China defends WTO

[What Would Durruti Do?]

http://english.aljazeera.net/business/2009/09/2009914231141575400.html

Against the U.S. no less. Heh.

Good luck to our Chinese comrades protecting free trade for the sake of the revolution!




:p

[khad]

http://english.aljazeera.net/business/2009/09/2009914231141575400.html

Against the U.S. no less. Heh.

Good luck to our Chinese comrades protecting free trade for the sake of the revolution!

Where's all your sympathy for your right wing libertarian friends?

http://www.revleft.com/vb/libertarianism-paradoxi-t116178/index.html?p=1531438#post1531438


I sympathize with the right-wing libertarians because by abolishing the state I would assume a social revolution wouldn't be much further behind and their version of pure capitalism would allow for our own vision to more easily come into existence.

[What Would Durruti Do?]

Where's all your sympathy for your right wing libertarian friends?

http://www.revleft.com/vb/libertarianism-paradoxi-t116178/index.html?p=1531438#post1531438

It's in the thread you linked to and in the post you quoted. good job answering your own question!

But I don't see why that's relevant. Surprise surprise, I'm anti-state. :blink:

[khad]

But I don't see why that's relevant. Surprise surprise, I'm anti-state. :blink:
But the WTO isn't a state, and in fact it's imposing on states to demand further liberalization of economies. :p

[gorillafuck]

Where's all your sympathy for your right wing libertarian friends?

http://www.revleft.com/vb/libertarianism-paradoxi-t116178/index.html?p=1531438#post1531438 (http://www.revleft.com/vb/../libertarianism-paradoxi-t116178/index.html?p=1531438#post1531438)
That's like the second or third time I've seen you bring that up out of nowhere, Khad. You don't need to post past stupid statements made by people if it's not relevant.

[khad]

That's like the second or third time I've seen you bring that up out of nowhere, Khad. You don't need to post past stupid statements made by people if it's not relevant.
He deserved to be joshed for this crap:
"Good luck to our Chinese comrades protecting free trade for the sake of the revolution!"

AFAIK, the comrades actually from China here on revleft are not neoliberals.

[What Would Durruti Do?]

But the WTO isn't a state, and in fact it's imposing on states to demand further liberalization of economies. :p

the WTO isn't a state?! mind blowing. Just so you know, I'm not JUST anti-state. Therefore I think I should be allowed to hate the WTO just as much.

[What Would Durruti Do?]

He deserved to be joshed for this crap:
"Good luck to our Chinese comrades protecting free trade for the sake of the revolution!"

AFAIK, the comrades actually from China here on revleft are not neoliberals.

I wasn't addressing Chinese revleft members. I was addressing the Chinese "Communist" Government. Nice try though.

[bailey_187]

Thats hardly "defending" the WTO. More like defending Chinese tyre makers.

The CCP claims to be expanding China's productive forces. American protectionism will cause a problem to this. What's the problem? What would you expect China to do?

[bailey_187]

I was addressing the Chinese "Communist" Government. Nice try though.

I dont think Hu Jintao checks rev left too often now. he's quite busy these days. try sending an email?

[What Would Durruti Do?]

Thats hardly "defending" the WTO. More like defending Chinese tyre makers.

How is using the WTO to protect free trade and chinese business interests not defending the WTO and it's policies? I'm not sure how much more they possibly could defend it.

Any government that claims to be "working towards socialism" shouldn't even recognize such an organization, let alone defend it.


I dont think Hu Jintao checks rev left too often now. he's quite busy these days. try sending an email?

thanks, that explains why he doesn't answer his PMs. I guess I should be more sympathetic to how demanding running a massive state capitalist imperial regime must be.

[bailey_187]

How is using the WTO to protect free trade and chinese business interests not defending the WTO and it's policies? I'm not sure how much more they possibly could defend it.

If someone rapes you or a loved one and you report it to police/participate in prosecuting the person, is that defending the state?



Any government that claims to be "working towards socialism" shouldn't even recognize such an organization, let alone defend it.

Well, if you think China's policy of expanding productive forces is not working towards socialism, fine. But appealing to the WTO to stop American protectionism is definitely justifiable under the CCP line.