Log in

View Full Version : Venezuela takes over Hilton hotel



KurtFF8
14th October 2009, 23:02
Source (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8307234.stm)


Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has ordered the obligatory acquisition of a Hilton-run hotel on the resort island of Margarita, it has emerged.

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/46548000/jpg/_46548110_008012994-1.jpg The hotel is on the resort island of Margarita in Nueva Esparta state



The move was ordered just weeks after the hotel housed Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe during the Africa-South America Summit.

The hotel would help develop tourism projects in a "socialist framework", a decree signed by Mr Chavez said.

Hilton Worldwide, which manages the hotel, said it was analyzing the move.

The hotel "remains a member of the Hilton system of hotels, and welcomes guests with the same level of service they have come to enjoy," spokeswoman Karla Visconti said in a statement from Miami, Florida.

Nationalisation drive

The hotel complex, on the Caribbean resort island of Margarita in Nueva Esparta state, includes more than 450 rooms and suites, a casino, restaurants, shops and offices, as well as an adjoining marina.

It is owned by two local companies who are facing problems with the government's financial regulator, the Dow Jones news service reported.

The presidential decree said the forced acquisition of the Margarita Hilton & Suites Hotel Complex would be carried out without assuming existing liabilities, and the assets would be held by the tourism ministry.

It is President Chavez's second takeover of a Hilton-run hotel. In 2007, the government assumed control of the Caracas Hilto, renaming it the Alba Caracas.

In the past four years, Mr Chavez's government has nationalised industries it considers strategic to the state, including electrical utilities, cement, steel, oil services and banking.

I feel so bad for the poor Hilton company, how will they feed themselves now amidst this crisis.

FSL
14th October 2009, 23:58
If only Venezuela started barking less and biting more.

Axle
15th October 2009, 01:38
"The hotel "remains a member of the Hilton system of hotels, and welcomes guests with the same level of service they have come to enjoy," spokeswoman Karla Visconti said in a statement from Miami, Florida."

Nuts to that. When you "take over" something in the name of socialism, you're supposed take it the hell over. Venezuela leaving something like that even remotely tied to a wealthy company is inexcusable if they're trying to build socialsm.

RedSonRising
15th October 2009, 02:55
These actions should be supported by a document approved by whatever community/municipality is in proximity and is affected most, that way it is legitimized as a popular force making these nationalizations, and not simply "Chavez declaring" what companies are to be seized.

dez
15th October 2009, 17:32
"The hotel "remains a member of the Hilton system of hotels, and welcomes guests with the same level of service they have come to enjoy," spokeswoman Karla Visconti said in a statement from Miami, Florida."

Nuts to that. When you "take over" something in the name of socialism, you're supposed take it the hell over. Venezuela leaving something like that even remotely tied to a wealthy company is inexcusable if they're trying to build socialsm.

What has michigan done?

Wanted Man
15th October 2009, 17:55
"The hotel "remains a member of the Hilton system of hotels, and welcomes guests with the same level of service they have come to enjoy," spokeswoman Karla Visconti said in a statement from Miami, Florida."

Nuts to that. When you "take over" something in the name of socialism, you're supposed take it the hell over. Venezuela leaving something like that even remotely tied to a wealthy company is inexcusable if they're trying to build socialsm.

Since the statement was made from Miami, the spokeswoman probably represents Hilton, not Venezuela. Just a heads up.

JimmyJazz
15th October 2009, 19:12
The Western press are so irrationally hostile to Chavez that I don't expect to get a detailed and impartial account of this action anywhere, but here is one thing I managed to find that the BBC left out:


the government has held majority ownership of the hotel since 1995, when a banking crisis forced many of the hotel's shareholders to sell their assets to the state.

Source (http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5huIEKG01x2xR29B7VCcgkX45CD_Q)

I mean, leaving out that "little detail" and throwing in a completely irrelevant mention of Gaddafi and Mugabe? Lulz.

I guess I am supposed to be outraged. Get back to me when the BBC devotes equal space to a story about Hilton (or any other Western company) pulling an equally shady or much shadier deal to snatch up some land or resources that had formerly belonged to natives.

Orange Juche
15th October 2009, 19:58
Too bad Paris Hilton can't be removed from pop culture, in the name of socialism. THAT would be a glorious day.

Tatarin
15th October 2009, 23:43
OMG, poor Adolf Hilton, the owner.