Log in

View Full Version : French transport workers threaten to pollute river Seine



bellyscratch
20th August 2009, 16:48
Angry lorry drivers at struggling transportation company threaten to pour more than 8,000 litres of toxic fuel additive into Parisian river unless their demands for redundancy pay-offs are met.

First they kidnapped their bosses (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/27/bossnapping-france-workers-fight-layoffs); then they threatened to blow up their own factories (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/13/france-workers-car-factory). Now, in the latest phase of France's summer of discontent, disgruntled workers are turning to environmental blackmail as a stick to beat the management into submission.

Angry lorry drivers at Serta, a struggling transportation company, are threatening to pour more than 8,000 litres of toxic fuel additive into the Seine if their demands for redundancy pay-offs are not met. Acknowledging the "dramatic" effect this could have on the river's fish population, they insist they will not be dissuaded unless their bosses give in.

"It's less dramatic than ... people being made redundant and sacrificed," Jean-Pierre Villemin from the CFDT union told French radio. "It's the only means we have of getting what we want."

Around 50 workers at the distribution site at La Vaupalière near Rouen are demanding severance packages of 15,000 euros after Serta, which went into administration a year ago, announced job cuts. The transportation company, which has suffered badly in the financial crisis, has already cut around 80 jobs since the start of the year.

Their threat to flood with the harmful substance their on-site drainage system - designed to channel rainwater back into the Seine - is the latest tactic used by workers desperate to draw attention to their plight.

Last month, workers at New Fabris, a bankrupt car parts plant, and at Nortel, an insolvent telecommunications company, vowed to explode gas cylinders at their factories if requests for improved severance package were not met. Both threats have since been lifted.

These actions, decried as media stunts by their critics, followed a springtime spate of so-called "boss-nappings" across France in which business executives were taken hostage by their bellicose employees. Such episodes are familiar features in the country's sociopolitical landscape and received more attention abroad than they did at home.

The more recent threats of environmental damage, however, are more unusual.

It may be that the Serta drivers are seeking to recreate the success of an infamous workers' campaign nine years ago in which workers at the Cellatex textile plant poured thousands of litres of sulphuric acid into the river Meuse. They were rewarded by management with a year-long redundancy package of 80% of their salary.

"The workers ... do not want to leave with the frankly pathetic minimum legal compensation," said Villemin, who has been on strike with the workers since last week. "If we do not obtain decent pay-offs we will unfortunately be reduced to opening the [fuel] drums and pour the contents into the sewers."

Antoine Faucher, campaign director of Greenpeace France, said the threats, though worrying, were in fact a reflection of growing concern for the environment. "It's significant because today, perhaps unlike previous years, the environment is recognised in itself as a resource," he said. "To take it hostage may be of greater value now than it was before."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/aug/20/france-transport-river-seine-pollution


I totally backed the French workers on their actions when it came to the boss-napping and threatening to blow up factories to meet their demands for unfair treatment and I do support these workers to get the demands they're asking for, but is this the wrong tactic? I don't know the exact implications, but could this cause other people who live near the river any sort of illness or affect them in other ways?

I'd just like to hear what other people's thoughts are on this.

cyu
20th August 2009, 19:03
I don't think it's a smart tactic, but still, if society doesn't give people enough legal ways of living decently, then they'll resort to more and more "unacceptable" ways - including enslaving others, contract killing, extortion, kidnapping, armed robbery, piracy, etc. Stuff like these union actions, of course, are still pretty tame compared to some of the more extreme stuff.

The employees want one thing, the employers want another. If the employees don't get their way, why does the mass media always point their fingers at the employees and not the employer? The answer, of course, is that the mass media is owned and controlled by the wealthy.

You can probably guess the tactics I'd prefer: assuming democratic control of the company and ignoring what the employers want.

Pirate turtle the 11th
20th August 2009, 19:06
Fucking brilliant tactic!

Sarah Palin
20th August 2009, 19:48
Oh because it's such a pristine river as is.

Misanthrope
20th August 2009, 20:26
Worker's liberty > environmentalism

What Would Durruti Do?
21st August 2009, 00:21
I don't see why the company would care about the river either though.

PRC-UTE
21st August 2009, 06:09
I don't see why the company would care about the river either though.

Maybe the idea is to motivate the public to put pressure on management?

OneNamedNameLess
21st August 2009, 12:06
I don't know what to think about such tactics. Obviously I am not in a desperate situation like these workers but surely they want to gain further support from the public? Polluting rivers will only result in pissing people off. Surely this would be a danger to poeple's health too? Don't get me wrong, it's great to see them taking such a militant approach to their employees, and the inequalities ingrained in the capitalist system.

Stranger Than Paradise
21st August 2009, 14:46
I love it! French workers have so much creativity!

Invincible Summer
27th August 2009, 18:55
Worker's liberty > environmentalism

I understand your point, but at the same time, what if there's no decent environment for workers to live in? You would support burning forests everywhere and dumping radioactive tailings into every body of water if it meant a big step in workers' liberty?

Pirate turtle the 11th
27th August 2009, 19:08
I understand your point, but at the same time, what if there's no decent environment for workers to live in? You would support burning forests everywhere and dumping radioactive tailings into every body of water if it meant a big step in workers' liberty?

Absolutely.

Luís Henrique
27th August 2009, 23:10
Does this help to unite workers, or does this tend to divide them?

Luís Henrique

Niccolò Rossi
28th August 2009, 08:52
Fucking brilliant tactic!


I love it! French workers have so much creativity!

Are you people serious? Instead of pointless one-liners, why don't you expand on this point?


Oh because it's such a pristine river as is.

I don't think sarcastic remarks like this contribute anything to the discussion.


Worker's liberty > environmentalism

Obviously despite being terribly simplistic to the point of being meaningless, I think the question to ask here is whether the tactic being employed here is synonomous with workers' liberty.

Luís is about the only poster here (as usual, though I should also mention Anti-Capitalist), who is making a serious point/contribution.

Contrary to one that is effective or should be appauled, the tactic being employed is not a winning tactic, it represents not a way forward, but an obstacle to the struggle. The actions of the Serta workers, under the lead of the CFDT, are those one of desperation and despair, and more than that, represent the manoeuvring of the union to isolate the struggle, preventing the spreading of the struggle, whilst lending to the union a venere of militancy.

Luís Henrique
28th August 2009, 12:30
Oh because it's such a pristine river as is.I don't think sarcastic remarks like this contribute anything to the discussion.

Perhaps, but the real problem here is not sarcasm, but absence of logic: if the river is already so polluted that the lorry drivers action will have no actual impact on it, what the point of such action? Where is the radicalism?


Luís is about the only poster here (as usual, though I should also mention Anti-Capitalist), who is making a serious point/contribution.Thank you. Curiously, this seems to point that it is possible to make one through an onliner...

And tbh, cyu and Rise Like Lions make similar points.


Contrary to one that is effective or should be appauled, the tactic being employed is not a winning tactic, it represents not a way forward, but an obstacle to the struggle.Nor is it related to workers liberation. On the contrary, its aim is to keep jobs - which while may be a valid aim considering the circumstances, certainly is not workers liberation.


The actions of the Serta workers, under the lead of the CFDT, are those one of desperation and despair, and more than that, represent the manoeuvring of the union to isolate the struggle, preventing the spreading of the struggle, whilst lending to the union a venere of militancy.This mechanistic separation between the union and the workers - as if workers were unable to make stupid things on their own - seems counterproductive. The working class, like the river Seine, is not pristine.

It may well be that this plays on the interests of this particular sector of the workers aristocracy (but it is quite an unusual move for them; their interests usually demand a lot more respect for legallity than this); but it much more seems an idiot idea coming from below, that the union leadership was unable to defeat without coming out as yellows.

Luís Henrique