Log in

View Full Version : Pittsburgh G-20: NYC Stalinist front group attempting to hijack opposition



griffjam
2nd July 2009, 21:34
Mike Boda
Pittsburgh Grassroots Examiner
"They maintain that only a dictatorship -- their dictatorship, of course -- can create the will of the people, while our answer to this is: No dictatorship can have any other aim but that of self-perpetuation, and it can beget only slavery in the people tolerating it; freedom can be created only by freedom, that is, by a universal rebellion on the part of the people and free organization of the toiling masses from the bottom up."
-Mikhail Bakunin
Anyone seeking to participate in, or make a contribution of time or resources to Pittsburgh's efforts to oppose the machinations and the very presence of the upcoming G-20 summit (http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20090630164718820), should take care to ensure that they are in contact with the Pittsburgh G-20 Resistance Project (http://resistg20.org/), and not some opportunistic Stalinist front group. Like the G-20 itself, the unaccountable, authoritarian, New York City-based, Bail Out The People Movement (which is a front group for the International Action Center (http://www.villagevoice.com/related/to/International+Action+Center), which is a front group for the Worker's World Party (http://infoshop.org/page/WWP-FAQ)) is making its own plans for late September, with little or no involvement or input from the people of Pittsburgh. Tellingly, the contacts (http://www.bailoutpeople.org/apr32009orgcents.shtml#pennsylvania) listed on their website, neglect to include anyone in southwestern Pennsylvania.
These dinosaurs from our nightmarish past and their hand-puppet, Cindy Sheehan (http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/11/329480.shtml), have been further granted misplaced legitimacy by the self-described Reuters 'news' agency (http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE55P6A120090626), who apparently could not be bothered to investigate whether local groups and individuals intended to oppose the upcoming invasion by the handful of elite figureheads and their camp-following amen corner and secret police (http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09179/980444-482.stm).
The grassroots Pittsburgh G-20 Resistance Project has strong, longstanding community ties and support and lacks the kind of centralized, top-down structure of both the G-20 and the Stalinist front group. Rather than reliance on a discredited, archaic party line, the local Project is based around a set of principles and points of unity (http://resistg20.org/about-us), that were agreed on by the participants in a directly democratic fashion:





Work to end all relationships of domination and subjugation, including but
not limited to those rooted in patriarchy, racism, classism, homophobia,
capitalism, imperialism and the state;
Resistance to the commodification of our shared and living Earth;
Organizing on the principles of decentralization, autonomy, sustainability,
mutual aid and respect;
Opposition the police and prison-industrial complex, and maintaining solidarity
with all targets of state repression;
The use a diversity of tactics to directly confront systems of oppression by
advocating forms of resistance which maximize respect for life and oppressed peoples’ rights, and to construct local alternatives to global capitalism.



Aside from cynically masquerading as a grassroots effort, like the astroturf (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Astroturf), right-wing media and lobbyist owned and operated 'Tea Parties (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tax_Day_Tea_Party)', the New York City-based (http://bailoutpeople.org/cmnt.shtml) Bailout the People organization is using the occasion of the G-20 summit to solicit donations (to supplement their trust funds established by socialites and the KGB) and engage in a form of a tactic that is common among, but not restricted to, the authoritarian left, (http://reds.linefeed.org/groups.html) known as "entryism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entryism)", where an existing struggle or organization is willfully, and often deceptively hijacked by members of an outside organization. Another Stalinist front-group, that is better known, is International ANSWER, which discredited and demoralized (http://www.forward.com/articles/1985/) the opponents of the escalation of the long-running US war in Iraq, through its ineffective, permitted, protest parades, its thinly veiled authoritarian politics, its insistence on taking credit for the mobilizations and protests of others, and its continued cooperation with law enforcement. This is no different than what the paper-selling (http://web.archive.org/web/20071227212333/http://www.infoshop.org/texts/ww_guide.html), authoritarian-left alphabet soup has done to discredit and derail popular resistance and grassroots organizations for the past 100 years, with special malice reserved for anarchists, who they tend to shoot in the back the back, both figuratively and literally, whenever possible. This is why people like Emma Goldman (http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Goldman/Exhibition/exile.html) and Alexander Berkman (http://libcom.org/library/the-russian-tragedy-alexander-berkman), among others, were publishing condemnations of Lenin and Trotsky's violent excesses, 40-50 years before US liberals would accept that that the 'Worker's Paradise (http://www.infoshop.org/faq/secH6.html)' of the USSR was merely another dictatorship. What began in Petrograd (http://www.infoshop.org/faq/append41.html), continued to Kronstadt (http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bright/berkman/kronstadt/berkkron.html), the Ukraine (http://www.nestormakhno.info/english/gtoct.htm), the Barcelona May Days (http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/spain/souchy_may.html), Hungary (http://libcom.org/tags/hungary-56), and the collusion with the de Gaulle regime (http://libcom.org/library/mass-strike-france-ico), which preserved his (and their) power.
Given their long-standing policy of uncritical support for any dictator or war criminal (http://archive.salon.com/news/feature/1999/06/21/clark/) willing to stick a red star on a national flag and/or taunt the US government, including the dynastic North Korean regime (http://www.workers.org/ww/2000/korea0309.php), Slobodan Milosevic (http://www.workers.org/ww/2001/statement0712.php), and longtime US asset, Saddam Hussein (http://www.diehippiedie.com/maximum/leftyfeb98.html), how sincere can the Workers' World Party (WWP) (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Workers_World_Party) in its opposition to the G-20? The WWP split from the Trotskyist Socialist Workers' Party (SWP) due to the latter's condemnation of Stalin's 1956 invasion of Hungary and subsequently fell in behind any tyrant willing to use leftist rhetoric as a justification for their brand of repression and imperialism. No apologists for the 1989 actions of the Maoist state in Tienanmen Square (http://www.workers.org/ww/tienanmen.html) are worthy of the level of trust and solidarity required for sincere opposition the G-20, who counts the WWP's beloved state capitalist China, among its member nations. Support the local alternatives to the G-20 and the WWP.

Kassad
2nd July 2009, 21:54
The WWP split from the Trotskyist Socialist Workers' Party (SWP) due to the latter's condemnation of Stalin's 1956 invasion of Hungary and subsequently fell in behind any tyrant willing to use leftist rhetoric as a justification for their brand of repression and imperialism.

You do realize that Joseph Stalin died in 1953, right?

mykittyhasaboner
2nd July 2009, 22:08
Stalin's 1956 invasion of Hungary:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:


It's really hard to take anything you say seriously after this.

Woland
2nd July 2009, 22:15
(to supplement their trust funds established by socialites and the KGB)

the what?

Jimmie Higgins
2nd July 2009, 22:30
As much as I disagree with the undemocratic methods of ANSWER and so on, the tone and content of this response is needlessly hostile and sectarian. This kind of approach will only add to the sense that the left is intolerant and factional and help drive people away just as ANSWER'S undemocratic methods do.

Besides, is it really that much different if ANSWER dictates a bunch of terms for the protest and announces it than if cliques of Anarchists who already agree politically draft their own points of unity and then dictate those points? It seems like these points are basically so that anarchists can have their protest their way without having to consult all the other people who may want to participate. These points of unity serve only to keep reformists, socialists, liberals who might agree with us on this issue and so on from having a voice in the protest.

I mean the points of unity include the mode of protest! Points of unity should be based on the shared concern of the protest - then you get people together and figure out together how to go about making said demands in the point of unity!

Like ANSWER, these sectarians seems like they would rather take their ball and go home if they don't get to dictate the rules as they want rather than build a large and diverse movement that will help to build a real radical alternative (both anarchist and socialist) to establishment politics.

Jimmie Higgins
2nd July 2009, 22:37
the what?Yeah, they realllly jumped the shark on this one. Try sticking to political criticisms rather than conspiracy theories.

It's funny that groups would get criticized for asking donations (if ANSWER is going to a protest they didn't build and collecting donations under the pretense that they built it, that's totally wrong and slimy and a different story - but I have never seen that).

Most groups have to collect donations unless they are a bunch of privately wealthy radicals with trust funds to make printed materials and rent stages and print posters and so on.

Kassad
2nd July 2009, 23:14
Gravedigger, I'm curious as to what you're basing your assertions regarding ANSWER on. Where have we acted sectarian? When have we been undemocratic?

Jimmie Higgins
3rd July 2009, 01:28
Gravedigger, I'm curious as to what you're basing your assertions regarding ANSWER on. Where have we acted sectarian? When have we been undemocratic?

I was addressing this article and its hypocritical sectarianism, not PSL or ANSWER. this article accuses the WWP for running ANSWER undemocratically and, if that is so it is no more democratic for a group of anarchists to set the terms and tactics of a protest and then announce a mass protest than it is for ANSWER's head committe or decision making body to make the same kids of decisions and then announce a mass protest. Their points of unity basically cut out 80% of people who would want to protest!

Although I have been to recent ANSWER-organized protests I have not seen or read about any of the behind the scenes situations so I can not comment on how ANSWER currently operates since the split. However I do think that the structure of ANSWER has not helped larger participation in the anti-war movement in the past and this has frustrated people coming to protests for the first time. I often heard people wanting to know why certain decisions were made and confused by the choices. I think if ANSWER was simply part of a larger coalition or perated itself as a coalition then the decisions would have to be argued for and debated and this would lead to a better understanding.

I am glad that ANSWER has worked so hard to organize protests, but I think for the movement as a whole to grow and radicalize, there needs to be a more democratic coalition approach than ANSWER or UFPJ (I'm not compareing ANSWER to UFPJ in politics or organization) calling the shots.
The anti-war movement needed to make mistakes if it is to learn from the mistakes and sucesses and grow and radicalize.