youth from East LA and Santa Ana mixed it up with Black people from the Florence and Crenshaw area, where the march began. A Black woman carried a picture of her brother, killed by San Diego police in August; the family of 13-year-old Devin Brown, killed by the LAPD in 2005, took part; students from a nearby charter school marched from their school. Later people rallied at Leimert Park, a center of Black culture in LA.

New York City—Following the Washington Square Park rally, over 150 people marched through the streets. A dozen students from New York University (NYU) joined the rally and march, and the protest was covered prominently in the Washington Square News, a student newspaper at NYU (article and photos online at /nyunews.com/news/2009/oct/23/police/ (http://nyunews.com/news/2009/oct/23/police/)). Later the auditorium at the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Center was packed for an evening of “Voices Against Police Brutality”—including performances by musicians and spoken word artists and families of police murder victims speaking bitterness. (See "Fighting Back: A Reporter's Notebook on October 22nd" (http://www.revcom.us/a/181/NDP_Rptrs_Ntbk-en.html) from NYC.)


Significant convergences were also held in a number of neighborhoods of the basic masses in major cities.


As we go to press, Revolution has received word about other October 22nd protests in Albuquerque; Atlanta; Cleveland; Houston; Seattle; St. Louis; Athens, Georgia; Champaign, Illinois; New Haven, Connecticut; Greensboro and Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Fresno, Humbolt/Arcata, and Santa Rosa, California.



*****



Sights, scenes and thoughts from October 22 around the country:

The youth today, especially youth of oppressed nationalities, face extreme police brutality, intimidation, and repression on a daily basis. The NYPD are on a pace to breaking their own record, set last year, of nearly 550,000 “stops-and-frisks”—mainly of Black and Latino youth, and more than 9 times out of 10 not even involving any alleged crime. On October 22, people building for the protest in New York City went out to one high school. They reported, “One girl had a telling story: a few weeks earlier the NY Civil Liberties Union distributed cards at their school outlining their basic rights when confronted by police. But she said when the students pull these out to claim those rights, the police take them and tear them up!”


And then there are the outright police murders: 23-year-old Oscar Grant, shot in the back by transit cops in Oakland as he lay face down this New Year’s Day; Corey Harris a star athlete at a South Side Chicago High School, shot in the back by a cop in September, and others.


Given this atmosphere of official terror, intimidation, and violence, it was very significant that people around the country—especially Black and Latino youth who are most targeted by the cops—took a stand on October 22, calling out the crimes of the police in a powerful and visible way. While the resistance is not yet nearly on the scale that it needs to be, there was a real sense of people beginning to step out in the spirit called for in “The Revolution We Need...The Leadership We Have,” the declaration from the Revolutionary Communist Party: “The days when this system can just keep on doing what it does to people, here and all over the world...when people are not inspired and organized to stand up against these outrages and to build up the strength to put an end to this madness...those days must be GONE. And they CAN be.”


In Cleveland, Rebecca Whitbey, a 23-year-old college student who was severely beaten and unjustly charged with multiple felonies earlier this year, refused to be silenced—and instead actively built for October 22nd.


A reader in Houston reports: “At the local high school, people grabbed posters and copies of Revolution, along with black armbands. One youth got on the bullhorn to call on people to join in, and said white and Black people should come together to fight police brutality. Several youth have recently been jumped and cuffed by the cops inside the school.”


In East Oakland, one young man said that all his friends were afraid to come to the march and rally...“But I’m not.”


At a time of incredible pain and tragedy, Natasha Williams spoke out in Chicago against not only the killing of her own son, Corey Harris, but against how youth more broadly are stalked and brutalized by the police. She described how the cop who shot Corey in the back had opened fire into a crowd of 20 to 30 youth fleeing the scene of a fight on a street corner.


And in different ways, the day brought out the dynamic between building resistance and spreading revolution and communism. People want to see real answers to the terrible situation they face—at the same time they are constantly hammered with the message that things can not fundamentally change. When the possibility of radical, revolutionary change start to become something real, this has tremendous attractive force. A reader in Houston reported, for example, “A speakout took place in the parking lot of an apartment complex... One woman took the initiative to step up to the mic and kick things off. She spoke passionately of people killed by the police, and shouted out, ‘We need a revolution.’ People not only came to the speakout themselves, but brought others. Many said they would check out the revcom.us web site and Bob Avakian’s Revolution... talk online. There was one point when people were literally waiting in line to sign up to be in contact with the revolution.”



****


Many people have seen the video of the fight among students at a Chicago high school which led to the death of Derrion Albert. This has been used by the authorities as an excuse to bring down even harsher repression in the schools. So it was very important that some youths at the Chicago October 22nd spoke to this, as reported by a reader: “One poignant moment in the rally came when a student from Fenger High School, who grew up in the same home as Derrion Albert, spoke about how the police had stood by and watched the fight where he was beaten to death. She called on the youth to stop fighting each other and to join together in the fight against police brutality.”



****


Among the family members who stepped out on October 22 were those who have been fighting for justice for many years and have long been active in the October 22nd Coalition: Juanita Young, whose son Malcolm Ferguson was killed by Bronx cops in 2000 and who has been the target of intense police harassment for her outspokenness; Margarita Rosario, whose son Anthony and nephew Hilton Vega were killed by NYPD in 1995; the family of Mark Garcia, murdered by San Francisco police in 1996; relatives and friends of Leonard “Acorn” Peters, murdered by authorities on the Round Valley Indian Reservation; and others. There were also those who have seen the police steal the lives of their loved ones just in the past few months.


At the New York “Voices Against Police Brutality” event, Margarita Rosario recounted how she and Anthony were watching the news together about the NYPD killing of another youth, Anthony Baez. Her son said, “You see mom, it’s like I said, the cops are racist.” She tried to cool his anger, afraid that it would get him into trouble. He told her, “You know mom, if I were a family member of that boy, I wouldn’t stop, I would take it all the way!”



Two weeks later, Anthony himself became a victim of police murder. When this happened, Margarita vowed, “OK, Anthony, I’m gonna take it all the way, I won’t stop.”


Later that evening, the mother, brother, and uncle of Jahqui Graham took the stage to tell people about how Jahqui had been arrested by the police in East Orange, New Jersey, in July—and then ended up dead in his cell three days later. Tawanna Graham said that the police claimed her son had died of seizures, but would not let her see his body for several days—and then when she was finally able to see the body, it was covered from head to toe with bruises.



****


While the presence and the voices of those most oppressed in society were at the center of October 22, there were also people from different walks of life who took part and supported the protests. An example from the Houston correspondent: “In another part of town, all the employees organized to wear black at a popular pizza restaurant in a traditionally countercultural neighborhood. This included waiters, kitchen staff, and the manager. People had made signs in English and Spanish, and while the waiters usually wear white aprons, on October 22nd they wore black aprons.”


An Atlanta reader’s report gives a sense of the positive mix on October 22: “Over 125 protesters joined the rally at Woodruff Park in the middle of downtown where a long speakout took place. Many victims of police brutality and family members of victims, including Iffat Muhammad, whose brother was gunned down in cold blood in DeKalb County by pigs in 2006, and Felicia Kennedy, who had recently been assaulted and arrested by police for videotaping their brutality on her street in southwest Atlanta, spoke bitterness about what they experienced, and students and community activists voiced their stand with those under the gun.


“They were joined by a walkout of over 30 students from Georgia State University who had staged a speakout in the quad beforehand and marched through classroom buildings chanting ‘Death is a reality, stop police brutality!’ Students from several other campuses, including Morehouse College, Emory and Kennesaw State Universities also joined the rally.
“The owner of a gay bar in Midtown Atlanta, which had recently been raided by police, voiced his support.”



****

The massive imprisonment of Black and Latino youth was on many people’s minds on this day. In at least two cities—Atlanta and Cleveland—marchers went to prisons where they were greeted by prisoners banging on walls and raising fists in support.

Uncle Ho
29th October 2009, 20:27
All this and no changes have occured.

The oppressors are deaf to your voice, but they can hear the crack of a rifle loud and clear.

Monkey Riding Dragon
30th October 2009, 12:33
As a polemic (given that I sometimes link to their newspaper), I'd like to briefly lament the Socialist Equality Party's failure to support either the recent March for Equality (http://www.revcom.us/a/180/Gay_rights-en.html) or the October 22 National Day of Protest to Stop Police Brutality, Repression, and the Criminalization of a Generation (http://www.revcom.us/a/181/NDP_Reports-en.html). (The SEP is the Trotskyist political party that runs the World Socialist Web Site.) As you can see at the links, these resistance events were very large and effective. (Larger even than most of these media-hyped "teabagger" events we've seen of late.) In fact, I'd say these were the largest and most effective protest events on this side of the political spectrum in this country since early 2007, when the Democrats first assumed control of Congress. Yet one notes the SEP's complete silence on these important protest events. Why? What explains their failure to support the masses who are standing up against the sh*t this system heaps on them and demanding justice?

The answer lies in the SEP's stance, which calls for "a complete break with the Democratic Party". You see, the mere fact that some of the speakers at events like these are low-level Democratic office-holders means that you can't support them (the events). Right? Wrong! The Democratic Party base is complex and in contradiction. We have to relate to that contradiction if we're to be relevant to the masses. Should we fail in this area, we will be seen as airheads. These events matter because of their progressive content, not because the speakers occasionally include a Democrat here and there. The mass line put forward by Mao points out that the masses are not always with us, be we must always be with the masses, working in a dialectical process of learning while leading and leading while learning. The Revolutionary Communist Party seems to grasp this.

NOTE: Not an RCP member (yet). Just an observer.

Uncle Ho
30th October 2009, 18:49
I wouldn't support those protests, either, as they will accomplish nothing but further diluting a movement which is already 99% water.

Now, if these "brave" protesters would arm themselves and start fighting back, it would be a different story.

Monkey Riding Dragon
30th October 2009, 23:23
While our work should certainly be that of hastening a revolutionary situation, I don't think you fully grasp that not every situation is a revolutionary one. Objective conditions have to exist in order for revolution to become possible. The Chinese Communists resisted the Japanese invasion and occupation as part of bringing about revolutionary conditions in China, for example. In a country like the United States, the entire system has to be caught up in crisis for us to have any chance at success, as just one other thing to note. We also have to have huge numbers of people with us from the outset in a country like this. If we simply pick up arms now, with our small numbers and the enemy's advanced armed forces and means of communication, we'll easily be crushed. Our work at this stage should be organizing and preparing the masses for battle, not proverbial suicide.

Omi
31st October 2009, 16:11
I wouldn't support those protests, either, as they will accomplish nothing but further diluting a movement which is already 99% water.

Now, if these "brave" protesters would arm themselves and start fighting back, it would be a different story.


Go out and shoot some cops then. What are you doing on an internet forum while you could be hunting down the upper class yourself?

Please stop making useless comments like this. Just because people don't pick up the AK's and start a full-out guerrilla warfare doesn't mean that certain actions are not productive to our movement. What where you doing on that day anyway?
Playing Uncle ''The Rambo'' Ho in your backyard?

Protests are part of what's called, movement building. If you don't like it, I suggest you leave the left because at the moment that's mainly what we do. :glare:

redwinter
31st October 2009, 18:13
I think the infantile posturing of "Uncle Ho" are reactionary and have nothing to do with October 22nd, stopping police brutality, or making communist revolution. Omi's comments, while I understand the point he was trying to make, could be willfully misconstrued by our enemies to be seen as supporting such a viewpoint...

I wanted to post a link to an important document I think relates to this kind of infantile posturing by Uncle Ho and also converts a great "negative example" into an opportunity to demarcate revolutionary communist science from non-revolutionary ideologies:

Some Crucial Points of Revolutionary Orientation — in Opposition to Infantile Posturing and Distortions of Revolution

http://revcom.us/a/102/crucial-points-en.html


Revolution is a very serious matter and must be approached in a serious and scientific way, and not through subjective and individualistic expressions of frustration, posturing and acts which run counter to the development of a mass revolutionary movement which is aimed at—and which must be characterized by means that are fundamentally consistent with and serve to bring into being—a radically different and far better world. Revolution, and in particular communist revolution, is and can only be the act of masses of people, organized and led to carry out increasingly conscious struggle to abolish, and advance humanity beyond, all systems and relations of exploitation and oppression.


A bedrock, scientific understanding which must underlie the development of such a revolutionary movement is that:


The whole system we now live under is based on exploitation—here and all over the world. It is completely worthless and no basic change for the better can come about until this system is overthrown.


And that:


In a country like the U.S., the revolutionary overthrow of this system can only be achieved once there is a major, qualitative change in the nature of the objective situation, such that society as a whole is in the grip of a profound crisis, owing fundamentally to the nature and workings of the system itself, and along with that there is the emergence of a revolutionary people, numbering in the millions and millions, conscious of the need for revolutionary change and determined to fight for it. In this struggle for revolutionary change, the revolutionary people and those who lead them will be confronted by the violent repressive force of the machinery of the state which embodies and enforces the existing system of exploitation and oppression; and in order for the revolutionary struggle to succeed, it will need to meet and defeat that violent repressive force of the old, exploitative and oppressive order.


Before the development of a revolutionary situation—and as the key to working toward the development of a revolutionary people, in a country like the U.S.—those who see the need for and wish to contribute to a revolution must focus their efforts on raising the political and ideological consciousness of masses of people and building massive political resistance to the main ways in which, at any given time, the exploitative and oppressive nature of this system is concentrated in the policies and actions of the ruling class and its institutions and agencies—striving through all this to enable growing numbers of people to grasp both the need and the possibility for revolution when the necessary conditions have been brought into being, as a result of the unfolding of the contradictions of the system itself as well as the political, and ideological, work of revolutionaries.


In the absence of a revolutionary situation—and in opposition to the revolutionary orientation and revolutionary political and ideological work that is actually needed—the initiation of, or the advocacy of, isolated acts of violence, by individuals or small groups, divorced from masses of people and attempting to substitute for a revolutionary movement of masses of people, is very wrong and extremely harmful. Even—or especially—if this is done in the name of “revolution,” it will work against, and in fact do serious damage to, the development of an actual revolutionary movement of masses of people, as well as to the building of political resistance against the outrages and injustices of this system even before there is a revolutionary situation. It will aid the extremely repressive forces of the existing system in their moves to isolate, attack and crush those, both revolutionary forces and broader forces of political opposition, who are working to build mass political resistance and to achieve significant, and even profound, social change through the politically-conscious activity and initiative of masses of people.

Omi
1st November 2009, 18:29
I think the infantile posturing of "Uncle Ho" are reactionary and have nothing to do with October 22nd, stopping police brutality, or making communist revolution. Omi's comments, while I understand the point he was trying to make, could be willfully misconstrued by our enemies to be seen as supporting such a viewpoint...


In what way? I thought I made it quite clear that I'm against his viewpoints?:confused:

Uncle Ho
1st November 2009, 19:50
Go out and shoot some cops then. What are you doing on an internet forum while you could be hunting down the upper class yourself?

Well, right now I cannot walk very well thanks to the police, so I somehow doubt I'd be able to do much hunting with one good leg.


Please stop making useless comments like this. Just because people don't pick up the AK's and start a full-out guerrilla warfare doesn't mean that certain actions are not productive to our movement.No, people doing "certain actions" that are not in any way productive and have zero chance of success are not productive to our movement. Direct action doesn't always require guns, but it always requires something more than sandwich board and chanting.


What where you doing on that day anyway?
Playing Uncle ''The Rambo'' Ho in your backyard?Actually on the 22nd I was assisting with the planning of a large scale direct action to shut down Whiteclay, NE, which peddles poison to the Native American community.


Protests are part of what's called, movement building. If you don't like it, I suggest you leave the left because at the moment that's mainly what we do. :glare:No, sandwich board protests are what's called "spoiled little bourgeoisie brats trying desperatley to appear hip and liberal before they graduate college, make 75k a year, live in a suburb to avoid minorities, beat their wives and watch Fox news as they slowly spiral down into alcoholism and despair."

If these people were shutting down police stations, strengthening their communities, chasing cops and criminals alike out of their neighborhoods or organizing massive legislative action, I would side with them.

I will never side with anyone waving a little sign, regardless of how much they claim to agree with my politics.

Omi
1st November 2009, 22:46
Well, mister ''assistant planner'', nobody asked you to side with anybody.
What I do ask from you, is some solidarity to people who are, maybe not ''revolutionary enough'' for you, organising their communities to oppose police violence against minority's.

Movement has to be built before you can begin actively shutting down police stations. This is a fact, otherwise you aren't shutting down anything, but making a fool of yourself. Just like you do when posting one liners about revolutionary warfare on Internet forums.

So sod off with your ''Oh I'm so much more radical, lets all shoot the b0iRg0izy!''

Monkey Riding Dragon
1st November 2009, 23:18
Uncle Ho:

While I'm deeply saddened to hear about your injury at the hands of the police and understand the sort of sentiment you're putting out doubtless as a result, I'm afraid I can't help but take this...


No, sandwich board protests are what's called "spoiled little bourgeoisie brats trying desperatley to appear hip and liberal before they graduate college, make 75k a year, live in a suburb to avoid minorities, beat their wives and watch Fox news as they slowly spiral down into alcoholism and despair."...as not only a personal attack against both myself and Red Winter (and perhaps even Omi as well), but also as an attack against all the participants in the October 22nd resistance action against police atrocities. Here you have hysterically characterized every last participant in such "sandwich board protests" as 1) white, 2) male, 3) relatively rich, 4) insincere and conservative, 5) alcoholics, and 6) college students and graduates (which apparently there is also something wrong with). Displayed are all the reasoning skills and maturity of a five year old. You'll need to grow up a little if we're to have a serious discussion about the serious matter of making revolution and getting to a communist world.

Uncle Ho
1st November 2009, 23:53
Well, mister ''assistant planner'', nobody asked you to side with anybody.
What I do ask from you, is some solidarity to people who are, maybe not ''revolutionary enough'' for you, organising their communities to oppose police violence against minority's.

Movement has to be built before you can begin actively shutting down police stations. This is a fact, otherwise you aren't shutting down anything, but making a fool of yourself. Just like you do when posting one liners about revolutionary warfare on Internet forums.

So sod off with your ''Oh I'm so much more radical, lets all shoot the b0iRg0izy!''

Just because I am a lineman doesn't mean I will support a lineman repairing a downed line with twine and duct tape. If you're going to do something, at least to attempt to do it right.


Uncle Ho:

While I'm deeply saddened to hear about your injury at the hands of the police and understand the sort of sentiment you're putting out doubtless as a result, I'm afraid I can't help but take this...

...as not only a personal attack against both myself and Red Winter (and perhaps even Omi as well), but also as an attack against all the participants in the October 22nd resistance action against police atrocities. Here you have hysterically characterized every last participant in such "sandwich board protests" as 1) white, 2) male, 3) relatively rich, 4) insincere and conservative, 5) alcoholics, and 6) college students and graduates (which apparently there is also something wrong with). Displayed are all the reasoning skills and maturity of a five year old. You'll need to grow up a little if we're to have a serious discussion about the serious matter of making revolution and getting to a communist world.

I don't know if you fall into this group, but it was more an indictment of the spineless modern western left than anything.

Omi
2nd November 2009, 00:00
Just because I am a lineman doesn't mean I will support a lineman repairing a downed line with twine and duct tape. If you're going to do something, at least to attempt to do it right.



Wait... what?:blink:

Uncle Ho
2nd November 2009, 00:09
If you want to fix something, you should try to do it right.

Doing it right does not involve waving signs and chanting as big brother watches to ensure you don't become too unruly.

Monkey Riding Dragon
2nd November 2009, 00:25
I guess this isn't directly relevant to the topic at hand, but I can't resist bringing it up in respect to this whole "Go for it right now!" thing Uncle Ho has going on. His signature features the slogan "Our aim must be the creation of a new social order, a society where the commanding value is the infinite preciousness of every man, woman and child." Googling this slogan reveals what appears to be its origin. Here is the official slogan of the Socialist Party USA: "Our aim must be the creation of a new social order; a society where the commanding value is the infinite preciousness of every woman, man and child." With the inversion of only two words, these slogans are identical. An interesting note here is that the SP isn't even a revolutionary party, but rather one that calls for "democratic revolution", by which they mean substantial reform through electoral processes. Why would someone of Uncle Ho's mentality provide the slogan of a regular reformist party in their signature as an identification of where they stand? It's perplexing.

Uncle Ho
2nd November 2009, 02:35
I don't disagree with their aims, only their proposed means of getting there. Their goal should be the goal of every Socialist. It is the entire point of the movement.

Omi
2nd November 2009, 10:31
If you want to fix something, you should try to do it right.

Doing it right does not involve waving signs and chanting as big brother watches to ensure you don't become too unruly.

I'm not an opponent of direct action (dude, I'm an anarchist) but rather asking you to show some solidarity to people who are organizing themselves against police brutality. This is the start of every movement, how the hell do you plan on storming a police station with 10 people?

The point is, you shouldn't be making macho comments all over the place, it offends people and adds absolutely nothing to the subject at hand.

Andrei Kuznetsov
2nd November 2009, 12:34
I was briefly at the O22 demo in Atlanta a few weeks back- it brought out 100-200 or so people. That's not much, but the energy and enthusiasm of those who came out was excellent. I hope that O22 gets revitalized as a mass organization, because it's one I was very active with in high school and it's a very important arena in which we can expose the farce that is the Obama administration's "post-racial society".

Jethro Tull
2nd November 2009, 13:06
All this and no changes have occured.

The oppressors are deaf to your voice, but they can hear the crack of a rifle loud and clear.

I agree, but this goes for inflammatory message board posts as well as mass-demos. ;)