Log in

View Full Version : US acknowledges Ahmedinejad as legitimate leader of Iran



Kukulofori
5th August 2009, 01:58
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2009/08/200984205842116812.html


The US government has said it considers Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the elected president of Iran, following a disputed election in which thousands of Iranians took to the streets.
Robert Gibbs, the White House spokesman, said on Tuesday that Washington regards Ahmadinejad to be the elected leader, although he did not say that the election was legitimate.
"This was a decision and a debate ongoing in Iran by Iranians, they were going to choose their leadership … [Ahmadinejad is] the elected leader," he said.
The statement comes a day Ahmadinejad is due to be sworn in by parliament, and nearly eight weeks after the election itself.
Results questioned
Barack Obama, the US president, has so far been careful not to make strong comments on the legitimacy of the June 12 vote.

"Neither Mousavi nor I have withdrawn. We will continue to protest and we will never collaborate with this government. We will not harm it, but we will criticise what it does"
Mehdi Karoubi, presidential election candidate
However, Washington has condemned Tehran for its use of violence against opposition demonstrators who were questioning the veracity of the poll result. Dozens of people are thought to have been killed and hundreds detained during the unrest.
As Ahmadinejad prepares to be sworn-in once more as Iran’s president, two of the losing election candidates said on Tuesday that they will continue their campaign against the incumbent's re-election.
"Despite all the hardship, we will continue our path to fight against the result (of the election)," Zahra Rahnavard, wife of Mir Hossein Mousavi, was quoted as saying by Mowjcamp, a reformist website, on Tuesday.

Opposition pledge
Mehdi Karoubi, another candidate, was quoted by the Spanish El Pais newspaper as saying that he will also keep up his protest against the election result.

"Neither Mousavi nor I have withdrawn. We will continue to protest and we will never collaborate with this government. We will not harm it, but we will criticise what it does," Karoubi said in an interview published on Tuesday.
"Quite honestly, if the authorities had acted in a different way, we would never have had these problems, because the majority of those protesting only did so for that reason."
Obama and the leaders of France, Britain and Germany have refused to congratulate Ahmadinejad on his re-election.
"In view of the circumstances of the controversial re-election, the chancellor will not, as usual, write the normal letter of congratulation," a German government spokesman said.
But the Iranian government has insisted that the election was free and fair and has accused Britain and the United States of stoking the post-election demonstrations, a charge those countries have denied.

Pogue
5th August 2009, 01:58
Legitimate! :lol::lol:

Lolshevik
5th August 2009, 02:01
Dear God. Our government sold the resistance down the river! I'm shocked, shocked.

Pogue
5th August 2009, 02:03
there there

Pirate turtle the 11th
5th August 2009, 02:12
Dont you mean

US acknowledges Ahmedinejad the fucking hardnut imperialist slayeing gangster as legitimate leader of Iran?

Revy
5th August 2009, 02:12
Of course, the US and Israel wanted Ahmadinejad to win the first time around in 2005. This Holocaust denier was a godsend for their imperialist propaganda. Ask an American before 2005 who the President of Iran was and they would not have had a damn clue.

JimmyJazz
5th August 2009, 02:22
The PSL must be like :ohmy:

The Ungovernable Farce
6th August 2009, 20:57
The PSL must be like :ohmy:They're probably having an emergency meeting right now to work out if this makes them tools of US imperialism.

communard resolution
6th August 2009, 21:40
Of course, the US and Israel wanted Ahmadinejad to win the first time around in 2005. This Holocaust denier was a godsend for their imperialist propaganda. Ask an American before 2005 who the President of Iran was and they would not have had a damn clue.

In fact, this move surprises me a little bit. Ahmedinejad the Holocaust denier was indeed a godsend for the Israeli regime. The United States, on the other hand, would have preferred Mousavi since he would have opened the country to US interests.

You see, Israel as the USA's most reliable business partner and political ally in the Middle East doesn't wish to have a competitor in Iran. I don't believe for a second they were afraid of Ahmednejad and his nuclear/uranium programme - but it served their propagandistic agenda quite well.

Perhaps the US have realised that it won't be that easy to get rid of Ahmedinejad so they will have to do business with him, though Mousavi might have been far more servile. Or alternatively, after the election riots Ahmedinejad is longing for some much-needed US backing and is forced to commence 'negotiations'.

Whatever the case, I predict 'diplomatic (=economic) convergences' between the US and Iran in the near future. The losers: the Iranian working class.

As with most of my predictions lately, I hope that I'm wrong.

JimmyJazz
7th August 2009, 12:23
They're probably having an emergency meeting right now to work out if this makes them tools of US imperialism.

They'll probably just choose to ignore it or play it down as unimportant, though to be fair, that's what every group does with facts that don't fit their analysis.

gorillafuck
8th August 2009, 05:29
I really do wanna know what the PSL and WWP think of this

What Would Durruti Do?
17th August 2009, 03:58
So acknowledging something changes history and alters foreign policy now? I like how something so meaningless gives the greens all the proof they need to justify their support of something so stupid.

The Ungovernable Farce
17th August 2009, 16:45
So acknowledging something changes history and alters foreign policy now?
If the government of a state acknowledges the government of another state as legitimate, then yes, that will affect their foreign policy. Well done.