Log in

View Full Version : "Cracker"



marxistcritic
6th September 2009, 19:07
How come "cracker" is so acceptable in society? It makes all whites seem like rich, ignorant rednecks who beat thier wifes. Less than 10% of us do that. People may say that it is more acceptable than "n***er" because it has no history of opression and slavery, but most blacks werent even alive during segragation. Most people seem to forget that blacks inslaved blacks and sold them to whites.

Schrödinger's Cat
6th September 2009, 19:10
We've had a few discussions on the subject. "Redneck," "cracker," and "honkey" serve no purpose other than to divide people based on skin color and should thus be marginalized like all other other racist or racially-motived terms.

Your conclusion about the slave trade is slightly inconclusive. While blacks enslaved blacks, the increase in demand brought about via Arabic and Portuguese traders resulted in a much harsher form of slavery than was commonly practiced in Africa. It's true that no specific race owes another race leverage, given that we're simply descendents (and the focus should instead be on class differences), but let's not pretend like European involvement didn't alter Africa in an (almost) entirely negative way.

gorillafuck
7th September 2009, 03:29
People may say that it is more acceptable than "n***er" because it has no history of opression and slavery, but most blacks werent even alive during segragation. Most people seem to forget that blacks inslaved blacks and sold them to whites.
Redneck is a bit of a classist term, just to point out.

And still today, blacks are affected by past oppression, and it's not like oppression against blacks stopped when segregation stopped. Blacks are still oppressed today. And to say "most blacks weren't even alive during segregation" doesn't make the word "nigger" still not have those connections to the past. The history behind a hateful word matters whether current blacks were around during segregation or not, and "cracker" doesn't have that history of oppression behind it.

Though Cracker should still not be used because it is a word that divides people.

SoupIsGoodFood
7th September 2009, 04:42
I say cracker and I'm fine with white people. When I say it I either refer to my white friends (jokingly) or to politicians, who are (whip)crackers in the sense that they oppress us.

StalinFanboy
7th September 2009, 05:50
White people haven't been the victims of systematic and brutal racism.

thejambo1
7th September 2009, 05:53
White people haven't been the victims of systematic and brutal racism.
think of poles,russians and jews during the second world war and i think you will see you are wrong there.

Klaatu
7th September 2009, 05:53
For what it's worth: I am a white man, 51 years old, grew up in Detroit, Michigan, USA. I've went to school with,
and worked with, people from almost all races, ethnicity, religions, etc. In my own experience,

The absolute friendliest people I've ever met
Blacks(cool), Italians(helpful), Chaldeans(jovial)

The most unfriendly people I've ever met
American rednecks(hateful), religious fanatics(smug), conservatives(condescending)

StalinFanboy
7th September 2009, 06:06
think of poles,russians and jews during the second world war and i think you will see you are wrong there.
I was referring to America.


And those groups of people obviously weren't considered White, nor were they enslaved for 200 years, and then dehumanized for unother 200 years.

marxistcritic
7th September 2009, 06:25
Redneck is a bit of a classist term, just to point out.

And still today, blacks are affected by past oppression, and it's not like oppression against blacks stopped when segregation stopped. Blacks are still oppressed today. And to say "most blacks weren't even alive during segregation" doesn't make the word "nigger" still not have those connections to the past. The history behind a hateful word matters whether current blacks were around during segregation or not, and "cracker" doesn't have that history of oppression behind it.

Though Cracker should still not be used because it is a word that divides people.

THERES A BLACK PRESIDENT! Blacks get better chances of going to college than whites. They cant be fired, because theylle say its cause thier black. If they assualt someone, they dont get in any trouble.

Plagueround
7th September 2009, 06:31
THERES A BLACK PRESIDENT! Blacks get better chances of going to college than whites. They cant be fired, because theylle say its cause thier black. If they assualt someone, they dont get in any trouble.

The fact that you say things like this and consider yourself a leftist is infuriating. Care to offer an explanation for these assertions?

Abc
7th September 2009, 06:58
THERES A BLACK PRESIDENT! Blacks get better chances of going to college than whites. They cant be fired, because theylle say its cause thier black. If they assualt someone, they dont get in any trouble.
...................

Led Zeppelin
7th September 2009, 07:47
THERES A BLACK PRESIDENT! Blacks get better chances of going to college than whites. They cant be fired, because theylle say its cause thier black. If they assualt someone, they dont get in any trouble.

Two days ago you said:


What the hell is a catholic doing on a left wing forum? You should have been restricted a long time ago.

Now I say: What the hell is a racist piece of shit like you doing on a left-wing forum? You should have been banned a long time ago.

And you hopefully will.

willdw79
7th September 2009, 08:17
To the poster of this question: It is only socially acceptable to backward people. Racism is unacceptable and should be met with violence.


White people haven't been the victims of systematic and brutal racism.
White people, black people, latino people, asian people ALL are victims of racism. Injustice done to me is a problem for society as well as me.

Having so many poor black people IS a problem for all people who want to make a living under capitalism. If you drive down the wages of one minority group, you drive them all down, because when U go on strike or U ask for more, they can replace you with the reserve work force of women, latinos, blacks, etc who are out of work or will accept lower wages. Being poor is systemic and brutal.

But this type of red herring argument detracts from the FACT that capitalism fails to meet the needs of workers and should be destroyed, by a group of people who believe in equality/egalitarianism.

Axle
7th September 2009, 08:27
THERES A BLACK PRESIDENT! Blacks get better chances of going to college than whites. They cant be fired, because theylle say its cause thier black. If they assualt someone, they dont get in any trouble.

There isn't room for this kind of bullshit on the left.

Quit babbling crap that sounds like it came straight out of some racist chain letter and learn something, because you've clearly got no understanding of race in America.

marxistcritic
7th September 2009, 08:30
There isn't room for this kind of bullshit on the left.

Quit babbling crap that sounds like it came straight out of some racist chain letter and learn something, because you've clearly got no understanding of race in America.

This does not sound racist at all. Cant I say anything about blacks having more rights than whites without being racist? I am telling the truth here. You just want something to complain about.

willdw79
7th September 2009, 08:33
This does not sound racist at all. Cant I say anything about blacks having more rights than whites without being racist? I am telling the truth here. You just want something to complain about.
No, because it is not true.

marxistcritic
7th September 2009, 08:37
Two days ago you said:



Now I say: What the hell is a racist piece of shit like you doing on a left-wing forum? You should have been banned a long time ago.

And you hopefully will.
What I said was not racist. What I said was about class differences based on race. For all I know, your just a rich black person who wants the working-class, ignorant, cracker, redneck, whitey to be reduced to slavery and have 70% of the population controlled by 15% of it. The left wing does not get a good name when all we do is scream "racist!" or "fascist" whenever we here anything we dont like.

Led Zeppelin
7th September 2009, 08:39
What I said was not racist. What I said was about class differences based on race. For all I know, your just a rich black person who wants the working-class, ignorant, cracker, redneck, whitey to be reduced to slavery and have 70% of the population controlled by 15% of it. The left wing does not get a good name when all we do is scream "racist!" or "fascist" whenever we here anything we dont like.

Yes, I'm a black person who wants to keep you down.

GracchusBabeuf
7th September 2009, 08:43
What I said was not racist. What I said was about class differences based on race. For all I know, your just a rich black person who wants the working-class, ignorant, cracker, redneck, whitey to be reduced to slavery and have 70% of the population controlled by 15% of it. The left wing does not get a good name when all we do is scream "racist!" or "fascist" whenever we here anything we dont like.
http://images.forum-auto.com/mesimages/807/sieg-fail-pic-22616-1233271819-22.jpg

marxistcritic
7th September 2009, 08:48
Yes, I'm a black person who wants to keep you down.

Your treating race-based oppression like a joke! All you have to do is look in the news. For example, a principal, Greta Salmi, in Palm Springs, California, fired a teacher because the parents of every single student in the classroom were sending complaints about the teacher. If it had been a white teacher, noone would scream RACIST!!!!! but, since the teacher was black, she is using her race as an excuse to sue, fire, and humiliate the principal and keep her job [and perhaps a promotion] because "shes hating me cause im black!".

Led Zeppelin
7th September 2009, 08:49
Your treating race-based oppression like a joke! All you have to do is look in the news. For example, a principal, Greta Salmi, in Palm Springs, California, fired a teacher because the parents of every single student in the classroom were sending complaints about the teacher. If it had been a white teacher, noone would scream RACIST!!!!! but, since the teacher was black, she is using her race as an excuse to sue, fire, and humiliate the principal and keep her job [and perhaps a promotion] because "shes hating me cause im black!".

Ok fuck you, you're done.

Banned.

willdw79
7th September 2009, 08:51
What I said was not racist. What I said was about class differences based on race. For all I know, your just a rich black person who wants the working-class, ignorant, cracker, redneck, whitey to be reduced to slavery and have 70% of the population controlled by 15% of it. The left wing does not get a good name when all we do is scream "racist!" or "fascist" whenever we here anything we dont like.
You are obviosly a gutter racist. Why did you waste time building your weak reputation just to tell a bunch of people who disagree with you some bullshit that even you don't believe?

scarletghoul
7th September 2009, 08:53
Though he is clearly incorect, I don't think he is being racist. He's just fallen victim to the racist thought and ideas of "reverse racism". It's clear that he's not a racist, but in fact is just naive and hasn't yet realised that racism is still a huge problem. Banning him will not solve this. It could even drive him towards genuine racists whose views he is unknowingly echoing. Incase you didn't notice this guy's 13 years old. He has a lot of learning to do. So instead of banning him, I think it would be much more healthy to explain why he is wrong.

Led Zeppelin
7th September 2009, 08:58
Though he is clearly incorect, I don't think he is being racist. He's just fallen victim to the racist thought and ideas of "reverse racism". It's clear that he's not a racist, but in fact is just naive and hasn't yet realised that racism is still a huge problem. Banning him will not solve this. It could even drive him towards genuine racists whose views he is unknowingly echoing. Incase you didn't notice this guy's 13 years old. He has a lot of learning to do. So instead of banning him, I think it would be much more healthy to explain why he is wrong.

Your opinion on this matter (as on any other) is irrelevant. Racists are not allowed to post on this forum, and he was clearly a racist. Unless the majority of the CC agrees with you that he isn't, the ban is going to stay in effect. And I promise you that it will, not because I say so, but because the majority of the CC's membership recognize racism when they see it, and do not defend it, like you do.

willdw79
7th September 2009, 09:02
Your opinion on this matter (as on any other) is irrelevant. Racists are not allowed to post on this forum, and he was clearly a racist. Unless the majority of the CC agrees with you that he isn't, the ban is going to stay in effect. And I promise you that it will, not because I say so, but because the majority of the CC's membership recognize racism when they see it, and do not defend it, like you do.
I agree that the poster is a racist. However your response should get you banned for not showing decency to your fellow revolutionary.

I know you probably have some story or explanation about how you are right and justified, but it does not matter. You should edit your post to make it more reasonable.

Axle
7th September 2009, 09:09
Your opinion on this matter (as on any other) is irrelevant. Racists are not allowed to post on this forum, and he was clearly a racist. Unless the majority of the CC agrees with you that he isn't, the ban is going to stay in effect. And I promise you that it will, not because I say so, but because the majority of the CC's membership recognize racism when they see it, and do not defend it, like you do.

I've got to disagree. Yeah, the guy was a racist, but if he's really thirteen, and not just some dedicated troll, this website could help him out, provided that he's willing to shut up and learn for a while.

Led Zeppelin
7th September 2009, 09:10
I agree that the poster is a racist. However your response should get you banned for not showing decency to your fellow revolutionary.

I know you probably have some story or explanation about how you are right and justified, but it does not matter. You should edit your post to make it more reasonable.

Haha, of course I'm not going to edit my post. Funny proposal though.

I do repent; but heaven hath pleas'd it so
To punish me with this, and this with me,
That I must be their scourge and minister.
I will bestow him, and will answer well
The death I gave him. So again good night.
I must be cruel only to be kind.
Thus bad begins and worse remains behind.

There is nothing I hate more than racists, and right behind them are the ones who apologize for them. "Oh, he's just young!", "Oh, he means well!", "Oh, he doesn't know any better!". Sorry, that shit doesn't cut it with me. I wasn't racist when I was 13, 12, 10, or 5, and if I was, I shouldn't have been allowed to post on this forum.

Anyone who says otherwise disagrees with the forum rules, and I will call them out on their apologetics. If you or anyone else doesn't like it, then tough luck. I know the majority of the membership does because they're just as opposed to racist sentiments as I am.

scarletghoul
7th September 2009, 09:14
Your arrogent attitude does not win any arguments, as you failed to address any of the points I raised, instead resorting to snobby remarks that really illuminate your unpleasent shittiness.

This is a naive kid who can upon the incorrect view. Despite the gross incorrectness of what he was saying, he never said anything racist. I have no reason to believe that he is a racist. He just mistakensly swallowed the racist line without realising it. What to do with someone like this? Of course we educate him. No one took the time to explain to this kid why he was wrong. Instead, idiot ****s like you chased him away with your shitty trot bullshit-spears.

willdw79
7th September 2009, 09:32
Haha, of course I'm not going to edit my post. Funny proposal though.

I do repent; but heaven hath pleas'd it so
To punish me with this, and this with me,
That I must be their scourge and minister.
I will bestow him, and will answer well
The death I gave him. So again good night.
I must be cruel only to be kind.
Thus bad begins and worse remains behind.

There is nothing I hate more than racists, and right behind them are the ones who apologize for them. "Oh, he's just young!", "Oh, he means well!", "Oh, he doesn't know any better!". Sorry, that shit doesn't cut it with me. I wasn't racist when I was 13, 12, 10, or 5, and if I was, I shouldn't have been allowed to post on this forum.

Anyone who says otherwise disagrees with the forum rules, and I will call them out on their apologetics. If you or anyone else doesn't like it, then tough luck. I know the majority of the membership does because they're just as opposed to racist sentiments as I am.
I would have kicked him off too. But the difference between me and you is confidence. I don't have to pop a pill to thug.

Pirate turtle the 11th
7th September 2009, 09:33
FFS I held positions like this when I was a pre-teen no need to ban him to make your dick feel bigger.

F9
7th September 2009, 11:59
Closed
Racists are not accepted in here, period. Age plays no matter on such situations, the obvious is obvious, this user have been controversial in the past with other things too, so a ban was in place.Stop whinnying for banning a racist, whatever the age...