Log in

View Full Version : Virtual voyeurism



Revy
21st September 2009, 04:42
Is it wrong if I watched (behind virtual bushes) a couple have virtual sex in Second Life?:unsure:

No, I did not take a screenshot, I'm not a virtual pornographer! :p

I am sorry if this post will make anybody uncomfortable. It is only a serious discussion on virtual meta-ethics.

bcbm
21st September 2009, 04:44
ew

ÑóẊîöʼn
21st September 2009, 07:22
No, why should it be?

Incendiarism
21st September 2009, 07:30
what is this i dont even

ZeroNowhere
22nd September 2009, 18:25
Well, if we're going to go in that direction...

Posting this thread was a brilliant political move.

eyedrop
22nd September 2009, 18:29
Is it wrong if I watched (behind virtual bushes) a couple have virtual sex in Second Life?:unsure:

No, I did not take a screenshot, I'm not a virtual pornographer! :p

I am sorry if this post will make anybody uncomfortable. It is only a serious discussion on virtual meta-ethics.
Having someone looking obviously while having public sex ruins the moment, so your being a bad boy.

Eat the Rich
22nd September 2009, 18:42
I just joine second life. My name is Vladimir Gracemount. Should I know anything before I log in?

Black Sheep
22nd September 2009, 22:26
The wrong thing is that you play second life to begin with.:closedeyes:

Pirate Utopian
22nd September 2009, 22:43
I just joine second life. My name is Vladimir Gracemount. Should I know anything before I log in?
Dont do it!

Eat the Rich
22nd September 2009, 23:20
Dont do it!

lol I played for 20 minutes. I was in second life Quebec and I was approached by two hot (second life) girls. I talked to them on the microphone and got their msn's. Turns out they were only hot on second life. :lol:

mannetje
22nd September 2009, 23:25
Isn't second life addictive or something?:blink:

#FF0000
23rd September 2009, 13:28
Isn't second life addictive or something?:blink:

Only if you don't have a first one.

Zing!

Il Medico
23rd September 2009, 13:34
Only if you don't have a first one.

Zing!
Which is something you would know about.




zing.

Jazzratt
23rd September 2009, 15:05
Only if you don't have a first one.

Zing!

I am going to kidnap you and force you to marry me.

cb9's_unity
23rd September 2009, 19:04
I am going to kidnap you and force you to marry me.

Zing?

ls
23rd September 2009, 19:11
Yes zing.

I played second life for 4 hours one day around april 2007, it got so boring, blocking people's way and generally causing trouble by singing cheesy songs to people is the way to go.

After those 4 hours have passed, put the application in the bin and empty it. :cool:

You can always disrupt capitalists on it too; a lot of companies have their virtual HQ or something on there, they sell shit from it (for irl moneyz).

Kukulofori
24th September 2009, 06:36
Yes but only because you didn't record it.

NecroCommie
25th September 2009, 15:05
I am deeply disturbed by this thread. :bored:

#FF0000
25th September 2009, 23:05
I am going to kidnap you and force you to marry me.

Only if you force me to get a prenup.

☭World Views
25th September 2009, 23:12
Is it wrong if I watched (behind virtual bushes) a couple have virtual sex in Second Life?:unsure:

No, I did not take a screenshot, I'm not a virtual pornographer! :p

I am sorry if this post will make anybody uncomfortable. It is only a serious discussion on virtual meta-ethics.

It happens all the time.

All of you with a SL account should meet at Communist Party SL sometime.

spiltteeth
25th September 2009, 23:15
Having someone looking obviously while having public sex ruins the moment, so your being a bad boy.

It makes the moment A LOT better.

☭World Views
26th September 2009, 14:58
You do realize that the Red Square in Moscow has been re-created on SL?

Usually there are a few Russians there playing a board game called Sorry.