Log in

View Full Version : An Informal Survey



Bud Struggle
18th September 2009, 20:19
Very informal. But it does say something about what Americans think about Communism and those that love it.

As we all know most people's understanding of Communism is distorted, but it is interesting to see just how much. It's also interesting to see just how much it is disliked and more especially why it's disliked.

http://www.amiannoying.com/(S(zslsii2dzqqbysmz3la1pdyd))/collection.aspx?collection=2940

While the Am I Annoying site's analysis of Communism is off base--I think it does reflect correct the American people's beliefs about Communism.

Muzk
18th September 2009, 20:37
What? So people contribute to this site? I don't get how it works


BUT

Why Communism might not be annoying

Like Santa Claus, many of them have beards and advocate the distribution of wealth (or 'presents') to the proletariat.

Bud Struggle
18th September 2009, 20:41
What? So people contribute to this site? I don't get how it works People that randomly go on the site vote if they find a particular thing annoying or not. 77% found Communism annoying.



BUT

Why Communism might not be annoying

Like Santa Claus, many of them have beards and advocate the distribution of wealth (or 'presents') to the proletariat.

I just found it interesting--I wouldn't take it too seriously. It's just interesting to see how people look at things.

scarletghoul
18th September 2009, 20:46
Whoa, how can people be hatin on George Jackson, Brecht, The Rosenburgs, Laos?

Durruti's Ghost
18th September 2009, 20:51
And why is David Rockefeller listed as a communist?

Manifesto
18th September 2009, 21:14
And why is David Rockefeller listed as a communist?
Probably because of that report FOX did of the hammer and sickle at the Rockefeller Museum.

Kronos
19th September 2009, 00:30
And why is David Rockefeller listed as a communist? If I told you I would have to kill you.

Okay fuck it. I'll tell you and let you live.

Make sure you are sitting down before I explain this.

Communism was financed by bankers. The Russian and Chinese revolutions were supposed to fail....that was the plan. The intention was to set back the industrial evolution of these countries so that European and American industrial powers would become superior.

Finally, once these nations became globally dominant, the powers-that-be would initiate the next phase and begin implementing socialism into the system.

So the guys that financed the failed revolutions are communists themselves....but a long series of stages had to be passed through before socialism would exist. Primarily, the remarkable industrial growth that resulted from the free market. Capitalism was a necessary evil.

You're in good hands with the Illuminati, I promise.

Spawn of Stalin
19th September 2009, 01:09
Mikhail Gorbachev is a Communist?

spiltteeth
19th September 2009, 01:49
Willhelm Reich was commie?

Also, I find it rather strong language to refer to Polpot as "Annoying"
I mean - he had is character flaws, but annoying is rather harsh.

Crurkean
19th September 2009, 09:04
Peoples understanding of communism is ignorant? :confused:

Laugh out loud! :laugh: I had relatives that lived in East Germany and they told me what it is like to live under the Stasi and I certainly do not want an Obama Stasi here!!

This is why the miltias are growing again! We shall defend ourselves! :ninja:

LOLseph Stalin
20th September 2009, 03:25
Wait, I don't get how this works. :confused: What are people voting on?

Kwisatz Haderach
20th September 2009, 05:02
Wait, what? That's just a list of people (mostly "communist" national leaders) with votes on whether they are "annoying" or not. You can be annoying and still be a good leader or politician...

Comrade B
21st September 2009, 21:33
Kim Jung Il is a communist?
Shit... that must make China a democracy, Hitler a socialist, Republicans opposed to democracy, democrats opposed to republicanism, and the song Love Gun very violent...