Log in

View Full Version : Zero Tolerance Policy



Manifesto
4th August 2009, 05:45
(Not exactly sure where to put this)
Due to the school system's zero tolerance they have suspended and thought about expelling a 18-year old woman for having birth-control which because it is considered a drug, it has even been related to illegal drugs.


When a Fairfax County mother got an urgent call from school last month reporting that her teenage daughter was caught popping a pill at lunchtime, she did not panic. "It was probably her birth-control pill," she thought. She was right.
Her heart dropped that afternoon in the assistant principal's office at Oakton High School when she and her daughter heard the mandatory punishment: A two-week suspension and recommendation for expulsion.
"I realize my daughter broke a rule," the mother said. But in an appeal to the school system, she reasoned, "the punishment does not fit the crime."
For two decades, many schools have set zero-tolerance policies on drugs. That means no over-the-counter drugs, no prescription drugs, no pretend drugs in student lockers or pockets. When many teens have ready access to medicine cabinets filled with prescription medications such as Xanax and Vicodin, any capsule or tablet is suspect.
Still, some parents and civil rights advocates say enforcement has been overzealous. Stringent rules have ensnared not only drug dealers and abusers, but a host of sniffling and headachy students seeking quick medical relief. The Supreme Court will consider this month the case of a 13-year-old Arizona student who was strip-searched in 2003 by an administrator who suspected that she was carrying ibuprofen pills.
Fairfax School Board members have debated over time whether to allow students to carry Tylenol or other over-the-counter medicines without registering them with the school nurse. County policy permits cough drops to be carried on campus, for instance, but not shared. Arlington County policies permit high school students to carry over-the-counter pain relievers. A 2006 state law in Maryland overturned some local rules requiring a doctor's note for children to use sunscreen at school.
In Virginia, school systems must comply with state code regarding prescription medications and illegal drugs on campus. Students face expulsion if they bring to school any "controlled substance" or addictive drug regulated by the federal government. "Imitation controlled substances," which could include virtually any prescription pill, are subject to the same hefty repercussions. Local school boards can give a lighter punishment after a review.
In Maryland, school systems have more leeway to set their own drug policies. In the District, prescription medications should be confiscated if they are brought to school without a doctor's order, Dena Iverson, a spokeswoman for the school system, wrote in an e-mail.
Health advocates say that harsh penalties for students who take birth-control pills at school conflicts with a campaign schools are waging against teen pregnancy.
A small portion of school health clinics across the country distribute birth-control pills to teens. But in Fairfax, even carrying the pills in a backpack is counted among the most serious offenses in the Student Responsibilities and Rights handbook.
During two weeks of watching television game shows and trying to keep up with homework online, the Fairfax teen, an honor student and lettered athlete, had time to study the handbook closely. If she had been caught high on LSD, heroin or another illegal drug, she found, she would have been suspended for five days. Taking her prescribed birth-control pill on campus drew the same punishment as bringing a gun to school would have.
The teenager and her mother declined to have their names published. But they showed The Washington Post some of her discipline records, including a letter that asked the school board to reinstate the student and reexamine the regulations so students would not "needlessly suffer" in the future.

School officials say they can't take chances. They are concerned about liability and safety. Any pills, even nonprescription pills, could be shared with another student who has allergies. And it would be difficult to enforce rules if students were allowed to take some pills but not others.
"Most people would not know the difference between birth control or some Ritalin or Tylenol or codeine," said Clarence Jones, coordinator for the Fairfax school system's safe and drug-free youth program. "If they are just pulling something out of their pockets and sticking it in their mouths, we don't know what they are taking."
Jones said the rules allow appeals and a hearing, so special circumstances can be considered.
Deb Hauser of Advocates for Youth, a District-based organization that focuses on adolescent sexual health, said, "To put birth control in the same category as illegal drugs or handguns stigmatizes responsible behavior."
In a 2008 survey, a little more than a quarter of Fairfax teenagers, and 44 percent of 12th-graders, reported that they were sexually active. That was lower than the national average. About 10 percent of those who were sexually active said they had not used contraception the last time they had sex.



The teenager said she started taking birth-control pills over the summer, a decision made with her mother, her boyfriend and a doctor. The pill is supposed to be taken at the same time every day. So when school started in the fall, she kept up with her daily routine during school hours.
According to school policies, her pills should have been kept in the school clinic. But the student said she did not see the logic in making a special trip to see the nurse, a relative stranger, each day during her 25-minute lunch break. She preferred to take the pill on her own. She tried to be discreet but she got caught.
The teenager and her mother maintain that the decision to take birth-control pills is personal. Now that private choice has been shared with her principal and many teachers. On Thursday, a long table full of school officials weighed her case at a hearing.
While the student awaits a decision on whether she will be expelled, she said she has learned one major lesson: It's important "to read the fine print."

RotStern
4th August 2009, 05:49
This is total bullshit. They should be encouraging her to be taking the pill!
They don't let girls take the pill but then they preach Abortion is wrong!
What logic is that!

EqualityandFreedom
4th August 2009, 11:51
A while ago I heard about a 13 year old girl who was expelled from her school because she had ibuprofen pills for a headache, zero tolerance is zero intelligence.

Dean
4th August 2009, 14:19
When I was in school, I took Fioricet and Xanax. I was prescribed them. I never tried to hide it, just made sure not to do it in front of the principles. The teachers weren't going to fuck with you.

TC
4th August 2009, 14:48
someone should walk onto that campus, drop an over the counter pill in each locker through the grate, then send an email cc'd to the local paper that they did it...so they all have plausible deniability and the rule is unenforceable.

Manzil
4th August 2009, 15:35
"That means no over-the-counter drugs, no prescription drugs, no pretend drugs in student lockers or pockets. When many teens have ready access to medicine cabinets filled with prescription medications such as Xanax and Vicodin, any capsule or tablet is suspect."

Sorry, what? No prescription drugs? That has to be illegal.

'No kid, you can't take your anti-depressants, or your insulin, and especially not those antibiotics. Because they're bad, m'kay?'

Manifesto
4th August 2009, 22:09
Zero tolerance is more flawed than with just drugs. Having anything that could be used as a weapon, even a safety pin, can get you suspended.

Il Medico
5th August 2009, 00:07
When I was in school I suspended for wearing a hat. Their #1 reason for why I couldn't wear a hat in school is because I could hide drugs in it. To which I responded "Well I could hide drugs in my pant's pockets much easier. Are you going to tell me I can't wear pants as well?". I got ten days OSS. Meh.
Official school policy:
Hats are bad M'kay?
Drugs are bad M'kay?
All the idiotic rules we make up make sense M'kay?

New Tet
5th August 2009, 00:30
Oh, and here I thought the discussion would revolve not around the legality or illegalities of drugs in school but around the fundamental reproductive rights of a woman still in public school!

Gentlefolk, please, let us focus!

Manifesto
5th August 2009, 00:32
Oh, and here I thought the discussion would revolve not around the legality or illegalities of drugs in school but around the fundamental reproductive rights of a woman still in public school!

Gentlefolk, please, let us focus!
The article is about drugs even being considered as birth control but yes it should focus on the"fundamental reproductive rights of a woman".

Outinleftfield
1st September 2009, 09:12
High school students should organize a union to stop this kind of bullshit. If large-scale student strikes were a concern school officials and politicians would be more careful to avoid making such ridiculous policies. Students under the dropout age might risk arrest but if all the students get arrested administrators lose their jobs(since all the students are taking their classes in juvie and not in high school). Point being that if enough students agreed a strike could be effective. Administrators would probably even try to encourage police to be patient and not arrest striking students so they can keep their jobs.

Luís Henrique
1st September 2009, 19:59
And all those schoolkids having hidrogen hydroxid all the time, don't they jail them for that?

As the rabbi's cat says, "the laws of the fool"...

Luís Henrique