What US Political Party Do You Support? [Archive]

View Full Version : What US Political Party Do You Support?

Richard Nixon

4th July 2009, 18:18

What US Political Party do you think is the closest to your beliefs and therefore support?

RedAnarchist

4th July 2009, 18:40

Why is this in the Learning section?

(Corrected your title, by the way).

Richard Nixon

4th July 2009, 19:06

Maybe you forgot this is a commie forum?;) We think all mainstream parties are bourgeois. Why dont you tell us your party?

Republicans.

Kassad

4th July 2009, 19:08

I'm a member of the Party for Socialism and Liberation. You can read our website at www.PSLWeb.org (http://www.PSLWeb.org).

scarletghoul

4th July 2009, 19:13

PSL is the best. RCP is good too

Bright Banana Beard

4th July 2009, 19:14

I am also a supporter for Party for Socialism and Liberation.

Kronos

4th July 2009, 19:19

I'm a 33rd degree Mason in the Illuminati.

21rst century political parties are all a joke.....which you will soon discover.

[ sinister grin ]

GPDP

4th July 2009, 19:19

Republicans.

Shouldn't you be better off with the Democrats, considering your support for unions and other social-democratic measures? Republicans are very much against those things. As are many in the Democratic Party, I'm afraid, since they're basically the Republican Party Lite at this point.

Ah, but then again, in the US, social issues such as abortion tend to be deal-breakers when it comes to parties, so perhaps that's why you're with the Republicans. Though I'm sure many Democrats are also anti-choice, since the Democratic Party has no specific platform on the issue, other than the fact many of its members are for it.

Am I right?

Also, I don't support any parties.

Havet

4th July 2009, 20:27

none

Richard Nixon

5th July 2009, 00:27

Shouldn't you be better off with the Democrats, considering your support for unions and other social-democratic measures? Republicans are very much against those things. As are many in the Democratic Party, I'm afraid, since they're basically the Republican Party Lite at this point.

Ah, but then again, in the US, social issues such as abortion tend to be deal-breakers when it comes to parties, so perhaps that's why you're with the Republicans. Though I'm sure many Democrats are also anti-choice, since the Democratic Party has no specific platform on the issue, other than the fact many of its members are for it.

Am I right?

Also, I don't support any parties.

Well foreign-policy wise I'm a firm Republican and again on the social issues. Perhaps the correct term is Roosevelt Democrat but I'm afraid that the Democrats are "Obamaizing" away from the legacy of FDR.

LOLseph Stalin

5th July 2009, 00:31

I don't support any of them because I'm a Canadian. :p

JimmyJazz

5th July 2009, 00:34

Republicans.

lol

5th July 2009, 00:58

I support the antifa and Anarchist parties, they are pretty good, trots etc are boring as usual so no, but yeah, if you left out of fun check an antifa-anarchist party!Football partys are great(especially when you get the champion or something) but then your football up there is lame so...

Fuserg9:star:

ʇsıɥɔɹɐuɐ ıɯɐbıɹo

5th July 2009, 01:53

I don't support any of them because I'm a Canadian. :p

Me too! :D

Comrade Bender

5th July 2009, 02:56

I was a former member of the Communist League, and then the Communist Workers League. After the CWL stopped functioning, I abandoned political parties, until such a time comes that another CWL-like organization arises, based upon Marxist principles.

So, none right now. :)

Sarah Palin

7th July 2009, 20:05

I am a revolutionary communist, so I identify with any US political that advocates a working class revolution. So I don't identify with any US political party.

Jack

8th July 2009, 00:36

I like parties that have Bacardi.

Bud Struggle

8th July 2009, 01:17

I like parties that have Bacardi.

Or Jack Daniels. :D

Kwisatz Haderach

9th July 2009, 02:43

Well foreign-policy wise I'm a firm Republican and again on the social issues. Perhaps the correct term is Roosevelt Democrat but I'm afraid that the Democrats are "Obamaizing" away from the legacy of FDR.
You do realize that a significant portion of the Republicans are of the opinion that FDR was slightly worse than Satan, right?

Misanthrope

9th July 2009, 03:43

I like parties that have Bacardi.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/75/Usmjparty-logo.png

SocialismOrBarbarism

9th July 2009, 04:19

Probably the Socialist Equality Party...

Rusty Shackleford

9th July 2009, 04:39

http://www.carolinapoliticsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/libertarian-party.png

/joke

cappiej

12th July 2009, 00:31

Republican, or Libertarian possibly given the big government views of the modern Republicans and their support for socialised medicine and welfare programs.

If Ron Paul were to have an influence on the general ideology of the GOP and they were to all take on a more libertarian, non interventionist stance I'd most definitely support them.

Rosa Provokateur

12th July 2009, 03:22

Guns and Dope Party

http://www.maybelogic.com/gunsanddopeparty/

Rosa Provokateur

12th July 2009, 03:23

You do realize that a significant portion of the Republicans are of the opinion that FDR was slightly worse than Satan, right?

Well... he did get us into World War II.

Bright Banana Beard

12th July 2009, 03:28

Well... he did get us into World War II.
Yeah, only one person vote against the war, he not at fault as the congress very want to go to war with Japan and help bring back their influence on Europe.

Rosa Provokateur

12th July 2009, 12:32

Yeah, only one person vote against the war, he not at fault as the congress very want to go to war with Japan and help bring back their influence on Europe.

He made Pearl Harbor happen though.

Dust Bunnies

12th July 2009, 14:02

Richard Nixon

12th July 2009, 20:03

The reason why Japan attacked the US is because quite frankly we pissed them off. We put an oil embargo against them at the moment they needed it. We provoked the attack so well it looked like we were the innocents, while in reality, it was just another imperialist move.

We had that oil embargo because Japan was invading China! Do you really think it would be moral for the US to keep supplying oil to an empire that was engaged in a war of conquest like the Nazi Germans and commiting horrible atrocities. You are a hypocrite, I'm sure if the US had kept on supplying oil to the Japs you'd be shouting about how those greedy American imperalists were giving aid to an evil war of conquest.

Dust Bunnies

12th July 2009, 20:22

We had that oil embargo because Japan was invading China! Do you really think it would be moral for the US to keep supplying oil to an empire that was engaged in a war of conquest like the Nazi Germans and commiting horrible atrocities. You are a hypocrite, I'm sure if the US had kept on supplying oil to the Japs you'd be shouting about how those greedy American imperalists were giving aid to an evil war of conquest.

What they did was good (the embargo), but their intentions were horrible. They wanted the war, then when we were attacked we whined, "Oh we're so innocent." If you are provoking a war man up to it and say, "Okay guys Japan attacked us let's go kick their asses."

Why? Because 60 years later when World War 2 is being taught, the story is how innocent the freedom loving United States is. :rolleyes:

Richard Nixon

12th July 2009, 20:39

What they did was good (the embargo), but their intentions were horrible. They wanted the war, then when we were attacked we whined, "Oh we're so innocent." If you are provoking a war man up to it and say, "Okay guys Japan attacked us let's go kick their asses."

Why? Because 60 years later when World War 2 is being taught, the story is how innocent the freedom loving United States is. :rolleyes:

The US was majority isolationist at that time so that was the only way to go to war. That is realpolitik.