Log in

View Full Version : A chink in their armour?



JohannGE
16th September 2009, 02:23
A LEAKED US memo has accused British troops in Afghanistan of being ill-disciplined, deficient in intelligence-gathering and suffering from problems of personal hygiene.

The confidential debriefing, said to have been handed out by a top American commander, cites a litany of concerns which the unnamed officer is said to have had about British allies in the fight against the Taleban.
They include complaints that the British troops do not spend long enough in the country or with indigenous people. The marines commander is also reported to have accused the British of spending too long recovering from patrols and suffering too many injuries away from the battlefield.
the battlefield.

The report claims the commander declared: Your standards of personal hygiene and field discipline arent good enough, and you have too many non-battle injuries. UK forces were said to patrol in formations that were too large, to spend too much time recovering and to patrol too often without the Afghan police or army.

http://www.hmforces.co.uk/news/articles/1040-british-troops-cant-patrol-properly-are-ill-disciplined-and-injury--prone-says-us-commander

Some of the comments posted at the bottom of the page are good for a laugh.

scarletghoul
16th September 2009, 08:24
Ha. Fucking thugs, kill em all.

danyboy27
16th September 2009, 17:36
haha, 1 leaked memo and revlefter got an hard on!

RedAnarchist
16th September 2009, 17:39
haha, 1 leaked memo and revlefter got an hard on!

Who, scarletghoul? He's not exactly the best example of a revlefter.

danyboy27
16th September 2009, 17:50
no report are unbiaised, and if this is actually true then there is no need to rejoice.

an exploited worker is an exploited worker.

Bud Struggle
16th September 2009, 23:55
Totally false. It's a well know fact that the FRENCH not the British lack personal hygene.

RedAnarchist
16th September 2009, 23:56
Totally false. It's a well know fact that the FRENCH not the British lack personal hygene.

Have you actually been to either country?

JohannGE
17th September 2009, 00:19
no report are unbiaised,.

Same goes for opinions!


and if this is actually true then there is no need to rejoice.

I disagree, a rift in the so called "special relationship" between two of the most lethally belligerent states in the world is in my opinion worthy of much rejoicing.


an exploited worker is an exploited worker.

Are you suggesting that the hired killers of corrupt states deserve the same consideration as exploited workers?
-

Bud Struggle
17th September 2009, 00:50
Have you actually been to either country?

Well yes. And both peoples are quite lovely. But that's why you Communists suck--you take all the fun out of typingcasting people. :lol:

danyboy27
17th September 2009, 01:22
Same goes for opinions!

-
humm..ok



I disagree, a rift in the so called "special relationship" between two of the most lethally belligerent states in the world is in my opinion worthy of much rejoicing.

-
LOL there is no fucking special relationship between the two, soldier might have a certain prestige but they are basicly fucked over by the state like any other worker.



Are you suggesting that the hired killers of corrupt states deserve the same consideration as exploited workers?
-

hired killers are mercenaries. those guy are soldier, misguided folks. if they would have been in the killing buisness for the money they would have joined a mercenary organisation to be paid 400 dollars a day instead of 800 a week.

what you seem to fail to understand is that, those folks are doing their job to protect their sibling, and frankly i dont see any problem in a communist society to have armed folks with experience to protect me.

what is important to consider is that right now they are misguided and misused by the people in power.

JohannGE
17th September 2009, 01:52
LOL there is no fucking special relationship between the two, soldier might have a certain prestige but they are basicly fucked over by the state like any other worker.

hired killers are mercenaries. those guy are soldier, misguided folks. if they would have been in the killing buisness for the money they would have joined a mercenary organisation to be paid 400 dollars a day instead of 800 a week.

what you seem to fail to understand is that, those folks are doing their job to protect their sibling, and frankly i dont see any problem in a communist society to have armed folks with experience to protect me.

what is important to consider is that right now they are misguided and misused by the people in power.

No special relationship between UK & USA? :blink:

What are soldiers hired to do then? Mercenaries are indeed hired killers too, where do you think they serve their apprentiships?

You are correct that I fail to understand how invading other peoples land and killing them is to protect their siblings. Why should their siblings be more deserving of protection than those of their victims anyway?

There are billions of people misused by the people in power, I respect the ones that don't volunteer to kill on behalf of those people in power far more than those who do, however missguided they might be.
-

danyboy27
17th September 2009, 17:31
No special relationship between UK & USA? :blink:

-
my bad i was thinking you where talking about the special relationship between the state and the military



What are soldiers hired to do then? Mercenaries are indeed hired killers too, where do you think they serve their apprentiships?

-
soldier are hired in theory to protect the country they work for and ultimately the people living inside. has i said earlier i dont see any problem with having people protecting me. of course they are misused by the people in power for various imperialist goal but still, their main function is to protect the people living in the country they work for.

numerous number of mercenaries have only police training or they get the basic training by the mercenary buisness itself.





You are correct that I fail to understand how invading other peoples land and killing them is to protect their siblings. Why should their siblings be more deserving of protection than those of their victims anyway?
-
has i said earlier its imperialism, it have nothing to do the soldier themselves. yes they are doing some pretty nasty stuff, but we are all in the same boat, by participating to the system we help imperialism, from working to purchasing a video game, its all finance and help imperialism.
the problem is not their job but their assignement.