View Full Version : Was Nirvana really as great as they are made out to be ?
TheFutureOfThePublic
21st July 2009, 12:47
Nirvana wer far from the most talented grunge band playing wise but if they didnt have Cobains writing skills then they would have died with grunge.And all the stuff about grunge killing metal.How many grunge bands are around and get cared about nowadays.How many metal bands are around and are cared about
TheFutureOfThePublic
21st July 2009, 12:51
Was Nirvana really the best grunge band.Or just a band that lived and died on one good album
Personally, I think Nirvana sucked.
Of course, there is no objective view on musical taste.
h0m0revolutionary
21st July 2009, 13:33
Nirvana were not just as good as the hype, they're better. And much unlike good looks, they get better with age.
Hail Kurt =D
gorillafuck
21st July 2009, 19:43
Mudhoney > Nirvana
New Tet
21st July 2009, 20:15
Was Nirvana really the best grunge band.Or just a band that lived and died on one good album
I don't know the answer to that question but I know what I like and I like Nirvana.
Curt Cobain songs are good.
Led Zeppelin
21st July 2009, 20:19
Was Nirvana really the best grunge band.Or just a band that lived and died on one good album
Probably not the best grunge band (Pearl Jam, Temple of the Dog, Alice In Chains and Soundgarden are just as close to that title) but still a pretty good one.
Nevermind is a good album, but so is In Utero, and to be honest, so is Bleach.
gorillafuck
21st July 2009, 20:24
Incesticide is my favorite album by them.
Molly's Lips is a damn catchy song.
Albert Wesker
21st July 2009, 21:29
Was Nirvana really the best grunge band.Or just a band that lived and died on one good album
I don't think they were the best grunge band. At the same time, a lot of the criticism they attracted was undeserved, IMO.
Nevermind certainly wasn't their only good album.
JimmyJazz
21st July 2009, 21:41
They're so overplayed they make the Beatles seem like indie rock. Yeah, they were good, but at this point I would be happy if every existing copy of their music was gathered in one place and nuked.
LOLseph Stalin
21st July 2009, 22:03
I say Nirvana is way over-rated. I really only like one song by them, Heart-Shaped Box.
RedCommieBear
22nd July 2009, 00:05
Nirvana's style wasn't nearly as grungy as people pretended they were. They were really influenced by a lot of indie pop and whatnot (Kurt was a huge fan of the Vaselines and Beat Happening). I once read somewhere that some critic said Alice in Chains make Nirvana look like the Beach Boys, and that's true, but that's also why I like Nirvana more.
Pirate Utopian
22nd July 2009, 00:40
Some songs are okayish but atleast they're not Pearl Jam.
LOLseph Stalin
22nd July 2009, 00:48
Pearl Jam is terrible.
Agrippa
22nd July 2009, 00:49
Nirvana is great. I am also a fan of Soundgarden and Alice in Chains but neither are as good...
I think all the imitators are terrible, but then again, they always are.
fiddlesticks
22nd July 2009, 00:51
Nirvana is good but they are not the best, though in my opinion there is no best with music..
JimmyJazz
22nd July 2009, 01:23
Soundgarden
yes.
LeninKobaMao
22nd July 2009, 04:14
Nirvana are shit boring in my opinion and you get a lot of idiots trying to do covers of their music like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8jg5pjvwjw
Skin_HeadBanger
22nd July 2009, 06:43
I've said it before and I'll say it again... Nirvana sucks, we're better off with that overrated 4 chord fuck in the ground.
I'm done here, too many other threads exactly like this one.
Led Zeppelin
22nd July 2009, 06:50
Just gonna say that Pearl Jam's first album Ten was a masterpiece.
Skin_HeadBanger
22nd July 2009, 06:53
I love grunge, but Nirvana was definitely not the best grunge band. I'd pick early Pearl Jam or even Soundgarden over them any day.
True dat. Alice in Chains, too.
Agrippa
23rd July 2009, 08:36
How can anyone with a right mind take Pearl Jam over Nirvana?
Compare the obvious social relevance of Nirvana's lyrics (with their most commercially successful song, Smells Like Teen Spirit, calling for anarchist insurrection) to the total social irrelevance of Pearl Jam's lyrics.
Hell, even compare the two band-names. :lol:
Janine Melnitz
23rd July 2009, 08:58
(with their most commercially successful song, Smells Like Teen Spirit, calling for anarchist insurrection)
lol
Anyway grunge was stupid and I like Kurt best
Hit The North
23rd July 2009, 09:45
Imo, Nevermind is one of the best American albums of the 1990s.
And Kurt was sexy.
Led Zeppelin
23rd July 2009, 11:19
How can anyone with a right mind take Pearl Jam over Nirvana?
As a note, I wrote that about two years ago when I was really into Pearl Jam.
This is my current view:
Probably not the best grunge band [referring to Nirvana] (Pearl Jam, Temple of the Dog, Alice In Chains and Soundgarden are just as close to that title) but still a pretty good one.
TheFutureOfThePublic
23rd July 2009, 16:13
How can anyone with a right mind take Pearl Jam over Nirvana?
Compare the obvious social relevance of Nirvana's lyrics (with their most commercially successful song, Smells Like Teen Spirit, calling for anarchist insurrection) to the total social irrelevance of Pearl Jam's lyrics.
Hell, even compare the two band-names. :lol:
Anarchism "a mulatto,an albino,a mosquito,my libido" nah not anarchism,just random lyrics
Hit The North
23rd July 2009, 23:59
How can it call for anarchist insurrection if its being whored by Mtv to 10 yr old girls
Why would the medium determine the message?
Bright Banana Beard
24th July 2009, 00:02
I found them not to be my taste. In order word, I tried to listen to them and my stomach clinched. I just don't like them, sorry.
RedCommieBear
24th July 2009, 00:17
How can it call for anarchist insurrection if its being whored by Mtv to 10 yr old girls
Really, who knows what it's actually about. I've read that the song can be interpreted sarcastically as well. He did put some thought into them (his journals contain a few drafts). But as far as the MTV thing goes, you shouldn't punish a band for being able to write a catchy melody. Fetishizing the obscure for it's apparent authenticity is a mistake.
(Yes, a lot, maybe most of what's popular is crap. But I'll stand by my statement nonetheless.)
TheFutureOfThePublic
24th July 2009, 00:46
Really, who knows what it's actually about. I've read that the song can be interpreted sarcastically as well. He did put some thought into them (his journals contain a few drafts). But as far as the MTV thing goes, you shouldn't punish a band for being able to write a catchy melody. Fetishizing the obscure for it's apparent authenticity is a mistake.
(Yes, a lot, maybe most of what's popular is crap. But I'll stand by my statement nonetheless.)
Im not blaming them.Im blaming mtv
RedCommieBear
24th July 2009, 01:27
Im not blaming them.Im blaming mtv
All right, cool. :cool: I might've jumped the gun a little bit, but I just get really annoyed by indie people who automatically deride anything listened to by more than a 200 people. Sorry if I misinterpreted you.
Agrippa
24th July 2009, 02:06
lol
I'm serious. The song was written about the subject of anarchism, whch he was introduced to by Kathleen Hanna of Bikini Kill. (whose drummer he was sleeping with)
And Tupac got a lot of publicity from the mass-media too, but he was still a brilliant, socially relevant musician. 95% of the music we all listen to, we never would have heard were it not for capitalist mass-communication.
Janine Melnitz
24th July 2009, 02:41
Dude: unassisted, nobody could ever make out the lyrics, which in any case are ah "oblique" let's say. Kurt may have had anarchist insurrection in mind when he wrote them, but the song itself wasn't "calling for" anything at all
gorillafuck
24th July 2009, 03:54
I thought he just wrote down random words for Smells Like Teen Spirit.
(If I cared whether artists I listened to sang random lyrics that hardly mean anything, I wouldn't be listening to Flipper right now)
Skin_HeadBanger
24th July 2009, 08:00
How can anyone with a right mind take Pearl Jam over Nirvana?
Compare the obvious social relevance of Nirvana's lyrics (with their most commercially successful song, Smells Like Teen Spirit, calling for anarchist insurrection) to the total social irrelevance of Pearl Jam's lyrics.
Hell, even compare the two band-names. :lol:
And the song was to MAKE MONEY. He was selling rebellion and that's bullshit. Really anarcho of Kurt demanding 98% of the band's income.
If I want songs of anarchist insurrection, I'll listen to anarchopunk and anarchist grindcore, not some douche that's the poster boy for '90s teenage angst.
Also, Pearl Jam refers to a hallucinogenic jam that one of the members's grandmother made.
punisa
24th July 2009, 20:49
For me Nirvana was always image, not music. I remeber kids idolize Kurt and mumble some crap about "life sucks" and similar nonsense :laugh:
Man, I tried and tried to really love that band. Cause I wanted to give them the respect they desrved in holding crap pop at bay for at least a few more years. But I failed, over n over again.
I'm very into deep lyrics and I just couldn't find any with Nirvana.
And the music... dreadful.
I ain't getting high on well tuned orchestra, I love when bands play with heart despites they actually can't play shit - for example Sex Pistols = awful musicians - awesome band ! :)
Funny cause I really liked some other grunge bands, especially Soundgarden. Although I always considered Soundgarden to be more on the hard hard rock side.
punisa
24th July 2009, 22:28
NN75im_us4k
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLL :laugh:
Now that's some kick ass music :lol:
leveller
27th July 2009, 21:26
I thought the thrash metal and even the hair metal of the late 80s was far superior to the whole whiney depressing grunge era
Axle
31st July 2009, 23:44
I kind of liked Nirvana when I was fourteen. By the time I was fifteen, I had found better music and moved on.
Nirvana was nothing but whiny, substanceless teen-angst smeared with hype.
Invader Zim
2nd August 2009, 23:04
Nirvana were, and remain, the most over-rated band that has probably ever existed. They made one half decent album and a few poor-mediocre ones. As far as I can tell, the only reason they were, and remain, so lauded was because they were a well needed breath of fresh air in the popular music scene of that time.
The Situationist
3rd August 2009, 20:01
Not sure if they're overrated, but it never hurts ones legacy to die young.
It freezes you in time and encapsulates you as a symbol of youth.
BabylonHoruv
3rd August 2009, 21:23
Nirvana wer far from the most talented grunge band playing wise but if they didnt have Cobains writing skills then they would have died with grunge.And all the stuff about grunge killing metal.How many grunge bands are around and get cared about nowadays.How many metal bands are around and are cared about
Cobain was an abusive junkie asshole and although he was a talented performer Nirvana is not really all that exciting musically.
kharacter
8th August 2009, 02:16
And the song was to MAKE MONEY. He was selling rebellion and that's bullshit. Really anarcho of Kurt demanding 98% of the band's income.
If I want songs of anarchist insurrection, I'll listen to anarchopunk and anarchist grindcore, not some douche that's the poster boy for '90s teenage angst.
Also, Pearl Jam refers to a hallucinogenic jam that one of the members's grandmother made.
I wish there was more of it. I love grindcore but the closest thing I know to anarchist is Phobia, and I was disappointed by their latest album. Do you have any suggestions?
Also, I don't think Nirvana did anything to metal, or good metal at least. Extreme metal (death metal and such) kept getting bigger through the nineties. I am in no way trying to keep Nirvana away from criticism by the way, especially when their bassist supported Ron Paul.
SoupIsGoodFood
11th August 2009, 05:00
No.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.